Hi Chuck,
NTSC ... Never The Same Color
Gerhard
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Im
Auftrag von cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Gesendet: Samstag, 10. November 2012 19:00
An: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Betreff: cctalk Digest, Vol 111, Issue 25
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Alexandre Souza - Listas)
2. Re: old tv's and CRT's (ben)
3. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM? (ben)
4. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Alexandre Souza - Listas)
5. Re: old tv's and CRT's (Chuck Guzis)
6. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(allison)
7. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Alexandre Souza - Listas)
8. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM? (ben)
9. Re: Disk drive manuals (Cameron Kaiser)
10. Laser printers, was Re: P112 question - what can you run that
uses 1MB of RAM? (Dave McGuire)
11. PC-1/CX cartridge compatibility, was Re: P112 question - what
can you run that uses 1MB of RAM? (Dave McGuire)
12. Re: Wanted: Research Inc. Teleray terminals (Ethan Dicks)
13. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(allison)
14. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM? (Mouse)
15. Sam's Computerfacts 4851 Disk Drive (Chris Tofu)
16. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Roger Pugh)
17. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Roger Pugh)
18. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
(Roger Pugh)
19. Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM? (ben)
20. Re: Networking a Macintosh SE/30 (Joost van de Griek)
21. Needed - rear brackets for BA23 mounting kit (Jack Rubin)
22. Re: To Metcal, or not to Metcal? Re: RepRapping. Was:Re:
Restoring an Intel SDK-86 to "mostly like new" condition (Jochen Kunz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:30:11 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas" <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <5A3297F6A7834D649F33D6EB0E3AA0B0 at tababook>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
> Tell me what toner does a P112 use or is that used to color the 1MB of
> ram??
Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with ease on a
Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
:oD
Well, at least I tried :D
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:40:56 -0700
From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: old tv's and CRT's
Message-ID: <509DA298.8030607 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/9/2012 4:17 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> At any rate, between 1950 and 1953, the official color television
> standard in the USA was the CBS field-sequential system, which,
> compared with the RCA system of the same time was quite good (at least
> for the time)--a mechanical 3-color filter was spun in front of the
> CRT, synchronized to a similar filter at the camera.
>
> It wasn't until 1953 that RCA had improved its system well enough for
> NTSC color to become the official standard.
>
> A few CBS System receivers still exist.
Lots of vintage TV's still can be found. It is getting working color CRT's
that are the problem from what I read on the net. Now might be the last time
to find CRT's for vintage computer equipment.
> --Chuck
Has the color on modern display devices matched the color purity of the
early TV's yet?
Ben.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:50:49 -0700
From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DA4E9.3020107 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/9/2012 5:30 PM, Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:
>> Tell me what toner does a P112 use or is that used to color the 1MB of
>> ram??
>
> Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with ease on
> a Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
>
> :oD
>
> Well, at least I tried :D
>
Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I am
sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in 16K
including the printer fonts.
Ben.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:59:27 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas" <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <792C68D6371B41E29AFE93C46BE4CEB5 at tababook>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
>> Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with ease on
>> a Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
> Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I am
> sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in 16K
> including the printer fonts.
I doubt. And you woudn't print raster graphics :)
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:07:22 -0800
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: old tv's and CRT's
Message-ID: <509DA8CA.9080005 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/09/2012 04:40 PM, ben wrote:
> Has the color on modern display devices matched the color purity of the
> early TV's yet?
If you're talking about 1950s RCA/NTSC sets, then the answer is
no--modern displays were much better. I vividly remember one of the
first families on the block to get color TV around 1957. It was an RCA
set--the color was greenish and the reds had a longer persistence than
the other phosphors, so red objects would "smear" badly on a dark
background.
Really, NTSC was terrible when it was new and didn't improve all that much.
--Chuck
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:15:10 -0500
From: allison <ajp166 at verizon.net>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DAA9E.2010702 at verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/09/2012 07:50 PM, ben wrote:
> On 11/9/2012 5:30 PM, Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:
>>> Tell me what toner does a P112 use or is that used to color the 1MB of
>>> ram??
>>
>> Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with ease on
>> a Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
>>
>> :oD
>>
>> Well, at least I tried :D
>>
>
> Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I
> am sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in
> 16K including the printer fonts.
> Ben.
>
Actually no. To do that you need to be able to process the data rapidly
enough to lay down dots
as the drum rotates.
The key thing for Laser printing (or any page printer) is the bit image
need to exist before
the paper moves or at least be preprocessed so that the raster image
processor can fill
a "band buffer" . The Video dot rate for a DEC LN01 (xerox 12PPM
engine) was about 7mhz.
The early character only version use a 12mhz 80186 with 8089 to keep up,
The system IO
to the host was handled by the 8089. Oddly the 8PPM LN03 Ricoh based
engine was not much
slower on the video clock. In the late 80s there were two lasers often
those that were
band buffer and generally limited to text and limited graphics and a
higher priced version
that had enough ram to buffer the page so the image could be composed
before the paper
was even moved.
Actually I use my CP/M-80 system to lay down images on a real
Laserjet4L. The price is that
I need to run the system for a long time to create bit images to
transmit. That takes hours
even with ram and bit of buffering to hard disk. Even then the printer
is doing much of the
heavy lifting.
The main issue was never ram but CPU cycles to process that data at
acceptable rates
for graphic images. It is the same issue as doing video graphics on a
CRT or LCD. In that
case you need enough ram to buffer the image for refresh and enough cpu
to create and
transfer images to that ram. So to simply move bytes to a 1MB page
buffer it would take
a Z80 at 4mhz around 8 seconds with no processing other than simple
paging. That's too slow.
Allison
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:39:16 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas" <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <F8B4613B967146C7AEA1AC774F475533 at tababook>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
> Actually no. To do that you need to be able to process the data rapidly
> enough to lay down dots
> as the drum rotates.
> ...
I love this list, I learn more and more every day :o)
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:41:58 -0700
From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DB0E6.6040001 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/9/2012 6:15 PM, allison wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:50 PM, ben wrote:
>> On 11/9/2012 5:30 PM, Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:
>>>> Tell me what toner does a P112 use or is that used to color the 1MB of
>>>> ram??
>>>
>>> Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with ease on
>>> a Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
>>>
>>> :oD
>>>
>>> Well, at least I tried :D
>>>
>>
>> Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I
>> am sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in
>> 16K including the printer fonts.
>> Ben.
>>
>
> Actually no. To do that you need to be able to process the data rapidly
> enough to lay down dots
> as the drum rotates.
That is a mechanical issue, not the idea of charging a drum with a laser.
The old, cheaper hardware, faster software problem here. I don't think
software has yet to solve the real problem of modern printers,
is that text on the screen does NOT match the printed page, but that is
off topic.
> The key thing for Laser printing (or any page printer) is the bit image
> need to exist before
> the paper moves or at least be preprocessed so that the raster image
> processor can fill
> a "band buffer" . The Video dot rate for a DEC LN01 (xerox 12PPM
> engine) was about 7mhz.
> The early character only version use a 12mhz 80186 with 8089 to keep up,
> The system IO
> to the host was handled by the 8089. Oddly the 8PPM LN03 Ricoh based
> engine was not much
> slower on the video clock. In the late 80s there were two lasers often
> those that were
> band buffer and generally limited to text and limited graphics and a
> higher priced version
> that had enough ram to buffer the page so the image could be composed
> before the paper
> was even moved.
I think history of Time-Sharing computers had a big impact here. You needed
BIG fast page laser printer to share between users, so high speed
printer was
needed. Speed I don't think changed much over the years, but build
quality HAS dropped.
> Actually I use my CP/M-80 system to lay down images on a real
> Laserjet4L. The price is that
> I need to run the system for a long time to create bit images to
> transmit. That takes hours
> even with ram and bit of buffering to hard disk. Even then the printer
> is doing much of the
> heavy lifting.
Custom software, or using a driver for a text processing package?
> Allison
>
Ben.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:42:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Disk drive manuals
Message-ID: <201211100142.qAA1gdBn30408900 at floodgap.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> > VERY little interest in books. And these are some of the better ones.
> > WhatamI gonna do when I get down to the boxes of Sybex books and crappy
> > books on WordPerfect?
>
> Build a fort and throw AOL CDs at people passing by?
I like the floppies. They have those nice metal edges which make a ragged
laceration if you get the right spin on 'em.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/
--
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Use foresight, and pessimism.
----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:20:32 -0500
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Laser printers, was Re: P112 question - what can you run that
uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DB9F0.2000206 at neurotica.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 11/09/2012 08:41 PM, ben wrote:
>> The key thing for Laser printing (or any page printer) is the bit image
>> need to exist before
>> the paper moves or at least be preprocessed so that the raster image
>> processor can fill
>> a "band buffer" . The Video dot rate for a DEC LN01 (xerox 12PPM
>> engine) was about 7mhz.
>> The early character only version use a 12mhz 80186 with 8089 to keep up,
>> The system IO
>> to the host was handled by the 8089. Oddly the 8PPM LN03 Ricoh based
>> engine was not much
>> slower on the video clock. In the late 80s there were two lasers often
>> those that were
>> band buffer and generally limited to text and limited graphics and a
>> higher priced version
>> that had enough ram to buffer the page so the image could be composed
>> before the paper
>> was even moved.
>
> I think history of Time-Sharing computers had a big impact here. You
needed
> BIG fast page laser printer to share between users, so high speed
> printer was
> needed. Speed I don't think changed much over the years, but build
> quality HAS dropped.
The build quality for consumer crapware has dropped, but if you buy
that stuff, you get what you deserve.
I had a DEC LN01 for a long time. It was a cantankerous beast but it
was built like a tank. (I would love to have one again, if anyone has
one lying around) Today's GOOD printers are built every bit as well.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:22:01 -0500
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: PC-1/CX cartridge compatibility, was Re: P112 question - what
can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DBA49.6000708 at neurotica.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 11/09/2012 06:00 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>>> . . . and the lab staff at the college (25 years ago) found out that if
>>> you fill the copier cartridge with printer toner, and then try to use it
>>> in the copier, it produces a very poor quality reverse video image.
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Tony Duell wrote:
>> I wonder whathte physical explanation for that is.
>
> The only explanation that I was given was:
> "The company selling the refill kit (Torx driver, page of instructions,
> bag of toner) sent the wrong toner."
If memory serves, the drum coating was a completely different
composition, it was even a different color.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:23:32 -0500
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Wanted: Research Inc. Teleray terminals
Message-ID:
<CAALmimnXUWH=3g+dWLLZXRJcUk+jLjAhDx9JNd_9tRDzgP8fBQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> wrote:
>> Richard wrote:
>> I wrote about Teleray terminals:
>>
>>> I'm not sure which model, but it was reportedly 6502-based, and had some
>>> kind of hacked firmware installed.
>
> Are there any photos of the PCBs out there? I have a small box of
> what appear to be 6502-based terminal boards with lots of socketed
> TTL. I do not know the vendor, but I can look for distinctive
> markings. I never had the terminals. I just picked up a box of
> "random" boards from a Hamfest some time ago.
I found one of the boards tonight... It's really hard to read the
hand-written scrawl on the label, but it certainly _could_ be 1061.
The board has several DB25s on one edge, a prominent pair of 9114
SRAMs, what looks like a ROM in one corner (if 8316 is a part number
for a 2K masked-programmed ROM), and I think it attaches to the video
circuit with a two-row 0.1" ribbon cable of about 20 pins. There are
a pair of side-toggle dip-switches on one edge for what looks like
configuration settings.
I did a bit of googling for the Teleray 1061 and about all I found out
is that it was released in 1978 for around $1100 and there are some
quirks with it enough to get mentioned in termcap comments. I did not
find schematics or a proper manual.
When I got it, I didn't know what it was and I got it for the socketed
parts. If anyone is trying to fix a Teleray 1061, this could be your
lucky day. The chips on it are worth a few dollars to me as spares
but not a vast amount. I already have more dumb terminals that I
could ever use, so I see no reason why I'd ever try to turn this board
into a working terminal. If someone wants it, contact me off-list,
otherwise, it'll stay in the parts bin for now.
-ethan
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:29:31 -0500
From: allison <ajp166 at verizon.net>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509DCA1B.80209 at verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/09/2012 08:41 PM, ben wrote:
> On 11/9/2012 6:15 PM, allison wrote:
>> On 11/09/2012 07:50 PM, ben wrote:
>>> On 11/9/2012 5:30 PM, Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:
>>>>> Tell me what toner does a P112 use or is that used to color the
>>>>> 1MB of
>>>>> ram??
>>>>
>>>> Well, a 64-K CPM system will not print raster graphics with
>>>> ease on
>>>> a Laser Printer...You need more RAM!
>>>>
>>>> :oD
>>>>
>>>> Well, at least I tried :D
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I
>>> am sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in
>>> 16K including the printer fonts.
>>> Ben.
>>>
>>
>> Actually no. To do that you need to be able to process the data rapidly
>> enough to lay down dots
>> as the drum rotates.
>
> That is a mechanical issue, not the idea of charging a drum with a laser.
You are not serious.
The drum rotates slowly but each line of pixels is the length of the
printed area
(8") times the 300line per inch of the circumference and at 8PPM the
average
drum in small printers turned several times to print the whole 11 inchs.
It's a raster scan system. Character printers could compose at a rate that
was one cell height at a time so they use band buffers that often allowed
typically 8 or 16 lines on the drum to be buffered at a time while the next
lines were being processed. That scheme was good to a point but there were
pathological cases that resulted in page to complex and imaging failures.
often overstrikes were the likely culprit.
For 8PPM that means moving 7920000 pixels in about 7.5 seconds without
much dead time. You cannot stop the drum during the process.
The laser does not charge the drum, it's used to discharge it, you can
do it with
LEDs as well but they were slow back then.
The typical cycle is charge corona, writing (laser, or led raster scan),
developing (toner)
transfer(transfer corona) and cleaning (discharge corona sometimes), and
doctoring
(scrape the remaining toner off with a silicone rubber blade). Repeat as
eneded.
Polarities and what optical range this are done are dependent on if the
drum was
selenium coated or the organic photoreceptor that Cannon wrapped the
cartridge
around.
>
> The old, cheaper hardware, faster software problem here. I don't think
> software has yet to solve the real problem of modern printers,
> is that text on the screen does NOT match the printed page, but that
> is off topic.
That belongs back with one of the threads that had NAPLPS in it or maybe
WYSIWYG
when WYGINS is the reality.
No one prints at under 100 DPI. Maybe now with very high resolution
color displays
we see what we get but then the best CRT I ran in color was 1280x1024 and
.27 dot pitch (about 70-80dpi) which is still coarse by then 300DPI
standard.
That meant the tube could not display (even in B&W) what the printer could.
New we have displays that are easily better than 300dpi but printers can do
600dpi and maybe more. That doesn't even cover color.
>
>> The key thing for Laser printing (or any page printer) is the bit image
>> need to exist before
>> the paper moves or at least be preprocessed so that the raster image
>> processor can fill
>> a "band buffer" . The Video dot rate for a DEC LN01 (xerox 12PPM
>> engine) was about 7mhz.
>> The early character only version use a 12mhz 80186 with 8089 to keep up,
>> The system IO
>> to the host was handled by the 8089. Oddly the 8PPM LN03 Ricoh based
>> engine was not much
>> slower on the video clock. In the late 80s there were two lasers often
>> those that were
>> band buffer and generally limited to text and limited graphics and a
>> higher priced version
>> that had enough ram to buffer the page so the image could be composed
>> before the paper
>> was even moved.
>
> I think history of Time-Sharing computers had a big impact here. You
> needed
> BIG fast page laser printer to share between users, so high speed
> printer was
> needed. Speed I don't think changed much over the years, but build
> quality HAS dropped.
>
No build quality is better. We ( I was part of the team that developed
the LN01, LN03 and
LPS40 and LPS20 series at DEC) found that getting engines that could run
at speed for 90 days
without breakdown was a mechanical impossibility, we had customers prove
it repeatedly.
Back then the choices were Cannon, Ricoh, Xerox and in about that order
of durability.
Getting 200,000 to 300,000 pages between failure was the challenge and
price was the
other.
To get to 40PPM (LPS40) a microVAX in the printer pushing a custom
bitslice processor
and a even more custom bitbliter so that a reasonably complex page set
could be printed
at 40PPM. That's what it took then. But the printer took postscript
directly and printed
up to B size pages with no page too complex issues. Now we have cheap
fast cpus that
can do that.
This development was in the time frame of the "workstation" so the big
VAX in the back
was not always the factor. However the cost of even slow printers was
high enough
Then that shared resource was what the customer said. The price of a
8PPM printer
then is far higher than a 20ppm color printer now.
So the existence of timesharing was and is a red herring as big systems
printers
printed less graphics and small single users wanted all the printing
capability..
Often the single user was a workstation of even then a PC with Hercules or
early CGA video.
>> Actually I use my CP/M-80 system to lay down images on a real
>> Laserjet4L. The price is that
>> I need to run the system for a long time to create bit images to
>> transmit. That takes hours
>> even with ram and bit of buffering to hard disk. Even then the printer
>> is doing much of the
>> heavy lifting.
> Custom software, or using a driver for a text processing package?
>
Very custom, in assembler as excess overhead was painful and I had one
of the uncommon
10mhz z80s. I did it mostly to prove a point but waiting hours per
page was not practical.
Doing hi res text only documents was easy and people were doing it tot
he limits of what
printers were available. Graphics just wanted more of everything by
many orders of magnitude.
Large ram was cost and speed issues but doable then. Code can overcome
a lot of things
but raw CPU speed was and is the prime solution (enter GPUs).
FYI I still run that LJ4L as its durable and parallel interfaces to all
my systems directly save
for the latest PC with no IO save for USB ( PIC24 programmed for USB to
parallel solution).
Allison
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:14:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <201211100414.XAA23825 at Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> I don't think software has yet to solve the real problem of modern
> printers, is that text on the screen does NOT match the printed page,
I don't think that - to the extent it _is_ a problem - _can_ be solved,
as long as printers are higher-resolution than displays. (Not unless
you artificially cripple the printout to match the display's
resolution, at least.)
> but that is off topic.
Well, to a point. Some classic machines had display resolutions close
to their printer resolutions, and the two _could_ match fairly well....
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 20:36:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Tofu <rampaginggreenhulk at yahoo.com>
To: "cctalk at classiccmp.org" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Sam's Computerfacts 4851 Disk Drive
Message-ID:
<1352522181.91090.YahooMailNeo at web141104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Need it. Anyone have it? Hook me up, ay/.
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:39:21 +0000
From: Roger Pugh <rogpugh at mac.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509E2ED9.7040701 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On 10/11/2012 01:15, allison wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:50 PM, ben wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well if you could access the toner drum directly from the host cpu, I
>> am sure you could emulate a generic mono-spaced printer like a TTY in
>> 16K including the printer fonts.
>> Ben.
>>
>
There was a laserprinter available for i think the Atari ST (or later
model) that did away with the processor and and used the atari. This
cut the cost of the printer down to about 1000 pounds/dollars which was
very cheap in its time, esp when compared to the apple laser.. I think
it was a canon engine.
This idea was used in the "windows only" laser printers where the
ripping was done on the PC and the raw data sent to the printer via
parallel port.
Roger
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:45:57 +0000
From: Roger Pugh <rogpugh at mac.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509E3065.3 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On 09/11/2012 19:45, Tony Duell wrote:
>> . . . and the lab staff at the college (25 years ago) found out that if
>> you fill the copier cartridge with printer toner, and then try to use it
>> in the copier, it produces a very poor quality reverse video image.
> I wonder whathte physical explanation for that is.
>
> -tony
Pretty much every type of printer or copier uses different
photoreceptor/toner/developer/carrier. As these all work on
electrostatic priniples things such as charge, spacing between
components, materials used in consumables, fusing temps are all different.
11 years working at Xerox, 12 more years on toner based digital printing...
Roger
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:18:19 +0000
From: Roger Pugh <rogpugh at mac.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509E37FB.7050505 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On 10/11/2012 01:15, allison wrote:
>
> Actually no. To do that you need to be able to process the data
> rapidly enough to lay down dots
> as the drum rotates.
>
> The key thing for Laser printing (or any page printer) is the bit
> image need to exist before
> the paper moves or at least be preprocessed so that the raster image
> processor can fill
> a "band buffer" . The Video dot rate for a DEC LN01 (xerox 12PPM
> engine) was about 7mhz.
> The early character only version use a 12mhz 80186 with 8089 to keep
> up, The system IO
> to the host was handled by the 8089. Oddly the 8PPM LN03 Ricoh based
> engine was not much
> slower on the video clock. In the late 80s there were two lasers
> often those that were
> band buffer and generally limited to text and limited graphics and a
> higher priced version
> that had enough ram to buffer the page so the image could be composed
> before the paper
> was even moved.
I am a tech at a company called XEIKON. We manufacture color digital
presses..
We print on rolls of paper of upto 50cm (20inch) at 1200DPI at speeds of
19 meters a min (about 60ft/min??). The presses are 5 colour on both
sides..
Being roll fed presses we cant stop the press and wait for the data,
LOTS of FPGA's are required to keep up the data stream.
We are low end industrial, some of the expensive stuff like Kodaks
Prosper of course need lots more....
Roger
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:41:04 -0700
From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: P112 question - what can you run that uses 1MB of RAM?
Message-ID: <509E7590.3070405 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/9/2012 9:14 PM, Mouse wrote:
>> I don't think software has yet to solve the real problem of modern
>> printers, is that text on the screen does NOT match the printed page,
>
> I don't think that - to the extent it _is_ a problem - _can_ be solved,
> as long as printers are higher-resolution than displays. (Not unless
> you artificially cripple the printout to match the display's
> resolution, at least.)
>
>> but that is off topic.
>
> Well, to a point. Some classic machines had display resolutions close
> to their printer resolutions, and the two _could_ match fairly well....
Well not resolution issue, but font scaling. Windows seems to have lost
TrueType somewhere on my machine. For what little C programing I do,
fixed with fonts is what I want!
Ben.
PS. If people were happy with printer output, programs like TeX would
not be here.
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:50:02 +0100
From: Joost van de Griek <gyorpb at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Networking a Macintosh SE/30
Message-ID: <802939B0-23D9-4074-99A4-29D786921F3C at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 9 Nov 2012, at 23:41 , Schindler Patrik <poc at pocnet.net> wrote:
> Am 09.11.2012 um 20:46 schrieb Tony Duell:
>
>>> I recall the same thing.
>> And o yet again Apple did not adhere to an accepted standard....
>
> Yes, because the monitor port on Macs already had been DB15-F, years
before Macs with Onboard-Ethernet came to life. Apple was eager to keep
setting up Macs as easy as possible. That includes distinct connectors for
distinct functions.
Size was also a consideration. Standard AUI connectors would ill fit on
PowerBooks.
.tsooJ
--
There are perhaps 5% of the population that simply can't think. There are
another 5% who can, and do. The remaining 90% can think, but don't.
- Robert A. Heinlein
--
Joost van de Griek
<http://www.jvdg.net/>
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Rubin <jack.rubin at ameritech.net>
To: classiccomp list <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Ed Groenenberg
<quapla at xs4all.nl>, Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
Subject: Needed - rear brackets for BA23 mounting kit
Message-ID:
<1352566935.26136.YahooMailRC at web181304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I'm racking a BA23 system into a corporate cabinet, using a BA23-AR mounting
kit. I have the rails, front brackets and front cover but I'm lacking the
rear
brackets that secure the rails to the rear cabinet posts. Apparently some
racks
require these brackets and some don't. I have _three_ racking kits and none
of
them have the rear brackets.
The brackets are short pieces of sheet metal, about 2" deep and 3" high.
They
are bent in a shallow U shape with an extended tab on one leg. Part numbers
are
7428372-01 and 7428372-02 (left and right sides). They are shown in the BA23
Enclosure Maintenance manual, p 2-22.
Please let me know if you can spare a pair (or more) of these items.
Thank you,
Jack
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:43:57 +0100
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: To Metcal, or not to Metcal? Re: RepRapping. Was:Re:
Restoring an Intel SDK-86 to "mostly like new" condition
Message-ID:
<20121110184357.52697ee564c856131a1e998a at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:27:25 -0400
Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
> If you end up getting one,
> I'd appreciate knowing what you think of it.
The Oki MFR-2241 arrived today. I did some (de-) soldering on scrap
PCBs in the last hours. It is amazing how the small 1 mm chisel
cartridge heats up large through hole pins soldered to big ground
planes. My old iron wolud not be able to do this, in no way. The OKi
tips are thin and short. Wheres the heater + tip of my old iron is much
thicker and longer. A touch up on a single SMD pin is much easier with
the OKi, as the total length of the tip is much shorter.
The "precision" tweezers aren't that precise as expected, but its OK.
Wane desolder that SO8? Grab with the tweezers, wait a second or two
and it comes off. Wane desolder that LM2676 (dPak)? Tin the leads for
better heat conduction, grab with the tweezers, wait some more seconds
(large ground plane under the chip) and it comes off...
My setup cost me 830 EUR (approx. 1055US$) including some tips.
The single PSU variant, MFR-1100, is 300 EUR (approx. 380US$). If you
are in buissines for a new soldering iron and can spend that much
money, get at least a MFR-1100.
It is worth every single cent!
I'll get a pair of larger tips for the tweezers later. These are
expensive, around 100 EUR. But desoldering a DIP16 or the like will be
a piece of cake with them.
p.s. At unpacking I noticed that the pacel had been droped top down
onto the flor. But the PSU survived without a single scratch. It is
build out of cast aluminium. It is heavy and build like a tank. Its
really industrial grade equipment.
--
\end{Jochen}
\ref{http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/}
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 111, Issue 25
***************************************
Hi Jim,
I've seen your 386 card on ebay and whilst looking for drivers came across your post here:
http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2012-October/137378.html
I'd take both the 386 and 68020 cards, however drivers are an issue as I can't seem to locate them on the web or newsgroups etc.
Any luck finding them at your end?
Regards
Clem
Hi, All,
I'm not joining in the kickstarter because I already have a P112 I
purchased as a bare PCB and loose SMD parts in the previous round. I
just uncovered it last night moving some things around and started
tossing build-parts into a bin to put it together. I do happen to
have a couple of 32-pin JEDEC 512K SRAMs (originally for an SBC6120
RAM disk PCB that got destroyed in the mail), so I _can_ fully
populate it, but it got me wondering... what CP/M software is out
there (except maybe a RAM disk) that can *use* 1MB?
I have a bit of experience with 48K-64K CP/M machines (mostly Kaypro,
but some others), because back when I was using it, that was how much
memory 8-bitters had. I didn't mess with them much after 1985, so if
there was still any development on that platform, I didn't see it.
So why *does* the P112 have 1MB of RAM? What's the space over 64K good for?
Cheers,
-ethan
> From: Tom publix <ittybittybytes at gmail.com>
> I'll be putting some apollo stuff up and maybe some other stuff later this
> week. Of course, mention your a member of the ccmp list and get some
> freebies thrown in.
I posted a few weeks back: I'm looking for a DN1000, or similar era
(pre HP). Do you have anything like that?
Fran?ois
--
solarisdesktop.blogspot.com - raspberry-python.blogspot.com
I think I have my head wrapped around the hardware tuneups that my Mac
SE/30 requires. Moving on to the software. I've found install media and
can get System 6 installed just fine. I can read and write HD floppies
in my Linux box to move things in and out by sneakernet.
I'm having a nasty time getting the ethernet board to work. I'm using an
Asante MacCon PSD slot ethernet board. I downloaded the driver pack
(still at Asante's website), made a driver install disk, and installed the
driver stuff. This installs a driver for the board, ethertalk, and
MacTCP. A diagnostic program on the disk says that the ethernet board is
checking out fine, but I can't get the machine to talk or listen to the
network. It's not at all clear how the MacTCP panel is supposed to be
used. I've tried following http://www.applefool.com/se30/ and nothing
works (though I can't get the Legacy Recover CD referred to there).
Is there someone on this list who has done this before who can help me?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I did some number crunching and decided that I can indeed produce P112
kits with all the parts you'll need. See http://661.org/p112 or
http://p112.feedle.net
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Hi all,
I'm Robyn and I'm a computer pack-rat... "Hi Robyn!"
I'm doing some cleanup at the behest of the wife and have some vintage gear
to get to a new home.
Anything is available for pickup or for the price of shipping. (Pickup
is preferred as vintage rotating media does not like un-parked shipping)
1. Hyperdrive 2.0 install (used - condition unknown - SEEMS to be all
there with drive and install binder, driver for Mac available online)
2. Powerbook 160 installed in a Powerbook 140 case (greyscale,
operational, Lead-Acid batteries in condition you'd expect).
(MAY be able to find the original MB for PowerBook 140, was a display
cable issue)
3. Mac HD-20 external HD for Mac Plus (operational with installed system)
4. Apple External SCSI CD drive (the big long one, includes HD-30 cable
and terminators)
5. Copy of MacIntosh 68000 development system with disks
6. Copy of MacIntosh, Lost Treasures of Infocom
7. Printed copy of MacIntosh User's Guide + HyperCard Manual
8. Mac SCSI IOMEGA ZIP drive (with P/S and 3 new Mac Formatted ZIP disks)
9. Mac 800K external drive
10. Misc Mac Plus mice, keyboard, microphone and Phone-Net dongles
11. Floppies and other Misc as I find them.
Robyn
rrissell at gmail.com
Lake Orion, MI
I just thought you'd all be interested to hear that my P112 Kickstarter
project has been successfully funded. Now for the formalities of getting
the money transferred to me and I can start buying parts.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Part One: Taking over the typing pool
By Tony Smith ? Get more from this author
Posted in Hardware, 12th November 2012 12:01 GMT
Feature In 1985, the UK home computer boom was over. Those computer
manufacturers who had survived the sales wasteland that was Christmas
1984 quickly began to turn their attention away from the home users
they had courted through the first half of the 1980s to the growing
and potentially much more lucrative business market.
The IBM PC had been launched four years earlier, in 1981. The 5150 and
the clones it had inspired at Compaq and other computing firms new and
established were winning an increasing share of the market. Some
British manufacturers were content to follow the American lead and
offer clones of their own. Others, however, believed they could win
with systems of their own design.
[...]
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/12/the_secret_history_of_liberator_the…
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884