test-drb March 2005

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

291 participants
840 discussions

by msokolov＠ivan.Harhan.ORG

Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com> wrote: > This is not your fault. As you may recall, we had this discussion about > half a year ago, and it boils down to people not configuring their e-mail > clients properly to obey the reply-to directive in the e-mail headers of > the list messages. No, that is not the problem. Since I read my mail with full headers using a very "raw" MUA that does *nothing* behind my back, I see what actually happens is this: most list messages arrive with Reply-To: set to the list, but some arrive with Reply-To: listing both the list and the author. Since the Reply-To: header is tweaked by the mailing list software, I can't see how it can behave so inconsistently. Since I am a hard determinist when it comes to computers, the only rational explanation I have is that there must be some differences in the headers of messages before they reach the list that causes the list software to process them differently. But of course in order to pin the problem down, one must see the messages in their original form prior to alteration by the list software, which I cannot do as a mere subscriber, only Jay or other list staff can do that. MS P.S. One thought: when I was designing my own mailing list management software, I implemented a feature by which a list can accept posts from non-subscribers with moderator approval. I implemented it so that it set Reply-To: header to both the list and the author on those approved outsider posts, on the reasoning that the author should see replies but won't see them on the list because he is not subscribed. I don't know anything about the software Jay uses for this list, but there is a chance that its authors followed reasoning similar to mine and the posts arriving with Reply-To: set to the list and the author come from non-subscribers approved by moderators.

19 years, 4 months

more duplicate posts

by jwest＠classiccmp.org

It seems that the duplicate posts fall into two categories... 1) People who were subbed to both lists, and had one of them set to "no email". This wouldn't be a problem, except during the member migration it lost the "no mail" setting. So, please check if you are subbed to both lists, and set one or the other to have the "no mail" flag. or 2) This one seems to be what is hitting a few people. I am not sure why this is happening... but for some people when I get an email from them and I hit "reply", the "to:" address shows their email address AND the list. So I'm actually responding to both places and that's why they get two emails. At this point I'm not sure if my own laptop has started doing something squirrely so that hitting reply picks up the list address AND the senders address, or if it has something to do with the list software, or if it has something to do with the senders setup. But anyways, it just dawned on me that more than a few times when I've hit reply to a post lately, I get the original posters address and the list address, both in the "to" box. Odd. I'll watch for it to happen again. Jay

19 years, 4 months

Taking photos of displays...

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Mar 1 2005, 7:20, Vintage Computer Festival wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Ethan Dicks wrote: > > > Agreed... I have an Olympus D10 I picked up a couple of years ago... > > one important feature is that it has an external trigger input for a > > "bulb". I used it to take pictures of the Aurora Australis > > (http://www.penguincentral.com/cgi-penguincentral/pix.cgi?target=2004) > > Man, I have got to get me down to Antarctica some day. I'm sure this is a > really stupid question, bit is that greenish glow really what it looks > like in real life? Amazing! Yes, though the colours vary, and aren't static. Take a look at AuroraWatch, especially the gallery: http://www.dcs.lancs.ac.uk/iono/aurorawatch/ -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

19 years, 4 months

classiccmp hardware costs

by jwest＠classiccmp.org

Just got the invoice today for the classiccmp hardware upgrade. Intel D845GVSR P4 motherboard - $61.00 Intel Celeron 2.0ghz - $70.00 Copper Pentium heat sink & ball bearing fan - $26.00 36" 80pin IDE cable - $4.00 Missouri Sales Tax - $9.22 Total - $170.22 Cost of not having to worry about that damn system locking up constantly - Priceless :) If anyone wants to paypal to help out... the paypal ID is jwest at classiccmp.org Thanks! Jay

19 years, 4 months

9track tapes & drives, denver area

by emu＠ecubics.com

Anybody likes some 9track tape drives (no SCSI, all pertec) in denver area ? Some cipher, one (?) DEC TS05 ... Some tapes also Cheers

19 years, 4 months

duplicate posts?

by dvcorbin＠optonline.net

> >>On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:01:41 -0600, Jay West > <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote: > >>>So is anyone still getting duplicate posts besides Mr. Corbin? > >> Jay the duplicate posts seem to have stopped. FWIW, the only duplicates I was getting were from YOU directly (primarily on the 11/45 Switch issues...)

19 years, 4 months

duplicate posts?

by jwest＠classiccmp.org

So is anyone still getting duplicate posts besides Mr. Corbin? If so, I'll dig into it. Jay

19 years, 4 months

WoffordWitch.com is now cookieless, stateless, and sessionless

by dvcorbin＠optonline.net

> > > By popular demand, and to prevent further harassment, > > > I have made my http://www.woffordwitch.com site > > > cookieless, sessionless, and stateless. It will no > > > longer prompt you to identify yourself and you may > > > now browse it anonymously. > > > > I an top that... some of my sites have recently > > become contentless..... > > Contentless? Like how? > Server Crash..... Waiting for new parts to arrive in Denver.

19 years, 4 months

WoffordWitch.com is now cookieless, stateless, and sessionless

by dvcorbin＠optonline.net

> By popular demand, and to prevent further harassment, > I have made my http://www.woffordwitch.com site > cookieless, sessionless, and stateless. It will no > longer prompt you to identify yourself and you may > now browse it anonymously. > I an top that... some of my sites have recently become contentless.....

19 years, 4 months

WoffordWitch.com is now cookieless, stateless, and sessionless

by wacarder＠usit.net

By popular demand, and to prevent further harassment, I have made my http://www.woffordwitch.com site cookieless, sessionless, and stateless. It will no longer prompt you to identify yourself and you may now browse it anonymously. I plan to do more site updates to better document my project(s) in the near future. Ashley

19 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
...
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
...
84
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb March 2005