General question for PDP-8 fans: I've seen references to someone having
created an RF08/RS08 replacement. Does anyone on the list know details
of such a project?
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Alderson RichA at vulcan.com
Server Engineer, PDPplanet Project (206) 342-2239
Vulcan, Inc., 505 5th Avenue S, Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 465-2916
cell
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:19:33 -0700
> From: Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com>
> Chuck Guzis wrote:
>> "COBOL programmers are hard to come by these days," said Fred Forrer,
>> the Sacramento-based CEO of MGT of America, a public-sector
>> consulting firm. "It's certainly not a language that is taught.
>> Oftentimes, you have to rely on retired annuitants to come back and
>> help maintain the system until you're able to find a replacement."
>
> It's not at all hard to find COBOL programmers, and they are NOT all
> retired. Offer a decent salary, and you'll get them. What the state is
> specifically trying to do, though is to cut everyone's salaries, so how
> likely is it that they'll offer a good salary to a COBOL programmer.
>
> The real story is that it's a bunch of political posturing.
When anyone with a tech company says "We can't find anyone to do X" what
they really mean is "We can't find any new graduates to do X" because
heaven forbid they should hire an older (like over 35) worker. There are
plenty of older tech experienced folks working at hardware stores, who
would jump at an entry level tech salary, but for some reason, human
resource drones in tech companies are universally convinced that they
would be too expensive or otherwise a poor choice. Sigh. <happy I have a
good job finally>
It's the same story as a few months back when B. Gates went before
congress and asked for more H1Bs claiming he couldn't find any
programmers.
Jeff Walther
Note: This was written at a eariler date than mailed.
This is due to the fact I personally do not have a net connection
and read email whenever and however I find a unsecure IEEE 802.11g
"Wi-fi" access point. As of such, I ask that would someone please be
so kind as to compile all relevant replies to this email into a digest
and email that to me, as at the last time I checked my email, I had
over thirty thousand unread email messages (30,069 to be exact) from
over the last 20 months or more and I am simply too lazy to junk them
all -- it's a GMail account and the ratio of incoming daily mail to
storage growth is low enough that accumulating email appears to be a
non-issue, even with 3 very high volume mailing lists subscribed;
wine-dev, cctalk, and I think LKML. (Normally, I sort this all out
using a rather ad-hoc set of regexp filters in Thunderbird)
My question is rather perplexing. When most people refer to
segmented memory, AFAIK, they mean banked memory systems, where
each segment is like a piece of paper, that is, seperate from each
other. On the contrary, the Intel 8086's segmented memory model is
like lessing some source code and using the terminal arrow keys
or K/L to move the display one line; given segment X, segment X+1
contains almost all of the memory of segment x, except for a new
line of 16 bytes (which the metaphor between a new line in 'less'
and the segment differential is rather ironic; most hex editors I have seen
display exactly 16 bytes of data per line)
The question is, is the Intel 8086's memory model brain-damaged? IMHO,
extremely much so.
> I'm based in Philadelphia. My current provided is disabling
> telnet capability at the beginning of September. I would like
> to know if anyone knows of a service that will permit me that
> capability?
> bs
Don't use standard ports. My provider (Comcast) blocks port 25 (mail)
inbound and outbound, and doesn't allow relaying through its mail
servers. Instead I use port 2525 and an external mail relay service.
With telnet, you won't need a relay service if anyone accessing your
system knows that it's on a non-standard port.
Do you really need telnet though? SSH preferable if your host can run
it.
Anyone collect and/or need parts to the AT&T Unix PC? I've got a pile
of systems I dismantled over a decade ago, and don't really want or know
how to put back together. I bought them "new" as surplus by the pallet
at the time, and about half of them were defective with only displaying
horizontal lines when turned on. The monitors are perfect, I also have
the 20Mb MFM drives and 5.25" drives, as well as the mainboards,
plastics etc. I'm not sure exactly how many and what I have yet, but
checking for interest here. Please reply if these are of interest at all.
Any suggestions on the line problem?
Mike Lee
ok, so i got a mac SE off ebay, for a decent deal. now a logic board,
floppy drive, CRT tube (I let the magic gas out of the first one)
later, im back where i started. i write a boot disk with my powerbook
1400cs, pop it in. it boots up to the system software. i go to hd sc
setup like i did when i used my external floppy to boot, and it shows
nothing. the first time, i got to boot with an external floppy and the
old logic board, and it showed the drive until i attempted to format
it, which it wouldnt. after that, i couldnt see the drive again, and
my boot disk kept getting wiped each use, and id have to reload it. so
then, i replaced the board, the CRT, and the floppy, and now its still
doing the same damn thing as it was before. is it possible i need new
or replacement SCSI and floppy cables? its just being really
weird.....
Thanks to all who helped out, I've got the problem sorted out. AIX 3.2
does not have a rmtcpip command, but, doing an rmdev on en0, then
issuing the mktcpip command has solved the problem - guess it was
something left over from the last site.
T.H.x.
Devon
Hey guys;
This may, or may not, be a silly question, but in all my years of
fiddling, I realised I had never tried this, so I'm unsure of what the
results will be.
My HP Logic Analyser (1630G) can talk to a HP 9121 via HP-IB. I have found
a 9122, which is a double-sided version of the same device, as far as I
can tell. I'm fairly confident the 1630G won't care - but the diskettes
that I have (inverse assembler pack, thanks Gavin - you rock) are
single-sided.
Is there any reason that the 9122 DS drive won't read a SS diskette for
the 9121?
Thank you for your help!
- JP
> What I'm remembering is a BASIC decompiler, written in BASIC,
> that was running on RSTS/e circa 1983. So that was BP, not BP2,
> right?
Circa 1983? Chances are it's BP2.
When I was a high school senior in 1978, I wrote a BP2 decompiler for an Independent Study project, so BASIC-PLUS-2 had been around for quite some time by 1983.
I got some of my first exposure to computers through Project DELTA (hi, Rich!!), and was fascinated by PPCODE. I still have a source listing at home on a VERY faded length of Teletype paper.
-- Tony
-----------Original Message(s):
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:10:55 -0400
From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IBM Model M keyboard spares
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <4899F73F.3010608 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Liam Proven wrote:
> /The/ classic PC keyboard, IMHO.
The Model M came out *waay* after the PC. The 84-key is the one for the
PC. I don't think the Model M is even compatible with the PC.
Peace... Sridhar
------------Reply:
People reverently talk about the Model M as though there was only one;
in fact there were probably almost 50 different versions, including at least
one for the late model XT (no indicator lights) and I *think* that at least one
version was dual-mode as well.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_M_Keyboard
To the OP:
I have a few different ones in the scrap pile somewhere, if you can send me
a picture of yours; does it have the removable keycaps?
I understand that replacing the spacebar on one of the older Model Ms
is a bit of a challenge BTW.
m