> My preference for distributing large trees of files is
> rsync, since it's designed for that, and it lets you efficiently
> update an existing local copy with as little data transferred as
> possible -- which is great for things like Bitsavers that are
> constantly being added to.
Which is working quite well..
> so it certainly sounds like a worthwhile project to me. "Voltsavers"
The issue isn't who hosts it, but the bandwidth issues. There are hundreds
of data books, and they are running about 100mb each when scanned. It is
impractical for me to burst them into smaller chunks due to the time it
would take to do it. I've had little luck getting people to work on
postprocessing the scans in the past. Currently, about 1/3 of everything I
have scanned is on bitsavers.
It takes about a week to process what I can scan in a day.
On an average scanning day I can scan 5-10 thousand pages.
I've been scanning now for over 9 years (obviously, not every day)..
Because of the thinness of the paper used, a box of data books is over
10k pages.
This should give you an idea of the magnitude of work involved in scanning
a large databook collection..
Be careful when using broker websites for semiconductors.
In my search for some SMC UARTS, I've come across some sites
that appear to have "open registration" for posting inventories.
(i.e., anyone can supply an inventory list, and an e-mail address,
and they'll show up on the vendor search.)
(Recently digchip dot com )
After submitting a few RFQ's, I received replies from
a number of different "companies" (read: individuals)
that were highly suspect.
For example:
Generic e-mail addresses.
References to what are supposed to be their
"corporate" website, but are in fact unrelated.
Payment terms "T/T" (wire transfer) or Western Union.
I also received nearly identical quotes, from
two presumeably different companies. While this is
certainly possible, the verbage used was almost exact.
As with any other transaction. . . . "buyer beware".
As info. . . .
T
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Eric Smith"
> Bittorrent doesn't help at all for things that only a few (less than
> about five) people are trying to download at the same time. FTP is
> generally *more* efficient than bittorrent for that.
Agreed. When you have a small community who have interest in a BT
file and most of the interested people have picked it up already, you
can grow whiskers waiting for a seed to emerge. I've seen some
rather pitiful begging on the 'net for a seed for such-and-such a
file.
Sometimes you do find a seed, but he's got his upload throttled down
to something like 3Kb/second. It'd be faster to get the file via
Aldis lamp.
The idea behind BT is utilizing the power of a mob, er "swarm".
Three isn't a swarm.
Cheers,
Chuck
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:40:28 +0100
> From: "Ade Vickers"
> Or, of course, I could bodge my universal power supply into powering the
> multimeter...... (don't dare suggest buying a battery! ;))
This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask the list.
I've got some old gear that take single D- or C-sized carbon-zinc
cells, usually as some sort of minimal-current supply. For example,
my VTVM uses one for its resistance function. (Sometimes a high-
impedance meter with a real needle is hard to beat).
I don't keep cells in this old stuff because I use it only
occasionally.
Is there such a thing as a long-life leakproof battery that I can
use? Silver-zinc perhaps?
Thanks,
Chuck
I finally got my selling spot this afternoon after about a 2 hour wait
in line (3303.) I must have missed any other selling spots except for
Patricks, but I'll check and drop by :). I have nothing classic computer
related this year, but I also should get a chance to look around!!!
On Thu, May 15, 2008 2:07 pm, Roy J. Tellason wrote:
>> > Case solved (I think). It seems to matter where I ground the
>> > probe. I
>> > pulled all of the boards out of the system, no change. I then
>> > grounded the
>> > probe to the middle finger of the voltage regulator on the board
>> > and the
>> > sine wave went away.
>>
>> The chassis may not be at digital ground.
>>
>> Also watch out for the middle lead of three-terminal (78xx/79xx)
>> voltage regulators...it's not unheard of to bring them up above
>> ground a bit with a voltage divider to make them operate at different
>> voltages.
>
> The _middle_ lead is not ground on the 79xx parts!
You're correct of course; I should've said "ground" lead.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
>Does anybody know if the DEC8235 is the same as the National DM8235?
>
Doesn't look likely. The DM8230 isn't the same as the Signetics 8230.
The DEC82xx parts seem to be the Signetics 82xx parts.
>Mouser claims to be able to order NTE8235, but there's no order pending or
>delivery date. ($9.09 each.)
>
http://www.rselectronics.com/ seems to claim stock.
This company search says they have non NTE parts. I used them in 1999 to
get a part and the minimum order then was $50. http://www.hrent.com/inv.htm
Who knows what has changed since then, the search is using an outside site.
They also list the MM57109N from another message.
Post back if you do use them.
---------Original Message:
From: Dan Roganti <ragooman at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: DEC8235 and MM57109N ICs
Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> Does anyone have the datasheet for an MM57109? How hard would it be to
> make a replacement, either with an FPGA or a microcontroller or
> something?
>
I've had no luck whatsoever in finding a datasheet for this part.
I've been searching online for a long time too.
I only have the programming info from old projects.
But I too like to get the complete datasheet to check everything.
I'm hoping the folks at Area51esg would have a lead on this.
=Dan
---------Reply:
Well, considering the MM57109 is a microprocessor, it's a little more
than just a data_sheet_ unless you only want the pinout & logic diagram.
It's one of the COPS family and should be in any NSC MOS databook of
the time; if you can't find it and Area51esg can't supply it, contact me
off-list and I'll try to find time to scan it, abt. 24 pages.
mike
... is tomorrow!
Is anyone planning on going this year?
I'll be there again, in spaces 3435/3436, and have a bunch of fun old
electronic and computer crap (including a few nice, fun, big UNIX
boxes).
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
On 15 May 2008 at 12:00, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 11:48:42 -0400
> From: Allison
> case ground may not be circuit ground... make sure the the probe ground
> is actually circuit ground.
>
> Many machines made the case RF ground and seperate from teh DC ground
> using capactiors (true for altair, NS* horizon, CCS, Compupro that I
> have).
That's my guess also. That 70v 60Hz signal probably doesn't
represent anything more than stray AC pickup by the case. Find the
real signal ground.
A couple of weeks ago, I was working on a friend's old Roland analog
synthesizer and discovered that there were *two* grounds on the thing-
-digital and analog. And they weren't the same. Neither one
corresponded to case ground or even the sleeve on the audio output
jacks. Fortunately, both grounds had labeled TPs on the PCBs.
Cheers,
Chuck