I picked up a nice little HP Omnibook 600C from someone here on the list, and after a few minutes of playing with it the hard drive decided it did not like its new home. Hey, no worries, stuff happens. It's a PCMCIA hard drive, so I plugged a CF card into a PCMCIA adapter and voila!, I have a new C: drive. But unfortunately, when the disk did its swan dive it took with it all the custom drivers and such that HP loads on it. That may explain why I can't get apparently simple things to work. So, does anyone have one of these machines or its startup disk, and are you willing to share? Thanks -- Ian
Title says it all... I've been looking for one of these for awhile.
Picked one up off eBay awhile back but it was totally trashed (though I
now have several spare batteries & accessories if I ever find a working
one...)
Anyone have one for trade/sale?
Thanks,
Josh
I'm cleaning house a bit. I have four IBM Model: WD-280 2.5" hard
drives. The interface is not IDE nor SCSI. I once managed to
Google up a page with an extensive listing of 2.5" drives (laptop
service company?) which indicated that the interface was something
else, the name of which I no longer remember.
Anyway, I have no use for these. If you do, email me, pay shipping
and they're yours. If I do not hear from anyone in one week I will
dispose of them.
Two of them are still factory sealed. A third one's bag is opened
but the drive passes a non-electrical inspection. The fourth one
has an ominous rattle coming from inside as if the head arm is
swinging around loose. If you do not want the fourth one, I am
happy to ship only three.
Other markings on the drive include:
P/N 06G6449
FRU P/N 95F4708
MLC C99714
I hope someone has a use for these unusual drives.
Jeff Walther
At 22:26 -0600 12/10/08, bfranchuk wrote:
>Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable langauge
>here. Tiny C will not work
>as my instruction set does NOT have register to register operations. I
>plan to have a wopping
>48Kb system as that was BIG memory 1975 ish.
At 12:00 -0600 12/11/08, Jim Battle summarized:
>Ben you have said these three things in this thread:
>
>(1) "Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable
>langauge here."
>
>(2) "Tiny C will not work as my instruction set does NOT have
>register to register
>operations."
>
>(3) "I could do Forth but it would be slow as I have no
>auto-incriment registers and wound
>need to use memory variables."
Ben (?), I note that on:
http://www.altair680kit.com/index.html
or more specifically,
http://www.altair680kit.com/manuals/Altair_680-VTL-2%20Manual-05-Beta_1-Sea…
Grant Stockly refers to "VTL-2" from Gary Shannon and Frank McCoy.
The manual says it requires 768 bytes to implement on a 6800 (which
has, admittedly, a pretty flexible instruction set, including good
stack operations).
Not knowing anything more about your system or the language than what
I've posted above, I still suggest it might be worth a look.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
Hi Vern!
Certainly Don was always happy and joyful to help out in any
way he could with the contents of his archive and his ability to
make odd-format floppies for any CP/M user. If you ever get to
the archive, you'll find several dozen floppies (Compupro and
VT180) that I sent his way.
In the 1990's I was encouraging him to make disk images and
make them publicly available. Tools at the time were teledisk etc.
He was worried about copyright issues
with a massively public on-the-net archive, he said.
Tim.
At 22:26 -0600 12/10/08, Tony wrote:
>Of course paper has the advantage that ... it withstands a
>hot soldering iron a lot better than any computer does :-)
Hm. I assume this refers to soldering iron settings below, as Ray
Bradbury would put it, "Fahrenheit 451"?
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
All,
I'm looking for a final accurate answer.
When the Apple II's came out, the keyboard had a power-light that looked like a lit up key at the keyboard's lower left corner, below the shift key.
Apple II+'s had a power-light that was (nearly) flush with the case.
See these for comparison:
http://www.vectronicsappleworld.com/ads/ads/appleii/howto2.jpghttp://www.computercloset.org/apple2Plus.htm
The question: Did Apple ever produce II's with this flush-power-light keyboard?
I know the II and II+ lines were sold concurrently, so it doesn't
surprise me if, for a time, the hardware was identical. All I've read
(and which sounds definitive) the only initial difference was the
ROMs. See the 1980 price list mid page two: http://www.barse.org/blog/archives/apple1980pricelist.pdf . In time, the II+'s motherboard's did go through changes
Other, slightly related info
It has an Apple II 16K model #: A2S0016.
The motherboard is a Rev 4, which, if I understand it correctly, was used for both II and II+'s.
The silkscreen on the MB near the "apple computer inc" text (above ROMs) says 1978.
The manufacture date code (handprinted on MB corner near slot 0) is 7928-- 28th week (mid July) 1979.
It has the AppleSoft/Auto-Start ROMs, but these were available as an upgrade. (The previous owner also added memory to 48K plus a language card).
Oh yeah, the previous owner lost the lid!!
All this is consistent with it being an Apple II. BUT one kicker is that the keyboard has a (nearly) flush power light that are used in II+'s.
Thanks,
Scott
bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca wrote:
> Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable langauge
> here. Tiny C will not work
> as my instruction set does NOT have register to register operations. I
> plan to have a wopping
> 48Kb system as that was BIG memory 1975 ish.>>
>
Your best bet is to write a byte-code interpreter in your native
instruction set. If your architecture Turing-equivalent it doesn't
matter what operations are missing. Tiny Basic, UCSD Pascal, Logo,
Java, Scheme and lots of other languages have been implemented this
way. Sure, this might be slower than a "native implementation," but you
can always bootstrap a native compiler later if you have the time.
Byte-code interpreters typically run faster than "regular"
interpreters. If you can find it, I would recommend UCSD Pascal. It is
a full-featured language (structs/records, etc.). I ran this on the
Apple II in about the amount of memory you have.
Hello,
My entire classic computer website is down for exceeding my monthly bandwidth allotment. I exceeded 60 Gigs in 2 weeks.
Can anyone recommend a good host? I need 150+ Gig/month bandwidth.
Thanks!
Steven Stengel
http://oldcomputers.net
I'd like to try and get a Kennedy tape drive (9600) up
and running and wondered if anyone had any advice or
possible interface cards?
The unit is complete and appears to be working, I have
two 50 pin connectors on the back, and the ribbon cables
to IDE connectors. This is the PERTEC interface I'm assuming?
I'm ultimately wanting to connect this to a PDP 11, but
initially it would be good to connect this some how to a
regular PC.
Are there any cards available to do this? I do have older
PC's (this is vintage computing after all) ie with ISA
slots which I'm guessing would be required.
Anyway, any pointers/leads appreciated.
Thanks
Ian.
