Anyone interested in a TI Explorer II machine? It's complete and
running .. includes the keyboard [marked as a special LISP model],
monitor and two outboard disk drives. Way to heavy to ship at a
reasonable price
[but it is probably shippable] .. pickup strongly prefered in the
Roanoke, VA area. It came as part of a sealed bid lot ..I figure I've
got about $100 in it.
Craig Smith
On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 14:51:02 GMT "Ken Seefried" <ken(a)seefried.com>
writes:
> A company called Opus made a number of ISA cards with interesting
> coprocessors. I used to have an Opus 32000 ISA card, a National
> Semi 32016 coprocessor. It unfortunately got tossed out by a careless
> girlfriend a decade ago
Stoppit! Stoppit! I can't take this anymore!! I'm gonna absolutely *die*
if I hear about another 32k system *tossed*!
There was another 32k coprocessor effort featured in the Micro Cornucopia
in 1986. I *so* wanted one of these, but the project died on the vine .
. .
> (along with my unbuilt PC532 kit...sigh).
AHHHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
From: Carlos Murillo <cmurillo(a)emtelsa.multi.net.co>
> "He who doesn't comprehend UNIX is destined to redesign it poorly."
> Does anybody know the origin of this quote?
Henry Spencer. He also said "If you lie to the compiler, it will get its
revenge", which I think is pretty funny, too. Oh, yeah...and his 10
Commandments of C Programmers is gospel. Helluva guy.
Ken
joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote (after someone else):
> > > Stoppit! Stoppit! I can't take this anymore!! I'm gonna absolutely *die*
> > > if I hear about another 32k system *tossed*!
>
> Rumor has it that Steve is going to bring his AT&T 3B2s to the junk
> fest in Orlando. I think they have 32k CPUs.
No, they have Western Electric...umm, 32100? processors. Not
National Semi.
-Frank McConnell
> >There was a Zenith MS-DOS 3.31+ that ran on the Z-150/Z-151;
> >I can probably scare it up...
>
>
> Thanks for the offer but the 150 and higher models are completely
> different machines from the Z-100. They use the ISA buss and are 100% IBM
> compatible so the OS is basicly PC DOS.
They're not *quite* 100% IBM compatible, e.g. power supply, and non-
Zenith keyboard use eventually causes the CPU board to no longer
recognize a Zenith keyboard.
But that would be picking nits...
-dq
Hi;
I have a few IBM 3270 emulation cards which sport BNC cable attachments.
What cabling standard does this describe, and how can I connect it to my
existing twinaxial cable plant?
ok
r.
At 07:02 PM 8/8/01 -0400, you wrote:
> > At 01:10 PM 8/7/01 -0700, you wrote:
> > >On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, joe wrote:
> > > > FWIW You could get MS-DOS versions 1.25, 2.1(something) and 3.1
>for
> > > > the Zenith Z-100. There's also a guy out there that wrote a program to
> > > > patch PC-DOS 4.0 to run on the Z-100.
> > >
> > >Is there a 3.31 available for it?
> >
> >
> > Not that I know of. MS-DOS 3.1 was the highest version that Zenith
> > released for it. The PC-DOs 4 is a private effort by John Beyers
> > <http://members.home.net/johnbeyers/hz100.htm>.
> >
>
>There was a Zenith MS-DOS 3.31+ that ran on the Z-150/Z-151;
>I can probably scare it up...
Thanks for the offer but the 150 and higher models are completely
different machines from the Z-100. They use the ISA buss and are 100% IBM
compatible so the OS is basicly PC DOS.
Joe
>-dq
I don't have the detailed history available to me now,
but --
didn't WordStar run under CP/M long before MS-DOS was created ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Master of all that Sucks [SMTP:vance@ikickass.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:56 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: an odd question
Well, MS-DOS 1.0 was doing it long before WordStar.
Peace... Sridhar
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> on 8/9/01 9:47 AM, Dan Wright at dtwright(a)uiuc.edu wrote:
> > not sure if this is exactly on-topic, but I figure if anyone would know, it
> > would be this bunch... where did the convention of using "^x" to represent
> > "Ctrl-x" come from? I wonder because you see that convention everywhere, but
> > it's totally non-intuitave -- i.e. why does the carat symbol mean "hold
> > control
> > while pressing the following key"? I think this came up because someone
> > pointed out that using pine the first time was really hard until they figured
> > out what "^" meant. so, anyone know where that convention came from?
>
> I believe Wordstar used to display the control sequences for cut and
> pasting and other block move type commands in that format in it's menus.
> I'm almost positive that versions of Worstar I was using on XT-clones in the
> mid-80's were like that. At the time, quite a large number of text editors,
> including those included with programs such as TurboBasic, used the Wordstar
> commands and conventions as well.
>
> Jeff
>