On Oct 7 2005, 12:51, Hans Franke wrote:
> Am 7 Oct 2005 0:09 meinte Pete Turnbull:
>
> > As some of you know, I'm helping with an exhibition of classic
> > machines in the Department of Computer Science -- for Open Day
> > tomorrow (Friday), and running conducted tours on Wednesday as
well.
[ ... ]
> > Well, one of the supposedly-working exhibits is my KIM-1, but it
> > died this afternoon.
> That's unusual, standard procedure is that a machine dies at
> the opening day at the first real presentation - no matter
> how often you testet before.
:-)
Well, I *was* demoing it to the organisers and senior staff...
Final death toll was one KIM-1, the top 1K of my Commodore PET (one of
the early ones with the nasty MOS Technology 6550 RAMs) and a Mac Plus
which got rather unhappy midmorning. Probably all fixable in one way
or another.
"Thank you" to the various people who replied about the KIM. I never
had time to look at it again this week, perhaps I'll have a go at the
weekend. I did actually know about the site that several of you
mentioned, and I also have the schematic and most manuals, just not
handy at the time, so I was really just wondering if there was a common
failure mode. The suggestion of using small components on the back,
out of sight, is an interesting one, though, and the suggestions made
about other methods may be helpful too.
In other respects the tours for the students were a great success --
and the staff loved them. Some went and fetched their colleagues and
came back with them!
We had a display of generations of computing from a 1920s mechanical
card tabulator through bits of ENIAC (valve), Pegasus (valve), LEO
(transistor, well the last version was anyway), and various TTL-based
boards (some SSI, some with 74181 MSI ALUs, etc) to LSI/VLSI ending up
with an 8008 board (we don't seem to have a 4004 between us,
surprisingly -- if anyone would like to donate one for next time, feel
free ;-)). We had a display of three generations (densities) of core
memory, static and dynamic RAM chips and SIMMS/DIMMS/etc, several
generations of EPROMS (oh, and a diode ROM board) and a few chips to
see under a fairly powerful binocular microscope. We had a whole range
of drives and discs, from RK05 to modern SCSI,including some hard
drives running with perspex covers, and all sorts of floppies,
stiffies, flopticals and zips, and tapes from paper tape (one of the
quiz questions was how much paper tape would it take to store the same
data as you'd fit on a 3.5" floppy?) through 1/2" magtape and C10
cassettes to TK50s, DLT-IVs and 200GB LTO Ultrium-IIs.
The microcomputer section included an Altair 8800B, some S100 cards,
Motorola MK6800D2, KIM-1, Scrumpi (an SC/MP kit), PET (running
moonlander), Apple ][ (displaying a rolling demo of digitised pics), a
BBC micro running games and with no less than 4 second processors, an
untidy heap[1] of "lots of micros from the late 70s and early 80s", an
Apple Mac (supposedly running Pagemaker 1.0 but that was the Mac that
got ill) with a modified "1984" promo video[2] at the side, an original
pristine 5160 PC/XT, an Amiga, and an Acorn Archimedes.
[1] the "untidy heap" was to convey the idea of the explosion of micros
that appeared around this time, and included -- some with the tops off
-- Exidy Sorcerer, Acorn Atom, TRS-80, Sharp MZ80K, Sinclair ZX80,
TI99/4, Sinclair ZX81, Jupiter Ace, Sinclair Spectrum, Dragon 32,
Vic-20, Acorn Electron, Sinclair Spectrum Plus, Commodore 64,
Commodore 128, Sinclair QL, Sony MSX and probably a couple I've
forgotten.
Altogether, we counted 16 different microprocessors in the display
(another pop quiz question the students were supposed to answer).
[2] the video is the 2004 version where the runner is wearing an iPod.
We wondered (another quiz question: what was the anachronism) how many
students would not notice the iPod because they're so common now, but
most of them spotted it. What most didn't get without prompting was
the question about how that related to the displays on either side --
which were an Acorn ARM Development system and an Archimedes (with an
ARM processor). We also asked them what the most common microprocessor
is, and a small number thought it was a Pentium (which doesn't even
make the top three, actually).
The "business and scientific" section covered a longer period, starting
with a PDP-8/E (pop quiz: which machine has been through a dishwasher?)
with attached ASR33 and which was running the inchworm and basic
accumulator test programs, as well as a little routine to punch "HELLO,
WORLD!" souveniers on tape (written by one of the staff who'd never
seen PDP-8 code before, so he was dead pleased when it worked). Then
we had an 11/40 opened up to the gaze of the onlookers (plus the "Ken
and Den" photo at the side) and boards from an 11/03, 11/23, and 11/73,
followed by a microVAX-II (no room for an 11/780, alas). The final
item in that row was a 20-year-old working 11/53 system running an exam
marking system under RSX-11M, with a mark-sense reader -- which booted
first time and ran without problem all week, demonstrating -- as we
hoped and expected -- that things were built to be reliable in those
days. The other side of that aisle was mostly RISC-based machines,
starting with an early Sparcstation, then the first microSPARC, a Mac
Classic (last 68K Mac, first under 1000UKP), then Indigo, Indy and O2
SGI workstations (what machine do you see in Jurassic Park?) running
assorted demos and finally a modern mid-range dual-processor Sun
server.
Note the complete absence of Wintel PCs (apart from the 5160) :-) We
managed to relegate them to a corner table of their own, but we did
have a full range of motherboards from XT (couldn't find a 5150 in
time), through AT, 386, 486, assorted Pentium and AMDs to a big
dual-core machine that will finally be put into service on Friday.
The last section was sort of unusual odds and ends -- a piece of one of
the Crays the Meteorological Office used to use for forecasting, some
transputer boards from a Meganode and a Paramid system, a Presence-II
neural net processor board (a PCI card designed and built by the
Advanced Computer Architectures group at the University), one module
>from my Origin 2000 "supercomputer" with some superfluous Craylinks to
make more lights flash, an Origin 200, and some FPGA stuff from
CompSci.
We also had some pieces of Elliot 803 and English Electric KDF9 along
with someone who had actually worked on these systems, and could talk
enthusiastically about the novel and innovative aspects of their
architectures, but sadly he got called away mid-morning.
We all had an interesting and enjoyable day, though some of us are a
bit hoarse from running sixteen tour groups through our parts of the
exhibition! One of the technicians took lots of photos so I'll see if
I can pick some out when I get a set and put them up online somewhere.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello,
This seems to be the better of the two lists to put this, so here goes.
Recently we've had a bit of a clearout at the company where I work. As it's
a SW house from the early 80s we've unearthed all sorts of kit in the
cellars. As I know people collect and use old computers I've gained a "stay
of execution" for the old computer kit while I try to find a better home
than a disposal site. If anyone can give a good home to any of the items in
the following list please get in touch with me.
Conditions:
* All equipment is unwarranted. I don't know if any of it actually works. I
can try to find out, but I can't guarantee anything.
* Shipping not included. This isn't a for-profit exercise, but I can't run a
for-loss exercise either - I don't think the powers that be would like that.
* If you want to make a donation it'll be most welcome.
In short, pay the shipping and I'll get it to you - carrier of your choice
so long as they'll pick up from here. I don't know if any of it works, but I
can try plugging it in and see what happens. It's all UK-spec, so if it's
shipped elsewhere I don't know if it will work on your mains power, etc. If
you want to cover the cost, I'll ship it to just about anywhere.
List as follows:
1x Apricot F10 (whirrs, beeps and flashes lights when plugged in) 1x Apricot
5.25 drive, model no XN525F 1x Apricot Monitor, model no 12HM
1x Maxi 150MB tape drive (it's as big as a modern thin desktop and weighs as
much, no media)
1x Tandon 286/N
1x Peanut PC2000 (this looks pretty old)
1x Northstar 100 (early 80s server, pretty big), and keyboard
1x Hasler telex, model no TU/014/10
4x Signet 3 boxes
1x Signet PC? (it looks like a PC, only it's dated Jun 1982)
1x Ampex ATL Model 210 + keyboard
1x Victor V286
1x Unisys <something> 5059
There's a fair amount of 386/486/pentium 1 + 2 class stuff, old CRTs
(working).
We're based in Blackburn, UK. If you have any questions feel free to contact
me and I'll try to answer them as best as I can. I hope someone can give at
least some of this a home - it seems a real shame to let it all go.
Regards,
Chris Shallcross
my.name at gmail.com
> This is almost Classic - I'm looking for a place to download an old
> version of FreeBSD, specifically the last release of the 2.2.x branch,
> which I think was 2.2.8.
Hey, don't call it classic, I use 2.2.7 on a file server at home! :-)
When the FreeBSD team moved on to 3.0 I thought they left the
"true path" - too many changes to the BSD core. Eventually I
switched to OpenBSD, but this one has also changed too much
recently.
> http://ftp.csie.chu.edu.tw/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/
FreeBSD-2/2/8-mini.iso: 140Mb distribution! That's more like it!
I bet it also contains the source.
**vp
I'm doing some homework about the TRS-80. This is for a follow-up to the
article I published on Aug. 8, "The controversial birth of the TRS-80".
http://www.snarc.net/c-trs80.htm
What I'm looking for now is ANY information about a company called
"Microcomputer Techniques". Any help is appreciated.
- Evan
-----------------------------------------
Evan Koblentz's personal homepage: http://www.snarc.net
Computer Collector Newsletter: http://news.computercollector.com
Mid-Atlantic Retro Computing Hobbyists & Museum:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/
>
>Subject: Re: PCs that support only one floppy drive in hardware
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:20:23 +0100 (BST)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>
>> you might be right by coincidence. However the second letter and third are
>> for options to the basic drive such as door latch or media ready indicator.
>
>The third letter, sure. But I thought single speed/density drives had
>just 2 letters (type and options), dual speed/dual density drives had 3.
>I've certainly seen HFR (or some other 3 letter combination starting with
>'HD') for 3.5" drives capable of 720K and 1.44M.
OK I have one so I know what it is. FD55BVR, care to guess? Also a FD55BFR?
Hint neither are dual speed.
Allison
Been so busy with work, finally took some "me time" and went to the local
scrapper/junkyard/surplus place and noticed these items there:
SGI Impact Indigo II (probably about six of them)
SGI Indy R5000 (probably about six of them)
IBM 3480
If someone has interest, let me know.
Jay
A techno-luddite? How apropos! I like to question what technology gives us.
Old computers or new. They can challenge us but that's as far as I care to
go.
Murray--
>
>Subject: Re: luddites!
> From: Brad Parker <brad at heeltoe.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:14:52 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>
>>>After all, aren't we all a bunch of Techno-Ludites :^)
>
>i haven't wasted any bandwidth *all day* so,
>
>I'd like to point out that the Ludites where not anti-technology.
>
>They were anti-loosing-your-job-due-to-technology. They didn't think it
>was right that 10 people working should become 3 people working just
>because a new machine was installed...
>
>(and, I think they had a point. I think economists are all smoking
>really good dope when they talk about mythical 'productivity gains')
>
>-brad
What wasnt noticed by the displaced employees was the 7 that got bumpped
went to making more machines, fixing them, selling them teaching those three
left behind how to run them.
Just a different view. With 35 years of high tech I've seen a few cycles
and even displaced a few times.
Allison
Rumor has it that 9000 VAX may have mentioned these words:
>I am not familiar with those new ATX style power supplies,
Not ATX... think "laptop."
There are some mini-ITX motherboards that use laptop-type power supplies -
external, 1 or *maybe* 2 voltages on the pins, and an external LED to
actually show if the sucker's got power & working.
That is the dark LED that tells Sellam the PS (and in this case, PoS) is no
worky.
Very handy if you want a small, very quiet, yet somewhat powerful PC.
Somewhat in this case means:
Laptop < mini-ITX < Desktop PC
I'm looking at one to build a new TiVo out of. JDR's got a decent deal on a
VIA (think: "Used to been Cyrix") 1GHz box for <$300. Quiet is good when
you want to watch TV. ;-)
Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers
_??_ zmerch at 30below.com
(?||?) If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
_)(_ disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
>Can't help with the evaluation board, but the mention
>of the 80186 reminds me of a system I worked on
>(Durango Poppy) using one (an added 80286 was an
>option if you wanted to run Unix).
Interesting. Wish there was some info on that.
>It's a great chip for its time with DMA done the
>right way and lots of I/O pins. Unfortunately, any
>programs that play with PC hardware are doomed to
>failure.
Right. Those aspects of typical pc hardware that had
been integrated on the chip. Seemingly though, the
Tandy 2000 ignored at least some of the extra
facilities of the 80186 and simply utilized it as a
fast 8086. That board has one of the highest chip
counts I've ever seen. But it's also true that video
and much else was integrated.
>I've got a little FAX receiver box that was designed
>to fit between a printer and a PC and would either
>print FAXen as received or store them on a
DOS->formatted 1.44MB floppy drive that was part of
the >unit. It uses an 80C188 and I recall looking at
the >27C256 BIOS and noting that it implemented many
of >the PC BIOS calls, particularly those for diskette
>I/O. It has 256K of RAM. The thing isn't much
>bigger than a floppy drive and is powered by a wall
>wart. It'd make a neat little CP/M-86 system if I
>ever got around to programming it.
I'd guess the bios was bought, or at least parts of
it, from a supplier of such (AMI, Phoenix...).
>But this brings up a question--how many early non-PC
>PC's are there wandering around? IOW, things that
>have the ability to run a full operating system, but
>aren't PC's per se. My DSL model is certainly
one-->runs Linux (just telnet to it and you get a
login).
I opened up a color IBM terminal years ago, mainly
because I wanted to see if the monitor could be
utilized as a vga (apparently had analog inputs, and
only r,g,b, and sync lines). Phor phun. 3179 is the #
sticking in my head, which might correspond to the
model number. But then again it might not. I never
actually bothered, but upon cursory observation of the
logic board - 8088 based - I was amazed how much "pc
stuph" was present. In other words most of the makings
of a pc/xt motherboard were present as I recall. Of
course there were no provision for disk drives and
whatnot, and may not even have had a bios as we know
it. I'd like to get another one.
BYTE tried to deal with a similar issue issue years
ago ~'85 in one of their special issues. They wanted a
baseline for IBM compatibility. As loopy as it sounds,
the Zenith Z-100 was elected a basis by which all
others were compared. Funny that an incompatible was
used to judge all the other compatibles.
>I'm not sure if that counts, though. It may well not
>be running Linux
>on anything that you would recognise as PC hardware.
>It might not have
>a BIOS as such, even.
Someone told me that MINIX didn't deal with the bios
at all. What about Linux?
>How about a TIVO or an MP3 player? Certainly most
>video game boxes have the necessary resources (I seem
>to recall a web site dedicated to getting early
>Xboxes running Linux--it wasn't as simply as you'd
>think).
No, but they figured out a way of doing it w/o
cracking the box. There was a couple of games with
bugs that upon crashing (intentionally) made a back
door available. You need some sort of usb device (a
thumb drive was often utilized). Blah blah blah. I'm
going there one of these days. I'm just hoping the
release of the 360 brings down the price of the
original ;). I wrinkled my nose when I found out a
sort of special distro was needed, but I guess the
hardware differed, however slightly, enough from a
vanilla pc to warrant it. There's a kewell book called
"Hacking the Xbox" that goes into different aspects of
reverse engineering. Doesn't deal with installing
Linux too much though.
The TIVO's I looked at didn't use intel procs. I want
to say PowerPC, but it might even be different from
that. And I don't think any (other) game consoles used
an 80x86. The Genesis used the 68000 I know. Show me
wrong if I'm wrong.
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com