test-drb December 2006

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

225 participants
420 discussions

by tpeters＠mixcom.com

Anyone have an urgent need for 300' of thicknet? Never been used, approx 117m (according to the writing on the spool) with one cut end and one N-connector on the other end. It's 50ohm cable right? Maybe I can use it for amateur radio, if I keep it indoors away from the UV. [Oops] It's a question of whether we're going to go forward into the future, or past into the back. --Dan Quayle --... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -... tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio) "HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters 43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531

19 years, 1 month

Build your own Apollo Guidance Computer

by Billy.Pettit＠wdc.com

Brent Hilpert wrote: I always kind of liked the idea of making an entire processor out of just one basic gate/IC type. ------------------------- Didn't Seymour Cray do this on one of his later machines? The Cray 2? Seems like it was a 5 input And gate. But then he always did like to minimalize. The 6600, his first big iron, used one transistor type tied together in different ways to make gates, flip flops and timing circuits. He used circles and squares to denote gates - but whther they were And or Ors depended on what fed them. Ah, twas fun to work with. And I loved the esthetics of the logic diagrams. All those little squares and circles had a kind of magic to them. Billy

19 years, 1 month

Build your own Apollo Guidance Computer

by trag＠io.com

>Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:30:36 -0700 >From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com> >In article <458726D7.17136.1434D6AA at cclist.sydex.com>, > "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> writes: > >> But, given that the original uses RTL and core, what's the point of >> building one in LSTTL? > >Is it even possible to build with RTL parts anymore? > >I guess you'd have to do it PDP-8 style with discrete transistors? Is there a guide somewhere to the different families of logic, such as RTL, TTL, LSTTL (never heard of that one) and CMOS? I was choosing some simple logic components for my IIfx SIMM project the other day and was somewhat bewildered by the choice of input/output levels. Also, some are Schmidt Triggered? My understanding extends to the idea that there are differences in how they (at what voltage) interpret the low and high states but beyond that, I'm ignorant. Anyway, before I go on a Google hunt (which will probably turn up all the surplus electronics suppliers and pricegrabber links first) does anyone already know of a nice educational source on the topic? Jeff Walther

19 years, 1 month

Cray-I PCB for display at Goodwill

by wbblair3＠yahoo.com

> > Sometimes Goodwill has interesting stuff. Here's one you don't see > > every day: > > > > http://shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=2423761 > > > > Cheers, > > Chuck > > > Thanks for the heads up and I bided on the item for the museum and it's at > $21 right now. > John These are sold by the National Atomic Museum on Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, NM: http://www.atomicmuseum.com/store/ProductItem.cfm?Category=7 I bought mine (016 of 340) about eight years ago for $50 when I visited the museum. I'm amazed they haven't sold all 340 by now. They now sell for $58 new to give you an idea of what your maximum bid should be if you don't just buy a new one from the museum. The one in the auction has been re-framed. I re-framed and re-matted mine but in a much nicer black frame than the one in the auction (frame only cost me $5 on sale at Target due to superficial damage on its BACK side). I, also, made some new labels with far more info about the machine and specific board. ASCI Red, the first tera-ops supercomputer was recently decommissioned at Sandia (on Kirtland): http://www.sandia.gov/ASCI/Red/ I emailed the National Atomic Museum to suggest that they get some boards and frame them because of the significance of the tera-ops barrier. I received no response. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

19 years, 1 month

RoHS question

by Watzman＠neo.rr.com

Almost all new equipment has to comply with "RoHS" (Reduction of Hazardous Substances) requirements, which among other things means it's made with lead-free solder. Enforcement is stronger in Europe than in the US, but in any case industry is cleary moving in that direction even when and where not absolutely required by law. Question: If one is repairing RoHS compliant equipment, with respect to functionality only is there a problem with using conventional tin/lead solder? I'm not asking if it's legal or "environmentally friendly", I'm asking if mixing the lead free solder and conventional tin/lead solder will cause functional problems (for example, any kind of problems similar to those which we used to see when someone repaired electronic equipment using plumbing acid flux solder). Also, if one wants to acquire and use RoHS compliant solder, are there any changes that someone accustomed to conventional tin/lead solder needs to make to their soldering technique? And I guess I should also ask the reverse question from the paragraph above: Are there any issues in using lead-free RoHS compliant solders on equipment originally built from tin/lead solder? Are there any other implications of RoHS that a casual classic computer and electronics enthusiast should know about, in either direction?

19 years, 1 month

Apple-1 History?

by dave06a＠dunfield.com

Hi guys, I've been having an esclating correspondance with a chap named "Murray Balascak" (anyone know him?) - who contacted me regarding his displeasure with my mention of the Apple-1 on the Apple-II page of my site - here is what I have posted as part of my introdiuction to the Apple-II: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 1976, Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs formed the Apple Computer Company, and built a home computer they called the "Apple 1" in their garage. Although it required the users to provide their own cabinet, power supply, keyboard and video monitor, it didn't require a separate terminal, and a simple BASIC interpreter could be loaded with an optional cassette interface. Although it required a fairly technical user to complete the system and make it usable, about 200 Apple 1s were sold in the first year. The following year (1977), Apple refined the design, providing a keyboard and power supply and packaging the machine in a attractive low-profile plastic cabinet with simple connections for the video monitor and tape storage. Now - anyone who could plug two connectors together could use this computer. The result, called "Apple 2" was one of the most successful early personal computers, and sold many thousands of units. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Mr. Balascaks first correspondance, he stated that the KIM-1 was a far better machine than the Apple-1, asked if I had succumbed to "the relentless revisionism of the brand zealots?", and demanded that I "correct the above reference to show the machine's irrelevance". In his second correspondance, he stated that I am spreading "Apple propaganda", again stated that the KIM-1 was better, sold in higher quantities and cheaper (I still do not know what the KIM-1 has to do with an Apple-II page). In his third correspondance he acqused me of "posting lies and being worse than useless by corrupting history into fiction". Again, he stated that the KIM-1 was a far better machine and much cheaper. In his last email, he indicated that he believes I am responsable for the degradation of the internet and the reason that it cannot be trusted as a source of information. I don't know where this is coming from - I believe my reference to the Apple-1 is accurate considering it's brevity - Apple was formed in 1976 and operated out of Jobs basement. The Apple-1 was sold through the homebrew computer club as well as a few of stores, and although I do not have confirmed numbers of sales, I believe it was around 200 units. It was never my intention to make a page about the Apple-1 (I don't have one, and I only feature systems on my site which are in my collection)... I believe at some point someone asked why I didn't mention the Apple-1 so I added this one paragraph as part of the Apple-II history. I have no other references to the Apple-1 (at least that I can recall) on my site. In all of my responses to him, I indicated that I am unwilling to change the site based on the hearsay of one individual, especially when that person has an apparent (in my opinion based on correspondance received) bias for or against the material being questioned, however I would be happy to revise the site in response to any documented facts/evidence he can provide that the material I have is incorrect. All I have received in return is statements about how much better the KIM-1 was (I make no such comparisons on my site), how expensive the Apple-1 and Apple-II were (I post no such prices on my site), and rants about a website that apparently lists Woz as the "inventor of the single-board computer" (I make no such claim on my site). I should probably just ignore it - but the fact that I have been accused of lying and deliberatly posting misinformation is disturbing to me ... So - I throw it to the list - As a background statement showing that Apple existed and sold a predecessor in small volumes for a time before the Apple-II ... Is my posting above non-factual? If so, in what way, and can you provide supporting documentation? Please keep in mind that I do not wish to post a page about the Apple-1, only a single paragraph as a way of introducing the guys who built the Apple-2. Regards, Dave -- dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com com Collector of vintage computing equipment: http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html

19 years, 1 month

Computer Music

by john3000＠cox.net

Hi Will, Look for an Apple II with the "Alpha Centauri" (or did they call it "Alpha Syntauri"?) package. It was fantastic! It used two cards from a company named "Mountain Hardware" and was an amazing synthesizer with 5 octave AGO keyboard and waveform design software. It was polyphonic but I don't remember the number of voices. I had the pleasure of using one while at George Mason University in Fairfax Virginia. We bought one (I was a computer center administrator there at the time) for evaluation and then bought more for the music department, and they loved them! If you can find one, it will be a real treasure! I don't remember if I have any recordings, and if I do they would be on cassette tapes that would be nearly 30 years old. I did use a lot of metal tape back in those days, so if the binder on the tape is still good, they may be playable. First, I'll have to see if any of the recordings still exist, and that will have to wait until I'm recovered (bronchitis). Good luck with your project! John At 12/24/2006 04:08 PM, William Donzelli wrote: >I am currently working on a project involving music made with >computers before MIDI. Some aspects and examples might be the old >mainframes playing tunes on band printers, minicomputers making tunes >with RFI, microcomputers controlling analog synthesizers, and so >forth. > >I have no strict timeline on this, but I would like to pull things >together in a few months maximum. > >Things I am looking for: > >1) Recordings of 2nd generation (or even before, if they exist) >mainframes making tunes. There are a few recordings out there, and I >may be getting some help from CHM for more. > >2) A working 1970s era minicomputer with core, probably a PDP-8 or >Nova, that is reliable enough to make a performance. > >3) A 1970s era microcomputer controlling an analog synthesizer. > >4) Outstanding examples of Atari and/or C64s making music. > >5) Leads to artists and musicians that used classic computers in >recordings, famous or not. Decent quality MP3s would be great. > >6) An example of the HP printer (a deskjet?) that contains the musical >Easter Egg, operational. > >7) Any examples of music made by computer algorithms, remixes by >computer, and so forth. Experimental works are welcome. > >8) Any suggestions to expand this. The computers need not be classics, >the music need not be oddball, but the results should be a little on >the weird side (for example, I do not need a Pentium 3 running >Protools making trance). > >While I am not looking to buy any of these machines, I am looking for >examples that are very reliable, and can travel to New Jersey for a >Saturday morning (probably). Appearance is not important, being this >will all take place in a studio. > >There is a very slim chance I can provide the minicomputer, but all my >tapes are lost in limbo, so I doubt it. Being a PDP-8/S, normal PDP-8 >music tapes will not work. There is also a chance I can provide a >Minimoog synthesizer, if someone can provide the microcomputer with >D/A cards (for the control voltages) and some sort of software for >making a tune. > >So please go and think about this, and tell me what you think, and if >you can contribute. Certainly proper credit will be given to those >that can help out, but sorry, no money. I am not getting paid for this >either. > >Thank you for your time. > >-- >Will John *** When replying to this message, please do not delete these *** *** signature lines. Otakon Katsucon HP3000-L @classiccmp.org *** *** DigitalCosplay.com JohnKorbPhoto.com JohnPKorb.com ***

19 years, 1 month

Multinet vs TCPware

by compoobah＠valleyimplants.com

Been looking at Process Software's stuff- for people who have worked with MultiNet and TCPware, what's the difference? Process doesn't seem to have a comparison between the two, only comparing with UCX. Which is easier for a newcomer to VMS to configure? I know that the issue is with TCP/IP v5.0 on the VAX since the same problems do not occur with an Alpha running VMS v7.3-1-TCP/IP v5.3. The network bogs down with many surplus packets as soon as a telnet connection is opened (doesn't happen with rsh/rlogin).

19 years, 1 month

Compaq floppy drive compatibility

by chrism3667＠yahoo.com

might be time to polish the ol bifocals mon frere LOL LOL --- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > > are we talking about the same puters lol? > > Ouch!. No we're not... > > I read 'Portable' and 'Plus' in the message text and assumed we were > talking about Apple Macs. What I said applies to those machines... > > -tony __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

19 years, 1 month

(found on another list) (Free) 4Ds/Challenge XL

by compoobah＠valleyimplants.com

Found this on another list- thought someone might be interested. Hi all, I have a few older Silicon Graphics systems up for grabs if anyone is interested. There's three 4D Predator racks, a deskside 4D/70GT and a Challenge XL. All the machines are complete except for the Challenge which is missing the CPU and memory boards. Except for that everything is there. They also come with a few boxes of parts, cables, keyboards and such. A 17" SGI monitor is also part of the lot. Pictures here: http://web.newsguy.com/AlexPhotos/sgi.html Everything is free if you take them as is. If you only want boards or other parts, I'll charge a small fee for the packaging material and for my time. The machines are located in Montreal, Canada. Thanks. Alex.

19 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb December 2006