> >I've been wondering, ever since I got it a few years ago, what my
> >PDT-11/150 would go for on eBay.
>
> Same here... I've got a few with the EIS/FIS chip in them, maybe
> that qualifies them for 'L@@K, R@RE' :-)
>
> Megan
Just being a PDT-11/150 qualifies them as 'L@@K, R@RE' :^) Having the
EIS/FIS chip should qualify them as 'L@@K, ULTR@ R@RE'.
I'm assuming that unlike me, you've also got software that will run on them.
The trick would be to come up with software and doc's, and include
'screenshots' of it booting up. Including a terminal would be icing on the
cake. I'm guessing such a setup would either go for a frightening amount,
or nothing.
Zane
I believe that the Colombia had recently been totally
refurbished stem to stern...
New Avionics, new wiring, crew compartment, the
works...
NASA is trying to upgrade and extend the life of the
Shuttle fleet rather than pushing for a replacement.
I think it's time an X Program or two were undertaken
to create an SSTO replacement for the shuttle.
Check out Jerry Pournelle's Site
http://www.jerrypournelle.com (and if you like it,
please become a member... Let's encourage good work
like his..), for some cogent discussions of this
issue...
All sorts of wacky stuff is flying around about the
cause. Someone sent me an e-mail about a terrorist
with a laser weapon... Geez!
What bugs me about it, beyond the obvious... Is that
Islamic Extremests will take this disaster and
interpret it to mean that God has spoken against the
U.S. and Israel, and that this disaster is an omen.
Let's wait and see, but I'm sure many in that crowd
were jumping with glee over this, and taking this as a
sign that "Allah" was on their side.
A sad interpretation of a Sadder event.
I'd like to see Burt Rutan on an X Project to develop
a replacement for the shuttle. I'd bet if anyone could
do it, he could get something cheaper and better
developed in a few years easily...
And the temporary solution is to build a few more new
shuttles and ground the older ones. It's obvious to
me, that age and metal stress played some part in this
disaster, and it's probably better to ground the
current fleet and fly all new machines until
replacements can be designed, tested and built...
Al
I'm looking for a COMPUTE! (not Gazette) issue, dating around '84-'85
(I think). I recall the cover clearly; it had Miami Ice on it, and inside
was Looking Glass, a useful little Commodore windowing utility.
If someone has this magazine and would be willing to part with it, please
contact me off list.
Thank you!
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Stand by to launch beef by-product into oscillating ventilation unit ... ---
The first computer that want crazy over was a SOL. It was an S-100 based
console that used a DUAL cassette interface. Super. Never could afford
one but I did get the original MSA (Microsoft) basic on cassette just in
case.
I would love to get one now just for nostalgia. If anyone should come
across one let me know. awt(a)io.com
All,
Although I, like everyone else, am sad about what has happened,
I would like to ask that we go back to ClassiComp related issues
here. I've been hitting the >D< key a little too often the past
few days.
Thanks,
Fred
Someone mentioned C3 the other day. That translates to Convergent
Technologies. I thing Burroughs bought them in the late 80's. I cut my
teeth on C3 gear. At age 8 I was an expert at crashing the Coast Guard
mini in Saulte Ste. Marie, Michigan.
Regards,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-admin(a)classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Brian Chase
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:56 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Old Computer Companies
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 vance(a)neurotica.com wrote:
> I'm trying to think of all the really old computer companies that are
> still in business. GE and Honeywell no longer make computers. DEC
and DG
> are gone. So there's HP, IBM, Bull... are there any others left from
> way-back-when? Oh yeah, there's Siemens. And Amdahl's part of
Fujitsu
> now. Do they still count? I guess Fujitsu probably counts on its own
> merits. Hitachi and Toshiba left the industry recently, after many
years.
> And then there's Unisys, with their recent turn to weird hybrid
systems.
> Did I miss anyone?
Sure... SGI and Sun.
-brian.
My linux box is a DataGeneral 486
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]
Jeffrey S. Worley <Technoid(a)30below.com> wrote:
> I bought a Sun Sparcstation 4/330 a few years ago. It's hdd was intact
> and after breaking the password file [...]
Why did you need to do that? Why couldn't you just boot single-user from the
ROM and get a root shell?
MS
loedman1(a)juno.com wrote:
> Please provide a valid address so we may do so.
Since I use Classic Computers for my mail and honestly follow the original
standards of the Founding Fathers of ARPANET without any obfuscation or other
desecration, the only address I have is the valid one, and it appears in the
From: header of every message I send.
MS
>The class action suit should of course be against the blockers. We
really need
>a law that guarantees penalties for spamblockers 10 times greater than
those
>for spammers. If you send spam, you get 1 year in prison. If you assault
an
>open relay operator, mangle E-mail addresses, or do anything else to
desecrate
>the Classic Computing tradition, you should get 10 years in prison. If a
>spammer gets 5 years in prison, spamblockers must get 50 years.
Excuse me ? Perhaps we should all forward all of our spam, porn and
otherwise, to you.
Please provide a valid address so we may do so.
Rich Stephenson
California