On May 4, Clint Wolff (VAX collector) wrote:
> In terms I understand, what's a J90, and what's it worth?
A used, operational J90 is worth anywhere from ~$8K-35K depending on
configuration.
Here's some quick info:
Type: PVP (parallel vector processor)
CPUs: 4 min, 32 max
CPU architecture: YMP family binary compatible
Memory: 4GB max
Disk: unbelievably huge quantities possible
Performance: 200MFLOPS sustained per CPU
Word width: 64 bits
FP capabilities: 64 bits single-precision, goes up from there
Vector element depth: 64 elements
Cooling: air
Power: 220V split-phase, about 3-4KW depending on config
OS: Unicos (SystemV variant)
Languages: C, C++, Fortran77, Fortran90, others
I have a relatively large J90 here. Pics of it can be seen at
http://www.neurotica.com/cray/mine. I absolutely love this machine.
It is, for lack of better descriptive terms, UNCOMFORTABLY fast when
crunching numbers.
-Dave McGuire
From: healyzh(a)aracnet.com <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
>
>I don't think the VAXstation 3100/10 is later than a M76, and it's got
that
>oddball connector. I thought it was the other way around. Also either
the
>DECstation 2100's and/or 3100's used the same cable.
The VAXstation if memory serves is later. The MV and DECserver3100s
were SCSI-II and before the M76 though the difference was less than a
year.
Allison
On May 4, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> > >Is anyone else having a problem with mails coming from
> > >ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk? They come out blank on my end.
> > >Bob Mason
> >
> > Yes. That is Tony (Hi Tony!) and for some reason they come out in Opera 5.x
> > as just an attachment that is unopenable (strange but his are the only ones).
> > --Chuck
>
> Strange, they're just fine in 'elm'. Last I checked they were also fine
> under Eudora 4.0.2/Mac.
Fine in VM under xemacs here..
-Dave McGuire
knightstalkerbob(a)netscape.net (Bob Mason) wrote:
> Is anyone else having a problem with mails coming from
> ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk? They come out blank on my end.
No. But Tony's mailer is inserting a header
Content-Type: text
...which isn't valid according the the MIME spec, but then there
isn't a MIME-Version header either so it your mailer shouldn't
be trying to interpret it as a MIME content-type.
-Frank McConnell
Can anyone tell me what the differences are between a KXT11-A, -AA, -AB *
-CA? I know -A? is dual wide, and -C? is quad wide, but other than that?
BTW...how would one get Micropower Pascal for one of these?
Ken Seefried, CISSP
Found this on usenet. Someone has kludged up an IDE interface for the
Apple II (!). Schematics and software for the interface can be found at:
http://s.guillard.free.fr
Apparently the thing costs about $5 in parts to put together.
- Mike
OK... from visiting various Comptometer sites (including a museum by
Victor themselves), this unit appears to be c. 1961, and is powered by
a 100-130V motor. The power cord is like nothing I've seen - three
brass rods, the middle one (earth), fixed, the outer two slightly
floating, about 1.25 cm long, 2-3 mm in diameter, spaced at about 1.25 cm
on centers, nearly, but not entirely, in line. The outer two conductors
are slightly farther apart than a modern Continental 220V plug.
I can tap in power internally, I can maybe use insulated alligator clips, but
mostly, I'd like to find a proper mains cord for this. From manually operating
the innards, it needs cleaned and oiled, but that's to be expected.
-ethan
=====
Visit "The Seventh Continent"
http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
From: jpero(a)sympatico.ca <jpero(a)sympatico.ca>
> From: Brian Chase <bdc(a)world.std.com>
>
> And then it'd be rather fun to implement your very own 6502 using 74*
> series logic chips.
>Possible, but length of traces to wire all those together will keep
>it to KHz range and needs few large boards that needs so much power
>that hottest athlon cpu is low power by comparsion.
It would eat power but it would not be that slow. The mos logic of
the time was quite slow compared to the ttl of the time.
I did do a 2901C version of z80 and it was much faster than the MOS
version, not due to the 2901s as they were logic savers but the
acutal speed bottleneck as well.
I have seen photos of apple IIe prototype laid out on early
pre-production logic board, one of that 40 pin chipset socket is
hooked to a equally same size board filled to the 4 edges with
tightly packed TTLs and few large ICs, I think it was shown in Byte
as well as few other publicatons. Large board full of chips vs. 40
pin IC, same thing...Amazing!
That was replaced by a 2000 or so gate array so thats were it
all went. Also the proto was built of all SSI TTL making it less dense.
I did some work like that in the early 80s. Logic was faster than
you think. It's true to get to the sub 100ns range for serious
cpus you have to get the interconnect problem out of the way.
However for a fairly fast machine (4-10mhz clocks) there are
many examples that are mostly ttl. For starters the PDP-8E
ca. 1971ish executes instructions in 1.4uS for the base modes
and that was SSI ttl on low density boards. FYI it was limited
by the core cycle time not the TTL, I ran one at nearly twice
speed easily with semicon memory.
Allison
OK. It looks like it will take a while to sort through this stuff from my last
haul but I will post some of the more interesting items(to me anyway) as I run
across them. A few of the items were from Bell Atlantic(Sorbus) and deal with
maintenence and diagnostics.
One box I found included a TK50, RX50, and 9-track tape diagnostic software. I
know there is a manual that goes with this in the pile somewhere as well. The
media is labled "Pro-Cure/OSD V1.3"
Anyone familiar with this?
I also have found many diagnostic dongles for serial/ethernet diags.
Also lots of color sales brochures on pretty much the whole VAX line.
I should have my website back up in a week or so completely redesigned. I will
slowly be adding pictures ands scans from many pieces in my collection. I am
inviting any of the 'DEC archivers' from the list to feel free to contact me if
I can fill in any of the holes in software or docs.
Recent additions are a VAX 4000/200 (this weekend) and beleive it or not I think
I found a CR11.
If anyone can help me, I am still looking for a front panel for my DSSI microVAX
3800. Someone on the list said they had one but I can't remember who. Also I
need a front panel for a PDP8a. Unfortunately it was wiped out during the trip
back.
Brian.
--
Brian Roth - System Administrator
www.webwirz.com - Old Computer Repository
Preoccupation is my main occupation.....
On May 4, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> My first prototype of my all-digital clock-data separator circuitry was
> wire-wrapped and operated nicely at 80 MHz. The speeds mentioned by Emanuel are
> certainly realistic, and certainly not the upper end of what was done with
> wire-wrapped high-speed logic.
I have to agree with Richard here. Back in 1986/87, I worked on the
Navier-Stokes Supercomputer project at Princeton University...the
prototype processors for that machine were wire-wrapped (most of the
boards by me! 8-)) and signals ran between 20-30MHz. We had no
problems at all. We used twisted-pair wiring for some of the clock
lines as I recall, but the vast majority of the wiring was simple
point-to-point wirewrap with no special routing considerations of any
kind.
Don't knock wire-wrapping...it's fast, easy, works very well, and
properly done and cared for, it will last for years. And if you're a
weirdo like me (and I know some of you are) it can even be FUN! 8-)
As an interesting side note, that supercomputer (the project is
still underway from what I'm told, undergoing various refinements to
keep pace with advancing technology) is built on Unibus-form-factor
boards, using PDP11/24-style expansion chassis. It was a cheap and
easy way to get nice, compact chassis with high-quality power supplies
and very well-known (and large) board geometries.
-Dave McGuire