On 10/18/10, David Gari <dgari at msn.com> wrote:
>
> I may be able to help. I've worked for Morrow Designs (Thinker Toys),
> Wordstar (MicroPro) and Stoneware (DBMaster). Yes, I am older than Godbout.
> I have pwned two Altairs and an IMSAI. I took a tour of the giant (empty)
> Cromemco facility back in the day. Sooo much promise. So sad.
Sounds like you have a few stories to tell.
My only experience with Godbout gear was using a couple of the
full-sized boxes loaded with SRAM cards, serial ports (over a dozen
lines) and a MC68K processor board - it was a proof-of-concept
prototype for an X.25 WAN router that was a logical descendant of the
CompuServe PDP-11-based serial I/O nodes (same architect, different
company). I don't remember a single problem with the hardware - rock
solid.
When the company closed, I gave a 4' stack of enclosures to a friend
in town. I should ask him if he's ever done anything with them (I am
positive he hasn't discarded them - he's not the type).
I have a Morrow Designs OEM ADM-20 terminal that I took with me to
VCFmw, but I was unable to get more than baud barf out of it. I
should hang an HP 4951 off of it to see what it's really doing.
Care to share any interesting stories from the S-100 trenches?
-ethan
I see there still are a few folks on Erik's VC forum trying unsuccessfully
to sign up on cctalk; wasn't there some talk recently about taking some of
the load off Jay's plate and giving approval authority to one or two other
people?
Or are new members intentionally being discouraged to keep down the volume,
etc., as some folks are speculating?
mike
For those that can listen to CBC Radio 1 / As-It-Happens show / tonight
6:30-8:00, there is to be an interview with the guy that wants to build
the Analytical Engine.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Rich Alderson <RichA at vulcan.com> wrote:
>
> Doesn't matter that it's crap if it contains an interesting verb form
> not seen before, or mentions an historical fact only known previously
> from a single source.
>
I keep thinking that Today will be lost forever because nobody thinks it is
important NOW.
Example: My daughter does not save her digital pictures on a computer
because it is too much trouble and, besides, there is more room on the
memory card. When the room gets too low, she deletes pictures from her
camera because they are from last year and who cares about last year.
> Emulators are great for a lot
> of things (offtopically, especially running WinXP in a sandbox) but
> aren't nearly so helpful when trying to get original hardware working
> again...
I have to disagree. Only last Wednesday I was single shotting my simulator and the real hardware to find where they diverged. It showed up the fault after a few hundred instructions instead of running for a half a second before crashing (by which I mean the hardware stopping because it detected the loading of an instruction where one of the digits was not binary coded decimal).
I am also working on a deeper simulator which models the actual gates of the computer and their interconnections. The source code of this describes the computer in great detail and I would say would be better than real hardware from some purposes. It will also allow monitoring of signals with a virtual oscilloscope and maybe one day, the introduction of simulated faults to test the brains of anyone mad enough to want to see how the original engineers would tackle faults. One day it might even have a 3D graphical interface where you can walk around the machine, open covers and connect your virtual 'scope and the original sounds recorded from the real hardware, like the drum running up.
Roger Holmes
ICT 1301 + many Apples - ][, ///, Lisa, and Mac up to the latest MacBook Pro.
-----Original Message-----
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010 5:31:40 pm
From: "William Donzelli"
Even the Romans had something like mass production for their armies.
Romans invented the Hamburger :)
=Dan
I didn't buy it, but I spotted a VAX 11/751 with Applicon branding on
it at a surplus dealer. I will upload some photos I took to a picasa
web album tonight. If there is any interest in purchasing it, contact
me and I'll put you in touch with the dealer.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:35:47 +0100
From: Andrew Back <andy at flirble.org>
Subject: Re: Xerox Alto on ebay (not mine!)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
On (21:02 15/10/10), Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > Teo Zenios wrote:
> > > There are many old machines that are worth preserving but are better
> > > off
> > > in a museum then in somebody's cluttered basement left to rot.
> >
> > There are cases where that's true - but I know how museums can't
> > possibly
>
> I feel even more strongly about this, having dealt with some particularly
> clueless people at musuems and related organisations [1]. To the extent
> that no part of my collection is ever going near a museum.
Tony, does a week ever pass where you don't feel the inescapable urge to
flame those who work at museums, regardless of their knowledge, ability and
track record?
You are rude and insulting. Yes, damned rude even. How dare you make such
sweeping generalisations? If the subject of your disapproval were a
particular race or subscribers of a certain religion this would not be
tolerated. Yet somehow it is and you get to flap your jaw, spewing out utter
nonsense asserting that everyone who works at a museum is an idiot, and we
have to put up with it. And *you know full well* that there are plenty of
people who work and volunteer at museums on this list. Oh, I'm not one, in
case you wondered.
...
So, how about this. Have you ever considered that if you slightly adjusted
your attitude and learnt to work with people rather than lambasting them,
you might actually contribute to the preservation of computer history for
future generations.
But, no, it's much easier to take the moral high ground and boast about how
clever you are and how much of an idiot most everyone else is.
Andrew
--------------- REPLY:
Whoa!
Talk about "rude and insulting," and making "sweeping generalizations"...
He said he's dealt with "some particularly clueless people at museums;" how
did you get "everyone who works at a museum is an idiot" out of that?
And if he and Curt decide that based on their bad experiences they won't
lend their systems again to a museum, I think that's their choice to make.
Finally, to suggest that he hasn't in fact "contributed to the preservation
of computer history" is preposterous and highly insulting; I don't see many
reverse-engineered HP schematics or extremely helpful posts "working with
people" on here with your name on them...
Not many of his contributions are relevant to my interests but I for one
certainly appreciate the time he spends helping the folks on here, in the HP
community and elsewhere (even if his rants are a little repetitive at times)
;-)
Sheesh!
mike
>(I often think that the downside of ebay is that an item goes to the person > with the deepest pockets, and they're not necessarily the best person to treat > an item nicely)>> >> So eBay is precisely like every other market on the planet.>> >> Shocking. <rolls eyes>><rolls eyes back> I don't think that I claimed that it wasn't. My point was >that it often has a downside when it comes to getting items to people who are >best capable of preserving them for future generations.
My appologies, Jules.
I had taken your comment as Yet Another instance of the weekly "eBay sucks because people pay more than I would and, as a special snowflake Classic Computer person, I'm an authority and anyone who pays more than I would is an idiot" thread, when in reality it was Yet Another instance of the weekly "eBay sucks because anyone who outbids me is certainly almost possibly definately as far as I'm concerned, as a Special Snowflake classic computer person, unworthy to own it" thread. I sometimes lack the patience to keep track of the multitude of ways that list members condescend to the world at large.
My bad.
> >> I've taken this as an opportunity to reorganize the documentation
> section of the retroarchive.org site a bit - It's now split between
> hardware& software docs instead of being mixed together.
> >>
> >> http://www.retroarchive.org
FWIW, Norton Internet Security 2011 calls http://www.retroarchive.org a
"known malicious web site" for a "malformed container violation" which
Norton characterizes as a virus.
Tom