> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:27 -0800
> From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
> In Aug, 2004, Jim Battle wrote:
>
> > Speaking of core memory, I used to work for a company that was still >
> shipping core-based systems in 1985, when I first joined them right out >
> of college. > > The machine was the "BTI 8000", made by BTI Computer
> Systems, based in > Sunnyvale, CA. I worked there for only a year, but I
> have some > recollection of the machine.
>
>
> I turned up a brochure and technical summary last night, scans up under
> http://bitsavers.org/pdf/bti
Holy cow--3.5 years to respond to a message!
I'm not certain, but I think I may have a boot disk for the 8000,
should anyone run into the real thing.
Cheers,
Chuck
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:52:23 -0500
> From: "Bill Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
Give http://www.jameco.com a shot--they have a bewildering thicket of
power supplies in stock. The hardest part is getting through their
inventory listing.
Cheers,
Chuck
If anyone else needs MS-DOS 3.3 for the Grid PC, I've put it up at
http://www.sydex.com/temp/griddos.zip. Two self-extracting 720K
diskette image files and Grid PCMASTER and PCSLAVE data transfer
programs.
Note that this version of MS-DOS includes enhancements for the Grid
PC.
I'll leave it up until Friday.
Cheers,
Chuck
Dave,
Thanks for replying to my other email. I am preparing a detailed reply, but
have been busy with some other high priority projects.
Overall, you seem to be the best source for and to send to such magazines!
I am developing a list of sites related to Kaypros and other older computers
I have found and will post it on several websites when I get it done. Those
are areas to explore, but you probably know of most of them already. Some
of these sites may be good candidates for such magazines.
It is a shame all this cannot be saved by someone or some organization, but
you just cannot save everything. Once they are gone, you cannot get them
back.
All the best!
Frank
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 22:53:42 Chris M wrote:
> what examples could you give as a not so conventional
> 8088 board?
The console control in the Ruffatti pipe organ at St. Mary's
Cathedral in San Francisco? (I don't recall exactly--could be an
8086).
Cheers,
Chuck
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:30:10 -0800
> From: dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
> I think the restore operation will cause a carry meaning I need
> to clear it here with something like:
>
> ora a ; or other carry clearing instruction
I don't think so--let's consider a simple case, using 8 bits and -10.
-10 = 0xf6
Our code looks like:
add -10 to dividend
skip next instruction if carryout
subtract -10 from divident
The question is "what is the value of the carry bit here?"
Let's try some sample values.
0 + 0xF6 = 0xF6, no carry, subtract 0xF6 = 0, no carry/borrow
9 + 0xF6 = 0xFF, no carry, subtract 0xF6 = 9, no carry/borrow
10 + 0xF6 = 0x00, carry; skip the subtract
11 + 0xF6 = 0x01, carry; skip the subtract
So the "ora a" to clear the carry shouldn't be required. Saves a few
more cycles.
For those porting this method to other platforms, be aware that the
6502/PIC subtract works differently than the x80; the carry bit
represents "not borrow" instead of "borrow".
The same algorithm can be implemented nearly as efficiently on the
8085 by using the "undocumented" instructions, as it includes a
double-precision subtract (as well as a 16-bit arithmetic right
shift) as a 1-byte instruction. Note that the BC pair must be used
in place of DE to use this instruction.
It might be possible to implement the algorithm efficiently on the
8080 by letting BC = -DE and using an ADD HL,BC instead of a SBC
HL,DE. One is left without a loop counter register however--but then
one could "prime" the A register with a 1 and iterate until the 1
migrates to the sign bit of A, then mask it out as part of the exit
code.
Cheers,
Chuck
16L8ACN. This is the PAL aboard the Acculogic
sIDE-1/16 XT-IDE controller I mentioned. Someone asked :)
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>You should indeed have activity on the address lines, take another look as the
>machine comes up, they should be toggling, even briefly. Could be that data
>lines are stuck, and/or it is getting a halt somewhere. Another trick would
>be connect a 1k to +5, and touch it to the reset line, you should see the
>address lines blip a little then. If they never change state the processor is
>dead or the mux buffers stuck (74245's?) .
>
>If you can build a little proto board to plug into the processor socket so you
>can disconnect the address lines from the board, you should be able to 'free
>run' the processor, and see activity. If those address lines dont toggle with
>clock, power applied and reset low, I would suspect the processor.
>
>Randy
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:26:49 -0800
>> From: jwstephens at msm.umr.edu
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: Dead IBM PC 5150 motherboard - help troubleshooting
>>
>> Richard Beaudry wrote:
>> > <snip>
>> > 6) One thing that seems odd is that the ADxx (Address/Data) lines seem
>> > "stuck". The scope does not show a waveform, and measuring with a meter
>> > shows some lines right at +5VDC, some at about +4VDC and some at 0VDC.
>> > Perhaps the processor is indeed HALTed???
>> >
>> On several of the CPU's if you hold the processor reset, you actually
>> get the reset vector address out. So on the 8088 8086 80186, you get
>> FFF0 out. I don't know if 8088 has all 16 lines out, or is multiplexed,
>> but on the 186 we could troubleshoot a board we had with a 186 on it for
>> a support processor by setting a flipflop that held it reset, and then
>> look at the lines with a scope.
>>
>> Jim
>
I did some troubleshooting of some of my 5150's using the "Sam's IBM PC Troubleshooting and Repair Guide Book". I noticed that there is one on eBay right now, item #190193033366. Might help.
david.
> From: rtellason at verizon.net
>
> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:21, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
>> On Friday 11 January 2008 15:36:05 dwight elvey wrote:
>>> Although, a side subject, I like Jay, consider tube manufacture
>>> relavent to some of my computing equipment.
>>> Dwight
>>
>> I wonder how much computing equipment you could make from home-made
>> triodes?
>>
>> Even a simple (say 4-bit) adder would be pretty impressive.
>
> In power as well.
>
> It'd be darn-near EMP-proof, though. :-)
>
Hi
I thought I might clarify what equipment I had.
First it is not digital, it is an analog computer. Each
tube calculates to about two decimal digits making
each tube worth about 20 or so TTL equivalent.
Dwight
_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts!? Play the word scramble challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
I email Al, but did not yet get a reply. I realize folks are busy, so I
thought I'd ask on the list for an update.
Anyone know the status on releasing the older Hewlett Packard software
that the agreement with the Computer History Museum allowed for?
I know there are others on this list that have HP software, is it now
legal to put that up someplace? or does it need a CHM stamp of some kind
first?
Is the agreement available for review?
Side Note: I'll be in San Jose tomorrow (Jan 23) and plan to drop by the
CHM in the afternoon. I'll hit some stores and scrounge sites in the
area as well to see what I can find that I can't possibly take back on
the plane with me. :)
You suppose I could check an HP-2116 as luggage? 230lbs might be a bit
over the weight limit, but it's close, right? :)
--
Tim Riker - http://Rikers.org/ - TimR at Debian.org
Embedded Linux Technologist - http://eLinux.org/
BZFlag maintainer - http://BZFlag.org/ - for fun!