Hi Gang,
While surfing, I found a repository of NASA FORTRAN code from the NASA-COSMIC library.
Lots
of graphics in here as you could imagine, supporting Tektronix, PLOT10
and VT100 graphics terminals. As I know there are lots of geeks here, like me
still interested in this sort of stuff. I have attached a abstract
list of the code.
Let me know if you are interested in any of
this - it certainly has application or useful as learning material; for
example the calculation of satellite trajectories for us AMSAT ham guys.
You
can certainly Google yourself, but the download for me was a bit tricky
- requiring a linux box and the Subversion version control system.
How can I push it up to Bitsavers?
Randy
Interestingly enough, the Sharp PC-1211 (early basic programmable calculator) displays 'O' in a manner similar to what you describe. Zeros have no slash or other markings, but the 'O' has a notch in the upper right corner.
See http://www.vintagecalculators.com/assets/images/SharpPC1211_1.jpg for an example.
Josh
-----Original Message-----
From: Al Kossow
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:52 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Slashing the letter O (Was: Re: Service bureaus (Was: Tek 4051 firmware listing))
There was an attempt at establishing what can roughly be described as an upside down Q
for a slashed O. The only example I know of where someone used this are in line printer listings
>from SDS in the late 60's. I would have to do some serious digging in magazines to find who was
pushing this as a standard. They end up looking like misformed 8's.
It does terrible things to OCR.
Hi everybody,
I have two Sun UltraSPARC machined to be picked up: a Ultra 1 (512 M
RAM, with extra memory modules) and an Ultra 5 (also 512 M RAM). The
5 works for sure, runs NetBSD. These are for pick-up at McGill
University in Montreal, contact me off-list if you want them. There
might be a SS4 kicking around here as well to be gotten rid of.
Contact me off-list.
Joe.
--
Joachim Thiemann :: http://www.tsp.ece.mcgill.ca/~jthiem
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:05:05 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas" <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: apple Lisa2. One working!! - one to go?
> An example to ilustrate the talk: http://tabalabs.com.br/c64/sx
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Definitely interesting and somewhat relevant, but not quite the same
> thing; that deals with the common problem of replacing 24pin 8K 23xx type
> ROMs (or 68764/66 EPROMs) with a 27xx equivalent EPROM (with multiple
> images in this example), whereas Tony was talking about replacing a 2716
> with a larger 27xx EPROM, not quite the same thing or adapter.
Thanks Mike, but please, read again:
> An example to ILUSTRATE the talk: http://tabalabs.com.br/c64/sx
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I've read it again, and I'd still say that although it's somewhat relevant
it's not what Tony was talking about.
Although the pictures and schematic illustrate the general idea of (badly)
making this *kind of* adapter (try reprogramming that EPROM ;-), I think it
would have been more useful to link to an illustration and schematic of what
Tony was actually talking about, i.e. adapting a 2716 (instead of a 2364).
You can buy those adapters for $5.00, by the way.
Am I missing something?
Brent wrote:
> On 2010 Dec 10, at 2:36 AM, Christian Corti wrote:
> >
> > we've had a look inside our IME 122 calculator and discovered that it
> > is full of SN14xx logic ICs. They are mainly from TI, but there are
> > also some from Motorola and others. It seems that they have the same
> > function and pinout as the SN74xx parts but there must be a difference
> > since the machine has quite a lot of SN1401 (the SN7401 is a quad
> > open-collector NAND), but there are no pullup resistors anywhere!
> > Some of the types are SN1400, SN1401, SN1474, SN1490; the ALU is made
> > up
> > of SN1482 and SN1483.
> > Anyone knows this series? BTW the supply voltage is 5V.
> I can't find a reference for those numbers, and I haven't seen them
> before, however I have seen TI inexplicably producing series identical
> or similar to more-common series, but numbered differently. For
> example, the SN3900 and SN4500 series are very similar to more-common
> DTL series such as the 700/800/900 series, but I have never seen a
> reference for the 3900 or 4500 series in TI databooks. One suggestion
> might be they were a 'consumer-grade' series, a step below the standard
> commercial-grade stuff.
Remember this was the late 60's or early 70's, and the thought of 7400 as the
"super series" with variants like 74L00, 74H00, 74S00 actually being inside the
family had not quite taken over in the same sense that it did later,
even inside TI. I don't think it's so much that the SN1400's/SN3900's/SN4500's
were a step below commercial grade, but they probably had product-specific
fanin/fanout/noise/current constraints and maybe even custom pinouts
or built-in pullup variants in their specs.
The 7400 "super series" of pin compatible parts in different speed/current/fanout
levels organized by 74L00, 74H00, 74S00, 74LS00 with often identical pinouts
was truly genius from a marketing-meets-technology point of view.
Not too different than say the 9-pin dual triode with similar to
identical pinouts but different gain variants (e.g. 12AU7/12AT7/12AX7) and a zillion
commercial/aerospace/computer variants (e.g. 5814A, 5963, etc.)
With regards to pinouts not everyone even inside a company had the same thoughts
regarding pin locations for Vcc and gnd. TI did a pretty good job most of the time putting
them at 7 and 14 or 8 and 16 for TTL which did simplify layout, but there are lots of exceptions
even inside the TTL product space. And sometimes there were good reasons for the
exceptions, other times I think it was just internal squabbling :-)
You can see some of this playing out in TI's competitors logic families too, e.g. Signetics
Utilogic with different subfamilies inside the Utilogic superfamily.
Tim.
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:32:00 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas" <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: apple Lisa2. One working!! - one to go?
> However, it's also quite easy to use a 2764 in place of a 2716 in the
> actual machine. What I normally do is make an adapter that will plug into
> the oriignal EPPROM socket and will tkae the 2764. Most pins just
> connect across, you need to connect the higher address lines on the EPROM
> to ground (do this on the adapter, of course). Then program the ROM image
> into the first section of the larger EPROM, and it should work fine.
An example to ilustrate the talk: http://tabalabs.com.br/c64/sx
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Definitely interesting and somewhat relevant, but not quite the same thing;
that deals with the common problem of replacing 24pin 8K 23xx type ROMs (or
68764/66 EPROMs) with a 27xx equivalent EPROM (with multiple images in this
example), whereas Tony was talking about replacing a 2716 with a larger 27xx
EPROM, not quite the same thing or adapter.
mike
Andrew,
The douglasgoodall website required a log in before viewing.
Status posted anywhere else?
Thanks
Rob
-----REPLY-----
Hi You can check the N8VEM wiki for schematics, PCB layout, and parts list.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder
<http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=S-100%2068K%20
CPU> ¶m=S-100%2068K%20CPU
Otherwise the status of the S-100 68K CPU board is
we've got a team of builders
schematic captured & reviewed
PCB layout done and verified
5 PCB prototypes ordered
prototype PCBs sent to builders
lead builder is currently doing build and test
project wiki set up
various pieces of TUTOR 1.3 software gathered
We are not done with build and test. No ETA. There are some minor changes
and items found so far but nothing of consequence. No cuts and jumpers
identified for the board.
After prototype build and test is done, we are going to focus on the
software. Probably custom test/debug/monitor EPROMs first, then TUTOR 1.3
with a goal of CP/M 68K (maybe)
The plan is the PCBs will be available for $20 each plus shipping. They are
for educational purposes only. No kits or pre-built boards. There is no
ETA for the manufactured PCBs.
That's about it. Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch