I've spent a few hours this evening transferring software from my PERQ
over the serial port at 9600 baud, and I thought I'd share them, since
there don't seem to be many games archived on the 'net (feel free to
correct me if I'm wrong on that count :).
Thus far I've archived binaries & source for:
- PERQMan (seems to be an early version, looks like a 100% clone of
Pac-Man, vs. the changed sprites & "Perq Interactive Debugger" name I've
seen in screenshots)
- Chess
- Puzzle
These are available at: http://yahozna.dhs.org/computers/software/PERQ/
These all compile and run under POS (I have D.6 running on my machine).
If I'm wasting my time (i.e. if these bits have already been archived
somewhere, let me know so I don't spend more time painfully extracting
these files one at a time over a serial link...)
There are a handful of other games and utilities (a vt52 emulator, a
Pente game, etc..) that I'll be getting to sometime later this week.
Additionally, I'm working on archiving a raw image of the 14" Shugart in
my PERQ (again, over the serial port). I've written a simple pascal
program to do the dumping and I'm doing it 10 cylinders at a time since
it takes so long :). My goal eventually is to write a PERQ emulator,
but we'll see how that turns out...
Josh
> Hmm, random thought, but does it make sense to have a list on classiccmp.org
> of what preservation work (in terms of utilities, procedures etc.) has been
> done for various machines?
This is part of my charter as Software Curator at CHM (documentation and tools)
It will be going up as part of the SCC (hopefully, with a new name soon) web site.
http://community.computerhistory.org/scc
along with a blog of the projects that I'm working on at CHM.
--
Connectivity for me is spotty, since I can't send or receive bitsavers mail at work right now.
I've got a couple of cubic feet of MULTICS manuals, here.
Should I put them in the "to be scanned" pile or the "to
be shredded" pile?
--
Check what's already been done on bitsavers.
> But, one key difference between the QNX approach and that of
>most other current OS's is the microkernel architecture.
>Instead of a BIG monolithic kernel with ALL the drivers
>installed (or, extra glue for LKM support, etc.), a microkernel
>based design treats all of these as components which can be
>plugged together. And *talk* to each other (instead of being
>invoked "from above").
Yes, you just have the IPC overhead, though.
Not sure if it's IPC or cheaper hardware, but large network operations on my Macintosh (System 10) bring the machine
much closer to it's knees than any monolithic UNIX or even VMS on a VAX 4000/200. NB - I haven't used the microkernel
based Tru64 yet.
Microkernels are neat in theory, but a well-trimmed monolithic kernel seems to do pretty well with not too much space.
I went over and checked out that Genrad 2294 tester here in
Atlanta. The auction includes equipment not shown in the picture,
namely the whole Genrad test platform itself, and the PDP-11/44 shown in
the picture. There are 4 DEC drives in the rack, plus one CDC drive
(over the CPU), the CPU box itself, and two 8" floppies.
Either I don't know the "trick" to getting the CPU box to slide out
on it's rails, or it's jammed. In any case, I couldn't get a picture of
it's guts. I do have some closeups of the exteriors of the CPU box, the
CDC drive, and one of the DEC drives. Maybe by looking at them,
sometime can determine what model they are.
I'm going to pass on the unit, as it's just too damn big for me to
put anywhere, and while they have a fork lift to load it, I have no way
to get it off.
The company bought the system while one of the Rockwell Missile
System Division buildings either closed or moved. From what I gather,
this Genrad was used in some phase of the Hellfire missile construction,
although he wasn't clear if it was the manufacturing process group or
the development group. There's also a bunch of good older test
equipment, but nothing I have any use for or don't already have.
The box hasn't been running in at least 3 years. I didn't get a
look inside the chassis, but overall it looked pretty clean, no dents or
major bashes. Seems like a damn good deal, for someone with the right
equipment to transport it.
--jc
Hi,
I'm digging through boxes in an effort to "lighten the
load". Are any of these worth keeping?
Future Domain TMC-840
TMC-850
STB Systems (no P/N... a pair of S3 *display* controllers
onboard along with a DEC DC1040F -- which I assme to
be a wide SCSI controller?)
IBM (no P/N... three adaptec AIC7880's, a PowerPC 403GA,
IBM "Viper" and "Rattler" chips. Lots of FRU numbers
but no idea which applies to the *assembly*!)
Thanks!
Hi,
This box has a little fold down door in the front
(below the half height CD-ROM/tape drive). It is the
size of a second half-height drive bay. But, I'll
be damned if I can figure out why it's there!
Behind the door there is no way that anything *could*
be installed (even if the opening into the chassis
was NOT blocked).
Perhaps this cover assembly is used for some other
product(s) which *could* make use of the space behind it?
(obviously, this isn't a material question -- just
something trivial.... why go to the expense of putting
something there that *only* serves as a place to hide the
model number, etc.?)
Thanks,
--don
I hope this qualifies for a classic computer. If not then wipe it out.
I have a Nixdorf LK 3000 and LK 3500 module that I was preparing to
put on E Bay but discovered it didnt work. Examining it I discovered
NO BATTERY, Inside there are a blue and a red wire that must have
originaly gone to a battery clip. But I dont know what size or where
it resided. I dont want to get rid of this without fixing it first.
Does anyone have any info on what the battery (pack?) looked like on
thei personal computer?
I am glad I decided to try it out because I had remembered that it DID
work. Shows what 70 years will do to your memory. I dont even
remember removing the battery pack!
--
Jim Isbell
"If you are not living on the edge, well then,
you are just taking up too much space."
Just wondering whether other collectors try to acquire
original boxes to go with their machines. I have several
original Ohio Scientific boxes that I prize as part of
my collection. Anyway, I just got a nice Koyo 9 inch
monitor (built 1979, IMSAI blue) in an IBM PS/2 Color
Display 8515 box. I know that there are a few PS/2
collectors on the list. The box is not in the best
shape, but it isn't awful either. Anybody interested in
it or should I pitch it? Located in the Maryland suburbs
of Washington, DC.
Bill
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.3/423 - Release Date: 8/18/2006