> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wright [mailto:dtwright@uiuc.edu]
> hmmm...I'd only need the latter :) anyone have any idea where I could
find
> it? might the drivers come with AIX 4.3.2? I sort of doubt it, but you
never
> know...
I know of somebody who's got some RS/6000 machines which he believes might
contain the drivers on their internal disks. He hasn't started any of them
up yet, though, AFAIK. He's promised me a copy of the drivers if he has
them, but as to when he'll get around to checking, your guess is as good as
mine.
I have heard (please let me know if you find out differently) that they
weren't part of any AIX distribution media, but were separate.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
For me:
I like to find systems with a National Semi 32000 series chip, esp. NS32532.
Not rare, per se, but very uncommon.
For really rare, I'd think:
A Lilith or a Ceres
An Ampere APL machine
Anything iAPX-432
Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r. 'bear' stricklin [mailto:red@bears.org]
> IRIX only runs on MIPS. Some other SVR3ish software I can't
> remember the
> name of ran on the m68k boxes.
I talked to the guy who handles the IRIS 2000/3000 FAQ, and he seemed to
think that it was "IRIX." I would be interested if you find out more
details.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)minnie.tuhs.org>
>To: The Unix Heritage Society <tuhs(a)tuhs.org>
>Reply-To: wkt(a)tuhs.org
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
>Subject: [TUHS] Anybody want 3B2 or 6300+ software/documentation/hardware?
>Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:49:30 +1100 (EST)
>
>All,
> Aharon Robbins just passed this on to me. Maybe some
>of you are interested in this.
> Warren
>
>----- Forwarded message from Aharon Robbins -----
>
> From: Aharon Robbins <arnold(a)skeeve.com>
> To: wkt(a)tuhs.org
> Subject: would any of this be useful to TUHS?
>
>I am cleaning out my attic. What does that mean?? It means a lot of
>AT&T documentation and software needs to find a home to avoid ending
>in the dumpster. I have documentation and sfotware for the 6300+ and the
>3B2. Some of it still in the original shrink-wrap.
>
>And yes, this is on topic. I also have quite a bit of software and
>documentation for the Unix-PC as well. Much of this still in the
>original packaging. OS, Development sets, utilities. everything must
>go. I also have three complete Unix-PC's and two without disks or
>heads but with functional motherboards. At least all of this stuff
>was functional the last time I actually turned any of them on. I have
>one that I just fired up (that's already been claimed) to test it and
>it works fine, so i assume the same is true of the others. I would
>probably be willing to let all of them go at this point. Nice machines,
>but my PDP's and VAXen need the room.
>
>Now the only string. I will not ship any of this. it is located in
>NEPA in the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre area and must be collected. And it
>must be soon.
>
>One person can claim it all and then ship it to others if they wish,
>or people can email me asking for particular packages. First come,
>first served. If you know of any other places where there might be
>interest in the 3B2 or 6300+ stuff feel free to forward this message.
>
>All the best.
>bill
>----- End of forwarded message from Aharon Robbins -----
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS(a)minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
So... down a path I've not gone in a while.
Just got a system for my business (it's classic too, I'll ramble on that
later) and part of it is a Wyse 386 box running SCO System V Xenix.
That's the good part...
Now, the bad... while cleaning it up (about 6 lbs of dust in the box) and
getting ready to image off the hard drive (backups are always a good
thing, no?), either I fumble fingered something or my drive test/backup
program was having a 'bad hair day', cause it nuked the boot record on the
drive! (AARGH!)
'Course... just to add insult to injury, it then went happily ahead and
ran off the image of the hard drive just like I wanted in the first place,
minus a valid boot record of course. B^{
So... would anyone perhaps have an appropriate boot disk on a 3.5HD
floppy that I could get, and any convienient hints on how to regenerate
the boot for this thing?
Many thanks;
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Note: the 'computergarage.org' domain is currently offline. The original
'Garage' site (URL above) is still out there and is currently being updated.
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Russ Blakeman wrote:
>
> > How in the hell did this list get into racial slang anyway?
>
> The same way it gets into cats, food, cars, guns, <insert other
> inappropriate topic here>...
>
> A lot of folks here need to get out more often.
<sigh> If only there were someplace to get out *to*... maybe
Bubba and Billy Joe are slugging it out again at the Silver
Dollar... that's always a good show.
We used to have some very cool, dark, smoky blues clubs
around in the 80s... then blues got popular with Gen-X-ers
and it all moved downtown to clean, glitzy, neon-infested
juke joints...
I might point out that some off-topic threads have gone
private and ended up being the beginning of more than one
new friendship...
-dq
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>What I wanted was a 12/24 bit CPU. Other than the 6100 cpu ( over
>priced? )
>by DEC nobody has ever put a octal machine 24:12 or 18:9 or 36:18:9 on a
>chip.
>(Ignoring PDP-10 stuff) to my knowledge.
Right on very few if any! Most went to byte wide or multiples of byte
wide...
give a guess why? I've always felt that 24bvits was a good starting point
for a clean slate machine or a stretched PDP-8. By Stretched 8 I mean
just add 12 bits to the right and extend everything else the same amount,
gives you a 500k page address and a 16mb machine address. So what
if the instruction set is thin if done with modern FPGAs an easy 100ns
(12x faster) instruction cycle time would be fine.
>I have yet to see a nice micro-code example. All the micro-code
>I have done ( on paper ) needed 32+ bits for a 2901 design.
>Also about 2K of ROM. TTL controller. It got messy after you added
>a MAR, In/out registers, and stuff like opcode decoding.
At 48 bits it gets better as then your not horozontal encoding.
Also if you use a prom to do the opcode to microaddress translation
it looks nicer and cuts a lot out. Also using the 2901 registers for
the PC and all saves a bit too. Still, as you noticed a lof of storage
bits for managing traffic are incurred. A combinational state machine
is simpler in some respects but far less flexible when it comes to
fixing a bent opcode.
>> Now that's depressing. ;)
>You tell me how I can make $$$ and I will not move to seattle.
I can't but, some things still taste bad. ;)
Allison
From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>Ah, Allison, where have you been all of my life?
Ah, right here.
>If you would have told me that 15+ years ago, you would have saved me LOTS
>of time and effort putting tape over index holes, making cables with
>switches to interrupt the index signal, etc.
;) and if you havd called NEC during the '79 to '83 time frame you might
have gotten me there. One trick for the short index or late index problem
of most 1793 formats is solved by using a oneshot that is a delay of index
around 98% of rotation time, once it fired the resulting pulse looks earlier
and the index window now has the right time. That makes it easy to wind out
the VCO sync delay in the 765.
>With a 765, if I want to read a sector from the second side of most Kaypro
>disks, I need to feed it a value that matches the WRONG value that's in
>the sector header for the H field. With WD, that field can be ignored.
Ah yep. I did a two sided to match an oddball that had sectors 1 to 18
on the top and 19 thru 36 on the bottom. no problem.
>Raw v formatted track read has advantges and disadvantages. The 765
>approach is very handy for reading a bunch of "normal" sectors. The WD
>approach makes it possible to read MFM that does not follow
>"normal" sector header standards, such as Amiga, or some TRS-80 address
>marks.
Yep, then again depends on what your doing too. If you building a data
recovery machine a 1793 may be it. Then again you'll need a 1771 too
as there were 1771 formats that were unreadable by the DD 1793. If you
building a virgin CP/M machine that needs to read a smaller subset of
media... 37c65 or later is far cheaper and easier.
>Personally, I would have preferred the "raw" approach of the WD, but I
>make no claims to be representative of the marketplace.
It's only useful for the special cases. For everything else you wnat a
track
or cylinder without the junk.
Allison
Marked in black felt-pen on the drive: "Amstrad PCW 8256." Cable is
attached. Unit is untested and is yours for postage from Orlando FL.
Any interest?
Glen
0/0
At 03:46 PM 12/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Allways wanted an SGI INDIGO.
>Allways wanted an Atari 1450xld and:
>an Atari 815 disk drive
>A trak disk drive
-snip-
I want a CRAY.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris [mailto:mythtech@Mac.com]
> Humm... but this still won't work for PSX game discs right?
> Since they
> have a bad checksum, a standard burner can't write them back
> out, because
> it will correct the checksum?
Well, you've answered your own question there. My understanding is that it
_is_ the burner that does it. You can copy playstation game discs fine, but
it would require a firmware patch to your CD burner. (So I hear...)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I should add to the list of hard to find stuff early Intergraph
workstations. Clipper based, and pre-clipper (were they VAX?) Intergraph
systems.
I also haven't looked -- but have never seen any DG Nova stuff around. It
may be relatively rare.
On another note, CDC hardware that wasn't OEM'd from SGI seems relatively
uncommon. There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>
>Having looked at a few other Floppy disk datasheets for the pc, I would
>suspect
>it needs a 24 Mhz clock. I can divide this by 2 to give me 12 Mhz clock
>for the
Either some product of 9.6mhz (for the oddball 1.2mb 5.25 floppies) or some
product of 16mhz for the 500khz 1.44mb floppy. That is of course for the
floppy side interface only. The CPU side is driven by Tacc for the FDC IO
ports (4 or 8mhz depending on part and age) and the data rate for read
or write since there is no silo on the parts I know of. This will be true
for all
765 based FDCs (most of the PC controllers are 765 or 765 core logic).
Data rates for 1.44mb floppy are the worst at 13uS first byte and 16uS
for the remaining.
If DMA is possible do it. If not can the cpu execute a wait state during
IO{wait
on data ready with the read or write pending}? If neither of those then you
have
to loop and test status or worse usually, use interrupts.
It's possible to find WD FDC drivers around but they will be very machine
specific more often than not.
Allison
Hand made, usually by women working under low
power microscopes.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Hudson <rhudson(a)cnonline.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: was "how to clean".. How did they
>or... silly question of the week...
>
>
>Anyone know how core memory was made?
>
>Did a person string those cores with a needle and
>"thread", or was it done by machine?
>
>
>I based my statement upon information gleaned from conversations with my
>customers, 80% of which are black. Most of them think that Kwanzaa was
>"made up" by retailers in order to get their money. Some have told me that
>they resent the "social engineering" aspect of Kwanzaa. Here in the South,
>there seems to be very little support of or identification with this event
>among African-Americans.
Oh, you need to come up here, and visit the heavily black neighborhoods
of Jersey City (conviently, right where my wife grew up)... there,
Kwanzaa is a big deal, and it has NOTHING to do with retailers getting
their money. It has everything to do with their not celebrating christmas
because that is whitey's holiday, and crackers are the enemy (their
terms, not mine... I get "whitey"... I get "white bread"... but
cracker?!? I would ask when visiting my inlaws... but I would just get my
ass kicked, or worse, shot).
As to the REAL reason for Kwanzaa, I have no idea, but I do know, around
here it is entirely a racial thing, and the only people that really seem
to take it seriously are the inner city high crime area
Afican-Americans... which unfortuantly gives the whole thing a bad notion
up here. Its a shame really, as I am sure there was a real reason for it,
but like many other things, it has been badly perverted by a very very
select group of people who decided to use it for their own agenda.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> Programmers were, are, and will
> always be lazy and impatient.
Man alive -- I always knew I was stupid for putting in all those 80-hour
weeks, but lazy? And impatient???
Glen
0/0
! >Same experience here. i've made copies of IRIX CDs, and I've made
! >non-standard bootable distribution CDs. The only unusual
! >feature is that
! >they're an EFS filesystem rather than, say, ISO9660. But as far as a
! >burner is concerned, an image is an image, and as far as
! >Linux's dd command
! >is concerned, the same is true (I've copied Apple CDs the
! >same way, by
! >dd'ing from the raw disk device holding the CD, to a file.).
!
! Humm... but this still won't work for PSX game discs right?
! Since they
! have a bad checksum, a standard burner can't write them back
! out, because
! it will correct the checksum?
!
! What I don't understand is, why can't someone write a program
! that will
! write the back check? I used to have a floppy disk copier for the Mac
! that did something similar. If the source disk was damaged, it would
! write the damaged data to the destination disk (the software
! was SUPPOSED
! to do that, it was to let you duplicate bad disks before
! running things
! like MacTools on it, in case it didn't work, you could dupe
! it again, and
! try something different)
!
! Alas, that software was for back in the "Classic Mac" era,
! and no longer
! runs (nor has any idea how to write to a CD)
!
! -c
!
I heard that CloneCD is what you're talking about...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>> Munged
>> wacky formats like using deleted address mark for address mark {you can
post
>> format with deleted data} and it was not designed to pump out all the raw
>> bits/splices/marks from the media.
>>
>What? I do seem to remember that the data fields could be written during
>formatting with the WD parts but I don't think anybody ever used that
feature,
>though it would have been a good/smart feature for software duplication.
There
>was some confusion about whether it worked properly because the part
responded
>to some bytes by generating an address mark, though I doubt it did that
while
>writing the data field.
Two differing things. The WD part you could format a disk with Deleted data
marks
where data marks are normally found. Infact you could put all sorts of odd
stuff
in strange placesn using WD. The 765 was ucoded to do IBM standard formats
so a lot of the who's where is already known and mapped.
>> Things it did do that the WD never had: Multiple seeks or recals, timing
>> for the stepper, head load delay, head settle delay.
>>
>Did it do "implied seeks" wherein the controller looked at where it was and
then
>automatically computed the difference before moving the heads?
No, I know of no chip that did. It made for a peice of that.
>> The biggest difference: register based programming vs command packet to a
>> "port".
>>
>Back in the '77-'82 period I was probably responsible for the use of 100K
>Western chips and it might as well have been decided on a coin toss. I was
No it wasn't, the 765 design was introduced in late '79, by then you were
locked to WD.
>vs packet programming though. Perhaps you could cite an example? The
Western
>part is certainly register based. Isn't the NEC part also just a register
set?
Internally the 765 has "registers". However, you feed it via one port
addres with a
command packet and after the data IO is done you read a status packet of 1-9
bytes
based on the command issued. It's obsious when you look at the part, the
765
has A0 for the port addressing (status and command/data) where A0 only has
meaning{it's only active during /CS not /DACK) during non-dma ops.
>That was an advantage for those who were invested in a software base, but
nobody
>knew that back in '78-79. What's the 36C766? Google comes up empty. I've
seen
>some 37C665/666 types, but 36Cnnn? Who made them?
Several vendors including SMC and UMC. They were variations of the 765 with
rate generators and interface to disk plus IOports (parallel, serial and
even IDE).
Aimed at PCs they replaced the two serial ports, IDE, FDC and parallel
boards.
>What's interesting, BTW, is that even Western, with its institutional
prejudice
>toward analog PLL's went with the 765 core once it went to the fully
integrated
>all-digital FDC, having dealt with the lower data rates in the 1770/72/73
chips,
>which were not shown to be capable of 500 Kbps for some reason. Perhaps
there
>was some advantage in the 765 core that made it more amenable to
integration
>with a digital clock extraction circuit at the higher data rate. I doubt
that
>Intel would have gone for the 765 type if there weren't some manufacturing
>advantage inherent in the silicon. That may be what's made the difference.
>Intel certainly would have chosen the chip that was more economically
>manufacturable, though maybe their primary economy came from the
>already-established relationship (which they'd sabotage later) with NEC.
The 765 core did the step rate and may of the external things that the 1793
needed external hardware for. The preference for digital data seperation
was
pushed by NEC as it could be done with a small 32x4 prom and a latch with
good reliability compared to the often difficult analog designs. Also
digital
fits on silicon of the time better. I have a design and samples we did in
late
'81 to put the floppy side "glue" on one 2500 gate array that allowed for
data
sep, write pre comp, drive and motor selects and all the other things that
would end up on the super chips. The end result was a complete FDC two
chip combo that was half the price of discrete 765 or WD 1793 designs with
no performance compromizes. It was never marketed for obtuse reasons
and less than three years later several vendors were putting 765+glue on
one chip.
And the d7265 wa the ISO 3.5" tuned version that had a shorter VCO sync
time{post index gap time} and a shortend index gap. I believe most of the
765 cores are of the 7265 flavor.
The aside to that is that the SMC 9229 was a digital data sep/clock/precomp
that worked with both the 765 and 1793 with equal perfomance for all rates.
SMC also had a 765 core with analog PLL (9265 or 66) for those that prefered
analog. The 1770/2/3 problem was not data seperator in itself but process
speed
of the die, they{WD} flat out could not do the required 16mhz stuff then for
the
data sep and the other rate generators. The 1793 with external 9229 works
great at 500khz but, the 1793 only has to see something like 2 or 4mhz max
and therein lies the difference.
Allison
> disks for the Bonus Pack. OS/2 Warp Connect version 3 (Blue box,
> includes DOS/Windows support) is on CD-ROM, as is the Bonus Pack. It
> does have two diskettes from which to boot the system for
> installation though. Is there a specific disk(s) that you need to
> replace for Warp 3? I also have OS/2 for Windows version 2.1.
Are the updates still available for this anywhere? For some reason, I'm in
the process of building a PP200 up as an OS/2 system and Warp 3 is the
newest version I've got. (OK, ok, I admit, I'm building it to play
"Galactic Civilizations".) Anyway, I'd kind of like to get it updated to
the current patch level or whatever it's called in OS/2 (been way to long
since I switched to the Mac from OS/2).
Zane
Ben Franchuk wrote:
> What I wanted was a 12/24 bit CPU
I can live with that - 24 bits is really cool from a DSP point of view. 140dB
dynamic
range and you can do two data moves and one arithmetic op with a 24-bit
instruction.
The only modern day 24-bitter that I know of is the Motorola DSP56XX family.
Great for fixed point ( fractional ) number crunching.
> You tell me how I can make $$$ and I will not move to seattle.
> Deal? I could move to Antarctica and make linux boxes. Take a
> penguin and stuff it in old 386. Stamp exported from 'Finland'.:)
I must protest, that's cruelty to penguins. How would you like to be stuffed
into a box labeled Intel or worse still Micro... Damn my keyboards locked up.
How about stuffing old silicon into FPGA's ?
Chris
On Dec 18, 10:56, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Well, I've never met a standard CD that it wouldn't work on. I was told
> third-hand by somebody who worked for SGI that their media was somehow
"copy
> protected" and couldn't be reproduced well.
>
> I've successfully imaged my IRIX 6.2 media and booted/installed my system
> from the backup. Works fine.
Same experience here. i've made copies of IRIX CDs, and I've made
non-standard bootable distribution CDs. The only unusual feature is that
they're an EFS filesystem rather than, say, ISO9660. But as far as a
burner is concerned, an image is an image, and as far as Linux's dd command
is concerned, the same is true (I've copied Apple CDs the same way, by
dd'ing from the raw disk device holding the CD, to a file.).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>Same experience here. i've made copies of IRIX CDs, and I've made
>non-standard bootable distribution CDs. The only unusual feature is that
>they're an EFS filesystem rather than, say, ISO9660. But as far as a
>burner is concerned, an image is an image, and as far as Linux's dd command
>is concerned, the same is true (I've copied Apple CDs the same way, by
>dd'ing from the raw disk device holding the CD, to a file.).
Humm... but this still won't work for PSX game discs right? Since they
have a bad checksum, a standard burner can't write them back out, because
it will correct the checksum?
What I don't understand is, why can't someone write a program that will
write the back check? I used to have a floppy disk copier for the Mac
that did something similar. If the source disk was damaged, it would
write the damaged data to the destination disk (the software was SUPPOSED
to do that, it was to let you duplicate bad disks before running things
like MacTools on it, in case it didn't work, you could dupe it again, and
try something different)
Alas, that software was for back in the "Classic Mac" era, and no longer
runs (nor has any idea how to write to a CD)
-c
Try www.dialelec.com, they're UK based and specialize in obsolete silicon.
No price given for the WD1773, you'll have to get a quote. They're not too
expensive, I recently bought some AM2901CDC's for about 7USD each.
Chris
On Dec 18, 10:22, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> > > There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
> > > relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
>
> > CDC was rebadging IRIS 3000 machines as Cyber 910s.
>
> *Really*? What are my chances of finding one? I'd love to have an IRIS
> 3000, if I found that I could fit it in the house. :) Did they run the
> early versions of IRIX?
Um, no, not really. I'm sure a Cyber 910 is a rebadged 4D/35 (or variant,
depending on the Cyber suffix), very similar to an Indigo, and much smaller
than a 3000. There are plenty of pictures on the web, and references in
the 4D FAQ. They'll run IRIX 4 or IRIX 5.
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/2258/4dfaq.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
! honky has been around for a long time - my dad was a Chicago
! cop since '55
! and even when I was little (4 or 5) I've heard him telling
! "war stories" of
! encounters with the people on his beat where they referred to
! white folks as
! "honkies".
Interesting. But I'm still curious as to how it got started...
! "hood" is a newer term, but I remember hearing ofay and otay
! on episodes of
! the Little Rascals, from back in the 30's...
!
! "cracker" is a southern version of "honky", never heard it
! until I went to
! texas for basic training.
!
! How in the hell did this list get into racial slang anyway?
Well, somehow we got to talking about Kwanzaa....
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>There ARE many things that the WD will do that the NEC won't, including
>writing much sooner after the index pulse, IGNORING certain fields in
the
765A writes or read sonner than base 765 and the 37c65 even shorter.
It doesnt ignore fields in a multisector read/write however if the
sectors
are written with a interleave it will also keep things in numerical
order.
Add to that a full cylinder read does not bring all the non data crap
that formatted media requires to marks all the data spaces. The real
beauty
of that is if you have real DMA you can fire it up and read a whole
cylinder
and all your buffer has is neatly ordered data if the read was
successful.
That latter feature is nice if your doing a caching scheme.
>Allison could probably gives us a more comprehensive and authoritative
>list.
Yes I can.
Allison
> Today I found the following:
>
> 1) IBM PS/2 P70 Portable with Xenix386 loaded. Does anyone know
> how to bypass the root password so I can log in?
Is it Xenix or AIX? I know IBM had a version of AIX that ran on these. Or
was it just that funky Microkernel OS/2 thing running on one of these with
AIX running at the same time? I know I saw that at a trade show once in DC,
that was cool!
Zane
! ... whitey's holiday, and crackers are the enemy (their
! terms, not mine... I get "whitey"... I get "white bread"... but
! cracker?!? I would ask when visiting my inlaws... but I would
! just get my ass kicked, or worse, shot).
Chris - Now, I'm a honkey (now what's the origin of that?) just like you...
(like you couldn't tell by the name! :-)
I think the term "cracker" is because, ISTR, crackers and bread made
basically the same, except crackers don't have any yeast. Both light
colored...
! As to the REAL reason for Kwanzaa, I have no idea, but I do
! know, around here it is entirely a racial thing, and the
! only people that really seem to take it seriously are the
! inner city high crime area Afican-Americans... which
! unfortuantly gives the whole thing a bad notion up here. Its
! a shame really, as I am sure there was a real reason for it,
! but like many other things, it has been badly perverted by a
! very very select group of people who decided to use it for
! their own agenda.
What's that cliche saying? "One bad apple to spoil..."
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>> that will do 125ns easily. Or you could easily find a d765
>> off an old board or NOS from JDR.
>Do you know of a WD37C65 data sheet on the web?
Check SMC for it.
>> parts and the requisite connections. Of the latter, the fewer the
>> better for both buildability and reliability.
>Hmm what ever happened to sockets and repairable stuff.
I hate sockets and try to avoid them, I've had equipment that
didn't use the machined pin sockets and most all had to be
rebuilt sans sockets at one point or another.
>
>> package = $1.35. So instead of Xilinx's $4.40 OTP chip we use a 8 pin
PIC
>> and the serial EEPROM for a total of $2.29 and get
re-programmability...
>
>A good solution but this is a one-shot project so price is not a major
>problem
A lousy one if you have a raft of TTL and few FPGAs. ;)
I have a few of the Lattice and Xilinx tools, older ones and the synario
stuff too. I just dont get all that excited about it. I've designed a
cpu
and built it years ago, it out of my system and not worth repeating.
Any cpu I'd do would need software and that means it would likely
be a copy of something... likely something I have.
Allison
This gentleman has Atari & Commodore systems in Iowa that are available,
someone please give them a good home and not make his equipment into
epay.com fodder....
Curt
----- Original Message -----
From: <brodtm(a)msnotes.wustl.edu>
To: <curt(a)atari-history.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:44 AM
Subject: Old Atari ?
> Curt,
>
> I have tried searching the web but with no luck. My mother has my
old
> Atari800 and Comodore systems. They are currently taking up space in her
> house, and we do not want them. We would like to either recycle them or
> give them to someone who is interested in them.
>
> She is currently located in NE Iowa. Would you by chance know of
> anyone who would be interested in these systems? I hate to just pitch
> them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Brodt
> St. Louis, MO
> brodtm(a)msnotes.wustl.edu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> > workstations. Clipper based, and pre-clipper (were they
> VAX?) Intergraph
> > systems.
> The early big servers were VAX based. In fact, they were mostly just
> rebadged. RCS/RI has an Intergraph VAX 8550. It has some
> really strange
> custom hardware in the disk controllers - something about
> these things
> could do searches thru files on the disks for specific
> graphics entities
> (for CAD) without bothering the processor. Odd.
"Really-strange-custom-hardware" was Intergraph's middle name for the
longest time. That's what makes their systems so interesting.
> > There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
> > relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
> CDC was rebadging IRIS 3000 machines as Cyber 910s.
*Really*? What are my chances of finding one? I'd love to have an IRIS
3000, if I found that I could fit it in the house. :) Did they run the
early versions of IRIX?
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> I'm pretty sure I have a copy of Warp 4 Server, if I can find it. I'll
> look this weekend. ISTR, though, hearing that the OS/2 CDs don't image
> well. Does anybody know whether that's true? I maintain that a
> byte-for-byte dd will work on *anything*. Very Slowly. :)
Well, I've never met a standard CD that it wouldn't work on. I was told
third-hand by somebody who worked for SGI that their media was somehow "copy
protected" and couldn't be reproduced well.
I've successfully imaged my IRIX 6.2 media and booted/installed my system
>from the backup. Works fine.
Also have done VMS, Solaris, and one of the "extras" disks that goes with
AIX. All of them worked fine.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
At 04:28 AM 12/18/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Actually, for manufacturing operators, in IBM, women on average make more
>than men.
I don't know if it has changed but when I was with IBM they paid for
performance in manufacturing. Those who contributed the most were paid the
most.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gene(a)ehrich.com
gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com
P.O. Box 3365 Spring Hill Florida 34611-3365
http://www.voicenet.com/~generic
Computer & Video Game Garage Sale
I accept PayPal
To subscribe to automatic updates send a blank e-mail to:
online-garage-sale-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com
More office cleanout finds:
I salvaged a new, shrink-wrapped copy of OS/2 Warp Version 3, Red label
(needs a separated copy of DOS/Windows), 3.5" disks. I'm offering it free
for postage (5 pounds) or pickup in the Chicago Loop. Email me at
robert_feldman(a)jdedwards.com. I will decide among multiple requests next
week (after Christmas holidays).
Bob
> I based my statement upon information gleaned from conversations with my
> customers, 80% of which are black. Most of them think that Kwanzaa was
> "made up" by retailers in order to get their money. Some have told me that
> they resent the "social engineering" aspect of Kwanzaa. Here in the South,
> there seems to be very little support of or identification with this event
> among African-Americans.
Doubtlessly true; I've heard some people say the same thing about Christmas.
> > January 1 was "made up" into New Years Day by an act of
> > fiat; New Years Day used to be April 1.
>
> When and how did this happen?
Actually, there was no "act", that was hyperbole. The earliest
reference to a Januray 1 New Year I can find is the Roman Civil
Year. Later, the Catholic Church, which liked to line up the
calendar with its Holy Events, wanted sto see Christmas become
the start of the new year. But some later winter/early spring
feasts were a popular time for the people, so through much of
the dark ages, April 1 was the start of the New year.
When the establishment of the Gregorian Calnedar began to
take hold (which moved New Year's Day officially to Jan 1),
people foolish enought to still celebrate it on April 1
became known as "April's Fools".
The Gregorian Calendar was adopted tt different times in
different countries; I think Russia held out until the
early 20th Centurt. See
http://www.genfair.com/dates.htm
for more info.
Regards,
-dq
> I recently acquired (out of desperation) a DSI paper
> tape punch/reader on ePay (at a reasonable price, but
> not guaranteed to work). I cleaned it up, oiled it
> here and there, and after puzzling out the RS-232, got
> it running punching Mylar fine. To test it, I wrote a
> Windows program to test it out with; the program lets
> you type in a phrase, looks up the ASCII, and prints
> the letters out on the tape in a 7x5 matrix format,
> upper and lower case. I'm pretty sure that there were
> programs that ran on mainframes to do this sort of
> thing. Useless, but kind of fun - I made a banner for
> my museum with it. If anyone on this list has a
> punch, and admits to using Windows, ha ha, I can make
> this available.
On the CDC 6600, we had a Model 415 High-Speed Paper Tape
Reader/Punch. We had a locally-created control card we'd
use to control the disposition of output. In the standard
KRONOS system, it was DISPOSE, but we had so many devices
spread out over so many campuses that we wrote a card we
called ROUTE. Among other tasks, ROUTE provided the banner
pages for print jobs. A standard feature of the banner was
the job name, usually, your three initials plus a job ordinal.
When you'd sent output to the tape punch, it would punch
the job name at the start of the tape, in the manner you
describe.
Regards,
-dq
> On another note, CDC hardware that wasn't OEM'd from SGI seems relatively
> uncommon. There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
> relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
Fascinating... and of the CDC hardware I've seen for sale,
I've never seen anything that CDC didn't build themselves.
But then, all I've seen was 60s & 70s era stuff...
-dq
> Why on earth would Sun put a cool set of leds UNDERNEATH the cover? I mean,
> you might as well put it out there.
Apollo did this, too, but had cute little hinged doors covering
the LEDs' most everyone leaves them open, because one LED is
flashed by the system once per second, and is called "The
Heartbeat".
The Prime 2455 has four LEDs on its virtual control panel
board, three red and one green. No one I can find has a
clue what they all indicate...
-dq
Matthew Sell <msell(a)ontimesupport.com> wrote:
> Vacuum cleaning is much more "dangerous" for a PCB than washing it.
> Pete made a very good point, one I had forgotten, the static charge created
> by dust moving through an insulated (plastic) pipe can generate some
> obscene voltages.
This is not a problem with a little bit of planning.
One of my other hobbies is woodworking. Breathing in the
sawdust from many hardwoods is very unhealthy, so most
well financed wood shops have some kind of dust collection
systems. With flow rates of 200-1100 cfm and long runs of
plastic hose, a dust collector plus sawdust can be an
explosive situation. Thats why grounding kit are sold
separatly or included with most dust collectors. These
kits consist of a lenth of wire that runs down the hose
and metal clamps to clamp the wire to the hose at regular
intervals. These kits are available in most woodworking
stores.
Of course my favorite way to protect a circuit board from
static is to cover the solder side with aluminum foil,
lay it on conductive foam or a conductive plastic bag.
On a different subject:
I've also used aluminum foil to create a ground plane
to cut down on noise on some extender boards. I take two
pieces of cardboard the size of the PCB and wrap one with
aluminum foil. After making sure that none of the solder
joints will poke through the bare piece of cardboard, I
make a sandwich of the solder side of the PCB, the bare
piece of cardboard, and then the aluminum wrapped
cardboard. With this taped to the PCB, I solder a wire
>from the aluminum foil to ground on the PCB.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> Sent: 17 December 2001 21:43
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Hardest to Find Classic Computers
>
> > The Digital Group systems get my vote. I've only *heard* of about 3,
> > since being on this list, which is a while. Maybe because no-one is
> > looking? I can't even imagine finding a full-up system, with several
> > CPU boards, Phi-deck tape drives, and matching cabinets for the
> > monitor, system unit, and tape drives, not to mention all
> the OS's and
> > other software... well, maybe I can imagine it...
>
> Yep, I'd agree here too. I have one complete system, and
> aside from that,
> the only other one I've ever seen was a kit sold at VCF 2.0 (or was it
> 3.0)?
>
Dammit - I was offered a Digital Group machine earlier this year and the
only thing that stopped me was the horrendous shipping cost from the US.
This thing had the (in)famous tape unit attached that contained either 4 or
6 drives; can't remember. I've still got the pix of it somewhere, and it
also spurred me on to do some digging with the result of finding Gus
Calabrese who was the founder (or one of them) of TDG in the first
place......
--
Adrian Graham, Corporate Microsystems Ltd
e: adrian.graham(a)corporatemicrosystems.com
w: www.corporatemicrosystems.com
w2: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk (Online Computer Museum)
> My Vaxstation 4000/60 has an 8 (or so) red led that also
> posts codes at
> power on but nothing else in either vms or in netbsd.
A number of years ago, someone wrote a utility
for OpenVMS that would display a CPU load
on the seven segment LED of a MicroVAX II
9or MicroVAX 3600 series, I forget).
Assuming you can find it, hacking it to
do the VS4000-60/VS4000-9x LEDs should not be too much
of a stretch.
Antonio
I spent most of today checking out most of my favorite places and found
few goodies to take back to Texas. A lot of it is too new to list here
but at the low prices I could not pass the items up. I picked a April
1985 issue of COMPUTE! with pictures and a article on a Commodore LCD
called a second-generation lap portable with 80 x 16 flip-up display,
32K RAM, internal modem, and eight built-in programs for under $600.
Has anyone every seen one in real life or better yet does anyone own
one? It looks pretty cool in the photo shown in the mag. Some of the
other items are listed below.
1. ICD printer connector cable for Atari 850 new in unopened package
2. Tandy cat#26-1398 6' RS232C cable new unopened package
3. Commodore Model 1351 mouse
4. Several Sega Master System cartridges
5. Compute! March 1985 issue some good stuff in it also.
6. Several mousepads for the collection
7. A RAD robot
8. A nice book called Understanding Computers by Grace Murray Hopper
9. Some Apple and Toshiba technical manuals
10. Tele-games Video Arcade (Sears) with 2- controllers and 2- paddles,
also came with 3 cartridges
11. A NeXT keyboard (pn 2122) and mouse (pn 193), the mouse was a style
I had not seen before.
Well that's all I can list as the others are not classic yet. Keep
Computing
I have December 1967 inCider, still wrapped in it's plastic
bag. I wonder if anyone is collecting magazines and would
find this more collectable because it still has the plastic.
I just want to read inCiders, especially those with articles
about the pre-GS apple II machines.
Anyone wanna trade me?
Anyone got inCider or nibble magazines they want to get
rid of?
I am in the San Jose, CA area- we can arrange to meet.
8251 was an OK chip, it had bugs, FYI there are three versions
and each has it's oddities! I have tons of them and use them
but, you do have to be aware of the oddities. The worst ones
are initial programming after reset (buffer clear bug) and the
repeats last character on /cts false if TX shifter is not empty
(8251A). However the 2SIO didn't use it.
NS* did use them as did many others. The worst chip was
the 8250.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org' <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: MITS 2SIO serial chip?
>> > Does anyone know what chip was used for the MITS serial boards? I
thought
>> > that it was the 6850, but I could be wrong.
>>
>> Weren't a lot of people using the 8251 back in those days?
>>
>> I had to play some tricks in getting an interrupt-driver
>> written for the 8251... this was for the redoubtable
>> Data General One, a sort cool, sorta nasty laptop...
>>
>> -dq
>
>I always thought the 8251 was a pretty kick-ass chip. I learned a lot
>about it since the Royal Alphatronic PC that I've got (somewhere in this
>disaster of mine) uses it. I was pleasantly surprised a number of years
>ago when I discovered someone had made a BYE insert for it. :)
>
>g.
>
>
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>> rebuilt sans sockets at one point or another.
>In this case I plan to use good sockets.
>> A lousy one if you have a raft of TTL and few FPGAs. ;)
>
>All the TTL is in the FPGA.:)
>Most of the TTL used is simple buffering or decoding.
Ah, don'tcha think I know that? ;) Then again I have enough
loose TTL to make a 24bit stretch PDP-8 with two sets of
spares and a full compliment of IO. I've done my stint as a hardware
designer analog DC to UHF and digital.
>The whole point of the cpu I designed, was because I am not happy
>with 8 bit micro's, RISC machines, or INTEL. Now what I wonder about
>is people that put a 6502 in a FPGA while you still can buy the real
>thing?
>I also wonder about FPGA's when you can't fit a 6502 in one!
Use a bigger FPGA... Thats why hammers come from small 4oz all
the way to to 10 pounds!
>I can guarantee you don't have a 12/24 bit cpu like mine. ( Not that you
>would want one :) )
Been there done that. Mine was 2901 based Z80 clone with hybrid uCode
wide bus and extented instruction set... Still didnt run any thing useful
on it, too big, too hot and far to weird. It was a good learning tool
depite all that.
Allison
I've got two cables here, DEC p/n BCC17-06 and one with out a p/n,
but looks like a DEC cable. Any ideas who/what they're for? And can one of
them replace the mono video cable on my VAX Station 3100 (BC23K-03)?
DEC p/n BCC17-06:
15 pin D-sub connector <--> a box with a DEC keyboard connector (the
phone plug looking thing), and/then 3 BNC (r,g,b)
Un-marked:
15 pin D-sub connector <--> box with PS-2 keyboard and mouse
connectors, then 3 BNC connectors (r,g,b) - this was included in the
shopping bag that came with my DEC 3000-400, but this doesn't go with it.
The PMAGB-B video adaptor in slot 0 has the 3W3 (?) video connector...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
> I'm not saying that to get an entry level job in the field you should
need
> to know the machine architecture like the back of your hand, but you
should
> at least know the basics and be willing to learn the rest.
The operative term here being "willing to learn the rest."
Too many degree-holders which I've met seem to believe that they "know it
all" and don't need to learn any more than they already know. As a
consequence, they ask the same questions again and again. I'm of the old
school -- don't go to your boss with a problem, go to your boss with a
*solution.*
I make it a point to learn *something* every day. Keeps my brain from
drying out . . .
Glen
0/0
I finally got a chance to get to the new thrift store that opened near me
(Salvation Army).
I got a good deal on a 28.8 external Mac modem (needed one for my nephew,
56k would have been nicer, but for $1 I can't argue).
While I was there, I saw two items that might be of interest to some of
you.
1: Texas Instruments calculator "Standard Business Analyst" in a wallet
case with a small guide book. They want $8 for it.
2: IBM PS/1 printer (dot matrix it looked like, but I didn't crouch down
to really check it out). They want $20 IIRC.
I will be going back there in a few days to see what the price is on an
Apple Thermal Transfer Printer (I have never heard of such a beast, but
since it carries a DB25 connector, I assume it is Apple II series stuff,
platinum, so it is later II). It didn't have a price tag on it, and it
seems they have a policy that when something has no tag, they remove it
>from inventory to be retagged and put back out on an unspecified day (I
guess to keep people from pulling tags to try to get things cheaper).
If anyone has an interest in the calculator or IBM printer (or the Apple
one, but specify what your max price for it is... I myself won't pay more
than $10), I can pick them up when I go back (and for the apple printer,
if they want more than $10 but less than someone else's max, I can pick
it up for them).
Let me know
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>won't support, and that's formatting with interleaving. The NEC parts
seem to
>be unable to format a diskette with other than strict ordinal sector
numbering,
Obviously you know not how the part works. I used to put sectors down on
floppies with physical skew for CPM using 765/9266/37C65. It was dirt
simple.
When the 765 and clones write they want CHRN, All you need to do is make
R the sector number what ever you want it to be then feed it to the FDC
when
doing a format track. What's difficult about that?
Allison
A newer chip that can still be found is the WD37C65
that will do 125ns easily. Or you could easily find a d765
off an old board or NOS from JDR.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2001 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: MITS 2SIO serial chip?
>If you must know it is a floppy disk controller I need. Right now
>I plan to use WD2797 floppy disk controller. I would love to use
>a newer chip,but I can't find any! I want to stay with DIP's and PLCC's
>here. This may be the 21 century but my soldering skills are the 19'th.
>I still favor the simple dumb uart chip. TR1602?. I like things than
>you hit reset, it starts ... not like the classic star-trek computers
that
>always go down. Usually when you need them.
It's an OK part but you could use the 8251 with fewer supporting
parts and two less voltages (com2502 is single voltage).
I've built enough to enjoy later parts as I'm old enough to want
it done in a lifetime and the older parts meant tons more support
parts and the requisite connections. Of the latter, the fewer the
better for both buildability and reliability.
Allison