Tony writes:
> Tim writes:
>> Having worked with 1103's I would argue that by modern standards
>> Even the "cream of the crop" were little above floor sweepings.
> Was it that a lot of new 1103s were DOA, oe what there a problem with
> them fialing in use, or what?
> The reason I ask is that I have several old HP calculators full of 1103s,
> and AFAIK all are original (and gettign on for 40 years old). So far,
> otuch wood, I've not had any problems with the RAM in these machines.
How many hundreds of 1103's are in each HP calculator? :-)
In the early minicomputer 1103-based memories (say 16Kbytes, so
128 1103 chips) it was, um, optimistic to expect a lot of stability.
In the bigger "supermini" systems (say 128 Kbytes, so over a
thousand 1103 chips) ECC was a necessity and continual scrubbing
helped a lot with stability - but that was a lot of work and power
consumption just to brag that you had semiconductor memory,
and the advantages over core were not all that obvious.
I'd expect that smaller systems probably didn't have ECC or scrubbing
but also didn't have high expected uptime. Were 1103's in the HP 9830?
I had a couple but they usually worked fine enough that I never had
to go rummaging through the insides.
My feeling is that in the 1103 era (which preceded my direct
involvement but I inherited several 1103-based systems), DRAM chips
were not quite ready for prime time. By the time the 4116 came
along things had settled down and a lot had been learned from
the 1103 and DRAM really was ready for prime time.
Tim.
Hi,
I don't know if this tread is still valid, but I have such a mouse with
a blue cover and white buttons. The mouse was especially made in this
color combination for our long gone firm. It's a quadrature mouse but I
have a special developed serial interface card for it too. It served to
couple the mouse to a Digital PRO350/380 (personal PDP11) computer.
Regards,
Hugo
My request was apparently a little hazy.
The machine I refer to is a Packard-Bell 486SX running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1
By "legacy machine" I meant a machine that was "slightly behind the times". 8D
Thanks,
Kurt
I know this isn't old... but I'm trying to rescue an Omnitech 16878-US
GPS from
the recycling bin.....
It boots, gives the Go!, Maps, and Setting icons, you can touch any of
them, get
a click sound, and then... locked up solid.
I applied a 'quick fix' from them, but that didn't fix anything.
I believe that it is more likely the software on the SD card has gotten
damaged
somehow.
Anybody have one of these ?
Would like to get it working.
It is a WinCE 5.0 based PDA basically (restricted to run the software
provided
of course).
-- Curt
> From: Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
>
> I'm thinking about making punched cards. I could need some information about the material used for
> them. Precise information about tolerances, specifications, references to more information, and so
> on would be quite helpful.
I have read the follow up e-mails too and wonder why you want to do this. If you want cards for storing data why do you need to print on the cards first? I have a loads (110,000) of cards of the right shape which I use for my mainframe. They are already printed up with every two columns marked out as one column of mark sense boxes but of course the mainframe doesn't see the markings. I have probably more than I will ever need in my lifetime. I even use them for keeping hand written notes and my ex-ICT engineer friend folds them in two, pushes the pins of a PCB through them and marks the bay number, carrier level and card position the card came from on them. If you want, I can sell you some at less than the commercial suppliers rate and I think less than they would cost to tool up to make them. Carriage is of course another question. I have been buying up local supplies of 11" by 14.5" fan fold paper for less than the carriage costs from say 50 miles away. I see your suffix is .de, I guess that's Denmark or is it Germany? At least there'd be no customs issues but I would think carriage would still be quite expensive. I'm not sure my card equipment would be happy without rounded corners. I know there were hardware modifications listed for dealing with cards with and without diagonally cut corners at leading/trailing edges. There's also the possibility of paper cuts for the operators. I think my IBM 029 keypunch uses the rounded corner to push the card guide down when it registers the card at the punching station. I think a square cut card would jam up.
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-November/294055.html
[Alexandre Souza]
> Andrew, Am I wrong, or the 68000 IC is a **very common**
microprocessor?
>:oO
I wouldn't call them common but certainly not rare either. It is the
thought of really nice and still useful ceramic 68Ks being reduced to toxic
sludge for a tiny bit of gold that bothers me.
They could easily be sold for much more than the value of the metal
recovery. eBay has them going for $8 to $50 or more each. Also amateur
gold scrappers have a nasty habit of making a mess with their chemical
waste.
Andrew Lynch
I am continuing my exploration of the SacState 8008 boot PROM code
(using James Markevitch's listing), and have a little more
understanding of the escape codes I was asking about previously (in
the thread 'identifying terminal by escape codes')
It looks like the SacState machine was built as a card that plugged
into a 4023 terminal motherboard. My current assumption is the data
going out of the 8008 card (i.e. where the code on the PROM is
running) is interacting with the other cards on the 4023 bus directly.
My further assumption is that there must have been some kind of block
device (tape or disk?) that was also on that same bus, and that some
of the escape codes must be doing some sort of device selection (i.e.
signalling that the next chunk of data is intended to be read from, or
written to, a specific device, not read from keyboard or displayed on
screen).
I am not clear as to whether the other devices are interfacing via
- a commercial 'dedicated' I/O card, e.g. a drive controller (if any existed?)
- a commercial 'generic' I/O card, e.g. a serial I/O and an
'intelligent' device is being controlled
- a custom made I/O card that plugged directly into the 4023 bus
The only 4023 documentation I can find online is the User Manual, which has:
- a list of bus signals, which confirm there are enough signals
available to construct complex device I/O
- a list of accessory cards, including a serial 'Data Communications
Interface', a 'hard copy unit', and 'audio recorder card' (tape
controller ).
- a reference to a 4023 service manual, which has a 'theory of
operation' which may describe enough of the bus protocol to work out
how the 8008 PROM could be interacting with other devices on that BUS.
So my questions are -
- were any commercial accessory cards available for the 4023 other
than the ones listed in the back of the user manual? If so, does any
documentation for them exist?
- is the 4023 "service manual" available through any means?
Cheers
Jonno