Und vy shut ve uz zis "Blowfish?" I sot zat PGP vas ze better enkriptshun,
nicht war?
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Philip
> Pemberton" <philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:52 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question
>
> Jim Battle wrote:
> > I've had the discussion with workmates about the following scenario.
> > If the German forces had access to a single 5150 IBM PC back in 1940,
> > would the war have ended very differently? I think it would have.
> "Who needs zis Enigma vee haff developed? Vee shall use Blowfish to
> encrypt
> our messages!"
>
> Later.
> --
> Phil.
> philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com
> http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Oh? I thought their only major drawback was in their heavy water
experiments. A nice scientific CAD setup for modelling the molecule might
have put them years ahead of us...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Eric
> Smith" <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:19 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question
>
> Jim Battle wrote:
> > I was thinking more along the lines of computing ballistics,
>
> Computing ballistics would have been some help, but nowhere near enough
> to change the outcome.
>
> > and advancing their nuclear program.
>
> Their "nuclear program" had serious defficiencies that wouldn't have
> been solved by more computing power.
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
>I noticed an auction on eBay for a KZQSA-SA SCSI controller and I was
>wondering (silly me) if it could be used with RT-11. I know that RT-11 is
>much older than this board, but I was hoping someone had written a driver
>for it.
There never was a driver written for it, at least not by DEC. If I
had had the documentation, I probably would probably have tried it,
since I did lots of handler work.
In fact, if someone has clear and complete documentation for it, and
a board to play with, I would not be adverse at trying my hand at it.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: mbg at world.std.com |
| | |
| "this space | (s/ at /@/) |
| unavoidably left blank" | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Mail List
> <mail.list(a)analog-and-digital-solutions.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no
> subject)
>
> > > This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
> > > customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
> > > tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such
> as
> > > the principles that this nation was founded on.
>
This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such as
the principles that this nation was founded on.
America was *NOT* founded by Christians. I'm very tired of hearing that
drumbeat. The founding fathers, if anything, were DEISTs, and/or
ceremonialisyts, and well knew the inherent dangers of including or even
nodding to support any one religion over another in this country and its
government - something our modern-day right-wing Christian brothers and
sisters either don't know or won't learn.
A state religion here would indeed be as dangerous to US national growth and
development as is has proven all over the middle east. Remember: prior to
1979, Iran didn't have either a "state religion," or a theocracy. Now it
does. Was there an improvement?
Cheers...
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Mail List
> <mail.list(a)analog-and-digital-solutions.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no
> subject)
>
> > > This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
> > > customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
> > > tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such
> as
> > > the principles that this nation was founded on.
>
> America was *NOT* founded by Christians. I'm very tired of hearing that
> drumbeat. The founding fathers, if anything, were DEISTs, and/or
> ceremonialisyts, and well knew the inherent dangers of including or even
> nodding to support any one religion over another in this country and its
> government - something our modern-day right-wing Christian brothers and
> sisters either don't know or won't learn.
>
> A state religion here would indeed be as dangerous to US national growth
> and development as is has proven all over the middle east. Remember: prior
> to 1979, Iran didn't have either a "state religion," or a theocracy. Now
> it does. Was there an improvement?
>
> Cheers...
>
> Ed
> San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>
> > You honestly believe that the governmant controls what CNN, MSNBC, FOX,
> > etc. put into there news casts?
>
Actually, our government controls *access* to who and what gets into
the news. Today, news isn't about Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite. Its
about money, looking good, keeping up the ratings, and, just occasionally, a
slanted nod to what's going on in the world. "Truth" went the way of the
wind with (maybe before) Kennedy...
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Since we're on points like this one, does anyone out there remember the the
first shots of the '86 Challenger disaster? One chase plane scene showed
for about 1/2 a day on CNN, as if it were normal and planned, then simply
disappeared. It *hadn't* anything to do with the SRBs... Did anyone see?
Does anyone remenber? Off list responses preferred...
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of chris
> <cb(a)mythtech.net>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: Classic Computer
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin!
>
> >It never made it to CNN or MSNBC.
>
> MSNBC's web site also altered a story the other day regarding Osama bin
> Ladin and Iraq. The first release made mention that bin Ladin was calling
> his people to kill Hussein. Then, when the US held a press briefing on
> the same topic, and tried to make it sound as if bin Ladin was in cahoots
> with Hussein, MSNBC suddenly altered their story, removing the reference.
>
> No explination to the change. Could have been an error, could have been
> an oversite, could have been a request by someone... could have been
> anything. Point is, the story took a change to reflect the US governments
> desired position on the topic, and they just pretened it had always been
> that way.
>
> Humm... does Winston Smith work for MSNBC?
>
> -chris
> <http://www.mythtech.net>
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
The Macintosh port of C64View, a freeware cross-platform Commodore 64 image
viewer, has been updated. This new version features drag-and-drop operation
and improved UI, as well as correcting OS X compatibility bugs and introducing
a new Classic version for 68K Macintoshes and non-Carbon Power Macs. It
preserves the Mac-specific converter capability, allowing you to convert your
Commodore images into PICT files for import to your favourite Mac application.
C64View's DOS version is also still available, and is compatible with Win32
as well as DOS 5.0 and up. You can capture the DOS version screen in Windows
to export images, or use your favourite screen-grab TSR.
C64View supports KoalaPainter, Doodle!, 8K bitmaps (including Flexidraw and
Print Shop Screen Magic) and 1K colourmaps. Sample images are included.
Download from
http://www.armory.com/%7Espectre/cwi/c64view/
C64View is freeware.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegcaps awound? ---------------------------------
>The earliest 1.2M drive that I saw (before the AT) was a
>Mitsubishi 4854?
>I was told that it had had been designed for the explicit purpose of
>replacing 8" drives. It did NOT also have a "360K" mode.
I still have some M4854 drives that are in use to this day! My *first*
computer that I saved up for was a Pulsar Electronics Little Big Board
system (Z80 - 64K, STD bus, 8" drive interface, CP/M 2.2) The neat thing
was that I had dual 5.25" M4854 drives that provided 2.4Mb online while all
of my friends had dual 360K drives.....
Anyway, I digress,
The M4854 was an 8" drive replacement. Motor speed was ?300? rpm, not the
usual 360rpm with the 5.25" drives. The hardist thing about it was that it
did not have a 50pin connector.
Doug Jackson
Director, Managed Security Services
Citadel Securix Pty Ltd
Level 1, 10 Moore St
Canberra ACT 2601
Ph: (612) 6290 9011 Fx: (612) 6262 6152 Mob: 0414 986 878
Web: www.citadel.com.au
Melbourne - Sydney - Canberra - Brisbane - Hong Kong - Atlanta
Any pricing or time figures contained within this email are indicative only,
and have been provided for planning purposes only. Please request a
quotation from your sales representative prior to undertaking any work.
CAUTION - The information in this message may be of a privileged or confidential nature intended only for the use of the addressee or someone authorised to receive the addressee's e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster(a)citadel.com.au. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citadel Securix.
Feel free to visit the Citadel Securix website! Click below.
http://www.citadel.com.au