I have a couple of 8" floppy disks. I believe that at that time they used
8560 Tektronix system with Tnix OS for these floppies. Now I want to
transfer data from those floppy disks to different media.
It is hard to find a service that does the data conversion from those
floppies. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Thanks for a million times
I am actively involved in the hobby program with Mentec. ( I even managed
to drag a couple other members of the list into it) The RT11 release is
just waiting for one last update for something that will be on the CD. All
of this probably would have been completed over a month ago but I had a
major fire that destroyed my office and storage buildings at the end of
January. ( You don't even want to know the amount of DEC equipment and docs
that were destroyed - over 3000 sq. feet of tightly packed racks and
shelves) this ranged from 11/40, 11/04 through 11/93's, M90's, M100's,
numerous VAX's up to and including a couple 4705A's.
Needless to say this has put me WAY behind financially and with the regular
customers I support.
I will be announcing it here when it is official but in the meantime please
go easy on Mentec. It ends up trickling back to me and I am doing as much
as I can, when I can.
RSX and RSTS will follow as my time ( and the others involved) permits.
Also don't expect them to be willing to put any time or effort into support
of hobby users. If you want support then you need to be a real commercial
paying $$ customer that pays for the consulting time like many of us here
get paid that are consultants.
Dan
Is this a duplicate message? I sent it at 16:04:04 - 04:00 (EDT) just over 92 minutes
ago! Either <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> did not receive it or (more likely) my ISP
did not send it! Or my ISP lost the reply! The test message I sent at 17:12:55 took
about 20 minutes round trip - not too bad, but since it has been over an hour and
a half for this message, here it is again! I suspect the most likely possibility is
that the original was lost since I have received many e-mails from classiccmp today!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of all the individuals of whom I am aware of that are still interested in any aspect
of RT-11, about half subscribe to this list. Since this is still essentially a private as
opposed to a public list (such as a news group), I would like some help plus an
opinion on whether or not anyone would still be interested in an RT-11 News Letter?
Also, should Mentec be approached to possibly support, provide a forum or
at the very least provide its blessing?
Obviously, I could just send a brief request via this list along with the "alt.sys.pdp11",
and "vmsnet.pdp-11" news groups before I even contacted Mentec to find out if
enough people are interested. But if some suggestions and feedback are useful prior
to that inquiry, then Mentec might be more receptive.
Note that the News Letter could be for both hobby and commercial users. Topics
could be Y2K compliance for the hobby V5.03 as well as bug fixes for current
V5.07 and enhancements for all versions.
DEC used to publish an RT-11 status document each month, but there are obviously
no funds as well as no need at this point due to the internet making distribution costs
zero. However, I suspect there are not many more years left before interest may
dip below a self-sustaining level. Consequently, it might be helpful to find someone
who will attempt to assist new converts as well as helping with bugs and enhancements.
I know that some interest remains in RT-11 and I would like to pass on my information
so that it can be preserved.
By the way, has anyone heard anything more about the hobby license issues for all
PDP-11 software from Mentec along with anything specific about RT-11?
I would appreciate any and all comments along with suggestions on how to proceed
with getting Mentec involved (Is that a plus or a minus?) although at this point I feel
the chances are very low and I would be more than satisfied if Mentec was just neutral.
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
Hi Folks,
Curt, would you consider shipping a slab to the UK, and if so how much
would it cost me? I think the chances of getting one over here otherwise
might be pretty slim!
Recent finds:
Boxed Atari 520STfm
Boxed Amiga A590 hard drive - nice! Like the SCSI out on the back.
Odyssey 1 'Baseball' game in practically complete condition
Unused boxed Timex Sinclair TS1000
Unused boxed Timex Sinclair TS1500
Unused Timex Sinclair TS2068 - smart :) Even the demo cassette is still
wrapped.
ICL One-Per-Desk with hi-res monitor in fully working condition; it's
even y2k compliant!
Mint boxed Sega Megadrive II to go with my Megadrive and MegaCD
Commodore CDTV with keyboard and floppy drive - wahey!
Another Mac Colour Classic :) I'm a sucker for compact macs, plus it was
only ukp10.
Mac Performa 5300
Acorn A7000 with monitor and keyboard
Acorn A4000 with keyboard (another one)
Fileware 'Twiggy' disk for the Lisa 1 :o))
Open University PT502 'Hektor' training machine. Hehe.....goes nicely
with the PT501!
Requests:
Anyone got a spare superfloppy for the Mac Colour Classic? My new one's
suffered from the 'dead floppy being pulled out with pliers' syndrome so
the r/w heads are munged as is some of the sensory gubbins.
And, anyone got a remote control and mouse for the CDTV they don't want
any more? <hopes>. My CDTV works fine but it's difficult to use without
the remote.....
cheers!
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum, as
featured in Computer Weekly!)
0/0
On April 16, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> I have the 454A and HP 54201D and I'm set for good, at least now.
Ahh, both nice scopes. I've seen many a 454A but never owned one.
I did own a 54201D for a long time, though. A great scope! My
favorite thing about it was that nice huge CRT. No squinting with
that scope! :-)
> By the way I misread your first message where the note of good scopes was to
> someone else. Ignore my DUH reply.
Understood...no biggie...
-Dave McGuire
Does anyone have anything for this computer? It's sitting in our house
collecting dust because I have no software for it, and it doesn't have a
programmer's panel. I would at least like the full control panel so I could
run machine language programs (assuming I can find out anything about it).
Every couple of months I renew my interest in my Honeywell Level 6
minicomputer.
Thanks,
Owen
On April 16, Gene Buckle wrote:
> Here's the last commercial simulator for the Lockheed L-188 (Electra). This
> is the civilian version of the P-3 Orion.
> http://deltasoft.fife.wa.us/BehindTheScenes/lockheed.html
What a great set of pics!
-Dave McGuire
The F8 is one I skipped over by choice. I do have basic data on it though. The 8080/8085/z80/z180/z280 and Z800x are machines I'm also familiar with. The only SBC in the 8080 family is the STP cards from VT100s I have gobs of them and they make handy little controllers. Other chips level cpus I've played with include the 8008, 8048/8049 family, 8051, DEC T-11, NSC800, NEC D78xx series, many of the 4bit machines other than intel's.
Allison
------Original Message------
From: Eric Chomko <chomko(a)greenbelt.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Sent: April 13, 2001 2:53:27 PM GMT
Subject: Re: Technico (Re: TI Minicomputer?)
ajp me wrote:
> For me to build it as a class project I'd have been the professor. I'd been out of school for a while by then.
> No, I wanted a 9900 based machine to see what was on the non intel track back then. My 9900, ELF, 6800d1 and SC/MP all came from that effort back then. I've had them since before 1979.
>
Whoa! The class I took in microcomputers (two actually) was once a week at 7:00pm. I was a regular full-time day student at that time. However, the class was
populated with many over 30 types and in one class the Prof. was about 60 and the other class the Prof was 28!
Interesting group of machines. Did the F8 have an eval kit?, as you mention the Ti-9900, RCA 1802, Mot 6800, and National's "Scamp". Fairchild's F8 seems to
be the ONLY one you missed barring 6502 and Z-80, which became very popular anyway. I think I have the spec books for most of the chips you list above.
Eric
>
> Allison
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Eric Chomko <chomko(a)greenbelt.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: April 13, 2001 4:07:02 AM GMT
> Subject: Re: Technico (Re: TI Minicomputer?)
>
> Did you build it for a class project? Techinco was based out of Columbia, MD.
>
> Eric
>
> ajp166 wrote:
>
> > From: James B. DiGriz <jbdigriz(a)dragonsweb.org>
> >
> > >On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Eric Chomko wrote:
> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> A company called 'Technico' put out a TI 9900-based single board mirco
> > back in
> > >> the
> > >> late 70s before TI had the 99/4. I rememebr building one for a class
> > project in
> > >> college. In fact, I got one in the attic that I need to frag out of of
> > these days
> >
> > I have one and it's operational. Bought is back in '77.
> >
> > Allison
On April 16, Jim Strickland wrote:
> On this note, can someone recommend me a good 'scope for a beginner?
> I'm looking to get into microcontroller programming and robotics and can see
> a whole bunch of places where a scope is pretty much a necessity.
>
> inexpensive is good, and I'm not afraid to use vaccuum tube equipment so
> long as it doesn't require too too much tweaking to produce useful results.
Tek 465/475 scopes are compact, reliable, predictable, and old
enough to be affordable. Those scopes are easily the most popular of
that era, sorta the Fluke 77 or Simpson 260 of oscilloscopes. Solid,
proven design, easy to use, predictable, smooth, bulletproof.
If you have a bigger budget, a Tek 2445 is a *sweet* machine, as are
its bigger brothers in the 2465 family. I paid about $1200.00 for my
2465A as a point of reference.
But if money is a concern, if you can live without fancy on-screen digital
parameter display and stuff like that, a 475 (or 475A) can be had for
less than $300.00. There's one on eBay right now, two hours left, at
$175.00. http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1229127837.
-Dave McGuire
does anyone have a cable that has 50 pin SCSI on one side and a 50 pin male
centronics on the other side? I need to connect an alternate boot disk to my
VS 4000/60, and I don't want to mess with the existing drives, and it'll
only be temporary while I try to fix my mistake in VMS, so it won't be in a
box or anything...
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>
>This RS pad must have a catalog number, though, Allison. Since you've
seen it,
>perhaps you could provide the catalog number, as the RS meatheads
wouldn't know
>what a keypad kit was if you asked them.
Well while picking up a barrel connector I noticed the Nashua store had
it on
the wall. I think 270-015 is the catalog number. Sheesh, if I do that
might
as well sent it to me for installation and labeling. Is it possible to
read a catalog
these days or has the "go ask the web, thin I don't have to work"
mentality
taken over?
Allison
Hi folks,
I was referred to this list be a gentleman from Ottawa, and he
suggested that there might be some PDP-8..12 computers floating
around that you folks might know of? I've managed to get a line
on 20 X PDP-11/70's in Seattle/WA, but then I looked at how much
it would cost to ship :-)
Basically, in order of priority, I'm looking for the following:
PDP-8/I
PDP-8/L
PDP-8/S
PDP-12
PDP-11/20
Also, I'm looking for schematics, docs, etc...
Thanks in advance for your help!
Cheers,
-RK
--
Robert Krten, PARSE Software Devices +1 613 599 8316.
Realtime Systems Architecture, Consulting and Training at www.parse.com
We have a system 36 #5360, printer 3262-BI and 3 3476 terminals that I
would like to get rid of to free up some space. The system was here when I
started so I don't know a lot about it, but have found some old
documentation. CPU 512K MAG 716MB, it was purchased in June 1986. There
is also a bunch of disk and cartridges that I don't have a clue what they
are for, but I'm sure anyone interested would know. I am just looking for
someone to take it away from our office in Cincinnati, OH. Please e-mail
me with any additional questions.
Thanks
Steve
There were a couple of video capture systems for the PDP-11 series, at USC
in the image processing lab we built one that digitized a monochrome camera
signal. It worked ok, but even better was the Micron drum scanner (boy I
wish I had that puppy hooked up to my 11/34!)
You can of course get a cheap digital camera (about $500 will get you one
that does 80% of what you need) or you can spend $49 on a scanner and using
a regular process camera get nice high resolution pictures of your
equipment. Further you can hook some scanners up to classic computers to
keep it "all in the family" so to speak, take pictures on a classic camera
(I love the Leica) and be even better.
--Chuck
At 12:36 PM 4/13/2001 -0400, anonymous wrote:
>Indeed. I have some machines I want to put up pics of here. All I have is
>an inexpensive Sony CCD camera that only does NTSC video, however. My TV
>tuner card has a capture function, but the camera has low resolution
>and limited dynamic range, and is not very well suited for
>detailed pictures of hardware, circuit boards, etc.
>
>I'm getting a better card, probably an ATI AIW, and I'm open to
>recoomendations on a better camera that isn't too expensive. I could go
>with a digital camera and a card reader, but I also have a security
>application here that requires video capture.
>
>jbdigriz
OK, out of the two Cyber 910's I picked up the other day, I have one
good machine
that is now booting up to Iris. The problem is getting past the root
password. Is
ther any way of bypassing it or a hack to gain root access from the
console monitor?
It does have a 150 Mb Archive tape drive but I have no system software
for it.
Thanks,
Brian.
Better late than never...
Apple II+
Apple IIe
Apple IIc
Apple III mono monitor
Apple Lisa XL - dealer demo in orig. packing
Mac Plus
Mac SE 30
Mac LC III
Mac Color Classic
Coco
Coco II
Coco III
Model 100 portable
Vic-20, boxed
C-64
PC 5150
PC XT 5160
PC AT
PC Jr. - dealer demo in carrying case
Portable PC 5155
Datavue 8088 laptop
HP 85
ProcTech Sol-20's, 1 w/ Helios II
NorthStar Horizon - 2 360k floppies
NorthStar Horizon - 5 MB HD
IMSAI 8080 w/ NorthStar dual floppies
Morrow Decision I w/ HD
Godbout CompuPro - Z80
Godbout CompuPro - dual 8085 + 8088
Ithaca InterSystems
Timex Sinclair 1000
Sinclair ZX-81
Ohio Scientific Challenger
Lobo Max w/ 10 MB HD
Epson PX-8
Sinclair Z88
Osborne Executive
KayPro II
KayPro 10
KIM-1
Synertek SYM-1
TI 99/4
and others I've forgotten about...
Most are in storage and haven't seen daylight in 2 years, unfortunately.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
From: Sipke de Wal <sipke(a)wxs.nl>
>> And in the UK version IIRC. The version I remember had a PCB with the
>> SC/MP (the origial PMOS version) and IIRC the crystal on it, linked by
>> ribbon cables (with individual socket contacts on each wire -- no IDC
>> connectors :-() to another board with the memory and DIP switches, etc
on it.
>>
>Yep that's the one !
Mine is the original NS design. The NS design used a 110baud TTY no
switches save for reset.
Allison
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>> To start with the switcher in question is 1987 design maybe earlier.
>> The MV2000 was available in 87 or 88 if memory
>> serves. And even if I'm wrong it's very definitely pre1990.
>>
>AND there's no reason to believe that because it behaves as I described,
it's
>because of an obsolete design. It's quite likely that they didn't want
the
>supply kicking on unless there was a load. PC supplies were designed
that way
>... of course that was in 1980 ...
PC supplies would overvoltage and crowbar there was no intelligence in
their design or applied to it.
>From what I observed, the DEC rotatin memory subsystems were
>ALWAYS of old technology, i.e. used SMD after nobody else
>would ship SMD devices, and didn't start to use SCSI until forced
>to do so by market demand and not until long after third-party
>competitors had been beating them in the marketplace.
Whats wrong with SMD? It was better than SCSI-1, and SCSI-2.
And there was no third party standard for SCSI at all until the late
80s.
Even then DEC had far faster technologies and regarded it for low
end slower systems.
>It was EMULEX, IIRC, that forced them out of the '70's with their
>disk drive subsystems. I wasn't aware that DEC ever built a disk
>drive. Their products seemed to me to be rebadged and
Then you arent aware. All the RA8x and 9x were DEC as were the
initial RZ2x series and a long list of others. They did off the shelf
stuff
too but then that was usually for the smaller packaged systems
or where time was a market driver.
>repackaged drives from other makers, only at 10x the current
>price. Those DEC labels were surely expensive.
Much of it markup but also a fair amount getting the vendor to fix
errors spotted by DEC, getting it to comply to spec and in many cases
getting it to pass FCC.
Allison
I have recently found an Apple II that is a bit interesting. Its
color is very dark gray, almost black, and so is the color of the
matching Disk II. The labels on both the Apple II and Disk II say
"Made for Belle & Howell by Apple Computer, Inc" and have the logos
of both companies. Is this a special machine in any way?
I don't have it currently. I found it yesterday and have not yet
contacted the institiution that owns it to see if is available
(though it most likely is).
--
Jeffrey S. Sharp
jss(a)ou.edu
I just found several boxes of "Verbatim DC 30 Data Cassette" tapes. I've
never seen these before. Does anyone knwo what they're for? In their
boxes, they measure 4 3/8" x 2 7/8" x 5/8". The look like an over-sized
audio cassette tape. They're driven by the tape hubs and the case does not
have a metalbase plate like that found on most data cassettes. There is a
note on the back of the tape saying "Do not to record on this side. Side B
has a 1600 FCI Pre-recorded clock track for tape speed control".
Joe
Just picked up a neat looking HP 6947A "Raster Display" .. looks like a
rack mountable monitor to me or ... is it some sort of X/Y plotter/graph
display w/o video capabilities? Manual copy would be great too.
Any info appreciated, Craig
Eric Chomko <chomko(a)greenbelt.com> wrote:
> Is the Apple Z-80 coprocessor boards the so-called "CP/M boards"?
Some, like the PCPI Applicard, may have more claim to SBCness than
others; the Applicard doesn't rely on the Apple for much other than
power (unlike the Softcard-alikes which used the Apple's RAM) and I
think I remember PCPI demoing one at Applefest in Boston in 1982 by
way of having the card out on the table with a 9V battery hooked up to
it via clip-leads. Mind, I can't remember what it was actually doing
(if anything) without any I/O hooked up to it.
-Frank McConnell