On Feb 28, 11:04, Andreas Freiherr wrote:
> Pete,
>
> understand or agree with all you say. Except:
>
> > > Yes. But this is neither a typo nor a printing error. If you read
four
> > > blocks of 200(8) _words_ each, starting at zero, you fill exactly
> > > 2000(8) _bytes_, and the next free location is 2000(8). As you state,
> > > the printed version is prepared for conversion to single density (by
> > > clearing the 400 bit in locations 2036 and 2072, right?) by reading
in
> > > four blocks... - So, the reason is somewhat similar to that for the
> > > TS-11.
> >
> > Yes, but if it's single density, which is the only reason you'd read
four
> > sectors, the sectors are 128 bytes [100(8)] not 256, so it's still only
> > 1000(8).
>
> Sure, you need not read four sectors if they are 200 words each, but as
> we noted earlier, the routine will always read these four sectors (so
> you need only change two words in order to switch to single density),
> and if these four sectors happen to be from a double-density RX02, you
> will want to have sufficient room for them.
Er, read the code again. The double-density version only loads 2 sectors,
in *all* the versions I've seen.
40 001122 120427 CMPB R4,#3 ; sectors 1
and 3 get done
40 001124 000003
> I haven't tried: is it possible to get a false error indication while
> you are supposed to wait until the RXV11 has digested parameters like
> sector / track number? From reading the docs, I would assume that the
> only reason for the error bit to come on at this time might be an
> invalid parameter like sector > 26, and in this case, you'll probably
> better abort as well (sure, should not happen during boot...). So why
> not just use this check every time you wait for the controller, once the
> check is in the subroutine anyway?
I haven't tried all the permutations to see what happens if you give
garbage in response to a TR request, but the error only shows up ast the
end in cases I have tried. It's almost impossible to test this by hand, as
the controller doesn't wait forever; you only have a short time to respond
to TR so you can't do it from, say, ODT or an 11/40 switch console.
> But, you're right: savings aren't too extreme with this approach, as the
> sequence BIT-BEQ-BMI takes three words, and a JSR would need two. In
> turn, you need two additional words for a MOV #something,SP plus one for
> the RTS, and there are four places with a BMI, so in total we save four
> words by spending three: makes a total of one word saved. Didn't you say
> something like this before? ;-)
Something like that, yeah ;-)
> Let me continue, and we can open a contest for writing the shortest
> bootstrap! ;-)
I used to do that with all sorts of small assembly-languge routines. My
best was saving 200+ bytes out of 2048, in some Z80 code that one
self-proclaimed expert (not the author) described as "a mastepiece of
conciseness".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 1, 9:00, Stan Barr wrote:
> pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull) said:
> > Lots of unix (including many BSD/Linux) systems have a program called
ppt
> > (usually in /usr/bin/games or similar) which takes an ASCII string and
> > outputs a facsimile of paper tape.
>
> Thanks for that, I just found it on this Linux box. "Man ppt" also
> listed bcd which does the same for punched cards.
And in case anyone thinks that's off-topic, this is the description from my
Seventh Edition man page on ppt:
bcd, ppt - convert to antique media
So it was considered antiquated in 1979!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
1. IBM Thinkpad 755c for $12.51
2. Commodore 1084 video monitor for $7
3. hp NetServer 4d/66LM for $33
4. Apple PowerPC 8100/80 tower traded 4 empty PC cases for it.
5. digital VT 420 - 2 for $1 each
6. digital VT 520 - 2 for $1 each
7. WYSE 30+ terminal for $1
8. hp Laserjet IIIp for $1
Hi.
I've seen this come up a couple of times with no real solution. I
very generous somebody just emailed me the VAXstation 4000/60 "Owner's
and System Installation Guide" (EK-PMARI-OM-001) and "Options
Installation Guide" (EK-PMARI-IG-001) in Bookreader format.
I don't have ftp or webserver space, but I'll be glad to share.
I can read these in OSF or VMS, but does anyone know of a reader or
conversion utility for Linux? If I had that, I'd see about putting them
in PostScript or PDF.
Doc
Hi,
We have a Personal Iris 4D/35 with a missing keyboard and mouse. Where and how
can I find something that works?
http://www.geocities.com/riskyfriends/
Jeff,
If you're out there drop me a line. I've send you at lest four messages
recently and I haven't gotten a reply. I don't know if the problem is your
E-mail or mine or ?????
Joe
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> Fred, You've mentioned Xenosoft several times. How about telling us
more
> about it, such as what formats it supports, how much it costs and
wheather
> it supports the Compaticards?
Funny you should mention this. I was looking through an old
book-of-the-month club purchase, "C Programmer's Guide to Serial
Communications," the other night and I found a plug for XenoSoft in it!
Glen
0/0
> ----------
> From: Bill Pechter
>
> Folks --
>
> I've been trying to find a copy of either ie4 or ie5 for Win3.1/Winnt35
> somewhere on the net. I tried the MS install setup.exe files and
> they both timed out looking for the url.
>
> Anyone have them locally cached? I lost my set in a disk failure last
> year.
>
>
> Either url that works, ftp site, or cd copy would be fine.
>
> Bill
> --
Have you tried 'The Internet Archive'?
http://www.archive.org/index.html
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > I remember reading about this, I'm surprised they
> > ever actually sold any:
> >
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2004920012
>
> It's just a third party ROM board that happens to have a SOLOS EPROM in
> it. While you could speculate that Processor Technology sold this
> (unlikely), it's more likely that some hacker back in the day put this
> together.
No, this was a product, listed in catalogs... my remark was
meant to convey that, I just never figured they'd actually
sell one, but this is it...
-dq