>>>> On the Osborne 1, Lee Felsenstein designed in a connector for
external battery power! When queried about how large the battery
would be, Lee
>>> Measuring mine (including case), it's about 155mm wide x 115mm deep x
190mm high
Then it must be a prototype, or custom-made, or unauthorized, because Lee
himself told me Osborne never made a battery, and that there was a deal in
the works to authorize an aftermarket battery, but the deal fell through.
It's been in the news this weekend -- Bill Moggridge, credited as the designer of the "clamshell" shape for laptop computers, died.
I agree that Moggridge did important work for the Grid Compass, circa 1982. His design may indeed have been the first of its kind, although I'd be curious to see any examples of prior art.
But, I strongly disagree with all the reports calling the Compass a "laptop" computer. I don't mean that as mere semantics: a vital definition of a laptop isn't just a flat lap-sized computer, but rather a flat lap-sized computer with its own power source. Compass users had no choice but to plug into wall power.
So the Compass may have been the first clamshell * computer * but it's not a laptop.
We are having an issue (a progressive issue, at that), with the PDP-11/40
front end in our DECSYSTEM-2065. There are no diagnostics for the front
end on the diagnostics pack (KLAD), only a couple of programs for formatting
an RP06 disk pack. All other PDP-11 programs on the KLAD are tests for
the main processor's hardware prior to loading microcode and running PDP-10
programs to test it further.
The PDP-11 diagnostic suite, collectively called XXDP, comes in different
variants based on the actual processor (or processor family). We happen to
have a set of XXDP diskettes for the 11/34, but that chokes (as one might
imagine) on an 11/40.
So.
Does anyone on the list happen to have a copy of the 11/40 version of XXDP?
We would very much like to borrow and duplicate it if you are willing to
allow us to do so.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Vulcan, Inc.
505 5th Avenue S, Suite 900
Seattle, WA 98104
mailto:RichA at vulcan.com
mailto:RichA at LivingComputerMuseum.orghttp://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/
Recently stumbled-upon this guys website who lives in El Sobrante, California (near San Francisco).
He has "literally 100,000's of Teletype parts, some new, organized, indexed, and available for purchase by Teletype restorers, rescuers, and users of Teletype machines of yesteryear."
http://www.johnwhitney.com/misc/paul-rtty.htm
I think you could use SIM-H with the image on bitsavers to create
floppy images with the files you need for your machine.
Then maybe you could transfer the images to real floppies using VTserver...
I did so with my 11/23...
Andrea
As long as we're on the subject, here's an interesting article I
saw just today about the performance and data safety aspects of
SATA vs. SAS/FibreChannel/SCSI disks.
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2367378
It's by Marshall McKusick, who is a man who ought to know his
filesystem and disk stuff.
For those who don't like going to web articles, it basically
boils down to the fact that while SATA is perfectly capable of
supporting proper tag queueing, most bottom-dollar drives don't
and basically all other higher-end transports (including SAS,
FibreChannel, and parallel SCSI) do.
There's a lot of other neat stuff in the article, but I thought
it might be interesting while we're bashing PATA and giving
SATA a "meh" around these parts.
- Dave
>Message: 9
>Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:37:01 -0400
>From: Evan Koblentz < evan at snarc.net >
>
>Osborne never did ship a battery, though.
Wrong! See my previous post (I have one).
Bob
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Fred Cisin < cisin at xenosoft.com >
>
>On the Osborne 1, Lee Felsenstein designed in a connector for external
>battery power! ?When queried about how large the battery would be, Lee
Measuring mine (including case) , it's a bout 155mm wide x 115mm deep x
190mm high, 3.6kg
:-P
Bob
>answered, "How big is your CAR? ?It is not intended for portable use on
>batteries." ? I thought that that interchange was on Computer Chronicles,
>but I can't find it.
>So, he wasn't competing for the "first ridiculous laptop" title.
>(BTW, Lee was driving a 1977 Honda Accord)
>
>--
>Grumpy Ol' Fred ? ? ???????????????? cisin at xenosoft.com
I am currently using Netscape 7.2 under Windows 98SE.
Has anyone any experience migrating all of the files to a
32 bit Windows XP?
I have over ten years worth of e-mails and posts from
previous versions of Netscape as well as the current
version that I very much wish to retain as is.
In addition, I just tested the Win32 variant (a 32 bit
program, of course) of V6.0 Ersatz-11 under a 64 bit
Windows 7. It seemed to work very well running at
about twice the speed of an older system which was
running under Windows XP. Does anyone have any
experience in a migration of Netscape 7.2 to a 64 bit
Windows 7 system? If Netscape 7.2 and Ersatz-11
can work well using a 64 bit Windows 7 system, then
I may skip all the in-between OSs from Microsoft and
go directly to a 64 bit Windows 7.
I know that there are many (and much better systems)
than Microsoft, but at 74 years old, I don't feel like taking
the time and effort to learn them well enough to set up.
My son will set up a system for me and I can just do
the migration. I would much rather stay with RT-11,
but I don't believe that it can do a reasonable job with
e-mail, if at all. PLUS, under that 64 bit Windows 7
system, RT-11 running under Ersatz-11 has a speed
of about 150 times a PDP-11/93.
Jerome Fine