On Mar 29, 19:07, Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 29, 6:20, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> >
> > > What is a DD50? I'm thinking of the connector used on PS/2s, which
looks
> > like
> > > a small Centronics connector.
> >
> > DD50 is a large D-connector, twice as big as a DB25 :-)
>
> Not really. It isn't a super-long shell with only 2 rows of pins (which,
> becuase of the offset between the rows would imply an odd number of pins
> total). It has 3 rows of pins in a shell a little shorter (although
> wider) than the DC shell (DC37, for example).
Nitpicker! I know it has three rows, but it does occupy twice the area
(near enough) :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Saw this on comp.sys.dec, thought to pass it on:
From: <tsm(a)palindrome.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Free MicroVAX II, Terminals in Portland, OR
-- Please disregard this message if you are not in the Portland, Oregon
area. --
I have a MicroVAX II, which I hope to find a new owner for. It is in the
H9642 cabinet, which is about 26"x40"x36" (WxHxD), and weighs a couple of
hundred pounds. It is not fully decked out, but contains the disk, and a
complete system's worth of boards (CPU, memory, disk controller, network,
etc.). It'll take a bit of work to put back together.
I also have two LA-120's (terminal-printers), with some spare ribbons, huge
box of paper, and a box of spare parts.
I can also throw in a Wyse monitor which will work with the system. I also
have a couple of boxes full of VMS and VAX documentation to the interested
party. A couple of boxes of misc. VAX hardware also.
All of this stuff is FREE, but preference given to whoever is willing to
take the most stuff. Items located in North Portland (Rose Quarter & St.
Johns area). I will NOT ship any of this stuff (so I apologize for the
worldwide distribution of the message); taker must arrange for
transportation of equipment. You will need a van or pickup truck to haul
this stuff.
Feel free to e-mail me back, or call me at 503-240-4922 if interested.
Thanks,
Terry Murphy
>The other thing to consider is: Will OS X run at a useful speed on her
>computer? Does the new versions of Photoshop require more RAM and / or
>computing power?
I just finished an install of OS X on a Beige G3/300 with 192MB RAM and
it seems to run fine. I'm doing the initial testing on the G3/300 before
installing it on the newer G4's we have. I installed it over the top of a
current OS 8.6 setup and in fact, this email is being sent from Outlook
running on 'Classic' under OS X. The install went painlessly, the speed is
acceptable and it was quite simple getting the network settings put back to
where everything worked. OS X ships with 3 CD's, one of which is OS 9.1,
which I had to upgrade 8.6 to prior to installing OS X. 9.1 is what it
actually uses to run 'Classic' applications.
BTW, for those familiar with NeXTstep, it's easy to see the lineage
behind OS X. They even kept the spinning multicolored pinwheel while the
system is loading.
Jeff
> DE-9, DA-15, DB-25, DC-37, DD-50, DE-15, DA-26, DB-44, DC-62, DE-78,
Well, so much for tirades. :) Can't even keep them straight myself.
That should be DD-78.
Eric
Everything past the early PowerMacs is PCI, not NuBus.
I'm going to agree that there's no compelling reason for her to upgrade to
OSX. Hell, Adobe and other major vendors aren't going to have their apps
carbonized for a few months yet. OSX is not essential even on the newest G4
until there's applications that can take advantage of its next-gen
capabilities (i.e. multithreading for multiprocessing, integrated G4
acceleration). If she were to upgrade to OSX she'd still be running the
majority of her stuff in a "Classic" environment window. If she decides
she's absolutely got to keep using this localtalk printer after LocalTalk
support is dropped, perhaps she could use a LocalTalk to EtherNet adapter.
Assuming the software will support such a thing.
Once ATM and Photoshop and Freehand and Premiere and InDesign are
OSX-native, look out!
Now - who wants to help me track down a 2 to 9 gig internal SCSI harddrive
for my Quadra 700 running NetBSD that I use as my BIND and Sendmail server?
-carl
"Russ Blakeman"
<rhblake(a)bigfoot.com> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent by: cc:
owner-classiccmp@clas Subject: RE: Apple LWPro parallel port?
siccmp.org
03/29/01 11:44 AM
Please respond to
classiccmp
I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics compatible parallel port - you might look around
for one. I'm not sure if your machine has NuBus or PCI but I'm guessing
that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading if the OS doens't suit
her needs?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Marion Bates
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:32 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OT: Apple LWPro parallel port?
Hi all,
My mom has the following setup:
- Beige G3 minitower
- Apple LaserWriter Pro 600
- OS 9.1
The printer and Mac are connected via LocalTalk. (This printer requires
AppleTalk.)
She is afraid that the next upgrade (OS X) will make the printer
unuseable, since Apple is phasing out LocalTalk (this Mac is the last
model that still comes with a damn serial port).
The printer has no Ethernet capability, but it does have a parallel port
in addition to the LocalTalk port.
The questions are: Is there any sort of hardware/software conversion kit
that would allow the Mac to use that parallel port if LocalTalk becomes
unavailable in the future? Does anyone have any experience with running OS
X and making it play nice with legacy hardware like this? Also, do they
still make LocalTalk PCI cards, and if so, is there any chance that the
drivers would work under OS X? This printer still works like new and she's
not ready to just chuck it and buy a new one.
Sigh. Old hardware doesn't wear out fast enough to keep pace with new
software. ;)
TIA,
-- Marion "Still using a PowerComputing100 with a G3 upgrade card and OS
7.6.1 so I can run my $1200 1993 Apple Color OneScanner which is not as
good as today's lamest $79 USB scanner but it still works goddammit" Bates
>I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics
>compatible >parallel port - you might look around for one. I'm not sure if
your machine has NuBus or
>PCI but I'm guessing >that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading
if the OS doens't suit her
>needs?
The Beige G3 is a PCI based tower. It was the first G3 powered
desktop/tower that Apple sold and is generally had in speeds between 233 and
300 mhz.
Jeff
On Mar 29, 6:20, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> What is a DD50? I'm thinking of the connector used on PS/2s, which looks
like
> a small Centronics connector.
DD50 is a large D-connector, twice as big as a DB25 :-)
"A small Centronics" connector could be lots of things, but if you mean a
half-pitch connector with clips, that's a half-density 50-pin D-connector
(even though it doesn't look quite like a miniaturised D-connector), and is
the device recommended in the SCSI-2 standard.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 29, 0:31, Tony Duell wrote:
> Looking at Poole&Molloy (Radio and Television Servicing -- annual volumes
> that cover the major TVs and radios for each year), it's amazing how many
> sets from nominally different manufactures contain the same chassis...
I know. Sometimes there only seem to be about two or three "current"
models (plus variations for tube size).
> The result was that my parents ordered the failed servoid out of the
> house, returned the rented TV, and I've been landed with repair jobs here
> ever since.
LOL! Serves you right!
> > 405-line 14" 'portable'.
> Converting a 405 line set to a (presumably 625 line) monitor is not the
> most trivial job, I wouldn't have thought. Don't tell me it was a live
> chassis set as well....
No, thankfully it wasn't. I don't recall having to do much to change the
frequencies, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:34:58 +0100 (BST)
>From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
>Subject: Re: ZX-TEAM meeting/TS1000 least expandable???
>
>> I thought that since the ZX80's memory couldn't be expanded, there were
no
>> expansion port either.
>
>I am sure I've seen Sinclair adverts for a 16K RAM pack for the ZX80. And
>maybe a smaller RAM pack (3K? 4K?) as well. I always assumed the
>connector was the same, because things like the ZX printer would work on
>the ZX80 if you fitted the later ROM, I think.
My ZX80 came with a ZX81 16K RAM pack and it works fine; ISTR physical
differences aside the only real difference between the 80 and 81 was the ROM
anyway, so by the time you'd bunged a 81 ROM in your 80 you ended up with an
81! The ROM even came with a 81 keyboard, overlay or real keyboard; can't
remember which.
The Jupiter Ace had a 4K RAM pack as well as a 16K one, and if anyone has a
spare Ace (UK) or Ace 4000 (US) I'd be happy to take it off them :o)
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum, now W3C
compliant!)
0/0