>
>
>Well, I have the Exatron Stingy Floppy adverts on the back of (and
>inside?) several issues of 80 Microcomputing which I could attempt to
>photograph with my (cheap) webcam, if anyone is interested?
>
>No newsletters though :(
>
I have some of these materials if anyone is interested in PDF
scans. Contact me directly and specify which issue of 80 Microcomputing
and/or Newsletter (I have only the first @LOAD, the newsletter's name). I
am presently working on a new drive belt replacement. I have found a
vendor to make the belts and hope to get them in early January. It seems
that every stringy floppy that I have come upon has a dried-up drive belt,
making the drives useless. Before my last belt died, I was able to take a
few pictures of a successful load:
http://www.vintagecomputer.net/tandy/trs80_1/exatron_stringy_floppy/
Bill
Has anyone seen sources floating around for WATBOL for the PDP ?
Thanks in advance!
Tim
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - http://webmail.aim.com
Greetings. . .
I'm looking for documentation on a System Industries QS1000 SCSI controller for the Q-bus.
I've tried the usual web searches, and checked out bitsavers and manx, to no avail.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Tim
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - http://webmail.aim.com
Now that sounds familiar. Two for an 80 character line (8bits) 7 bits
for the ASCII code and one for the extending under line cursor. 48 for
24 lines = six rows of eight on the board. Add address counters etc.
Yup that could have been it.
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thatcher
Sent: 20 December 2007 20:18
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: E: Shift Registers as Delay Lines (was Delay lines in TV
actually Texas Instruments had a quad 80 bit MOS shift register package
available in the early to mid seventies. I had used two of them for a
frame buffer on a CRT controller design I did. The part number was
TMS3409 I believe and it was something I got from the surplus market.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
>Sent: Dec 20, 2007 10:40 AM
>To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: E: Shift Registers as Delay Lines (was Delay lines in TV
>
> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
>
>> I actually worked on VDU's that used shift registers as the display
>> memory around 1973.
The next VDU design after that was a sort of state mahine.
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Tony Duell
Sent: 20 December 2007 21:58
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Shift Registers as Delay Lines (was Delay lines in TV sets)
>
> I actually worked on VDU's that used shift registers as the display
> memory around 1973.
> If I remember correctly one lines worth (80 characters) got
> transferred to a buffer in the interline gap (Fly back time). The
> buffer was scanned out in such a way as to address the character
> generator one row at a time. Characters were 7x5 dots so the top five
> dots of the first character was serialized followed by the top row of
> the second one and so on. Then all of the second character row dots on
> a line would be displayed until the end of the store (and therefore
> frame was reached)
The HP9866A thermal printer used MOS shift registers for character
storage. I am tryign to recall the details, because it's not as obvious
as you might think. From memory :
The printhead is the full width of the paper, with 400 eleemnts (80
charas * 5 dots/char). Physically it's made up of 4 modules. IIRC each
printhead module is divided up into 4 sectiosn, each of 5 characters,
and I think they're interleaved (so characters 0, 4, 8,... are one
section, 1, 5, 9,... are the next and so on. I might have got that
wrong, though)
Incoming characters (7 bit ASCII) are re-encoded to 6 bits (it's an
upper-case only printer, so 6 bits is enoguh) and stored in 6 80-bit
Shift registers (physcially 3 TO99 cans).
When the printer dtects a LF character, the more comlicated parts starts
up. This reads ou the shift retgisters, every fourth character is sent
to the character geenrator ROM, and the bit pattern for the top row is
shfited into a set of 5 (one for each column of the chracters) 20 bit
shift registers (I think the chips used are 8203s) which drive the
printehad.
That pattern or dots is printed
The shift registers are run rount again, now the next set of chars taken
throgh the character gernearotr ROM. to the printhead shift registers,
and printed
After the top row of all 80 characters has been printed, the paper is
moved up one dot-line, and the process is repeated, only this time the
character generatoter ROM outputs the patterns for the second row of the
characters.
And so on until the complete characters have been printed.
This is controlled by a state machine that looks simple as a schematic
(a handful of chips), but is not easy to understnad!
-tony
Thu Dec 20 2007 at 06:55 Dave McGuire wrote:
> Well then you'd have the problem of defining "most powerful". By
> many metrics, any VAX is an incredibly powerful system, but the
> average
> not-so-powerful modern PeeCee will blow its doors off in integer
> performance. So how will you define "power"?
>
> -Dave
Good question. Wish I'd asked it myself :)
It could be any number of things. Myself, I'm going to eventually
use it for a "simple" robot rover (more "museum piece"
engineering ... it's a long story; ask me by private e-mail if you
really want to know). Most people would probably do something
different, though.
Here's an idea: a machine powerful enough to serve a simple webpage
with minimal graphics, a page views counter, and, oh, maybe a few
links elsewhere. After all, these days Real Computers are all on the
web, right :)
I am not a web head, but it seems this ought to be doable. Shucks,
if a Commodore 64 can browse web pages, this ought to be relatively
straightforward.
Sort reminds me of a guy I knew in the early '80s who recorded modem
tones and about a page of 1200 baud bulletin board data on his
answering machine outgoing message tape. He said it was to drive the
then new phenomenon of computer hackers crazy....
-Bobby
The clearout continues....
I've turned up a couple of Televideo 950s and a couple of Wyse 30s if anyone
wants them?
AFAIK The Wyse 30s are fully functional (though bear in mind I haven't used
them for some 7 years), but I think the TV950s may need some TLC - I vaguely
remember them having problems communicating with their respective keybaords
the last time I used them (they'd make a good source of spares though).
There's also a Zenith Z89 available, which definitely needs some work doing
on it. Again, probably best used for spares for a working unit.
All of these are available free for pickup from Birmingham before the end of
January (whereupon any computer crap left in my house *WILL* be
unceremoniously junked).
BTW I've also turned up a number of old "Micro Decision" magazines from
1989/90 if anyone wants them (they were heading for the recycling bin, but
with the amount of stuff I've chucked in there tonight they simply won't
fit). They'll be heading for the recycler next fortnight, so speak up now if
you want them!
As usual, contact me off-list if interested.
TTFN - Pete.
> From: "Andrew Lynch" <lynchaj at yahoo.com>
> Does anyone have a schematic for *simple* hardware only circuit using a
> commonly available UART, like an 8251 or 8250, to do the serial to
> parallel conversion? I am looking for a schematic which I can easily
> modify to strap the UART to 300bps operation.
If you don't want programmable logic, an 8251 or 8250 isn't going to
be what you want. Try a TR1602 or TR1865 or any of the other
"hardwire" UARTS--set parity, data bits, etc. by connecting
appropriate pins to Vcc or GND; put the serial data in on one pin and
take the parallel data out on 8 pins. No programming needed.
Cheers,
Chuck
Fred wrote:
> That was less than 30 years ago.
> Intro'd at 3rd West Coast Computer Faire?
> (the one time that it was in southern CA)
I used to get the newsletters from Exatron. I seem to recall
(probably a sign of an impending ischemic event) that someone wrote a
ditty in praise of their product and published it in one of those.
Did anyone hang on to the newsletters? It started with "I love my
Stringy Floppy..." or some such.
> Actually, I think that he was referring to uses of empty 8 track cases for
> ROM cartridges.
Ah, so not magnetic at all and not germane to the topic.
Cheers,
Chuck
That's BSCP as in "Bit-Serial Computer Project." The 2N2/256 part of
the name is a nod to ham homebrewer Jim Kortge (K8IQY) who designed a
QRP rig called the 2N2/40 for a design contest about ten years ago.
The contest objective was to design and build a functional amateur
radio transceiver, using a maximum of twenty-two 2N2222 type
transistors.
Whether it uses drums, disks, or ultrasonic delay lines, my challenge
is:
1) To build a complete functional computer, including memory,
using no more than 256 2N2222-ish transistors (plus scads of diodes,
resistors, etc.).
2) Use no ICs or other parts that wouldn't have been available
to hobbyists ca. 1965.
3) Must be transportable in the boot of a mid-size sedan (i.e.
a few roughly 350mm cubical modules).
Anybody up for a contest to see who can design the most powerful
general-purpose digital computer given these constraints? I guess
we'd have to figure out what "powerful" means in this context, given
that it's likely never to exceed a few KIPS.
I'm prototyping DTL NAND gates and flip-flops today...
-Bobby