Hi all
Sometimes I receive messagages like the one below.
I havnt sent anything recently, so I cant see why.
Could someone have sent some HTML, which is being bounced, but copied to
cctalk ?
What worries me, is the line X-RCPT-TO., Where could that come from ?
Nico
----- Original Message -----
Received: from dewey.classiccmp.org [209.145.140.57] by post6.zitechnet.dk
(SMTPD-8.20) id AE350EB4; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:37:57 +0200
Received: from dewey.classiccmp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dewey.classiccmp.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5N5fvC2012780;
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:44:01 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org)
Received: from dewey.classiccmp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dewey.classiccmp.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5N5fr31012770
for <cctalk at classiccmp.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:41:53 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org)
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1195093276=="
Message-ID: <mailman.102.1151041311.459.cctech at classiccmp.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:41:51 -0500
Precedence: bulk
X-BeenThere: cctech at classiccmp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
X-List-Administrivia: yes
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: The results of your email commands
X-BeenThere: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Reply-To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
List-Id: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk.classiccmp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request at classiccmp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk>
List-Post: <mailto:cctalk at classiccmp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cctalk-request at classiccmp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request at classiccmp.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
Errors-To: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
X-Declude-Spoolname: D7e35032f00008ac8.smd
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None [0]
X-RCPT-TO: <nico at farumdata.dk>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 348442292
X-IMail-ThreadID: 7e35032f00008ac8
I've got some equipment here that has RS422 serial on it - i.e. it uses
differential signal pairs rather than RS232's reference against ground.
Question is, can I wire up a cable so that I can use an RS232 terminal with
this RS422 equipment? (running over a short distance)
Looking at the schematics, I think it's possible, with signals mapping to:
RS422 RS232
RXD- GND
RXD+ RX
TXD- no connection?
TXD+ TX
CTS- GND
CTS+ CTS
BSY- no connection
BSY+ RTS
... but I don't know if I should ground TXD-, or indeed one web site I saw
suggested that TXD- should be used as the signal and TXD+ is actually the
reference. I suspect that one or other should be left floating and the other
pin of the pair forms the 'real' TXD in RS232-speak.
Obviously I need to swap signals for communications to work (RX -> TX, TX ->
RX etc.) :-)
CTS- and BUSY- aren't actually brought out to the comms port on the equipment
at all; CTS- is currently jumpered to ground internally, and BUSY- is left
floating and brought to a test point on the PCB.
RXD- is also currently jumpered to ground, which suggests that I can indeed
connect TX on the RS232 terminal to RXD+ on the equipment and expect that side
of things to work - I'm just not sure what I need to do with the TXD+/TXD-
signal pair (which one actually connects to RX on the terminal end)
(the actual comms chip is a 6551A, then the receiver for RXD and CTS is a
26LS32 and the driver for TXD and BSY is 26LS30)
cheers
Jules
Eric? I'm trying to reach you via E-mail, and your system produced the following error (timestamp in PDT):
Jun 30 21:02:11 willy postfix/smtp[27491]: 60BF12FE7: to=<eric at brouhaha.com>, relay=mx1.brouhaha.com[64.62.206.9], delay=3, status=deferred (host mx1.brouhaha.com[64.62.206.9] said: 450 <eric at brouhaha.com>: Recipient address rejected: Policy Rejection: Please try later. (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Could you get in touch with me, please? I was trying to send you some software of interest.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
> I recently rescued three boards from Cipher tape deck that had been
> stripped of motors before it headed for the great scrapper:
>
> Servo Board 966047-001 Rev 06
> Formatter 967058-001 Rev 02
> Overland Data Assy 606740-002/A
>
> Available for postage.
>
> CRC
They have been spoken for....
CRC
David Griffith wrote:
So, is anyone interested in my VME wirewrap boards?
--
David Griffith
David,
I wrote you offline before I realised that I won't have access to my email
at this address until the 7th. But yes, I'm very interested in the boards.
I'll be getting amail at bpettitx at comcast.net through the next seven days.
Billy
Hi,
Has anyone running NeXTSTEP any experience with the
Trillium speech product? This is the basis for GNUspeech.
I am curious as to the quality of the speech produced
and if it is worth pursuing (and if I should hunt for
a NeXT cube or just follow the port onto different hardware)
In addition to the auditory quality, I am interested in
just how much of a CPU-hog it is (was).
I'd be interested in any realistic (i.e. un-tuned) sound
samples.
Thanks!
--don
I recently rescued three boards from Cipher tape deck that had been
stripped of motors before it headed for the great scrapper:
Servo Board 966047-001 Rev 06
Formatter 967058-001 Rev 02
Overland Data Assy 606740-002/A
Available for postage.
CRC