On Jan 5 2006, 0:53, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> On Jan 4 2006, 10:56, Richard wrote:
> > Mine is labelled "AUX On/Off" and I didn't know what it did.
> >
> > On the 861 power conditioner there is a connector labelled J2. Is
> > this where the switch connects up?
>
> If it's a 3-pin AMP Commercial Mate-N-Lock, then yes it's the power
> control bus.
I should have added:
There's a fairly good picture at
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/PDP-11/AMP-Mate-N-Lock3.jpg if
you don't know what those connectors look like. The one on the left is
the one that goes on each end of the control cable; the one on the
right is the one you'll find on the 861, 871 or 874 controllers and the
panel carrying the AUX switch. They are, incidentally, the same range
of connectors used for the full-size 4-way power connector on disk
drives and the like.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 4 2006, 10:56, Richard wrote:
> In article <10601040813.ZM28391 at mindy.dunnington.plus.com>,
> Pete Turnbull <pete at dunnington.plus.com> writes:
> > There should be, on all BA11-M, BA11-N, and BA11-S boxes (except
some
> > expansion boxes that have no LED/switch panel at all) though
depending
> > on the box, it may be labelled LTC or AUX.
Incidentally, on a BA23, the power control is brought out to the
standard 3-pin Mate-N-Lock labelled J6, on the back of the chassis, at
the left, near the IEC mains inlet.
> Mine is labelled "AUX On/Off" and I didn't know what it did.
>
> On the 861 power conditioner there is a connector labelled J2. Is
> this where the switch connects up?
If it's a 3-pin AMP Commercial Mate-N-Lock, then yes it's the power
control bus. There should be two connectors, actually, so you can
daisy-chain cabinets/controllers. As Henk said in a separate reply,
the controllers normally have only mains power outlets and two or three
control sockets.
On my 861Bs there are 8 mains outlets on the left, 4 on the right, and
the ON/OFF/REMOTE switch is towards the right, with one unlabelled
power control socket to the left of it, and two more to the right.
On my 871Bs, on the smaller QBus cabinets, there are three pairs of
mains outlets, with the ON/OFF/REMOTE switch just to the right of
centre above one pair, and two power control connectors labelled J1 and
J2 above the rightmost pair.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Anyone have intermediate to advanced level advice on relay logic?
When I was a kid, each relay would cost about one hour of labor, a cheap
bench linear supply could only handle about 10 active relays, and fanout
ratios were maybe only 5 to 1.
Now according to my latest Mouser catalog, each relay will cost me about
two minutes of labor, a cheap switching power supply will run hundreds of
relays, and I can easily get a 10 to 1 fanout even with cheapie relays.
I'm quite well aware of how to make basic gates, FF, counters etc out of
relays but I'm curious about anyone elses experiences. I can contemplate
all kinds of weird problems like mechanical shock from so many relays
clicking at once, or the relay equivalent of contact bounce, but I don't
know if they're real problems. Then there's mounting issues.
>From: "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at blazenet.net>
>
>On Wednesday 04 January 2006 09:31 am, J.C. Wren wrote:
>> This fellow has some interesting projects. A 6502 opcode compatible
>> CPU implemented in latches and EEPROMs. A NAND-gate based MC14500B.
>> And a CPU using (mostly) only transistors. Also a introduction to
>> microprogramming article, and some other good stuff.
>>
>> <URL: http://people.freenet.de/dieter.02/index.htm >
>>
>> I don't know if anyone else mentioned this page in the past. I
>> don't recall it, and I tend to follow the homebuilt CPU threads here.
>> If you've seen it already, sorry about that.
>
>I wonder how fast you could get one of those to go...?
>
>--
>Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
>ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
>be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
>-
>Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
>M Dakin
>
Hi
I suspect the limits are bus and speed of the EEPROM's. One
can get EPROMs that are in the 50 to 60 ns someplace but
getting data from normal random access memory can be
an issue. Using one of the newer protocols, such as DDR
would require a memory interface that was almost as complicated
as the uP you were building.
Still, there are a number of processor models that make sense
for using slower memory. I've seen one that used a 20 bit data
bus and most instructions were 5 bits. This means that 5 operations
can be done on one instruction fetch. This doesn't work well
with the typical RISC machine because you need operands.
It does work with zero operand machines quite nicely :)
Later
Dwight
> the 68HC11 seems to be everywhere--and the 6502 has been pretty
> much relegated to obscurity.
The reason you don't see it is that the part number oftem bears no
similarity to 65x02. All the Mitsubishi 740 series and ITT CCU3000
series ucontrollers were 6502 cored as are a lot of Rockwell modem
chips. Every BSB D2MAC receiver had two 6502 chips, one in the CAM
badged GEC, Sharp TVs and Videos used them.
In non computing equipment the most popular CPU core seems to be the
8031/51, 6502 and Z8,
Lee.
..
___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
Greetings to all, and here's to 2006!
My first post, though I have skulked for months...still, consider me a
PDP newbie...
I've recently acquired a fully functional PDP-11/23plus with the idea
that I'd re-acquaint myself with RSTS/E which happened to be the first
system I was actually paid to program on. Trouble is, it was a short
stint with this local VAR, and it was nearly 30 years ago! I don't even
remember what the systems were exactly, though I think they were
11/40s. Stangely, these systems were in blue cabinets (did DEC ever do
blue?), with none of the typical maroon or red PDP-11 signature
color...that is until the LSI models started showing up in white, which
is what I've got.
Anyway, I'm now happily in the process of re-assembling the system and
preparing for my first power up since getting it home. The
configuration I have is in a double-wide 40" tall rack unit. Each rack
or 'bay' between the three uprights has a 874-A power conditioner /
power-strip unit that I'm trying to understand. I haven't been able to
find any references to this component. Though I could just replicate
the configuration that it had before being relocated (switches, wiring,
etc.), which I have plenty of photos of, I'd like to understand this
compenent better.
Since I have a double-wide cabinet, I've got two of these units that are
linked together with a 3-conductor cable, each end plugged into one of
the four "Power Control Bus"-labeled sockets. One 874-A also has
another connection from a second "PCB" socket to the the 11/23+
processor box. My guess is this line somehow is controlled by the front
panel AUX ON/OFF switch.
Also, each of the 874-A units has a small 3-position toggle switch:
'Remote On', 'Off', and 'Local On'. Before I go much further with
experimenting on my own, I wonder if anyone here knows these units and
can offer some info about how these units tie together and what settings
do what. Comments?
J.
Hi
If it was some IP you bought or got from someone else,
I don't think it would qualify. If you did the work your
self, then it is valid.
Think in terms of:
I build my PC by plugging these cards in.
versus:
I build my cpu using FPGA for my alu and instruction
decoder. I used my own MISC instruction set.
later
Dwight
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>
>What qualifies a CPU as "homebuilt"? Would an FPGA implementation qualify
>as one? If not, why not? If FPGA is disqualifed, how about CPLD/GAL/PAL?
>
>I'm just trying to understand the rules of this thing.
>
>Cheers,
>Chuck
>
>
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>
>On 1/4/2006 at 11:29 AM Dwight Elvey wrote:
>
>> If it was some IP you bought or got from someone else,
>>I don't think it would qualify. If you did the work your
>>self, then it is valid.
>> Think in terms of:
>> I build my PC by plugging these cards in.
>> versus:
>> I build my cpu using FPGA for my alu and instruction
>> decoder. I used my own MISC instruction set.
>
>Okay, so where does "I put together the logic (or used an FPGA) but
>implemented someone else's instruction set (e.g. PDP-11, VAX, 6502, Z80,
>etc.) fit in?
>
>Cheers,
>Chuck
>
Hi
I'd consider that to be home built. Just as the EPROM alu
that he used on the 6502 was homebuilt.
Still, it is much more fun to think about your own processor.
Dwight
Dear Sir,
Kindly send me your quote for the RA60 pack and the
condition and quantity of these packs including
delivery to Jordan.
BEST WISHES
Nader Qandah
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
I would like to use the vast knowledge of this community, as a brief
search through the calssiccmp archive gave no answer ...
I can't get RT11 booted anymore on my 11/34.
To isolate the problem I have only one RL02 drive connected to the RL11.
Before I start the M9312 monitor, I dumped 00005's in the memory locations
000000 thru 000070. Then I started the M9312 monitor (at 165020), and
enter "DL" on the prompt.
I loaded the RL02 cartridge, that I always use, first, of course.
The READY lamp of the RL02 drive flashes briefly off/on once, and then
the display on the 11/34 console shows (address) 000004, and the RUN lamp
goes off.
Examining the memory shows that location 000000 contains 000240, and
all subsequent locations contain 000000.
So the memory locations are written ...
Is the first word (000240) the first word of block 0 of the RT11 bootstrap?
I hesitate to load the XXDP RL02 cartridge that I have.
I never made a copy (stupid, I know), and I am afraid to loose it ...
thanks,
- Henk, PA8PDP.
This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a "reply" message.
Thank you for your cooperation.