As seen on the CoCo list (hosted by MaltedMedia):
http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/coco/2010-November/052008.html
In short: 2 each Gimix 6809 multiuser systems, SS-50 based.
These are quite rare critters, it would be a shame to see them go.
I put a reply on that list & will echo the sentiment here:
The systems are in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The owner says that
shipping might be possible to the US *if* they arrange their own Customs
brokerage. I'd be happy to help if I can, so even though I live in the
US, I'm in a border town (I can see Canada from my bedroom window) so
instead of dealing with Customs, if "the lucky rescuer" can arrange
shipping to (or near, lets say 50km) Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada,
I'll drive across the border, get the units, bring them into the US [1],
and then reship them from the local UPS depot to their destination. [2]
[1] As I'm fairly sure the units were made in the US, there *shouldn't*
be any duty -- If there's any sticker or documentation that states the
fact, that would be much easier to prove.
[2] I reserve the right to look at the units for a few minutes -- I
remember wanting one of these ever since I saw the ads in Rainbow &
HotCoCo... I'll be sure to wear a bib, just in case I drool... ;-)
It's much easier to deal with Customs in person, instead of "Hopefully
the correct documentation (but probably not) taped to a box (but
probably not) and waiting 2-3 weeks for Customs to actually find it (but
probably not)." ;-)
Winnipeg is about 13-14 hour drive (one way) from where I live, and my
pocketbook won't stop hemorrhaging until next February (and something
tells me Winnipeg in February ain't the most fun to drive...) so if this
were next June, I could prolly find the time (and the $300 in
gasoline/petrol) but he's indicated that his timeframe won't allow that.
Just tryin' to spread the word,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
Well, this is more than a child?s dream. This THE child?s dream :D
Got today an Ozone with 1 proc, 768MB RAM and no hard disks
:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
It is working, I already downloaded the Irix install media and found some
36GB HDs that seems to fit :D
Just want to share it with you :D :D :D I?m so happy!!! It may be a toy, but
I ALWAYS wanted to have a SGI computer :D
I even got the original granite SGI keyboard. So bad I wasn?t able to find
the matching mouse :(
Now I just need to find a proper sled (at least one) for the hard disks. I
think I can order one from ebay.
W00T!!! I?ll play DOOM on that!!! :D :D :D
Uhuuuu! :D
Alexandre
(happy as a child on xmas with a brand new toy :D)
(photos soon, as soon as I have some free time)
Well, incluiding the HUGE pack of hardware I got today (and the SGI =D) I
got an A3311A SCSI hard drive enclosure from HP. How hard is it to find
drive sleds? It has three, a pair of 9,1GB drive and a 18GB drive. I want to
find at least four drive sleds (ideally 5) so I can put my 4 36GB drives on
it, and make it avaiable for the SGI, Ultra 60 or HP9000
BTW, is there such a thing like a SCSI selector, so I can direct the scsi
array for one computer or another?
Thanks
Alexandre
It was sold by Montgomery Ward, and I believe it is a repackaged RCA system
(uses the 1802). I have scans of literature if you want more info.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: CyberVision 2000
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Anyone know anything about this computer? Google reveals almost nothing.
>
> According to an email I just received, it was sold in the mid 1970's in
> department
>
> stores around Washington, DC. Email claims before the TRS-80 and Apple
> II.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
Hi,
Anyone know anything about this computer? Google reveals almost nothing.
According to an email I just received, it was sold in the mid 1970's in
department
stores around Washington, DC. Email claims before the TRS-80 and Apple II.
Thanks,
Bill
Hi guys,
I have -- just this second -- got the standalone, single-board
DiscFerret hardware ("0I06") to image a disc. First, the proof:
Scatter plot:
http://www.discferret.com/temp/dat.scatter.png
Histogram:
http://www.discferret.com/temp/dat.histogram.png
Raw transition data, gzipped space-separated format. First column is
array index, second column is the timing value:
http://www.discferret.com/temp/dat.gz
Rawbinary track dump, gzipped. Most significant bit of each byte is the
status of the INDEX sensor (1=index detected). If (x&0x7f) = 0, then a
counter carry occurred -- the next byte should have 128 added to it.
Repeated counter-carries are allowed.:
http://www.discferret.com/temp/dat.bin.gz
MagScan analyser output for dat.bin:
http://www.discferret.com/temp/dat.magscan.txt
For those of you who have a copy of the sources to my Magdecode decoder
engine (I know I sent it to at least one person on-list...), the
Rawbinary dump should load straight into Magdecode. The space-separated
data can be loaded straight into Gnuplot (which is what I used to
produce the plots), and I suspect MATLAB and Octave can probably load it
too.
The image file was created from an old coverdisc from "PC Zone"
magazine, and is completely undated on the label. The volume label is
"PCZ_OCT_3" which suggests it's from October, with last-modified dates
in February and August 1993. It only covers Track Zero, which (if memory
serves) is the MBR, FAT and Root Directory. The disc is 720K DOS format,
sampled at 40MHz.
Other things to note:
- The hardware works fine at 80MHz, and possibly faster than that. It
should be possible to sample with enough resolution to image a 5Mbps MFM
hard disc.
- There are plenty of spare registers. The new PIC uses 8-bit
multiplexed addressing, which gives 256 register addresses. Only 16 are
in use at the moment (!)
- Write support isn't enabled yet. I need to port this across from
DiscRW and test it (and no doubt rewrite parts of it, as I did with the
reader engine).
Surprisingly, there are only a few minor issues on the 0I06 PCBs:
- C6 is missing a polarity marker. This is a non-issue, as one end
connects to the ground plane and the other quite obviously connects to
+5V.
- Some of the component pads are rather small (notably the inductors
and Schottky diodes in the power supply). This makes it hard to heat
both the pad and the component pin at the same time, and thus makes the
parts a bit of a pig to solder. I worked around this with a hot-air gun,
preheater and solder paste... later boards will have bigger pads.
- The power supply chip is a QFN with pads under the chip. The only
way to solder it down is to use a hot-air gun... unfortunately TI don't
make this chip in a more accessible package, and the only viable
alternative would have nearly doubled the size of the power supply.
Despite these issues, it's perfectly possible to assemble a 0I06 and
have it work perfectly, without any "green-wire" fixes. I'm impressed:
usually a first-spin board needs at least one track-cut and a couple of
green-wires :)
Now here's where you guys come in.
I really don't want to have boxes and boxes of unused boards and parts
hanging around, so I need to know how many people would like to buy a
DiscFerret. These would be available as:
- PCB only
- PCB with the power supply section assembled and tested
- Fully assembled and tested PCB
- Some other form -- feel free to make suggestions!
I'd appreciate it if anyone interested in buying a DiscFerret could
email me at philpem at philpem.me.uk, with one of the following in the
subject line (start, end, on its own, uppercase, lowercase -- anything
will do, my procmail rule is pretty lenient):
- "I want a PCB on its own" -- DISCFERRETBARE
- "I want a PCB with the PSU built and tested" -- DISCFERRETPSU
- "I want the whole thing ready-built" -- DISCFERRETBUILT
- "I want a DiscFerret in some other form" -- DISCFERRETOTHER
Thanks to everyone who has supported the project thus far -- your
thoughts, ideas, comments and criticisms have been very useful!
Now to get my reflow oven working and build some prototypes... :)
Thanks!
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
Thanks to the ever-useful JP Hindin, I've obtained a set of TRS-DOS
disks and other application disks for my TRS-80 Model II system, which
is the entire setup pictured here, plus a bit more:
http://oldcomputers.net/pics/TRS-80-II_table.JPG
It's been sitting, covered, pretty much since I obtained it, but now I
can try reviving it and actually seeing what it can do. I'm going to
tear into it and clean the drives and so forth, document what it has,
etc. and then boot 'er up and see what we can see.
I'm looking for a copy of the Technical Ref manual for it; despite
finding scans of the covers and so forth online, I'm unable to actually
locate one. In addition to that, if someone has a Shugart 8" Service
Manual, that might come in damned handy for making sure those are up to
speed as well.
Many thanks,
Nathan
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nathan Pralle, Computer Geek
Email: nathan at nathanpralle.com
Web: http://www.nathanpralle.com
Blog: http://www.philosyphia.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/NathanPralle
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Anyone interested in two MaxSpeed MaxStations? One is a SVGA MaxStation
and the other a VGA MaxStation. The SVGA version uses a PS2 kb connector,
the VGA version an AT kb connector. Sorry, no power supplies. These are
free, I'd prefer not to ship, but if I have no local takers then the buyer
to pay shipping costs. I'm in Austin TX. These will go to Goodwill if no
one is interested.
I'm in the very very early stages of shedding the majority of my
collection and this is just the start.
On 2010-11-01 00:02, "Chuck Guzis"<cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2010 at 11:37, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
>> > The important question here - are the programs aware of the RA
>> > register, and can they change it? And can they address the full range
>> > of memory addresses as perceived by the program.
> No they aren't. Their memory exists from 0 to whatever the field
> length is, physically and continously. If they need more, a system
> request can expand their field length provided the system has
> sufficient physical memory to accommodate them. There is no way
> (absent perhaps a system request to get that information) for a
> program to know its real physical base address.
Ok. So, a program would think it addressed a memory space, which was
it's own, and the addresses it used would in no way related to the
actual physical memory it ended up referring to.
I'd call that virtual memory.
Although, having to map the whole virtual memory as one chunk to
physical memory makes it a little more work, end less flexible than
having pages. And it pretty much prevents you from ever being able to
share memory in a reasonable way between processes.
>> > Another word for swapping in and out?
> But much older and specific to the architecture and not done in
> pieces as a tranditional VM swap file would be.
Hmm. I don't think swapping is considered to be done in pieces today
either, although swapping is also a term that seems to be defined
differently depending on which OS we're talking about. Unix systems can
both page and swap. Swapping is throwing everything out to disk,
including some kernel structures for the process. Don't happen that
often nowadays... Paging is normally enough.
> I'll take the coward's way out and use the dictionary here:
>
> "1. Existing or resulting in essence or effect though not in actual
> fact, form, or name"
>
> So my definiton of "fooling the user into thinking he has more
> physical memory than he actually has" is certainly valid.
>
> And the VAX sense is also true, but only if one takes along with it
> the ability to over-commit memory space such that the amount of
> addressable memory (i.e. the sum of all users' memory) is greater
> than the physical memory present.
>
> A single task running on a VAX with at least as much physical memory
> as addressing space would not be using the virtual memory facility--
> every bit is reflected in the presence of real memory.
>
> But then, we fall on marshy ground again, when we consider the old
> "roll/swap" multiuser situation. I can run 8 jobs, each requiring
> 65K of memory on a system with 128K physical memory, simply by
> selecting when I give each a time slice and swapping/rolling them out
> as needed. So is that virtual?
Indeed. I remember (not so fondly) running on a PDP-11/70 back in the
80s. The machine was running RSTS/E V7, and the system allows max 63
jobs. We were at times actually 63 users running on that machine, and it
only have 1.5M of memory. It was swapping a lot, and things sometimes
went slow, but it worked perfectly fine. Seeing a machine today with
over 60 users is not common, and I'm not sure it would feel a single bit
more pleasant than the RSTS/E system I used back then...
And I'd still claim that the memory used by each process was definitely
virtual. And I'm willing to continue to fight for that view. Besides,
for the PDP-11, that is what DEC called it. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol