Hi
Both right but it really depends on usage.
Dwight
>From: "der Mouse" <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca>
>
>>>> Wired-OR will work fine for open-collector output TTL.
>>> Well, except you generally get wired-AND, because the open
>>> collectors are generally NPN collectors with emitters to ground, not
>>> PNP collectors with emitters to Vcc.
>> That is twice you've tried to make this point. If a signal is viewed
>> as active low, then what is going on is logically wired-or.
>
>Yes...but would you call (? of) a 7408 an OR gate if it happens to be
>manipulating such signals? That's the sense in which I say it's
>wired-AND: the resulting signal is what you'd get from feeding the same
>logic levels (except with pullups, or non-OC outputs) into the gate
>usually called an AND gate.
>
>/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
>\ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
>/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
Ok, here's the FastPath software I promised:
(what an odd trick of fate that *I* would be doing this; yee gods! How
come no asks for gatorbox software? :-)
http://www.heeltoe.com/download/shiva/FastPath/
download/shiva/FastPath/shiva-ftp/distrib/fastpath/9.2/NewFeatures.txt
download/shiva/FastPath/shiva-ftp/distrib/fastpath/9.2/fp92.sea.bin
I can't say what runs in a FP-4 vs a FP-5, sorry. You might start with
the 8.1.1 on a FP-4.
Also, in case it's not obvious I'd use something like "unstuffit" to
deal with the .sea.bin files.
-brad
Afternoon...
We were given an AIM65 the other day (first time I've seen a real one)
in a rather fetching custom blue case that has a carry handle on one
edge. It was apparently used by Xerox for some for of magnetic media
testing way back when; it still carries a Xerox asset tag on the back.
Unfortunately in between the previous owner saying they wanted it when
it was retired and them going to collect it, it got thrown into a skip -
so there's some damage to the case and the red display cover needs
replacing. Luckily the electronics survived, apart from one broken
switch.
Curious thing about the machine is that it has a second board mounted
under the main board, containing quite a bit of circuitry. I was
wondering whether this second board is something custom produced by
Xerox (there are no marks indicating manufacturer) or whether it was an
official off-the-shelf expansion board...
Quick and dirty pics at:
http://www.moosenet.demon.co.uk/temp/comps/aim65/
Wish I'd brought the machine home now, but I can get a list of the main
ICs on that second board when I'm next at the musuem if needs be.
Note that there seems to be no RAM on the AIM65 board itself, - just ROM
- but there are 16 4116 chips on the expansion board.
cheers
Jules
They're all megabit devices. So whattaya call these things,
megabubbles?
I got a dozen or so of these kits, new unused and unopened,
mostly, they include all the oddball support chips and the funny
muonting brackets for the bubblebucket. 1984 and 1985 date codes.
Any interest in them? I'll likely eBay them for money, but I'm
willing to trade (I need a working 8" double-sided floppy drive,
ugly OK).
Anyone have, or willing to work up, a PCB to make them usable?
Parallel interface would be nice.
OK, this came to me by a rather circuitous route, but I now have a new in
the box Quadlink by Quadram. It includes all the cables, software, and
documentation (the warranty card is still there).
This card is essentially and Apple II/Apple II+ on an 8-bit ISA plug in
board. I don't know how compatible it is with today's PC equipment. Anyway,
the point of this is: Does anyone want this? Contact me off list if so.
Shipping would be from New Jersey, USA.
I'm always looking for old Tandy items in trade too.
Kelly
I'm sure this is a familiar question to many - does
anyone have a list of the two-digit codes displayed on
the PDP11-73 during power-up ? I am resurrecting a
dormant unit which stops at '1' (I have only the CPU
and memory installed in the backplane) I'm not sure if
this is a good or a bad code. Any help would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
David Comley
Dave, the Error Code 1 = cpu error
1. Make sure that your cpu diag switches are correctly set
2. Make sure your +5vdc and +12vdc power supply is good
3. Make sure your eproms do not have any bent pins
J Richardkurtz(a)prodigy.net
On Jan 6 2005, 9:30, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
> > >And the programmers were not smart enough to figure a way around
this
> > >because...why?
> >
> > It would have been trivial for them to adopt a simple
> > block transfer for serial binary at the begining. I suspect
> > that the reason they didn't do this was that they didn't
> > wan't people to transfer programs from machine to machine.
> Your theory would make sense in an alternate universe where the
floppy
> disk was never invented ;)
I think the reason is simpler than Dwight implies, and more along the
lines of John's comment. Microsoft were in a hurry to make DOS work
for IBM, and there was simply no perceived need to add the
functionality. If you look at CP/M-related and Apple ][ systems, you
see they had (er, have) the same problem: no out-of-band way to signal
end of file. Several versions of kermit for Z80 machines and Apple ][s
therefore come with a little program to talk from a remote machine to
the serial port, start debug or equivalent, and stuff an
ASCII-converted copy of kermit over which debug then saves in
executable format.
I've still got the ASCII HEX files for an Apple ][. As far as I
remmeber there are two ways to get Kermit-65 onto an Apple. The first
way is to type "IN#2" to set he serial card as the input, and then on
the remote machine give the command to send the main file. It starts
with "CALL -151" to jump into the monitor, and then follows that with a
series of lines like "E00:38 A5"... which cause those bytes to be
stored in memory; then it calls the code it's just stuffed in, and that
in turn loads a huge number of much more compact (no addresses, no
spaces) lines, before finally issuing a "3D0G" to get back to BASIC.
Ditto for the serial card driver's HEX file. Finally you type "PR#6"
so output goes to the disk, and you EXEC the two HEX files to create
the actual binary as a disk file. Easy ;-)
The other way is superficially simpler; you type IN#2, transmit a small
file which creates a BASIC program and runs it; that program receives
and saves the two HEX files, and then tells you what to do with them.
Seems slightly simpler, but actually takes a lot longer, as I recall.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
actually you can wire-or with diodes as long as you pay attention to the "higher" low logic level. Naturally, the voltage is not TTL compatible, but I have used that technique also. As for totem pole vs open collector, that is why I mentioned reading the specs rather than getting more technical with output types. I don't think anyone is going to whip out their TTL chips and start connecting them up to see which one works and which one doesn't.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Stevens <chenmel(a)earthlink.net>
Sent: Jan 7, 2005 10:33 PM
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: RTL Logic
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Tom Jennings <tomj(a)wps.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Steve Thatcher wrote:
>
> > dirt has been known to be found in most places in the world...
> >
> > doing a wired-or and wired-and depends on reading IC specifications
> > for specific chips. It is what design engineers do...
>
> Sorry for being so obtuse! Phrase meant: "wire OR/etc was very
> common in RTL".
>
> I tried wired-OR once in TTL, didn't like the results :-)
>
Wired-OR will work fine for open-collector output TTL. It will fail
miserably with totem-pole output parts. A 'battle of the transistors'
will ensue and one output or another will win.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly Leavitt [mailto:CCTalk@catcorner.org]
>
>
> OK, this came to me by a rather circuitous route, but I now
> have a new in
> the box Quadlink by Quadram. It includes all the cables, software, and
> documentation (the warranty card is still there).
>
> This card is essentially and Apple II/Apple II+ on an 8-bit
> ISA plug in
> board. I don't know how compatible it is with today's PC
> equipment. Anyway,
> the point of this is: Does anyone want this? Contact me off
> list if so.
> Shipping would be from New Jersey, USA.
>
> I'm always looking for old Tandy items in trade too.
>
>
> Kelly
>
Man, sure seemed to be a lot of interest in this. Maybe I should have tried
EPay ;-)
Anyway, someone that has been helping me a lot with getting an old Quadra
running has asked for this. It is officially his. I guess I should have
asked him privately FIRST.
In the same lot is a bunch of other interesting stuff. I have to inventory
it yet, and see what is running, but I know of at least:
A 5155 (one of the luggables) with dual floppies,
an IBM PC reference set
A 5150 (with dual floppies and a 20M drive (with cassette port)),
lots of NIB software and docs.
A largish 8 bit memory expansion card.
A "turbo" XT Clone
Anyway, I'll be listing this stuff as available once I have inventoried it
and know what is running and what is not.
As for the Tandy stuff I collect: My main interest is in the old
II/12/16/6000 line running Xenix
Thanks for all the interest.
Kelly