At 19:51 -0600 4/1/05, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:19:09 -0800 (PST)
>From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
>Subject: Re: Sparc5 bits wanted
>....
> > > The SS5 uses a JDEC 5v SIMM similar to Tsunami based Mac's. I seem to
>> > recall that 5v FPM Mac SIMMs will work in a SS5
>>
>> That's not a G3 then? I've got one full of memory I can, er, 'borrow' :)
>
>No. This is RAM from the older PCI Power Macs, such as the 7300 (or in
>this case, the 9500, which is the aforementioned Tsunami). The G3s were
>the first Macs to use SDRAM.
>
Is this the stuff you are talking about? If so no idea whether this
is a good price or not. Not affilliated with Other World Computing,
but a satisfied customer.
http://eshop.macsales.com/Item_XLR8YourMac.cfm?ID=6454&Item=OWC5MD128MBE2
--
- Mark
210-522-6025, temporary cell 240-375-2995
Folks,
(eep, is a Sparc5 on topic?!)
While clearing out the soon-to-be dining room where all my stuff has been
stored for the last couple of years I found a Sparc5 that I'd completely
forgotten about. It's been completely robbed of bits that I can see -
memory, floppy drive, CD, HDD - so what's the minimum I can get away with
before at least powering it up to see if it works? The only spare memory
I've got is PC100 (may even be PC66) 168-pin DIMMS.
Can I use a serial console on it or do I need a 13w3 monitor cable? The
HDD looks like it's a standard SCA-80 connection....keyboard and mouse are
there but I hope I don't need one of those foil mousemats!
Assuming it does work does anyone have a floppy and CD spare for this thing?
Cheers!
--
adrian/witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UKs biggest home computer collection?
On Apr 1 2005, 21:18, William Maddox wrote:
> --- "David V. Corbin" <dvcorbin at optonline.net> wrote:
> > There are a few "rescues"/"scraps" that I **REALLY** hope are
> > hoaxes.otherwise I will be in jail for murder.
> > PDP-1's G-15's if *EITHER* of these went from intact system to
> > the skip, it WOULD be a crime.
> After close examination of the pictures, I am
> certain that the PDP-1 shown in the pictures is
> in fact the one at the Computer History Museum.
Didn't anyone read the whole thread? Or look at "Mike Rowe"'s email
address (backwards)? Or the actual sender in the headers? :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Just got back from Radio Shack. I bought a fast blowing 250v 2 amp fuse
and installed on in the laserdisc player. Unfortunetly, it blows just
as fast as the .75amp fuse. So.... that means I have a dead short
somewhere, right? How do I go about checking that?
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
--- "David V. Corbin" <dvcorbin at optonline.net> wrote:
> There are a few "rescues"/"scraps" that I **REALLY**
> hope are
> hoaxes.otherwise I will be in jail for murder.
> PDP-1's G-15's if *EITHER* of
> these went from intact system to the skip, it WOULD
> be a crime. Even
> semi-significant parts would be a shame.. Done know
> if I will sleep tonight
> wonderng...
David,
After close examination of the pictures, I am
certain that the PDP-1 shown in the pictures is
in fact the one at the Computer History Museum.
You can even see the purple cubicle walls (left
over from SGI's former tenancy of the building)
that are used as a backdrop for the Visible
Storage exhibit currently on display. Also,
the picture of the inside does not look like
a production machine -- it is almost certainly
a photo of the prototype PDP-1 also owned by CHM.
Others have noted that the photo of the G-15 appears
to be a fake composite.
I admit that before realizing this, I sent serious
inquiries to both parties advising them that they
were sitting on treasures worth big $$$$ and would
be well advised to preserve them.
--Bill
Chrisian Fandt wrote:
> Aggh!! Where is it??!! Anybody!!??? I'LL HELP PAY their citation from the
> police for having "junk" in their driveway!! Let's just try to rescue
> anything that remains (if there's much left)!
>
> Just look at this URL to see what we're basically losing:
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~dgreen/
>
> Jeeez, that's all the more reason for someone to have disposal
> instructions, including basic descriptions, for the "stuff" their family
> may be stuck with after their death.
>
> Keep us posted on this please.
>
> --Chris F.
>
> NNNN
>
>
> Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
> Jamestown, NY USA cfandt at netsync.net
> Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
>
> *
I want to second this and third this message. I'm in another hobby,
science fiction fanzines, where we just lost one of the most significant
collections of the last 50 years. And all because the collector didn't
write it's disposition exactly in his will. He left most of his estate
to his church. The fanzines were left to a University collection. He
mentioned this is letters and conversations - but not in the will.
But probate ruled that the church gets everything since it wasn't in the
will. The church wass fighting to keep the stuff because they smell big
money.
So the collection now is lost to the group that would appreciate it
most. I know of two major collections of science fiction lost the same
way. One of them was original art worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Is your collection going to the dump? Will your kin know what to do
with it? Will the books and tapes be tossed? If you value the effort
you put into it, protect your collection.
Write it up - talk to your heirs.
Billy
There are a few "rescues"/"scraps" that I **REALLY** hope are
hoaxes.otherwise I will be in jail for murder. PDP-1's G-15's if *EITHER* of
these went from intact system to the skip, it WOULD be a crime. Even
semi-significant parts would be a shame.. Done know if I will sleep tonight
wonderng...
>From: "Randy McLaughlin" <cctalk at randy482.com>
>
>From: "Jules Richardson" <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
>Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:38 PM
>> On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 12:52 -0700, Ben Franchuk wrote:
>>> Randy McLaughlin wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I started using self-expanding archives because of complaints that
>>> > people couldn't unzip straight Zip files. Not everyone uses the same
>>> > Zip format. I use Winzip v8.1, many people use a variety of programs.
>>> >
>>> > I have yet to find one archival format that everyone can use,
>>> > self-extracting archives at least supports 99%.
>>>
>>> Umm I may want files for my LINUX box... I favor raw files for TEXT
>>> since anybody ( using ascii ) can read them.
>>
>> And tar for multi-file archives... more portable than zip I'd say, plus
>> errors won't trash the archive (or at least not so much!).
>>
>> Of course if compression *has* to be used... hmm... I suppose zip *is*
>> the best bet there, as at least it's more widely supported than some of
>> the other compression methods.
>>
>> Self-extracting archives sound like a *very* bad idea when you have no
>> idea what the target machine will be! :)
>
>As stated in a different post the *.exe file can be renamed to *.zip and any
>zip program will handle it normally, that is if the algorithms are
>compatible. I had too many complaints from people that didn't have a
>compatible program so a self extracting archive is the best way I've found
>so far.
>
>If anyone can come up with a method that is truly better I'll jump on it.
>The problem is simple if it's not a self extracting file then everyone has
>to use a compatible extractor :-(
>
>For DOS/Windoze there are many different incompatible zip programs.
>
>
>Randy
>www.s100-manuals.com
>
>
Hi
The older ZIP program works fine and is compatable with
most any newer versions that I know of.
Dwight
Marvin wrote:
> In searching for radio gear, I ran across this URL
> and thought it might of some interest here. I don't
> recognize it, but it looks like it might be some older
> computer stuff.
> http://www.geocities.com/heftyharry/OLD_COMPUTER_SALE.html
Looking at the picture on the website, it looks as though this guy has a
Bendix G-15. Wow.
Compare it to the following picture:
http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/BRL61-bendix-g15d.jpg
Same thing. (Same picture, too? Hmmm...)