> test equipment seems to be a poorly covered area in the museum
> and archive world.
I was thinking about this some more last night, and there is little
activity preserving the software for test equipment. Brokers keep the
manuals and the hardware, but rarely keep the software to make it work.
For example, the Biomation CLAS 9000 logic analyzer had no built in
user interface; it was a SCSI periperial connected to a Macintosh.
They didn't document the protocol to talk to it, so it is a rather
large boat anchor without a Mac and the software to talk to it.
Then, there are all the PC instruments that had custom cards and software
to talk to their widget. The parts are separated, and no one saves the
card inside the PC or the software to make it work.
I can buy or trade but I would prefer to trade. I have a large
collection of S-100 cards and some other goodies to work a trade
with. If it has the CUTTER ROM, all the better. If not, I can
burn a 2708 (and I'll probably post a "Wanted: CUTTER ROM dump"
message).
Thanks,
Bill Sudbrink
I have to assume then that the software that ran on the 3*'s was a later development then the stuff that ran on the Televideo Personal Mini series (80286 based). Dubbed Infoshare, which was an OEM release of early Netware (and I am looking for it). Other boxes that come to mind are the Northstar Dimension (80186), and an Altos box. Not sure what they ran though. There was a PM/286 too, which ran a later version of Infoshare IINM.
?Anyone familiar w/the Burroughs '286 boxes that also weren't MS-DOS based?
?Sorry didn't mean to *help* hijack the thread. That is a very interesting piece. The peculiar 68k stuff is far and away the rarer birds though, sadly snifful.
regardless, and be sure I am no expert on semiconductor manufacturing, I'd be surprised to find out that all 8088's were CMOS after a certain date. The 80c88's were used mostly in small laptops, no? (small being anything smaller then that Zenith big honker, w/the shocking blue display. It used a *real* 8088 IINM). A CMOS version would be slower and more prone to damage from static electricity. And it would require less power. Off the top of my head I can't think of any desktops that used them, but I may have actually ran into 1 or 2 in my travels.
?But I am glad you managed to answer your own question Jimbo :)
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> wrote:
From: Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org>
Subject: Re: 8088 vs. 80c88
To: General at mail.mobygames.com, "On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:49 PM
Jim Leonard wrote:
> So a simple routine to try to identify the 8088 vs. the 80c88 would look something like:
>
>???mov? ???cx,2? ? ? ? ? ? ; test if following instruction will be
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???; repeated twice.
>???db? ? ? 0F3h,26h,0ACh???; rep es: lodsb
>???jcxz? ? Yes? ? ? ? ? ???; intel non-CMOS chips do not care of rep
>???jmp? ???Nope? ? ? ? ? ? ; before segment prefix override, NEC and
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???; CMOS-tech ones does.
It turns out my information is bad.? The bug only asserts itself when an interrupt occurs during the REP.? Buggy CPUs don't continue; later ones do.? So to fix my detection code, I will increase the count in cx to something much longer, probably f000.
-- Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org)? ? ? ? ? ? http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:? ? ? ? ???http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at? ???http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
Dr. Dobbs was pretty cool... up until the IBM PC came out and
dominated everything. By the mid 80's all the Dr. Dobbs articles
were the-latest-TSR-to-do-something-in-MSDOS and it wasn't really
worth the effort for me to even look for something interesting
in it. That may have marked my turning point towards classic
computing, in fact :-).
Tim.
-- "james" <james at jdfogg.com> wrote:
>> Here are some pics of a Novell file server circa 1987.
>> http://bitsavers.org/pdf/novell/68k_file_server
>>
>> Was wondering if anyone had documentation or software for
>> this. I had some of the external dual drive scsi boxes for
>> these at one point.
>
>
>This reminds me of a similar oddity I used to support years
>ago. 3Com made a server, and an OS called 3+ Open. As I
>recall, it was an OS/2 - LAN Manager derivative.
Ah yes, the era of the 3Server is forever seared into my
brain; my first *real* job in the computer business involved
the care and feeding of several generations of these beasties.
The Original 3Server (about the same vintage as the Novell
unit pictured earlier) used an 80188 and a heavily modified
version of MS-DOS. It used an early SCSI implementation,
which was closer to SASI, to attach MFM disks and QIC tapes
via Adaptec bridge boards.
Because there were neither video nor ISA bus, there was more
room for contiguous DOS memory; something over 700k, which
pertty cool at the time. They originally were equipped with
30MB drives, but then the 3Server70 had an 80Mb (unformatted)
unit by Vertex.
These early boxes had the (optional) QIC tape in an external
box; the 3Server3 introduced in 1986 (IIRC) had disk and tape
in one box; in addition the 3Server3 could be interfaced with
appletalk, and also sported the then-new LIM memory used to
speed up the operating system.
These 80188 systems all used either 3+Share or EtherSeries
NOS's for basic drive sharing. IN addition, 3+Mail, 3+Route
(for routing e-mail between sites), 3+Backup and other network
applications were supported under the 3+Share NOS (in <1Mb
RAM).
These were followed by the 3S400 & 3S500 machines, which are
not interesing as they are little more than stock ISA 80386
machines running at 16MHz. These guys could run 3+Share, or
3+Open (a.k.a. OS/2 LanMan as pointed out above). ISTR that
they added TCP/IP late in that products life.
Then Novell took over the world and all of the above 'stuff'
died in obscurity.
It was at this point where I learned in my life that I had a
knack for picking losers.
I need a stiff drink now . . . .
____________________________________________________________
Wasting money? Stop, now. Click here for top online coupon websites.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw3g7mjTpd5rxcCErbhdwKhlKnl…
I've been reading the now increasingly mistitled thread on alignment disks, and it's gotten me thinking. What IS required to make alignment disks? I've always aligned malfunctioning floppy drives "the wrong way", using a known good disk - or an original software disk. On the Commodore 64 (and most systems, really), you can get the drives working well enough like this, but as others have pointed out, it's not the "right way". I just don't have any alignment disks. "Good enough" is much better than "not at all", and I don't mess with the drive alignment unless I have to. I'd love to be able to align drives properly though. And that requires an alignment disk.
There are different kinds of alignment disks too - analog and digital, ones that are intended to be used with a special program on a particular computer, and those intended to be used with a scope.
With today's modern machining technology, it should definitely be possible to create a system to write new alignment disks. Starting with a standard floppy drive, you could replace the stepper drive with something more precise and controllable. Then, you have to somehow accurately calibrate this whole thing. Is there a document out there that describes the track layout of a standard (say, 5 1/4" 48tpi, 40 track) diskette? There has to be a spec, one that describes exactly the distance between tracks, the width of a track, and the distance from the center hub to the beginning of the first track. If you had that information, and precision measurement tools, one could set up and calibrate the drive to spec.
Then, of course, there needs to be a controller for the thing, a computer interface to control the precise positioning of the head, as well as being able to read/write to the disk.
It's possible. It's beyond the equipment and tools at my disposal, but it's definitely doable for a hobbyist who has access to a machine shop and good tools.
Anyone out there a machinist? :)
-Ian
've got two of these systems. One is working, one may have a bad
PSU. Very cool-looking clone of the Sparc in a large tower/deskside
case. Yours to pick up in the Chicago area (60074.) Shipping would
be tough; these are heavy. I've also got a bunch goodies including
the special Solaris distro for Fujitsu and some manuals.
Come 'n' get 'em!
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
Hi folks. Does anyone have an electronic copy of the manual for
the Fujitsu M2312 SMD drive? I need to configure two of them for use
on an Emulex SC72 controller and I need to know how to set the DIP
switches.
Lacking an electronic copy, does anyone have a paper copy, and if
so, would you be willing to scan or type in the relevant pages?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Today my wife and daughter were at Goodwill and found a Atari Portfolio in the box with a working Portfolio in it, a 32MB memory card, smart parallel interface, and a file manager/tutorial card with all the manuals/papers for everything. Cost was only $1 plus tax. That got me a few other goodies too. Life is good.
John K.
To Bill Maddox: Your ISP is using an outdated DNSBL that is blocking all
ip addresses (see http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/tqmcube/)
Please send me your mailing address and I'll get the guide out to you
asap. Just paypal me the amount shown on the postage meter sticker when
it arrives.
tnx.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
(slowly working through some boxes...)
DEC VT102 Video Terminal Users Guide. Pub #EK-VT102-UG-003
219 pages.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
Soft Sector magazine, Sept 1986.
This mag is dedicated to the Sanyo Personal Computer.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
For the cost of postage:
TK50 Subsystem User's Guide. Pub #EK-OTK50-UG-004
LN03 Programmer's Reference Manual. Pub #EK-OLN03-RM-001
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
Hello all,
Please, no flames if you don't consider an Ultra 30 a "classic
computer". :-) At 300 MHz, it's not terribly recent either.
My system is a Sun Ultra 30, 300 MHz, 1.7 GB RAM and a 16 GB hard
disk. Trying to install Solaris 10 10/08. The initial installation
reboots after having copied Solaris to the hard disk and the machine
freezes at the line "creating new dsa pair"... I've given it a few
hours on several occasions with no success.
Note that NetBSD works just fine on this system and that I encountered
the same DSA key problem with Solaris 10 4/08. Also, I had had
significant trouble installing NetBSD initially because of defective
memory (the system would freeze at "boot cdrom" until I removed the
offending items). Once the problem with the memory was resolved, the
NetBSD installation worked perfectly and I presume that the remaining
sticks are fine. Finally "boot -k" (after the Solaris installation
has copied Solaris to the hard disk) yields no further details.
- Alex
> I'd like to try and get as much of that as possible on Bitsavers;
> what is the usual process for doing that? I don't have a scanner handy
> and I really don't have the time to manually scan 1000+ pages of docs.
Either loans in chunks to be scanned at CHM, or I have loaner scanner systems
that can be sent there.
> I get the impression
> that there is NO effort by any official archive to collect manuals and
> such
Stanford Library special collections have the Ampex and Apple archives,
which contain manuals.
The Charles Babbage Institute at the University of Minnesota as well as
the institution I work for (The Computer History Museum) have extensive
manual collections. Test equipment is out of the scope of CBI or CHM's
collecting scope, though.
> test equipment seems to be a poorly covered area in the museum
> and archive world.
But seems to be getting coverage from private collectors and some companies
(like Agilent).
If there were significant numbers of people from universities at this conference,
you should have noticed that they have problems enough trying to fund the archiving
of the contents that their own institutions, without actively collecting on
the outside.
This reminds me of a friend from years ago that was a fan of steam traction engines.
No "official" institution collected documentation on them, but there were preservation
organizations that kept their own archives. The problem, of course, is if the society
is disbanded without a long-term recipient for the material collected.
I am happy to report that my large S-100 collection is going to a single
person, both to expand his own collection and for eventual sale to other
collectors. [sigh!] If only I had another 400 sq ft and another 40
hours/week.
Thanks to everyone who responded with some good ideas (and requests!). The
important thing to me is that it is all going to someone who will not be
cutting off connectors to melt down for gold! I'm sure that he will let
list members know what he has available in the next few months.
Bob Stek
Former Saver of Lost Sols
> Hmm. Yeah, I've never heard of Nicolet either. Interesting find!
In the early 80's the company I worked for had a very neat little
portable audio-range FFT spectrum analyzer called the
"Mini-Ubiquitous". Always wanted one.
In '92 the USAF transferred me to Dayton OH (home of Mendelson's
Surplus) and they had one sitting in the pile of instruments for quite
some time... but they wanted $400 for it.
So they are hardly "ubiquitous" since I've only spotted two :)
-Charles
ps anyway I acquired an HP 3580A for $100 at the Hamvention which was
an easy fix...
anyone know where I can get some decent knobs for it?
Larry,
>From the info you gave and the info I have, I offer the following.
You need a "CP / M boot disk", not an MS-DOS boot disk for the Kaypro 2X -
either 2.2H or 2.2G. CP / M.
Your mainboard shoud be an 81-294 [underneath board usually under serial
port] and the ROM version should be 81-292-A - white label on the about 1" size
chip at U47.
But since you have a Turbo upgrade, the chip may have just a Turbo
designation. Any manufacturer designation and revision / year, etc. could also be
important.
Also check what the U43 chip label is - usually again a white label on a 1"
size chip.
There is also a Kaypro 2X / MTC version.
How do you really know it is a 2X - cover designation, back plate
designation, etc.?
These are all common questions many ask and many of us answer as best we can
>from the info you give and the info we have
All the best and keep us informed of your progress.
We like to keep "vintage" computers running and in "good homes!"
==========================================================================
In a message dated 2/11/2009 9:42:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
laptoplarry at gmail.com writes:
Frank,
Thank you for the information!
My original plan is/was to retrieve my Compaq Portable (my wife buried it in
a closet) to create a boot disk...only to find that I could not
locate the MS-DOS boot disk for the Compaq?!?!
While in the closet, I also retrieved a MacPlus that booted A-OK from a
removable hard drive...except I could not find the mouse!
Mac no mouse = no go...
So, I have no 5.25 360K drive available to create a boot disk for either the
Compaq or the Kaypro :-(
I'm now wondering if I can find a SCSI 5.25 low density drive to attach to
the portable hard drive of the MAC to create a boot disk for the Compaq.
>From the Compaq's DOS I'd be able to create the boot disk for the Kaypro
using the usual tools.
Of course, I'd have to locate a mouse appropriate for the MAC...
I guess the ideal thing would be to find a drive and controller for my
"modern" machine.
I'll check out the leads you gave me. Hopefully some kind soul will send me
a bootable Kaypro disk and/or a MS-DOS disk on 5.25 360K media.
Hey! Ain't this fun!
-Larry
...
--
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message.
Larry,
Go to _www.vintage-computer.com_ (http://www.vintage-computer.com) and do
a
search on that topic.
Also, contact "Sharkonwheels" there - again do a search - he posts a lot.
He is into the Kaypros "after" 1983 versions - i.e. the "2X's", I am into
the 1983 versions.
Looks like it may have been upgraded with the Turbo.
I believe such upgrades are still available for the post 1983 versions -
Advent might be a search word to use. Shark will know. He even sells
modified
Kaypros of that era.
Getting the right boot disk for the specific Kaypro you have is critical -
many do not understand this - today you need Windows - there are not very
many
main options.
Kaypro had about 15 - 20 different versions before they went bankrupt.
Also, in those hectic times, many "unofficial' modifications were made that
may
not have been documented, by Kaypro and previous owners of such computers.
Modifications and upgrades were very common in order to try to keep them
running efficiently, until the inevitable change to windows, after we all
invested so much in those systems, especially our time!
Sometimes you just have to take the top off and look around, especially at
chips at U43 and U47.
Please post your results on that site so others can benefit.
You can check my site out - _www.kayprosts.org_ (http://www.kayprosts.org)
-
under the folder "special" for a draft of my book on computers of that era
and a 2008 Kaypro calendar I did - lots of pictures of my 6 1983 Kaypros
modified to Kaypro " 8 ' 's.
All the best.
Frank
**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
Frank,
Thank you for the information!
My original plan is/was to retrieve my Compaq Portable (my wife buried it in
a closet) to create a boot disk...only to find that I could not
locate the MS-DOS boot disk for the Compaq?!?!
While in the closet, I also retrieved a MacPlus that booted A-OK from a
removable hard drive...except I could not find the mouse!
Mac no mouse = no go...
So, I have no 5.25 360K drive available to create a boot disk for either the
Compaq or the Kaypro :-(
I'm now wondering if I can find a SCSI 5.25 low density drive to attach to
the portable hard drive of the MAC to create a boot disk for the Compaq.
>From the Compaq's DOS I'd be able to create the boot disk for the Kaypro
using the usual tools.
Of course, I'd have to locate a mouse appropriate for the MAC...
I guess the ideal thing would be to find a drive and controller for my
"modern" machine.
I'll check out the leads you gave me. Hopefully some kind soul will send me
a bootable Kaypro disk and/or a MS-DOS disk on 5.25 360K media.
Hey! Ain't this fun!
-Larry
...
--
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message.
Larry,
Go to _www.vintage-computer.com_ (http://www.vintage-computer.com) and do
a
search on that topic.
Also, contact "Sharkonwheels" there - again do a search - he posts a lot.
He is into the Kaypros "after" 1983 versions - i.e. the "2X's", I am into
the 1983 versions.
Looks like it may have been upgraded with the Turbo.
I believe such upgrades are still available for the post 1983 versions -
Advent might be a search word to use. Shark will know. He even sells
modified
Kaypros of that era.
Getting the right boot disk for the specific Kaypro you have is critical -
many do not understand this - today you need Windows - there are not very
many
main options.
Kaypro had about 15 - 20 different versions before they went bankrupt.
Also, in those hectic times, many "unofficial' modifications were made that
may
not have been documented, by Kaypro and previous owners of such computers.
Modifications and upgrades were very common in order to try to keep them
running efficiently, until the inevitable change to windows, after we all
invested so much in those systems, especially our time!
Sometimes you just have to take the top off and look around, especially at
chips at U43 and U47.
Please post your results on that site so others can benefit.
You can check my site out - _www.kayprosts.org_ (http://www.kayprosts.org)
-
under the folder "special" for a draft of my book on computers of that era
and a 2008 Kaypro calendar I did - lots of pictures of my 6 1983 Kaypros
modified to Kaypro " 8 ' 's.
All the best.
Frank
So I've amassed way too much stuff lately and I have a lot of cool stuff
that I never touch anymore, so I'm thinning out my collection a bit to
free up some space. Smallish stuff I'll ship, but the large stuff is
local pick-up only. (Seattle, WA area). Happy to drive out a ways to
meet you if it helps. Make an offer -- no reasonable offer refused.
Stuff that doesn't get claimed 'll probably end up on eBay eventually.
Thanks!
Josh
Monitors:
---------
- Amdek Color II - Works.
- Gateway 2000, 15" Vivitron (does 1280x1024, actually a nice SVGA...)
- Ball 9" CRT
Terminals:
----------
- Intertec InterTube II - Does not work. Makes horrible
hissing/screeching on power-up. Dirty, but will clean up.
- Beehive SuperBee - No keyboard. Needs work. Ugly looking on the
outside, but very clean inside, given how old it is.
- Wang terminal - Cannot find model on case, believe it to be part of an
old Wang word-processing system. Built like a tank.
Computers:
----------
- Compaq Portable III - Worked the last time I powered it up. Hard
drive, 5.25" floppy drive.
- Compaq Portable 386 - Also works. 2MB ram, hard drive. Carrying case
(travel in style!)
- Dell Optiplex, Dual PPro/w P2-Overdrive. No HD, I have RAM somewhere.
- HP 9000/236 - W/Monitor. Works, but floppy controller reports errors
on startup.
- HP 9826 - Was working, but monitor no longer powers up.
- Mac Plus - Not working.
- Pet 2001 (32k) - Works
- CBM 8032 - Works, PCB is a bit hacked up, but works.
- ComputerVision CADDStation 32 - Neat old Sun3-based machine I
inherited awhile back. Really heavy, no I will not ship. Just the
machine, none of the various CAD-related input devices. Mostly working
-- CPU board needs repair (but it's just a rebadged Sun3 VME processor
board so it's not impossible to find parts...)
SGI Personal Iris 4D/35 + Iris File. No RAM, alas. Chassis has a bit
of rust, but is otherwise solid.
TRS-80 Model II + external 8" drive box (w/2 drives installed). Works,
a bit worn. (Have not tested all the drives.)
Laptops:
--------
A goodish stack of older laptops. 386, 486, and Pentium. Ask for
details. Take one, take all... take as many as you want!
Misc:
-----
CBM 2031 5.25" floppy drive - works
CBM 4040 dual 5.25" drive - does not work.
DECServer 200/MC. Appears to work. Never took the time to set up a
machine with LAT, etc... to try it out.
HP 1200B Oscilloscope. Rack mountable, Dual trace. Needs some repair
(trace does not scan across the screen correctly.)
> I wonder what happed to apple's cray?
Traded in for a smaller model in the early 90's. It had little practical
use after the Aquarius project was killed. Last use for the Cray-ette was
as a backup system with the large tape robot that was attached.
In its prime, they had people begging to buy time on the thing, which sat
idle most of the time.
From another mailing list:
> I am glad to announce, that a major European research project, which is related to the preservation of complex digital artefacts, has just started. KEEP (Keeping Emulation Environments Portable) is
funded by the European Community with 3,15 Mio. Euro will go on from now for three years. Aim of the project is to utilize the preservation tools, which are mainly created in the gamer community, for
a broader range of users and purposes. The impact of the project lies also in the structure of the consortium itself: for the first time traditional memory institutions like the national libraries of
France, Germany and Netherlands and researchers with a background in humanitities (University of Portsmouth) come together with organisations specialized in games resp. their preservation (Computer
Game Museum, European Games Developer Federation ) within a common research effort in such a scale. I am pretty sure, that we will be able to boost the awareness of the need to preserve the gaming
culture on that basis and of course provide concrete preservation tools and interfaces to do the job.
>
> More details about the project can be found here:
> http://www.computerspielemuseum.de/index.php?lg=en&main=News&site=02:00:00&…
>
>Subject: Re: 8048 Intel programming languages
> From: Robert Borsuk <rborsuk at colourfull.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:51:42 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Steven and Allison,
> I've spent some time today with SDCC and I'm sorry to say I couldn't
>find any reference to 8048 in it. The 8051 yes. Unfortunately the
>memory structure (specifically the banking and jumping) is different
>between the 8048 and the 8051. How about this: Did they ever
>release any sort of languages for the IMSAI 8048 board?
You have an Imp48????
First if you have a manual I'd appreciate a copy, I've been looking
for 28 years for one! Yes, I have one too, I know the general circuit
for mine by reverse engineering it and I do use it for playing.
As to languages for 8048, IMSAI never did. The concept of a higher level
language for a board with 1K of program space is only a thing you hear
lately. One reason is the limited stack and ram/romspace of the 8048
really does require the efficientcy of assembler. It's possile to create
some varient of a tiny micro basic but then it has to fit in 1K and also
any program in the same 1k. If you working with 8048/9 off that board
more space is possible but remember the ability to address ram without
some banking scheme is limited to 256 bytes. I'd say keep looking
though as I've likely missed a few. I'm sure it's possible to tweak
the code generator in SDCC to do 8048 and it's rare anyone uses more
than 4k. But the compiler logic to do the bank switch is likely insane
since interrupts are only handled in the low memory page. There are all
sorts of cross assemblers out there.
Allison
>
>Rob
>
>
>On Feb 10, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Scanning wrote:
>
>> Rob,
>>
>> I think a good place for you to start is with the Small Device C
>> Compiler
>> ( http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/ ) and see if that will fit your
>> needs. It
>> supports 8048, 8051, etc.. family. Good luck.
>>
>> Best regards, Steven
>
>
>>> Subject: 8048 Intel programming languages
>>> From: Robert Borsuk <rborsuk at colourfull.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:19:04 -0500
>>> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org
>>> >
>>>> Does anyone know of any programming languages (compilers)released
>>>> for
>>> the intel 8048 microcontroller?
>>>
>>
>> Lookup SDCC, Small Device C Compiler. Theres plenty of stuff for
>> 8048/9 family
>> and it's cousin the 8051.
>>
>> Allison
>>
Alrighty --
This info, gleaned from the Emulex SC02 manual:
Fujitsu 2311 and 2312 - Switch settings for * 35 SECTORS *
SW2-1 ON
SW2-2 ON
SW2-3 ON
SW2-4 OFF
SW2-5 OFF
SW2-6 OFF
SW2-7 ON
SW3-1 OFF
SW3-2 OFF
SW3-3 ON
SW3-4 OFF
SW3-5 OFF
SW3-6 OFF
SW3-7 OFF
At least this will be something to go on, if you can't locate a manual.
.. .
Sorry about that -- I no sooner hit "send", when I realized that I
transposed
numbers on the Fujitsu model number.
I don't know how close the model numbers are;
perhaps you can extrapolate the sector settings
based on the 2321 info. . .
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:08:20 +0100
Jos Dreesen / Marian Capel <jos.mar at bluewin.ch> Wrote:
> Mr Ian Primus wrote:
> >
I've heard this doom and gloom talk about "when all the drives are
dead" and "when nothing is left to read $MEDIA" - and while I admit
that these things are likely to happen eventually, I also don't believe
it's a problem for any of us.
> >
> Your are wrong. It might
be true for the common formats, but there are drives out there were the
number of functioning units is approaching zero.
>
> Try finding an Honeywell-Bull D100 "Cynthia" series cartridge drive or media for instance...
>
>
> Jos
Arrg...
Yes, I know all about those drives, and I have one that it is "semi-operational". I worked on these in 1979 and had them connected to a 6800 system. While they worked most of the time, they were a bit picky. They needed 36 volt power supplies as well as others. The controller provided actually did work. The early drives had a secondary board that eventually was replaced with an LSI chip.
Their main problem was that they were a bit (well actually more than that) temperamental. The drives themselves were only 10Mbyte goodies, and used embedded servos with on-track sparing. The disks themselves were "cut-down" from 14 inch media (like 2315's).
Thankfully I eventually replaced these with SMD drives, then 5 1/4 drives with the Xebec 1410 controller (SASI). All on a 6800!
Fun in the early 80's
Hi all,
Just put my Decmate III on ebay if anyones interested.
#300293036980
Rob
Rob Borsuk
email: rborsuk at colourfull.com
Colourfull Creations
Web: http://www.colourfull.com
Does anyone know of any programming languages (compilers)released for
the intel 8048 microcontroller?
Rob
Rob Borsuk
email: rborsuk at colourfull.com
Colourfull Creations
Web: http://www.colourfull.com
Larry,
Go to _www.vintage-computer.com_ (http://www.vintage-computer.com) and do a
search on that topic.
Also, contact "Sharkonwheels" there - again do a search - he posts a lot.
He is into the Kaypros "after" 1983 versions - i.e. the "2X's", I am into
the 1983 versions.
Looks like it may have been upgraded with the Turbo.
I believe such upgrades are still available for the post 1983 versions -
Advent might be a search word to use. Shark will know. He even sells modified
Kaypros of that era.
Getting the right boot disk for the specific Kaypro you have is critical -
many do not understand this - today you need Windows - there are not very many
main options.
Kaypro had about 15 - 20 different versions before they went bankrupt.
Also, in those hectic times, many "unofficial' modifications were made that may
not have been documented, by Kaypro and previous owners of such computers.
Modifications and upgrades were very common in order to try to keep them
running efficiently, until the inevitable change to windows, after we all
invested so much in those systems, especially our time!
Sometimes you just have to take the top off and look around, especially at
chips at U43 and U47.
Please post your results on that site so others can benefit.
You can check my site out - _www.kayprosts.org_ (http://www.kayprosts.org) -
under the folder "special" for a draft of my book on computers of that era
and a 2008 Kaypro calendar I did - lots of pictures of my 6 1983 Kaypros
modified to Kaypro " 8 ' 's.
All the best.
Frank
In a message dated 2/10/2009 11:34:45 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
laptoplarry at gmail.com writes:
The boot disk I have is looking for Turbo ROM.
I guess I need one for the 2X (without Trubo ROM).
Please help or point me in the right direction.
Thanks!
-Larry
--
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message.
**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
Hi folks,
> I suppose someone might magic up a way of creating DIY floppies from
> scratch in a home lab, but I'm not holding my breath.
http://www.madehow.com/Volume-1/Floppy-Disk.htmlhttp://www.mylarstoreonline.com/25ft.html
I think you want the 3mil type (assuming 3mil means 0.003", my knowledge
of non-metric units is getting rusty ;-) )
With this and some iron oxide (from China?) you have the makings of a
floppy disk - you just need a jacket and liner; something to polish it all
with and a pair of scissors (kidding).
-cheers from Julz @p
>
>Subject: Re: Anyone have a line on batteries for the NLS
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:32:31 +0000 (GMT)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Allison wrote:
>> > The only reason batteries are needed to run the NLS is the charger is way
>> > too small run run it directly.
>>
>> I found THAT out the hard way.
>> When I sold my NLS215 at VCF, I had to sell it "AS-IS" because the
>> batteries wouldn't take a charge.
>
>That's quite common with devics powered with rechargeable batteries --
>the charger on its own can't supply enough current to run the device.
For the NLS 'scopes the battery is between the charge source and the
scope power supply so if it's open (badly sulfated as the battery is
lead acid gell type) the PS has to carry the load. It's only a charger.
if you substitute a larger charger then you find the charge circuit
does not have the capacity to start the unit (initial surge current).
>Assuming the battery pack is just a battery (that is, no 'battery
>management' circuitry), you can often run the unit from a bench power
>supply connected to the battery wires _with the battery disconnected_. Of
>course this assuems you have a suitable PSU...
The pack in this case is just 3 2v cells and the "management" is the
charge circuit on the rear board.
In this case (nls miniscopes) a 6V PS can substitute for the battery at
less tha 1A (must be connected to the ground and +6V termianls of the
battery connection point internally). Only if the battery is removed first.
Note that is the battery has failed (usually sulfated from not being kept
charged) they tend to build corrosion around the terminal, they are best
removed and recycled as any gelled lead acid battery should be.
Since I use my miniscopes intermittently I've long since removed the
battery and disconnected the internal charge circuit (pull the fuse).
The battery area has a small board inserted to allow it to accept any
voltage from 9 to 30V and run from that. Since I have a number of small
12V gell cells that fit nicely in the probe pocket of the carry case
this proves more useful and maintainable. The change is completely
reverseable and the ability to use a larger and longer lasting 12V
battery as source is very handy.
The NLS is somewhat unique as it uses a lead acid type rather than NiCd,
Nimh, lithium or even common dry cells. In an emergency I have run it
off 4 'D" sized alkaline cells in an external holder for many hours.
Allison
Hi,
Apologies for the constant stream of questions at the moment, I hope I'm
not consuming too much list bandwidth at the moment. I've brought my
whole collection out of storage and I'm bringing them all back to
working condition and going through a steep old learning curve with my
Unibus machines!
So here are the latest round of questions:
1. I have started work on a second 11/05 I have. At the moment it has a
processor, an 8K core set, NPR cards and a pair of unibus terminators.
At present when powered up the machine has its run light constantly on,
shows what looks like a random set of lights on its address/data LEDs
and doesn't respond on its console.
I have tried swapping the CPU boards and core cards for known working
cards with no success. I have also hooked up a scope and confirmed the
power supply is supplying correct voltages.
Any ideas on what could be causing the bus error?
2. I have a Plessy PM1116/B core card. This is a single slot solution
consisting of driver/sense logic on a card and a core plane on a
daughter board. Does anyone have any details/documentation on this card
or any idea of what slot would be suitable to plug it into (on a 5 1/4"
11/05-8KW backplane).
3. I have an 11/34A (in 5 1/4" box) which is experiencing a similar
constant run light problem to the 11/05. The machine has CPU cards,
terminators, console card and a MOS memory board in it. With both
terminators in, run light stays on. If I halt it, the bus error light is
illuminated.
If I remove the end terminator and power on, the console is responsive
and I can deposit values into memory and read them back.
As with the 11/05 I have connected a scope and checked the power lines
are supplying the correct voltages without any oscillation.
Any ideas?
Many thanks,
Toby
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Would anyone have a pdf of the user manual for the hp 82321A Viper card?
also does anyone know when doing an extended test at boot up is it normal
to get the following errors CRT Alpha Failed Memory failed @ 00512001
Missing Keyboard I am using the 6.2 basic from the hp musuem in Australia.
Jim
The boot disk I have is looking for Turbo ROM.
I guess I need one for the 2X (without Trubo ROM).
Please help or point me in the right direction.
Thanks!
-Larry
--
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message.
>
>Subject: 8048 Intel programming languages
> From: Robert Borsuk <rborsuk at colourfull.com>
> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:19:04 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>>Does anyone know of any programming languages (compilers)released for
>the intel 8048 microcontroller?
>
Lookup SDCC, Small Device C Compiler. Theres plenty of stuff for 8048/9 family
and it's cousin the 8051.
Allison
>
>Rob
>
>
>
>Rob Borsuk
>email: rborsuk at colourfull.com
>Colourfull Creations
>Web: http://www.colourfull.com
Tobias Russell <toby at coreware.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the constant stream of questions at the moment, I hope I'm
> not consuming too much list bandwidth at the moment. I've brought my
> whole collection out of storage and I'm bringing them all back to
> working condition and going through a steep old learning curve with my
> Unibus machines!
Fun things to play with... :-)
> So here are the latest round of questions:
>
> 1. I have started work on a second 11/05 I have. At the moment it has a
> processor, an 8K core set, NPR cards and a pair of unibus terminators.
> At present when powered up the machine has its run light constantly on,
> shows what looks like a random set of lights on its address/data LEDs
> and doesn't respond on its console.
What do you mean by "NPR cards"? Technically there is no such thing.
There is the bus grant cards, and the extended bus grant cards which
also carry the NPR signal.
The normal bus grant cards only carry BG signals, and thus you normally
need to connect/disconnect the NPR wire on the backplane.
The symptoms you describe sounds pretty much like an NPR signal problem,
but of course, it could be a number of different things.
> 2. I have a Plessy PM1116/B core card. This is a single slot solution
> consisting of driver/sense logic on a card and a core plane on a
> daughter board. Does anyone have any details/documentation on this card
> or any idea of what slot would be suitable to plug it into (on a 5 1/4"
> 11/05-8KW backplane).
Normally I seem to remember that memory cards can go anywhere. You
should of course check documentation, as the card can require specific
voltages only available at certain slots.
I don't have any documentation for that card. Bitsavers perhaps?
> 3. I have an 11/34A (in 5 1/4" box) which is experiencing a similar
> constant run light problem to the 11/05. The machine has CPU cards,
> terminators, console card and a MOS memory board in it. With both
> terminators in, run light stays on. If I halt it, the bus error light is
> illuminated.
>
> If I remove the end terminator and power on, the console is responsive
> and I can deposit values into memory and read them back.
>
> As with the 11/05 I have connected a scope and checked the power lines
> are supplying the correct voltages without any oscillation.
>
> Any ideas?
Once more: check the NPR signal.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
They exist, and are listed by DigiKey and Mouser as the dreaded
"non-stock" items. From past experience, this means they will not lift a
finger without an order for 1000s in hand.
Zilog has, in theory, a sample portal. But they've outsourced their web
site to Elbonia and it does not function to the extent of being able to
complete my registration.
Anyone know a source for onsie-twosies on these?
Steve
--
Fellow techies,
While cleaning up today, I came across an 8" floppy in good condition, labeled as follows:
P/N 060025 REV B
DSD 880 DIAGNOSTIC DISKETTE
SINGLE DENSITY, BOOTABLE (DSDMON)
Considering that I've not done any 'classics' collecting for years, I have no use for it. However, I suspect it should be archived and made available for others.
First person to offer me postage/handling costs (say, $5) can have it.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"Quid Malmborg in Plano..."
>
>Subject: Re: Anyone have a line on batteries for the NLS portableoscilloscope?
> From: "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at verizon.net>
> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:14 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Wednesday 04 February 2009 01:51:59 pm Ethan Dicks wrote:
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> The topic of replacement batteries came up in the Yahoo Group
>> for the RB5X, and someone posted a link for 2 volt 2.5 Amp-hour
>> cells (which are apparently used in an older version of the robot
>> than mine)...
>>
>> <http://www.batteryweb.com/hawkersla-detail.cfm?Model=0810-0004&label=singl
>>ecell>
>>
>> I saw the image and immediately thought of my NLS portable oscilloscope.
>> I'd love to refurb mine, but $45 in batteries is a little on the high
>> side for me.
>> Has anyone on the list replaced a set of this sort of battery, and does
>> anyone know of a place that stocks them for a bit less?
>>
>> -ethan
>
>Are we talking about more or less standard gel cells? The 2V terminal voltage
>would seem to indicate so.
>
>Those are *very* standardized, in terms of similar sizes being offered by a
>great many different manufacturers. When I was doing the retail battery
>thing some years back (roughly 1993-5), we carried PowerSonic and one other
>brand I'm not remembering at the moment, and the sizes for similar
>capacities was a pretty good match for the Panasonic units listed in the
>Digi-Key catalog. Folks would come in with all sorts of other units and I
>was usually able to match them up with something that would fit.
>
>I've never seen single cells, but we did have some 4V units which were only
>two cells.
Gates was a major provider of the single 2V cell in the "D" size with tabs
on one end.
NLS used three of them but a 6V monolythic battery with the same outer
dimensions will also work fine as the tabs soldered to the rear board for
mounting and to create a series connection.
The only reason batteries are needed to run the NLS is the charger is way
too small run run it directly.
Allison
>Capacity in any given size of box seems to gradually increase over time. I've
>seen 6, 6.5, and 7AH in exactly the same size container, for example.
>
>Shipping is going to be the worst of it. I'd find some national chain
>convenient to you (Batteries Plus being an example) and then see if you can
>get them to order what you need, and it won't cost you for shipping at all.
>
>Feel free to direct any other battery-related questions my way, if you have
>any. :-)
>
>--
>Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
>ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
>be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
>-
>Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
>M Dakin
Mr. Fox,
I just discovered your message on the Internet. What do you want to know about it. I still have an SMC 70 and SMC 70G, manuals, and accessories in the garage. I purchased my first one about 1984. They were so far ahead of their times. They were even Y2K compatible. The only one that was when the Y2K panic hit.
Cheers,
James
While looking at datasheets of 3.5" floppy drive motor control ICs, the
LB1813 apparently supports four different speeds "out of the box". Pins 15
and 16 are used to select 300, 360, 600 or 720 RPM. So, I know 3.5" drives
with one of the first three speeds, but has anyone ever seen a 720 RPM
drive?
A drive with that IC would be the very common Mitsumi D359.
Christian
Hi,
I was looking for people who might have a Kennedy tapedrive for sale, either working or not, and I stumbled upon your ad. I know iT's been like year, but, are you still looking for those boards for your 9100 tapedrive? Or did you find them?
Owen W.
(I used to own a 9100 and my friend had tow others. Gov't auction)
Hi,
My brother has requested to borrow a CD. So whilst
hunting around for it I came across his old walkman. However, I had not
realised that it still contained a battery in it. The walkman is over
15 years old, and since my brother moved out around 2002 it makes the
battery atleast 7 years old!
Here is a link to a page I quickly set up with some pics:
http://www.geocities.com/aliensrcooluk/public/BatteryInWalkman.html
The reason I am emailing the group, is because a power adaptor (wall wart) was sat underneath the walkman and has some brown paint-like marks on it. I am assuming this is from the battery and am wondering what is the safest way to clean it off without ruining the adaptor.
The adaptor is used to run some of our modified table-top games (which originally ran from batteries, but have been modified so that they run from the adaptor instead).
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Is anyone here planning on bidding on this, and who's willing to image
these disks?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220356462708
I'd be willing to get them just to make images, and if someone else
wants the physical disks I'd be happy to go in on bidding on them, and
send that person the disks after I make images of them. Or, if someone
else wants to get them to make images themselves, that'd be fine too.
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
Ah, now I have an excuse to pull
all of my DEC stuff out of storage. ;^)
-- Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org> wrote:
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Bruce Lane wrote:
> The DSD 880 diagnostics diskette has been claimed. Jeff Kaneko was
> the lucky(?) winner.
Good, now the rest of us know who to harass about getting an image. :)
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
____________________________________________________________
Compete with the big boys. Click here to find products to benefit your business.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw2USkyYum1s3vN5M8ubUB4x89I…
The DSD 880 diagnostics diskette has been claimed. Jeff Kaneko was the lucky(?) winner.
Thanks to all for your interest.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"Quid Malmborg in Plano..."
The xa 6502 cross-assembler package has been updated to version 2.3.5. This
version fixes a bug with the .bin pseudo-op and character sets, adds PETSCREEN
and HIGH character sets, adds the .aasc pseudo-op, and has multiple small
custodial and bug fixes. It will compile on most systems with an ANSI C
compiler, can generate code for all NMOS and most CMOS variants of the 6502
and the 65816, and is known to work on Win32, most Un*ces and Mac OS X. It is
licensed under GPL.
http://www.floodgap.com/retrotech/xa/
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- There are few problems that the liberal usage of high explosives can't cure.
Or possibly not broken? I have two items which I must part with as
part of The Great Reduction of 2009:
- Epson HX-20 Portable; no AC adapter; could not power it on with any
AC adapter in my stable; fair cosmetic shape, some sticker residue;
has micro-cassette drive module
- STM Pied Piper CP/M Computer; I plugged it in and Magic Smoke was
released; a competent technician (i.e. not me) can probably fix this
easily; comes with a box of 5.25" floppies which may or or may not
contain CP/M and other Pied Piper goodies, a Dealer Guide, some
brochures for an STM 80186 machine and whatever else I can find
Shipping on these items will be from 60074. I have scanned the
scannable items from the Pied Piper and they are up at
chiclassiccomp.org. Asking price is whatever you feel it's worth for
me to box something up and send it out, plus actual shipping. In
other words, please give these fine machines a home.
-j
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
Hi! Is there any sort of a standard for S-100 backplane spacing?
I measured a couple of backplanes I have (a VG and another one) and they
both measured .375" (3/8") gap between the connectors. That seems rather
closely spaced to me if the boards are 3/4" apart if the connectors are 3/8"
wide themselves.
What would be the minimum useful gap between S-100 connectors for a small
hobbyist S-100 backplane? I presume 3/8" gap is not enough if you want to
accept prototype boards with wire wrap sockets and maintain some clearance.
Any constructive thoughts on the subject much appreciated.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
S-100 backplane board spacing
Al Kossow aek
<mailto:cctalk%40classiccmp.org?Subject=S-100%20backplane%20board%20spacing&
In-Reply-To=> at bitsavers.org
Fri Feb 6 09:13:35 CST 2009
* Previous message: S-100 backplane board spacing
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/268634.html>
* Next message: Some Microtek MICE documentation
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/268620.html>
* Messages sorted by: [ date ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/date.html#268616> [
thread ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/thread.html#268616> [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/subject.html#268616>
subject ] [ author ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/author.html#268616>
_____
> does anybody have a handle on where I
> could obtain 5 S100 edge connector sockets?
You also need to specify the spacing of the circuit and component
side pins on the connector for your backplane. There are at least
two different spacings that were used. Most were the wider style,
early MITS backplanes had closer spacing.
_____
* Previous message: S-100 backplane board spacing
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/268634.html>
* Next message: Some Microtek MICE documentation
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/268620.html>
* Messages sorted by: [ date ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/date.html#268616> [
thread ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/thread.html#268616> [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/subject.html#268616>
subject ] [ author ]
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2009-February/author.html#268616>
_____
More information <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk> about
the cctalk mailing list
_____
-----REPLY-----
Hi! Thanks Al! My question is really what are the commonly accepted
standards for appearance, casing, etc. I agree there seem to be an early
"narrow" width and a later "wide" width between S-100 connectors.
Is there a standard or commonly accepted practice for center to center
"wide" board spacing or is it arbitrary? My intent is for a small (4 slot)
motherboard used for hobbyist prototyping not a full blown system. The
primary application would be the development of new peripherals using
prototype boards. I expect that the use of wire-wrap sockets would be
common requiring some clearance on the copper side and that the ICs and
passives would be socketed.
My estimates are that wire-wrap sockets need just bit over 1/2" clearance on
the copper side and that most socketed ICs/passives require 1/2" clearance
on the component side. Allison's estimate of 1" centers for the boards
seems like a reasonable compromise. It won't get every possible combination
but enough to be useful. The purpose is to allow low cost prototyping not
for a full blown long term system installation. Cost is of primary
importance which translates to little PCB surface area as possible while
still being useful.
BTW, Digikey carries a couple of types of S-100 compatible connectors but
they are not cheap. Sullins and EDAC 0.125" spaced, 50 position, 2 row, 100
pin, PCB through hole solder tails card edge connectors run from about $8 to
$12 a piece. I can get them surplus occasionally. eBay sells them too but
are the wire-wrap variety which would work but is a gross abuse of a
wire-wrap connector to solder it into a PCB. It can be done but I wouldn't
tell anyone about it. :-)
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
I'm trying to recover some files off of a couple of Atari SH204 hard
drives but I only have a 520ST and need to find an external floppy
drive to bootstrap my system. Does anyone have a spare Atari SF314
floppy drive around that they'd be willing to part with? I don't have
much classic stuff left so I guess this will have to be a sale rather
than a trade.
Thanks,
David
I been "listening" to most of this thread so, forgive me if I already mention an idea that someone has already brought up...
I seem to recollect that when I was working on hard sector floppy drives back in the Northstar Horizon system days, that the controller only wrote a block of data for each sector with basically nothing in between. It saw an index hole, wrote the block and then waited for the next index hole to write the next sector. If you want to recreate index holes for reading a hard sectored floppy, it seems you could detect the end of data from the previous sector and then generate a accurate index hole for the upcoming sector. Use the single index to reset the sector count if you are keeping track of that.
Obviously, this is only a solution for reading the disk
best regards, Steve Thatcher
>
>Hi Chris
> I was recently looking at my Teac drive's index pulse to see how it
>worked relative to the drive going ready ( the problem of trying to
>find a way to recreate the /Ready signal ).
> One thing I noticed was that the leading edge of the index pulse
>was as accurate as my scope could show but the trailing edge was
>all over the place.
> My thinking is that the drive is controlled by a servo loop.
>The leading edge is when a crystal clock says the pulse is suppose
>to start and the trailing edge is when the actual edge is detected.
>If one timed the length of time between the two edges, one would
>then know the corrective response of the loop.
> As an example, if the pulse was long, you'd keep a similar software
>wheel rotating that you apply a correction to by the amount the
>pulse was long.
> It would be this internal software generated wheel that you'd use
>to create the index pulses from.
> You need the code to watch the drive to determine the parameters
>of the control system, gain, dampening and intertia.
> If done this way, I suspect that one could get very close to
>the right index pulse spacing.
>Dwight
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Windows Live?: Keep your life in sync.
>http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_howitworks_022…
I've got a big pile of paper here (the binding is missing:) Digital
Research CP/M Plus Version 3 OS User's Guide, Programmer's Guide and
System Guide (all one book.) I'll send it out for the cost of
shipping. It probably weighs a couple pounds. Preference given to
someone who can scan it nicely and get it into one of the document
archives out there. My sheet feeder has given up on feeding the 6"x9"
paper.
Or, if it already has been scanned and is out there somewhere, someone
let me know. Then I won't feel bad recycling it.
j
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
For anyone interested, I scanned a copy of the LA12's operators manual,
which Tom Ponsford graciously loaned me, and have placed a copy here:
http://computer-refuge.org/classiccmp/dec/la12/
Al, if you want to grab that or my TIFF copy for bitsavers, let me know
and I can send it to you. It's 400dpi/1bpp and G4 compressed.
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
I may soon be acquiring a PDP-11; I do not know the exact model. My
question is, what kind of power supply might this require? It sounds
like some can use 110V and others require 220? Are there models that I
can just plug into my apartment's wall socket, or do I need to get an
extension cord from the washer/dryer socket (which is not in use right
now)?
If anyone can summarize what models need what sort of power, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
John
--
"I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS
reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C,
Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba
Hi, All,
The topic of replacement batteries came up in the Yahoo Group
for the RB5X, and someone posted a link for 2 volt 2.5 Amp-hour
cells (which are apparently used in an older version of the robot
than mine)...
<http://www.batteryweb.com/hawkersla-detail.cfm?Model=0810-0004&label=single…>
I saw the image and immediately thought of my NLS portable oscilloscope.
I'd love to refurb mine, but $45 in batteries is a little on the high
side for me.
Has anyone on the list replaced a set of this sort of battery, and does anyone
know of a place that stocks them for a bit less?
-ethan
Hi all
I had a super Xmas break and as a result The following have been
restored to factory spec and are running.
On TCP/IP network
VAX 4000 M500
VAX 4000 M200
MicroVAX 3100
VAX Station 3100
Alpha 3000
Alpha Station 200
Stand alone
Rainbow 100+ Needs a DECnet adapter
11C23 Running Micro RSX needs the DECNet board (which I do have) and
the Cable which I don't.
Decmate III
Working Periperals
VT200's
VT320's
VT240
Awaiting Parts/Attention
PDP 8e - Has a difficult to trace hardware problem
It was running but now I can't toggle in a test proigram.
Set address -> DEP -> Set Data - > DEP (Increments the
address ok)
Go back and examine memory = nothing.
System has four x 4K core memory.
Removing any one or three out of four makes no difference.
I'm rusty on PDP8's ( I last worked on one in 1972)
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VAX 4000 M300
(Needs the upper outer door and the door for the front of
the CPU compartment
PRO 350 Needs a RD-5X MF ST506 Drive
PRO 380 Needs a RD-5X MF ST506 Drive
VT 103 (Needs a monitor board)
PDP-11/94 (Needs KDJ11-EB = M8981-BA)
Wish List
DEC logo colour monitors of any type.
VAX VLC's
11/05
11/10
11/34
11/70
RL01's
VT100's
VT102
VT4XX
LA36
LA180
BA123 (Enclosure)
BA23 (Enclosure)
11X94-E (Enclosure)
Rod Smallwood
Almost nothing was out there for the low cost ICE's that Microtek
built, so I scanned and took some pictures of the bits that I have.
Additional personality docs (esp for the MICE-II 6502 and 6809) would
be nice to find. Still need to take some pics of the original 6502 MICE
that I have.
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/microtek/mice
I can't speak towards the older, larger Unibus models,
such as the 11/45, 11/55, 11/60, and 11/70.
However, these models generally had a standard 115volt line cord:
11/02 11/03 11/23 11/23+ 11/24
11/34 11/34a 11/44 11/53 11/73
11/83 11/84 11/93 11/94
(Sorry in advance, if I left anyone's model off the list.) ;-)
If it's in a rack, it MAY have a power distribution module
at the base, with a 20-amp or 30-amp power cord, but
in most (if not all) cases, the individual chassis inside the rack
will have standard 115volt line cords that plug into it.
T
> does anybody have a handle on where I
> could obtain 5 S100 edge connector sockets?
You also need to specify the spacing of the circuit and component
side pins on the connector for your backplane. There are at least
two different spacings that were used. Most were the wider style,
early MITS backplanes had closer spacing.
>
>Subject: S-100 backplane board spacing
> From: "Andrew Lynch" <lynchaj at yahoo.com>
> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:32:10 -0500
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Hi! Is there any sort of a standard for S-100 backplane spacing?
>
>I measured a couple of backplanes I have (a VG and another one) and they
>both measured .375" (3/8") gap between the connectors. That seems rather
>closely spaced to me if the boards are 3/4" apart if the connectors are 3/8"
>wide themselves.
>
>What would be the minimum useful gap between S-100 connectors for a small
>hobbyist S-100 backplane? I presume 3/8" gap is not enough if you want to
>accept prototype boards with wire wrap sockets and maintain some clearance.
There are two considerations, airflow and bus length. Wider gap helps
airflow to a point then wider doesnt help as much. Wider spacing makes
the bus longer for a give number of connectors and longer has more problems
with reflections(ringing) and other transmission line behavours. Longer may
also impact power distribution as well. Last items is the height of boards
limits how close or forces skipping slots. Some fo the taller boards in my
collection suggest greater than 0.75" center to center would barely be
adaquate because of tall heatsinks contacking the next board.
Look at the better backplanes, Compupro would be one.
Also the later boards (more modern) were dense enough that only a few
slots are required.
I have at least two machines that are:
Zpu-B z80 cpu
64K ram (ram 16, 17 or 22)
Interfacer (multi serial plus parallel)
DISK1A FDC
DISK3 HDC
Systemm Support
Thats only 6 boards and the smallest backplane I have is 8 slots. It's as loaded
a system as most or more so. The limiting factor for the box is fans, power supply
and mountings for the disks.
Older antiques like an altair filled with then current board may have:
CPU 8080or later Z80
Ram boards anhywhere from 4k per to 16K per (as many as 8 for 64K)
Some form of rom boot card
possible a dual board FDC (altair disk was a two card set)
multiple IO baord for serial
possible multiple boards for one or more printers or other parallel devices.
And cooling issues.
Hope that helps with some history. I'd say 6-8 slots spaced 1" and also on
the board terminator.
Allison
>
>Any constructive thoughts on the subject much appreciated.
>
>Thanks and have a nice day!
>
>Andrew Lynch
Can anyone assist me in getting a copy (pdf preferred) of this article:
Proceedings of the IRE, Oct. 1953 (Vol. 41, Issue 10), pages 1388-1392. The
article is called. "The Design of Logical OR-AND-OR Pyramids for Digital
Computers" ... thanks!
- Evan
Thanks to those here and on comp.os.cpm who have responded publically and
privately with some ideas I had not considered before. I know there is at
least one ebay selling service in Tucson, a solution I hadn't thought of. I
wouldn't mind spending the time describing items correctly if that's how I
go. I would be hoping that they have the space to take it so I could get it
organized for them. I will also get in touch with Sellam. I have been to a
few users group meetings here in Tucson but have never met anyone suffering
>from the classiccmp disease - perhaps a few weeks worth of notices on
Craig's List might scare one or two out of the woodwork.
To those who have responded with wish-lists: the biggest problem in my
current situation is that too many boxes are labeled "Old computer stuff" or
even those that are labeled '8" disks' are in X different boxes in Y
different places, usually with boxes in front and on top of them! If I
could easily retrieve specific items I would rather they go to people on the
lists who appreciate them. Alas, when I packed them away I fantasized that
I would have sufficient room to organize everything properly - the reality
is that I don't. If I go through an ebay service I might be able to pull
some stuff that people have mentioned.
I was surprised (thrilled?) to hear that at least one person thought
$15-$25k was a reasonable ebay estimate. Frankly that about twice what I
would estimate (at least in today's economy!). Maybe I should just sit on
it all for the next 2-3 years and wait until one of the next Web 3.0
millionaires wants a legacy collection!
Jim Battle, you and Barry Watzman are the only 2 people I know with working
Helios systems. If I find those Helios disks I lent you a few years ago,
you two guys can split them if you want them.
Bob Stek
(former) Saver of Lost Sols
Does anyone have copies of the various revisions of the Grammar Engine
PROMICE? I have a manual for a really early version of the device, and
have a few of them of various vintages made in the 90's which neither
match my manual, or the current versions.
Hi,
I have a couple of uPDP-11 boxes (BA23) with failed power supplies.
Being no expert on repairing switch mode power supplies (and to be frank
slighly scared of trying), is there any reason why I shouldn't adapt a
ATX power supply from a PC to provide the required voltages?
Most ATX power supplies offer pretty meaty 5V and 12V feeds plus a
fairly small -12V (~0.3A) feed.
Will I need to generate a LTC/BEVENT L signal if I go down this route?
Finally, does anyone know of any good guides on repairing switch modes?
Whilst not keen, I guess I should bite the bullet (hopefully not
literally) and learn how to repair them.
Thanks,
Toby
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
> Until the boss sees that you screwed around in the lab for an hour or
> two getting all the parts and building the test circuit
I doubt any company newer than 10 years old even has lab stock any more
to breadboard something with.
I'd end up going to Haltek or Halted for parts, because Apple killed off
their parts stock room when the hardware group was moving from Valley Green to
Infinite Loop. One day I went over to it and it was empty. They had dumped
the whole thing into recycling because none of the hardware engineers used
any of it anymore.
I have been mostly a lurker on the classiccmp lists for the last 10 years or
so, though I have had individual correspondence with Jim Battle, Dave
Dunfield, Rich Cini, Allison, and a few others ? I think they would vouch
for me. I?ve been mostly an S-100 and CP/M guy, and I have probably used
more impulse than sense in collecting micro stuff. My worst sin has been in
putting off any systematic cataloging of my collection, and unfortunately I
am not in a position to do it now. What I describe later on is from memory
? there are all sorts of miscellaneous things as well.
The time has come for me to liquidate 90% of my collection. I won?t give it
away ? my kids can deal with it after I?m dead! I started to sell it piece
by piece last year and sold about $3,000-$4,000 worth on ebay (I know,
boo-hiss! But that?s where I got most of it from.) I would rather not go
this route again, except perhaps for my Altair or one of my IMSAI?s. I am
willing to take a loss if I can dispose of this stuff in bulk, but want this
to be as painless (for me) as possible. All of this stuff has been packed
away in moving boxes for at least 4-5 years and I no longer want to have to
take it out, photograph it, test, troubleshoot, write accurate descriptions,
re-package for safe shipping, take it down to UPS or the P.O., deal with
eBay, etc.
So, questions for the group:
1) Does anyone here have an interest in acquiring my collection and is
willing to come to Tucson (7 hour drive from San Diego) and pick it all up?
2) Does anyone here know of anyone ? a computer museum, a collector not
on this list, anyone else of unsound mind ? who might be interested?
3) Any other ideas on eliminating hassles from individual sales and
shipping?
4) Anyone want to take a guess at a value of the collection as a whole?
a) if individually priced on ebay or b) Entire lot value
It?s all packed well enough for storage or shipment in a van, but most would
need to be re-packed for individual shipment. Part of the problem is that
while individual boxes are generically labeled (i.e., 8? disks, BYTE mags,
Votrax, monitor, etc.) I have no simple or easy way to put the appropriate
docs and disks together with the hardware (nor the room to even attempt it).
I think I did a fairly good job of rounding up original docs and boot disks
(or good copies thereof) for most of the equipment. It would be a shame to
let that effort go to waste if I eventually decide to go the ebay route
after all; I would have to sell it all ala carte as I come across it.
To give you an idea of some of the items (almost all with complete
documentation, extra S-100 boards and boot software if appropriate, and most
were known working when put in storage) here is a good part of the
collection that I still have:
2 or 3 Processor Tech Sols (have extra foam pads for 1 keyboard restore) ?
original docs
Ithaca InterSystem S-100 ? original docs
2 IMSAI?s ? original docs
1 Altair 8800 ? some docs
2 NorthStar Horizons, 1 with HD ? original docs
1 CompuPro 8/16 ? original docs
1 Morrow Decision 1 with HD ? original docs (the big iron, not the
MicroDecision)
Many, many S-100 cards ? 8 and 16 bit CPUs, 4k thru 256k memory boards,
Matrox video, disk controllers, almost all w/ original docs
1 Lobo System with HD ? original docs
3-4-5? Circuit Cellar SB-180 systems, 1 with HD ? original docs
2 NOS Xerox Z-80 64k systems w/ 5 ?? dual drives ? original docs
2-3 KayPro?s ? original docs
Televideo 925 terminal
Older memory chip tester
Pro-Log M882 8080 analyzer
Z-80 MicroProfessor
Digital Group programs on cassette
Many original ProcTech programs on cassette w/ original docs
Multiple SS/DD and DS/DD 5.25? disk drives, some in cabinets w/ PS, most not
Several monochrome composite monitors
Collection of text-to-speech units, 3-4 Votrax and a large DEC-Talk plus a
few others ? original docs
BYTE magazine from, v1#1 through mid to late 80?s
Many issues of Creative Comp, complete Kilobaud, S-100 Microsystems, early
Dr. Dobb?s, Interface Age, Computer Shopper, Lifeboat Lifelines, etc.
2 dual 8? drive systems
2-3 Apple II Plus
2-3 Apple Z-80 cards
Ohio Scientific Challenger (C4P? ? can?t remember, plus I may have sold this
last year, not sure but I think it?s still here) w/ docs
Franklin Ace 100 (the original one with the Apple II ROMs that led to
landmark court decision allowing copyrighting of software)
1-2 early Macs
Mac LC w/ MS-DOS card
Cables ? lots and lots, from RS-232, Centronics parallel, to power cables to
ribbon cables to . . . .
Lots of original software and docs: boxed sets of Digital Research CP/M,
CP/M-86, CP/M-Plus, CBASIC, Concurrent CP/M ? all from DR in slip cases,
WordStar, Magic Wand, Palantir, dBASE II, Microsoft BASIC-80, baZic,
Lifeboat Associates CP/MUG disks, lots of NorthStar format software, NOS
Dysan 10-hole hard-sector disks, complete International NorthStar User?s
Association newsletters and disks, complete original SOL Users Society
newsletters, etc.)
IBM XT
TrackStar 6502 card for IBM
Baby Blue Z-80 card for IBM
IBM AT
Central Point Match Point card, several Option boards
. . . and this is just the stuff I remember.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
P.S. If I can?t sell it all in one swell foop, I MAY consider offers for
individual pieces from list members, but I would REALLY like to sell
everything at once. Please don?t ask for any particular item right now ?
I?ll let everyone know if I do decide to do that later.
Josh Dersch wrote:
> Just acquired one of these bad boys and I've found very little info on
> it -- it appears to have two video out connectors -- a 25-pin D-sub
> labeled "RGB Multi Out" and an 8-pin DIN labeled "B/W Multi Out."
> Anyone know the pinouts of these?
If you're still looking for pinouts, here they are:
http://www.eskimo.com/~adam/smc70vidpin.pdf
Sorry about the huge PDF file.
Since you have the G (genlock) model there should also be RGB video
on BNC connectors.
> Any ideas what kind of monitor I can expect to use with this machine?
For authenticity, a KX-1211HG, CPD-120 or PVM-1270Q. Otherwise, a
Commodore 1080 or 1084 or whatever.
> Anyone have manuals/software archived?
I have a little bit of stuff... I'll drop you a line if/when I archive it...
probably some time in 2015? :)
Amazingly enough Sony still lists a SMC-70G manual as available to order.
The part number is 3-773-522-22. If you feel like taking a $20 gamble you can
order it online at servicesales.sel.sony.com or servicesplus.us.sony.biz or
by phone at (800)488-7669. You might end up with a hefty bound manual or you
might end up with 2 xeroxed pages. I have no idea what it is other than it's
an instruction manual for SMC-70G serial number 20211 and later and it's not
one of the ones I have.
-- Adam
I don't have an answer for the other gentleman's query on 720RPM floppies
but I recently discovered that new 3.5" drives appear to no longer support
720K media. I purchased a number of Samsung drives for a project where
I am converting a system with 5.25" drives to use 3.5" and I found that
these drives have left out the media density sense switch all together!
They no longer have any way to detect the lower density, 250kbps media
and run at 500Kbps no matter what is installed.
I needed the 300 rpm, 250Kbps capability to be compatible with the old
5.25" stuff.
What's particularly nasty is that I chose these drives, Samsung SFD-321B,
because I had a recent datasheet that clearly showed they supported
this mode-- until of course they arrived and the switch/sensor is not
even installed!
Is this true of all 3.5" drives now?
This might explain why 720K 3.5" drives are selling for $285 on eBay :-(
I'd sure like to find a way to force the drive into 250Kbps mode-- I
can't believe the chips don't still support it-- I just need a way to
figure out where the sensor is supposed to connect and hard wire it to
720K mode. Any ideas on how to do that?
Chris
There is a Microdata Reality in Sandy, Utah that needs a new home. This
is a large and heavy early- to mid-1970s mini in a 6 foot cabinet.
Please contact me directly if you're interested and I'll pass along the
contact info.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Printronix P-600's availability "soon" in St. Louis. I'm posting for a
friend who has as many as three which may be retired and scrapped.
These are well maintained, but obviously elderly printers.
The Qume is a wheel printer I posted about some time ago w/o any
response. Reply off list unless there is a useful comment, obviously.
Qume printer is in Evansville, In.
Jim
>
>Subject: Anyone have a line on batteries for the NLS portable oscilloscope?
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:59 -0500
> To: classiccmp at classiccmp.org
>
>Hi, All,
>
>The topic of replacement batteries came up in the Yahoo Group
>for the RB5X, and someone posted a link for 2 volt 2.5 Amp-hour
>cells (which are apparently used in an older version of the robot
>than mine)...
>
><http://www.batteryweb.com/hawkersla-detail.cfm?Model=0810-0004&label=single…>
>
>I saw the image and immediately thought of my NLS portable oscilloscope.
>I'd love to refurb mine, but $45 in batteries is a little on the high
>side for me.
>Has anyone on the list replaced a set of this sort of battery, and does anyone
>know of a place that stocks them for a bit less?
I've replaced the min my NLS MS-15 and MS215 portable scopes, I usually pay around
8-9$ each
(it uses 3) for them new. Google "2V 2.5AH Gell cell" you get mroe than afew hits.
Note any 6V gellcell that fits in the form factor (NLS has an area) will also work.
I've found 6V/2.2AH Yusa and others that fit in mind and they can be cheaper usually
under 15$.
If your really game 4 nicads of the 1800-2200mah size fit there but require the
charger side to be modded for constant current rather constant voltage.
Allison
>
>-ethan
Dan,
My first comment is - watch your back!
--- On Thu, 1/15/09, Dan Gahlinger <dgahling at hotmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dan Gahlinger <dgahling at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Old Software rights (was content rights)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 8:48 AM
> In an unrelated topic,
>
> I have a bunch of old programs from my University days,
> back in the late 70's, early 80's
> all Vax/VMS code, in various languages, etc.
>
> In those days we never put "(C)" or copyright
> notices on code.
> I'm just wondering if it's generally "ok"
> to release this code to the public?
>
> It's been 30 some years (longer than copyright would
> apply anyhow).
> I have searched for 20 years for some of the authors and
> never found anyone.
>
> 14 years ago I posted pieces of it, and said "if
> anyone objects to this, please contact me"
> and never got any response from anyone.
Just an experience I recall observing.
A guy was posting old games on USENET (don't recall which group), from the CP/M to early IBM PC era - games for which no owner could he could find, games that seemed to be abandoned.
And then one day he announced that he would no longer be doing this, having been warned by his ISP and having received a cease and desist notice from a law firm.
> The system and associated parts used for the development
> are long gone.
Copyright is a can of worms, particularly with the obscenely long period that has been recently legislated. And there will always be someone willing to threaten action.
Your examples seem safe, but I would be quick to be responsive to any request to "desist".
> But another age old question, who has rights to code
> developed on the universities equipment?
> I know it's a common question these days, but
> "back in the day" such considerations never
> occurred,
> it was a different era.
I well recall those days when software was free, included in the rental of the mainframe. Until unbundling and the "Program Product" which would rent or sell independently from the machine. IIRC, IBM's H Assembler for OS/360, first NEW product issued under the unbundling agreement, rented for $250/mo. in 1970 - which would be something more significant these days.
Those days really ended around 1970.
It's particularly annoying in the area of OS's for our classic computers, which remain under copyright to companies which may have gone belly-up, been absorbed and forgotten by their buyers, etc. Getting an old CP/M machine without the OS, and not having a legal source for it, makes 'criminals' of us all.
And it's damned unfair!
> Everyone from that era has also vanished with the wind, I
> know, I've looked.
>
> So is it fairly safely abandoned?
> Another way to look at it - If it was your code, some small
> silly thing you wrote, would you care?
Now that is a very GOOD question. There are a lot of things I've written that I would NEVER want seen - by ANYONE; guess they're in the class of 'silly'.
Most of my serious software belongs to entities (alive or dead), under 'work for hire'. If it were distributed with their blessings, it wouldn't bother me; I've been paid - though never enough :)
OTOH, I have several proprietary systems I have written for the use of my own business AND I WOULD EXPRESS SERIOUS ANNOYANCE if they were somehow obtained and distributed. But they have never been shared, and the likelihood of it happening seems small.
That said, good fortune.
Vern Wright
> Dan.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
Hi all,
I noticed an 11/34 on eBay (# 200302612244) which reminded me
of the 11/04 that I have in similar size / housing. Just as the machine
up for auction, I am missing the black metal box into which the unit
is placed and mounted in a 19" rack.
So ... if anybody has an empty box, I am very interested!
thanks,
- Henk, PA8PDP
I wonder if any classic computer specialists would be interested in attending this conference. Please do let me know if so. Best wishes, Jeremy.
CONFERENCE FOR DIVERSE SPECIALISTS:
ARCHIVISTS, CLASSIC COMPUTER EXPERTS, DIGITAL PRESERVATION, HISTORIANS, CURATORS, AND SOCIAL SCIENTISTS
___________________________________________
DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009
Monday 9 February to Wednesday 11 February 2009 at the British Library, London
Scientists, historians, writers and IT specialists will come together to address the challenge of organising and preserving personal digital archives at the first ever Digital Lives Research Conference, which will be inaugurated by British Library Chief Executive Dame Lynne Brindley.
The conference will address (i) how libraries and archives can help all people whose lives are becoming increasingly digital - particularly academics - to secure, preserve and organise their personal archives of digital photographs, documents, correspondence and multimedia, for themselves and their families; and (ii) the possibility of establishing relationships with providers of online services and social systems technologies.
Topics will range from digital curation and digital preservation to the creation of personal digital archives and their use by historians, biographers and scientists.
Highlights include:
(i) Keynote Lectures by biographers Georgina Ferry and Andrew Lycett, psychologist Charles Fernyhough, historian Orlando Figes, and archivist Dorothy Sheridan of the Mass Observation Archive
(ii) Invited Presentations by George Oates, member of founding team at Flickr, Simone Brunozzi of Amazon Web Services and Ian Hughes of IBM
(iii) Keynote Presentations by computer scientists Mark Baker of University of Reading, Peter Bentley of University College London, Annamaria Carusi of University of Oxford, Jon Crowcroft of University of Cambridge, Kieron O'Hara of University of Southampton and Dave Taylor of Imperial College London.
(iv) A Writers in Conversation session on the creation of digital archives, featuring Tony Benn, Dame Antonia Byatt and Wendy Cope, and chaired by pioneering computer scientist Dame Wendy Hall
(v) Day 3 of the conference will involve the participation of visitors and inhabitants of virtual world Second Life, with the conference broadcast onto the Elucian Islands , the Second Life home of Nature Publishing Group and Macmillan Publishers. There will be a keynote lecture by Timo Hannay, Publishing Director at Nature.com
(vi) A presentation on 'Digital Life at the Extremes' by polar explorer Ben Saunders
See: www.bl.uk/digital-lives/conference.html for further details.
The first day of the conference will focus on the latest approaches to curating digital objects and archives. The second day will look at the development of such archives from the point of view of the creators and researchers - writers, scientists and historians. The third day will offer an overview of life online and digital archives as they are developing at present. The conference is FREE to attend on the 9 and 11 of February, registration is required as space is limited. There is a registration fee of ?35 for 10 February, but WAIVERS ARE AVAILABLE.
Please register at the Digital Lives Research Conference 2009 website: www.bl.uk/digital-lives/confreg.html
***APOLOGIES FOR CROSS-POSTING***
About The Digital Lives Research Project
The Digital Lives Research Project is led by the British Library and is designed to provide a major pathfinding study of personal digital archives, and is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). The project team is drawn from University College London and University of Bristol as well as the British Library itself.
**************************************************************************
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
The British Library's new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2007/08 : www.bl.uk/knowledge
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
*************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the postmaster at bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
*************************************************************************
Does anyone have manuals or any information about the DECwriter
correspondent? I managed to grab one today, and would like to at least
look at the docs before I plug it in, and turn it on, if anyone can
find a copy..
Thanks,
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
Not quite a computer but maybe a distant relative.
I am looking for anything on the Xerox 914; anything operation,
maintenance, or marketing material that I can get a copy of. Its for
a uh, performance that I am involved in and I would like to be more
technically accurate in describing the machine and its operation.
Thanks!
I assume the answer to the subject line is "no," but I figured I'd ask
just in case one of you has a stack of this stuff lying around somewhere
:).
Picked up a Corvus Concept -- just the main CPU unit, no monitor, no
keyboard, no drives. It appears to work (it beeps when I turn it on!)
but of course lacking any other hardware it's a rather bulky doorstop.
I'd like to get it running, it's a cool 68k-based machine with a
bit-mapped display and Apple II (!!) compatible expansion slots. (Are
there any other machines out there that used the Apple II bus for
expansion? Aside from Apple II-family machines and clones, of course...)
I suppose given enough time I could build a compatible monitor, hack
together a keyboard interface, and get it booting over OmniNet but
somehow having the original hardware would be nice too...
Thanks,
Josh
>
>Subject: Stack Depth requirements for CP/M 2.2 CBIOS
> From: "ROBO5.8" <robo58 at optonline.net>
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:08:49 -0500
> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only'" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Hello,
>
>I have rewritten my old systems CP/M 2.2 CBIOS to add an IDE Drive.
>
>I've run into a problem that has me stumped. Everything works as long as I
>don't try and copy or assemble a large Assembly file (>80KB).
>
>I will be going along fine and then out of nowhere I will see CP/M request
>access to Drive "T". My debug info says SELDSK is requesting Drive 0FF00h.
>
Ok this is easy. CP/M 2.x (2.2 nominal) can only address 16 logical drives
so that's limitation one. Each drive is limited to 8Mb (65525sectors*128bytes).
If you use one of the CP/M like imperoved work a likes this is less an issue
and logical drives can be much larger (up to 1gb).
>I have added debug code to all the CBIOS routines so that they report what
>they are doing to the console (slow but nice).
>
>I've gone through my code many times and tested each routine via an embedded
>debug monitor. I believe I have added every CP/M 2.2 patch (1-6 and 9)that
>is specific to the CBIOS including those dealing with Blocking/Deblocking.
Good but likely not the problem itself.
>
>In the back of my mind I kept wondering if I was exceeding CP/M's Stack
>Depth. I can find no information on the web or in my doc's that specifies
>what the maximum Stack usage is for a CBIOS.
This does not could like a stack size issue. That tends to be very static
for any disk size.
>Do any of you have any thoughts on my Stack Question? Are there other
>issues with Blocking/Deblocking that become visible with large Disk Drives,
>and that are not covered in any of the published DRI patches?
Wrong plase to look.
Likely areas of breakage:
More than 16 drives
Alloc storage areas inadaquately sized or overlapping
BIOS local variables being trashed.
Bios logic in error (deblock, sector addressing other??)
Allison
>Thanks for your assistance.
>Robo
I am looking for volunteers to help reverse-engineer and document Apple
II VisiCalc.
Besides documenting this for future historians
--I plan to give all this work to the Smithsonian--
I'd like to get Apple II VisiCalc running in emulation.
Right now this isn't possible because of the copy protection.
(BTW the PC DOS version is available on the web, and doesn't have copy
protection).
I have three versions of the Apple II software. I know one of them
still boots (1983?)
and have some confidence that the other two versions (1979 and 1981)
work too.
I have been in contact with both Bob Frankston and Dan Bricklin.
Of course you ask, well then why do you need volunteers?
The answer is because no one can find the sources.
Bob and I plan to dig around his garage when the weather gets warmer,
but there are no guarantees, and the 30th anniversary is in October 2009.
--Tim McNerney
http://www.4004.com