There was the Sun SuperMerge (on the side - what software used the NeWS portion of that? Anyone here used the straight Sun NeWS? NeWS seems to be difficult to find information on besides the Don Hopkins site), there was also the 4Sight implementation for IRIX 4D1-3.x. In common with the later DOMAIN DM implementations it, too, came with an X server that could be run on top. NeWS is one of those things that is in my "interested to find more out about, but probably not interested in programming" because of the additional PostScript layer on top. Did they have any IDEs to help with that?
I remember reading about a new "UNIXy" window system project that seemed to leverage many of the points discussed above, but the authors had completely ignored network transparency. That's the sort of thing that seems needless fluff until you start to use it, then the network features of X become very convenient. I can't remember the name right now, however. Seems that useless stylistic effects were amply provided for in it.
On 2012-08-08 23:17, Mouse<mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG> wrote:
>
>> >The rights were bought from Mentec by XX2247, LLC
> With a name like that it's clearly someone who actually has some DEC
> clue, not just a random holding company. I'd call that good.
As Al Kossov alluded to, the "someone" is Dave Carroll. Ex. DEC, ex
Mentec, and the last person around at Mentec who did the development of
this software.
Yes, it is a good sign. However, don't anyone hold their breath. The age
old problem of HP still have a controlling interest in all this is still
around and just as unsolved as ever before.
Johnny
Susan, Peter,
I have an IBM 7094 in my collection, the model after the 7090.
See http://www.piercefuller.com/collect/main.html
My 7094-I is complete with peripherals (tape drives, card reader and printer) cables and spares, along with full hardware documentation and extensive software including diagnostics and IBSYS. It is in storage and until recently has been on view, but now the entire collection is packed to tight for viewing. It is not unreasonable to expect that it could be made to run again; Jay Jaeger, Richard Smith and I brought up a 7094-II in similar shape many years ago. Susan, does your 7090 have its cables?
I am not aware of any other 7090/7094 systems in existence except for IBM's own collection. IBM only kept the cabinets, and in some cases only the consoles, not the cables or documentation.
There is/was a small trove of 7094 bits and pieces in Ohio, including several consoles and much valuable software, but no cabinets. Jay Jaeger and I have raided the tapes and documents a couple of times, that is where the SHARE tapes on my web site came from. SHARE was the IBM user's group for the 709x series.
I have a working setup to read the 7-track tapes that were used with the 1401 and 7000 series computers. I've read most of the tapes in my collection and several other interesting tapes people have sent to me. I wrote special decoding software to extract the data despite dropouts caused by specks of dirt on the tape, and I've found that nearly all tapes no matter how old or how well or poorly stored can be read easily.
Once I've read a tape I put the bits up on my web site, and several people have used them to get the old software running again on simulators they have written for these old computers.
Peter - We are still missing several interesting pieces of software and software documentation. Its possible the stash you are responsible for contains some of these. Regardless of the eventual disposition, it would be very helpful if I could at least borrow anything I don't already have to read it and make the data available.
Nearly all the tapes I have in my collection are already read in and can be found here and at the next link below:
http://www.piercefuller.com/library/magtape7.html
A little of the software documentation I have has been scanned and can be found here (drill down to individual systems):
http://www.piercefuller.com/library/ibm709x.html
More can be found at bitsavers:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/7090/http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/share/
If you already have a detailed list of the tapes, cards and documents I would like to look it over to see if there is anything interesting. Alternatively, you might compare what you have available to the lists above and note anything different. We are particularly looking for some of the larger SHARE programs that were distributed seperately from the regular compilation tapes, such as the SOS operating system. I am also particularly interested in the APT application, and it would be great to find copies of famous old programs such as LISP.
Paul Pierce
Lately I acquired some HP 9865 cassette units and a HP 9821A three cassette
drives suffered from 'slow running'
I found out the LDR's used in the EOT sensor are causing this behavior, the
used LDR's are from the NSL314 type which is practically unobtainable.
The NSL314 is a IR-sensitive CDSe type LDR, replacing it with a standard low
resistance LDR doesn't do the trick, the LDR needs to have a resistance
lower then ~5k at low light.
The most of the cassette drives also suffer from bad sensor bulb, replacing
the bulb by a white LED doesn't give enough light to do the trick.
The combination white LED and new LDR isn't working because the LDR
resistance isn't getting low enough.
The sensor amplifier circuit needs to be modified to work correct, I did
this by creating Wheatstone's bridge by adding a grounding resistor to the
LDR input.
Adding a series resistor of 10k to LDR input and changing the feedback
resistor from 18k2 to 100k made the amplifier work correct with the
combination white LED and 'normal' CDS type LDR.
I made some pictures from this fix which can be found at my flickr page :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hp-fix/sets/72157630819381098/
-Rik
I received the post from Johnny at around 7:19 P.M. EDT in Toronto.
The time stamp was 7:11 P.M. EDT in Toronto which I thought
corresponds to when Johnny sent the post from Sweden? which
would have been no more than an 8 minute delay.
In any case, I send my reply to classiccmp at 7:37 P.M. EDT
and received the copy back at my computer about 20 minutes
later at about 7:57 P.M. EDT.
What I am curious about is the 20 minute delay from when my
reply was sent to classiccmp vs the time the reply was received
back from classiccmp? Is a 20 minute delay normal?
I know that classiccmp has a delay of at least 5 minutes whereas
another list I monitor responds almost immediately. Any comments?
Jerome Fine
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT), Fred Cisin
<cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
> He was
> well-regarded by his colleagues, and displeased when I suggested that
> a
> TEACHER of FORTRAN should surely be ably to debug such an obvious
> error,
> for his was too highly evolved a mind to concern itself with whether
> it
> should be a comma or a full-stop between the device number and the
> FORMAT
> statement number in a WRITE statement (such being the ways of the
> Grand
> Academy of Lagado, and most of the rest of Academia). When he moved
> to a
> different university a few years later, I was given his job, starting
> with
> teaching FORTRAN, now on 5150 with MS-FORTRAN.
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2012-08-05/
/Jonas
Just landed a nice C8000 with a dual-core PA-8900 CPU for playing with at a
nice price, the last and most powerful of the Visualize workstations. I
have a CD set of 11i v1 in my stock closet which should do nicely.
Any other PA-RISC users onlist? Any gotchas? The last Visualize I worked on
was a C3750, so that was a little behind this generation. I just don't have
the space for a K-class, tho. 8)
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Xerox never comes up with anything original. -------------------------------
>Message: 7
>Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:12:38 -0400
>From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
>
<snip>
>
> I heard about CDE the other day too. That could be interesting. Many
>people hated CDE, but I thought it was ok. (not great, but ok) I will
>probably try to build it soon.
>
> -Dave
>
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/09/cde_goes_opensource/
>Message: 13
>Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:31:22 -0400
>From: Paul Anderson < wackyvorlon at me.com >
>
>I'm at university right now, studying classics(ancient rome and greece), and this reminds me of something my prof told me. He was participating in one dig where they >ended up uncovering a grand total of about ten *tons* of potsherds. That's about nine thousand kilograms for the metric inclined.
>
>The problem is that most of them had no real diagnostic value - no markings, nothing unusual. Not really much to be learned from them. Of course, you couldn't put them in >a museum. All the museums in the world put together don't have space for ten tons of random, unmarked potsherds. I had thought they should see about selling them, lots >of people would love to have a piece of ancient greece - but, no, my prof pointed out that they would then become fodder for forgers. So, what to do? Fortunately, at the >time, Athens Airport was building a new runway - and needed fill. Those potsherds are buried under the runway.
>
>Sometimes, there's just too much *stuff*.
I used to do archaeological field work in Peru, and have personally reburied pot sherds and shells after the analysis was completed. I would include some indication that the material was reburied, but in one instance that did not prevent a later project at the same site from ignoring my note as intrusive and thinking they had found a large quantity of one type of marine shell buried in a grave pit .
As to museums having much more material in storage than on display, my experience comes from a natural history museum, where the collections try to encompass as much variation in a species as possible. You might display one example of a bird or snail, but have 40 or 50 (or hundreds) more in storage. For cultural artifacts, storage is more dense than the exhibit galleries, and space is limited, so that is one reason most of the collection is kept in storage. Another reason is that even a good exhibit is more damaging to an artifact than good storage. The museum is committed to preserving the artifact for an indefinite period of time and is (or should be) very concerned about protecting the artifact from damage.
As a curator, I was fairly broad in allowing access to the stored collections. You could not just walk in off the street, but if you could give a good reason why you should be allowed to see the collections (not just the desire to see more examples, however), you could get an appointment. Other curators were stricter, but they were the ones who had the legal responsibility for their collections. The Conservators were the strictest -- even curators had to bow to them over questions about whether or how an artifact could be displayed.
Bob
At 19:48 -0500 7/1/12, ARD wrote (more or less):
>More seriously, can you name a present-day computer where the
>manufactuers do supply schematics, data on ASICs, and the like?
N8VEM.
Pretty sure that's not what you meant, though.
Seriously, I love the idea but see no good way to market it
to the average user.
Imbedded systems, "educational" systems, etc. could maybe
develop a market size that would make it possible to produce, but the
cost of providing good service info (much more to produce good
"educational" material to accompany the system if that's the route
you are going) ... ouch.
It looks to me like the market has fragmented into
a) N8VEM class systems -
*truly* niche market, open architecture but tiny numbers sold
b) Rpi class systems -
incomplete docs and SMI/unserviceable construction, moderate
numbers sold
c) Commodity boxes, iPad/ThinkBook/etc -
serviceable only with specialized tools or not at all, the
vast majority of the market.
d) Server boxes
more serviceable, but at the fast,
board-swap-to-get-it-running level. Expensive. Small fraction of
market.
Anyone have ideas on how to break out of those categories? I
think whatever it is will need a powerful enough CPU to run a *big*
fraction of modern hardware (recent Linux -> web browser +
self-hosted development environment?), be easy enough to assemble to
require minimal tool acquisition, and use commodity peripherals
(flash card storage, HDMI output, bluetooth or USB KB/mouse,
microphone?). Complexity is already an issue at that point; trying to
"educate" a new user across that whole array of components is pretty
daunting.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
