Bob ---
Well, the problem that I had, is like I guessed. I did a little test
with my cctalk subscription... Netscape(D/UX) does pass some different
header info than Outlook. So I just subscribed to cctalk on the D/UX box
also, supplying the other address (and disabled delivery, so I don't get all
the posts duplicated), and now it works.
Now, I just have to add the other address to cctech...
--- David A Woyciesjes
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Bob Bramwell
!
! Actually the delay was amost certainly my own fault. I
! subscribed to the list using one mail address and then
! tried to reply to an incoming digest using a different
! one. So I un- and re- subscribed, and now *this*
! should serve as a test that I can post to the group.
! Look no further than the nearest user for
! your software "problems" :-)
! >Message: 4
! >From: David Woyciesjes <DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
! >
! >***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small
! >"problem" between the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape
! >handle the Reply-To (or is it Sender) field in a message..****
! >! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob@copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
! >!
! >! Sure is quiet, isn't it?
_______________________________________________
cctech mailing list
cctech(a)classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
Calling all Apple II gurus . . . . .
I procured the following and am wondering if you can add/subtract to
what little I know:
Street Electronics Corp. Echo+ [some sort of speech synthesizer]
Apricorn super serial imager card [serial/modem and ?/printer outs, some
sort of super fx]
unknown mfg. pn-1300-42 Super Serial Pro, has pigtail with 8 pin
mini-DIN plug
[serial card?? has two DIP switches next to xtal]
Apple Workstation card [Appletalk??]
The Appletalk and synthesizer boards look interesting . . .
Gary Hildebrand
St. JOseph, MO
Actually the delay was amost certainly my own fault. I subscribed to the list
using one mail address and then tried to reply to an incoming digest using a
different one. So I un- and re- subscribed, and now *this* should serve as a
test that I can post to the group. Look no further than the nearest user for
your software "problems" :-)
>Message: 4
>From: David Woyciesjes <DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
>To: "'cctech(a)classiccmp.org'" <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: RE: [CCTECH] Re: anybody out there?
>Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:47:09 -0400
>Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
>***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between
>the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it
>Sender) field in a message..****
>
>! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob@copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
>!
>! Sure is quiet, isn't it?
| the digital divide is an issue of poverty;
Bob Bramwell 60 Baker Cr. NW | if we can eliminate the information
ProntoLogical Calgary, AB | barriers, we'll all live in a safer,
+1 403/861-8827 T2L 1R4, Canada | more prosperous world.
| - John Gage, Sun's chief researcher.
_______________________________________________
cctech mailing list
cctech(a)classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
I recently got an Apple QuickTake 150 digital camera, but I can't find the
disks for it anywhere, and they don't seem to be available from apple's web
site. Does anyone have these disks so I could get copies of them?
Thanks!
- Dan Wright
(dtwright(a)uiuc.edu)
(http://www.uiuc.edu/~dtwright)
-] ------------------------------ [-] -------------------------------- [-
``Weave a circle round him thrice, / And close your eyes with holy dread,
For he on honeydew hath fed, / and drunk the milk of Paradise.''
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Kubla Khan
> From: SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com
[re old IBM mice]
> jeez, i just round filed dozens of them a while back! the buttons start
> getting dodgy after long term use.
So did I! Someone brought in a paper grocery sack full of them and wanted
to sell them. When I said no, they just left the shop, and left the mice
behind, so I chucked 'em.
Are you sure that's not a PS/1 mouse in the photo? The ones I trashed were
exactly like the photo, but I didn't think they were the really early mice.
Glen
0/0
You could use a Rabbit board: http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/
--tom
At 09:30 AM 5/30/02 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, 30 May 2002, Glen Goodwin wrote:
>
>> > From: Pat Finnegan <pat(a)purdueriots.com>
>>
>> > What I'm looking to do is provide a (small) SLIP or PPP based TCP/IP
>> stack
>> > for a machine that will stay resident and can be used by CP/M 2.2 [or
>> > perhaps MP/M II] user programs.
>>
>> Pat --
>>
>> I would be extremely interested to learn of your progress in this area.
>> Please keep us posted, or contact me off-list.
>
>I'm starting to have some second thoughts about how I'm going to do this.
>I'm considering an external 'black box' that will connect to a PPP server
>on one end and have a RS-232 connection on the other that will provide
>something like a serialized verion of BSD's sockets. I'm also thinking
>about implementing a raw tcp port that would connect to an extra RS-232
>port [optionally password protected] that could be used to attach to the
>system's console, and replicate it on the other end of the network.
>
>Right now I'm looking at either a Z80 with 32k of ram, 16k of flash, a CTC
>and one or two DUARTS, or a uC that'll provide as much of that in hardware
>as possible. PICs are nice, but generally seem to have too little memory
>for TX/RX buffers, and Basic stamps are too slow. (and who wants to
>program in BASIC anyways?)
>
>Any suggestions on a good uC to use?
>
>-- Pat
>
>
>
***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between
the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it
Sender) field in a message..****
! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob@copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
!
! Sure is quiet, isn't it? But I'm listening, and this can
! serve as a test of my
! ability to submit to the list by the simple expedient of
! hitting "reply" in my
! mailer window.
Yeah, cctech is kinda quiet, but I believe that has to do with the
whole moderation thing, and discussions branching off once they get
re-posted to cctalk.
I'm currently subscribed to both. I have rules in place to send
messages from each list to separate folders. That way, depending on my
mood, and workload, I can follow the wandering discussion on cctalk, or
just read whatever meat comes through on cctech.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2:
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
_______________________________________________
cctech mailing list
cctech(a)classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
Thanks to a friend around the corner, booting DKA0 now gives me
AXP/VMS 6.1, and, as before, booting DKC0 gives me Digital Unix 3.2.
Now all I need is for the same benefactor to dig out his layered
products CDs for AXP and I'm set!
One problem... we tried to put a CD-R of the AXP/VMS 6.1 disc into
the RRD42 and it didn't like it. Has anyone else had any experience
with DEC CD-ROM drives and burned media? Do I need to get a different
drive here? Will a Sun-compatible SCSI CD-ROM drive work in place
of an RRD42? (in case the 512 byte/2048 byte sector thing is an
issue).
Thanks again for all who helped recently. I'm one step closer on
my journey to bring my VAX experience to the end of the 20th C.
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
The adaptor fits on the 20-contact video edge connector near the middle of
the front panel. Just remove the shunt and replace it with the TTL-Composite
adaptor. The shunt just takes the signal from the contact on the bottom of
the O1's circuit board and carries it to the corresponding contact on the
top. So, if the converter does not also run the signals to the top of the O1
board, the internal monitor will not be on -- only the external composite
monitor will be.
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Goodwin [mailto:acme_ent@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:03 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Osborne 1 Video Adapter? (was:RE: IBM 026 Printing Card
Punch)
> From: Feldman, Robert <Robert_Feldman(a)jdedwards.com>
> I was looking through the Alltronics listings and noticed a TTL-Composite
> video adaptor (http://www.alltronics.com/computer_miscellaneous.htm ,
> #92C024) that looks like the adaptor I have for my Osborne 1!
Robert --
Please tell me more about this adapter. I like my Oz 1 but hate the
screen. Where does it connect to the Oz?
Glen
0/0