> The stock AIM 65 was offered with either 1K or 4K RAM, I bought a 1K
> and a guy I knew at Rockwell gave me the other 3K.
: That RAM wouldn't happen to be in 2114s, would it? If so, I'd suspect
: those early on, I've had more trouble with 2114s than with any other
: chip. I've lost count of the number I've replaced (certainly the RAM
in
: my Commodore 8050, the video RAM in my TRS-80 Model 3, the RAM in my
: HP82163 (HPIL video interface)...)
: -tony
Yep, the RAM is 2114! I swapped the zero page RAM with others in
several configurations. Out of 8 RAM how many would you suspect as
bad?
Could it be all 8, or a significant number such that getting just the
right 2 for zero page wold be difficult, maybe I should buy at least a
couple just to hope I get 2 good ones to try?!
Thanks,
AndyD
--- Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org> wrote:
> First off, before you go around modifying VT420s,
> you may want to test
> the Pro first.
Yes, the Pro is a complete unknown quantity at the
moment. My suspicions about someone messing with the
power supply were confirmed when, after removing the
already-unscrewed top cover I found a nice green
jumper cable across what was left of the fuseholder.
I think I will take my time on this one. Perhaps I
should make sure I have a fire extinguisher handy as
well.
> The 'composite' output of the
> machine nicely matches
> NTSC (RS-170) composite signal specs, so you can
> hook the output
> directly to a TV with a composite input. Beware
If I can ever get the thing to power up I have an old
portable TV upstairs I could use - no composite input
but I do have an RF modulator I bought years ago.
Perhaps that will work. And the VT420 I had in mind
needs to be repaired anyway since it screeches at me
when I turn it on, so perhaps that's not the best
approach. Thanks for the advice.
Regards,
Dave
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
On Apr 17 2005, 7:32, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Bob Shannon wrote:
>
> > I think the actual frame here is magnesium alloy, not aluminum.
> >
> > Any attempt to weld this might be spectacularly bad idea.
>
> Listen to the man (with an emphasis on "spectacular" in the true
sense of
> the word).
Probably not, actually. It's hard to get the stuff to burn, and it
might well collapse under its own weight before you got it all that
hot, at which point you'd probably remove the hot flame and emit a few
hot words instead ;-) [1] Yes, the ignition temperature of some
magnesium alloys is below the melting point, but you need an *awful*
lot of heat to make it catch, not just a high local temperature. You
also need an awful lot of heat to sustain it -- remember it dissipates
heat readily -- and you need oxygen[2] to keep it going. Under normal
welding conditions, the inert gas used for TIG/MIG excludes the oxygen
(that's the whole point of the method) and the heat is highly
localised, and other techniquesuse much lower temperatures. TIG
welding of mag alloys is quite commonplace, and most items of magnesium
alloy you'll come across are heat treated during manufacture, at high
temperatures. This is not something you can do at home with a paraffin
(kerosene) blowlamp, it's usually done in ovens in an inert atmosphere,
but it's nevertheless standard procedure.
If you want to know just how hard it is to burn a mag alloy chassis,
take a look at Simson Garfinkel's infamous webpage at
http://simson.net/photos/hacks/cubefire.html and note how much gas it
took to cause even sporadic ignition. It was a pile of molten slag by
the time it caught.
Disclaimer: if you do have an enormous blowtorch, don't blame me if you
set your workshop on fire. However, if you have such a blowtorch, you
can do that more easily without the magnesium alloy :-) And if you do
set a magnesium alloy chassis alight, there's not much will put it out.
For small fires, copious water (not a spray) to deluge it is sometimes
used, but common practice, I'm told, is to protect the surroundings and
let the metal burn out. There's at least one firefighter on the list
who might know more about that than I do.
[1] Yes, I found out the hard way when trying to repair something.
[2] Or more usually air. However, once the reaction gets going,
magnesium is sufficiently reactive to burn in carbon dioxide or
nitrogen, stripping the oxygen from CO2 leaving soot behind, or forming
magnesium nitride. Standard school chemistry demonstration. That's
why MIG/TIG for aluminium and magnesium (and their alloys) use pure
argon instead of cheaper gasses.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Apr 17 2005, 8:51, Bob Shannon wrote:
> Could be I have no idea what I'm talking about here.
>
> But I do know many older HP devices use magnesium rather than
> aluminum. As to how to weld these materials, I'm no expert.
>
> But I'd rather not hear that the machine, and the shop that attempted
> the repair had been reduced to ashes.
Agreed :-) To be quite honest, although welding would be the neatest
solution short of finding a replacement chassis, I'd just buy a couple
of those L-shaped brackets used for reinforcing woodwork, and rivet
them onto the frame.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I just checked what that GenRad box was and it's a 2610 Universal Field
Tester. What the? Whatever it is, it looks complete with pods and a
plug-in module in the inside compartment.
Also realized I had an HP 1640B Serial Data Analyzer.
Sweet debugging tools!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Every now and then, you can still get a good buy on ebay.
Described simply as:
5 1/4 Full height floppy disk drives
this lot:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=4193&item=5183306657
is not one, not two, but three MPI B51 floppy drives. Ohio
Scientific used this model in all of their "MF" (mini-floppy)
offerings. If you don't want to bother following the link,
I got the lot for $10 plus shipping. One of the drives has a
gray faceplate, which I've never seen before. I've had a hard
time figuring out what other manufacturers used B51s. Atari
used the mechanism in some of their 810s but with their own
custom electronics. Before any Atari enthusiasts scream, I
have not and will not disassemble any working 810s for parts.
Fred? Would you please contact me when you have a moment? I've still not heard back from you as to which address you want the tape drive you got from me to go to.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
I am moving from a home in South West Michigan, between St. Joseph and South
Haven. I have old classic computer equipment I will give away, but will not
ship, as I do not have time to pack it. It can be picked up between Monday
April 25 and 29.
Email or call me if interested.
I have the following:
DG Computer with 64 K RAM, Z-80 CPU
DG Keyboard
2 Monitors that work but are not original DG Phideck with 4 drives.
External Floppy drives
Digital Group dot matrix printer.
A box of misc boards for use in the DG
Model 33 Teletype
Model 40 Teletype
One S-100 Computer configured to use with TurboDOS, a multi-user operating
system much like C/PM. This has a 5 MB hard drive and one 8 inch floppy
drive. I have additional software on disk for this system. It needs a minor
repair, a cable needs to be made for the controller.
Televideo terminal, for use with the S-100 box.
Marshall G. Olsen
molsen at runbox.com
312-498-2955
Thanks to all that replied.
I gave everything away to the first person that called to pick it up except
I still have model 40 teletype printer. It is a great printer for Z-80
systems, printing 400 lines a minute.
If interested, CALL my cell. 312-498-2955
Marshall G. Olsen
molsen at runbox.com
>Subject: Re: 7201 (was Re: Z8530 (was Re: Navtel 9460 Protocol Analyzer info?))
> From: Tom Jennings <tomj at wps.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
>8251! Now there's a turkey! At least it was simple. One of the
>buggiest pieces of crap I ever had to initialize.
I use the for basic serial as they depending on version are
predictable and easy to init. using them for other protocals,
can you say masochistic!
>Serial chips, I get post-traumatic-stress just thinking about
>them.
I'll remember that one. Though compared to serial chips many disk
controllers and their associated stuff that wraps around them
programtically are pretty horrid too.
Allison