"In 1977, Ken Olsen, the founder and CEO of Digital Equipment
Corporation, said, "There is no reason for any individual to
have a computer in his home."
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/kenolsen.asp
- John
Correct.
I have an 11/84 in 10.5" box (console at the right-hand side)
and one 11/83 in 5.25" box (console in the middle of the front).
The original poster is maybe not so "DEC-aware", but then again,
I often doubt my DEC knowledge too.
How much difference is obvious in just a glance at an 11/73 and
an 11/83?
- Henk, PA8PDP.
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Christopher McNabb
> Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2004 16:10
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: URGENT - DEC 11/83 (?) needs to be picked up this weekend
> (10 /9)
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:48:18 +0200, Gooijen H <gooi(a)oce.nl> wrote:
> > So, my guess, it is probably an "11/83".
> > The 11/83 QBUS CPU board plus memory on QBUS side, then the
> > QBUS-UNIBUS bridge and the rest is UNIBUS with its famous
> > line of (beautiful) peripherals.
> >
> > - Henk.
>
> That would make it, in fact, an 11/84. The 11/83 is all QBUS, the
> 11/84 is the 11/83 CPU with the Bridge.
So, my guess, it is probably an "11/83".
The 11/83 QBUS CPU board plus memory on QBUS side, then the
QBUS-UNIBUS bridge and the rest is UNIBUS with its famous
line of (beautiful) peripherals.
- Henk.
> >>>>> "Jack" == Jack Rubin <jack.rubin(a)ameritech.net> writes:
>
> Jack> DEC 11/83 (or 73?) system with 2 RP06 drives ...
>
> ??? A Q-bus system with RP06 drives???
>
> paul
DEC 11/83 (or 73?) system with 2 RP06 drives and several DECwriter terminals
needs to be picked up this weekend in the New Buffalo, MI area (Lake
Michigan near the Indiana/Michigan border) - you'll need at least a van or
large pickup truck. Please come prepared to take it all - no cherry picking!
Email me immediately or call me tomorrow (Friday, 10/8) at 847.424.7320
(work) or 312.804.4508 (cell). Owner is clearing out his warehouse over the
weekend.
Jack Rubin
jack.rubin -at- ameritech.net
Hi gang,
>>3490 is 36 track<<
Hate to pick nits, but 3490 is actually 18 track with
compression--physically the same recording method as 3480, but with an IDRC
compression chip.
The 3490E is 36-track.
regards, Chris
www.mullermedia.com
On Oct 7 2004, 19:31, Bob Shannon wrote:
> Be careful with high velocity rounds against pins, I've seen shots
come
> right
> back at you.
>
> Bowling pin shooters (its a handgun sport) use flat-pointed, heavy
rounds to
> 'smack' the pins back off the table.
Indeed, we used to use "pin-grabbers" -- like a flat-nosed "wadcutter"
but with teeth moulded into the front to reduce the chance of bouncing
back.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello all,
Does anyone have any information or instructions on how to connect the 4P to a display? I have the computer but I'm not able to connect it to anything. There are 6 what appears to be RCA type plugs on the back, 2 wide by 3 tall, with + over one column and - over the other. What do I need to do to get this thing working?
I also have an Intellec 4 that I am trying to find accessories and information for.
Thanks,
Jeff
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
---snip---
>There was also a discussion about bouncing signals off the moon to create
>a delay-line memory of sort.
>
>What if we were to preserve software by encoding it as audio and bouncing
>it off the moon? I figure we could probably save a few old programs that
>way :)
>
Hi
You'd need a few different frequencies. The round trip to
the moon and back is only 2.6 seconds. It would be much more
reliable if there was a repeater on the moon otherwise the
signal would be weak.
Dwight
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj(a)wps.com>
>
>On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> You'd need a few different frequencies. The round trip to
>> the moon and back is only 2.6 seconds. It would be much more
>> reliable if there was a repeater on the moon otherwise the
>> signal would be weak.
>
>Fill the intervening space with a gas or liquid and do it
>accoustically, you'd get a lot more bits in there. I will
>hand-wave the accoustic energy loss problems as obvious.
>
Hi
Use a mercury delay line hung from a sky hook. Put multiple
repeaters along the line. One can add some switch boxes
along the line so that one can short path the delay for
more rapid response for specific packets. You'd basically
exchange an originally out going packet of an in going
packet. If a good algorithm wasn't used, some packet might
not ever make the full loop.
Dwight