Slightly OT but..
Two Madge Smart 16/4 PCI ringnode cards.
Untested. Anyone?
Cheers,
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
I've got a bunch of (8) MCA NICS, and four PS/2 Model 70s with a NIC each
in them. Only problem -- some of the computers dont have hard drives,
some dont have floppy drives, and NONE have memory.
All of the NICs are SMC/WDC cards that have both AUI and 10BaseT
connectors on them.
I'm interested in DEC and RS/6000 hardware, or money. Make offers if
interested.
-- Pat
Is anyone here familar with the sv-1600 SCSI-View SCSI bus analyzer made by VeriSoft? I found one today. It's a card that fits in a 16 bit PC-AT socket. I'm looking for a manual and software for it.
Joe
Forgot who it was that alerted me to the XL on eBay for $20, but wanted to say thanks as I won it for the $20. Now if you can just find me a Lisa 1, then I will have a complete collection of the Lisa's. Oh yea the same $20 would be nice too. :-) On a little different note I was talking to my daughter about the Lisa 1 manual going for $350 on eBay and she reminded me of the fact that I tossed about 10 of those manuals (she took them to Half Price books to sell and only got about a nickel apiece for them) back in 1995 when I was closing down my shop to move to MN. Oh well you never know. :-(
> >>You can open a file to append, in which case the version number isn't
> >>changed. Of course, typical VMS applications open the log file and never
> >>close it and assuming you code it correctly, other applications can read
> >>the log file.
> >
> >Unfortuantly at least version 1.9 of Samba (yeah, I know it's ancient, but
> >it works for me) has the bad habit of creating a LOT of log files. I
> >finally ended up creating a batch job to clean up after it.
> >
> > Zane
>
> Hey, I have an unused distribution of "rumba" which claims to
> do what samba does but on VMS. Has anybody ever used it?
> Is it any good?
I've never used Rumba or Samba on VMS. I use either Pathworks
or Advanced Server.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
VMS has a distinctive that when you open a file for write or append, a copy
of that file is made with a higher "Version" number.
What happens then if you have a "log" type file, the OS (or some application)
open it from time to time to add info.
Mass copies of this file?
Actually, it's not a rescue of sorts, but a revival--
Got an email from a guy that runs a machine shop. Seems they use a PS/2 model
60 to run a lathe. They were having problems getting it working and were out
of production. Turns out they are located about an hour away from me. We
corresponded and a deal was struck and the following day a guy drove down to
meet me and got two replacement model 60s from me for a cool $150. They
wanted to keep using the same system since it was a package of some sort they
bought quite some time ago and upgrading it would cost $10k. Kinda neat to
see old machines still working. With it being a PS/2, I'm not surprised
especially being in a machine shop. For those others that run computer
museums, it might be wise to state your location. It was lucky he was located
in the same state as me.
> > Tandy M100, M102, M200. Olivetti M10. And whatever the Kyocera version
> > was called. (OK, they contain an 8085 CPU, which was originally an Intel
> > design, but I don't think that's the normal meaning of 'Wintel')
>
> These are Wintel, but they are MStel. The ROM was written by
> Microsoft.
I meant "These aren't Wintel..."
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Ross Archer wrote:
>r65c02p2 wrote:
>
>
>>--- In 6502ag@y..., "rey_bbs" <rey_bbs@y...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is there a way to use 8255 in a 6502 computer instead of a 6522?
>>>
>>>
>>Howdy Guys,
>>
>>I've read the list discussion regarding 8255's and the 6502 and
>>thought I'd pipe up. I use 8255's with 6502 whenever I need lots
>>of I/O bits per package count. Interface is rather simple. I also use
>>NEC part Nr. D71055C which is a 8255 pin/program compatible CMOS
>>component that will work to 10 MHz. Also using 82C55 for battery
>>powered systems. All work quite reliably.
>>
>>The /RD and /WR signals for the 8255 I generate this way:
>>
>>/RD is 6502 R/W NAND Phi2
>>/WR is 6502 INVERTED-R/W NAND Phi2
>>
>>Easily accomplished with single quad NAND...I generally use these
>>same strobes for memory access and other buss connected device access.
>>
>> Regards All,
>> Brian
>>
Hi, and thanks for that. The cool thing is you've just generated
Z80-compatible strobes.
Don't forget to use that last NAND gate left in your 7400
to invert the reset signal from 6502 pin 40 into 8255 pin 35.
If not inverted, the 6502 RESET will hold the 8255 in reset
indefinitely, and if omitted, may not come up 100%. Correct?
-- Ross
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>6502ag-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> I haven't heard much talk about DOS-11 or DOS/BATCH (same thing?)
At one point there were two separate products that were combined to
create DOS/BATCH. It was sold until the late 70's but deemphasized
in favor of RT-11.
I have a bunch of DECtapes of this material queued up to be read in
the next few months. The one document that I'm missing was the companion
to the DOS/BATCH handbook that was the sys admin guide which describes
the system generation process.
A copy of a DOS/BATCH distribution tape that John Wilson and I read
has been forwarded to Bob Supnik. Hopefully there's still someone left
who would be willing to give permission for its release similar to that
given for the version of RT that he has.
