On December 8, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> > testing
>
> testing 1..2..3...
KA410-A V1.2
F_..E...D...C...B...A...9...8...7...6...5...4_..3_..2_..1_..
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
test number 2
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> Scrapping them off the books for tax purposes, in all likelyhood. We
> used to have to physically destroy our COMBOARDs before we could write
> them off. If we were ever audited and happened to have product that
> was logged as scrap, but hadn't been, we would have been in a world
> of hurt from either the County Tax officials or perhaps the IRS.
>
> It sucks, but if you scrap hardware, you have to render it useless.
IMHO, all you need to do is ensure there remains no evidence to
the contrary... admittedly, it might get very difficult to have
10,000 units disappear with a wink and a handshake...
-dq
Hi All,
I've noticed that a few of you have been chatting about Badtrans -
according to Symantec, if you drop the underscore from the "From:" address,
you should end up with the user's actual e-mail address - if the virus chose
to use the actual address...
I've picked apart the message source and what it does is quite sneaky -
it uses an IFRAME to load the virus and also uses
MIME-headers-within-MIME-headers... A few of the regulars on alt.comp.virus
might want to elaborate... It's a crafty little bugger - it even installs a
keystroke logging trojan... Anyone remember the so-called "Sexyfun" or
"Spirale" virus (it's real name was Hybris) - it came in an e-mail from
hahaha @ sexyfun.net and could update itself over the web with new
"plugins"... One of which displays a _huge_ hypnotic spiral on-screen...
Sophos put a screenshot of it on their website (www.sophos.com).
Later.
--
Phil.
philpem(a)bigfoot.com
http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/
On December 1, jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
> > Type 3 definitely requires a different pad from type 4...
> Then you have other type 3 rodents than I. Mine are identical to the
> type 4 mice, only with an other connector.
It's certainly possible that I'm thinking of the Type 2...this was a
long time ago and I was running a couple of Sun2-120 boxes at the time.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
Chris (mythtech(a)mac.com) spake:
>>The mouse looks to be a slightly
>>modified version of the "PC Mouse". The neat thing is that it is an
>>optical mouse. [:-)]
>I had an optical mouse way back when with my Mac Plus... I bought it
as >a replacement for a broken mouse. I think it was made by A+
>At the time, I hated it, you needed a special mouse pad for it to work,
>and it wasn't as accurate as the Mac Plus mouse, which made it even
>harder to draw.
>Just one of those things that I found interesting now that optical mice
>are all the rage.
Actually, I don't like the old style optical mice at all. I like
this one because I think the older optical mice are hard to find.
And on top of it, this was manufactured for use on the Jr - it wasn't
just a run-of-the-mill PC mouse, it had two funny connectors specific
to the Jr. (One for serial, and one to take power off the lightpen
port.) All of that makes it special.
My original machine had an MS bus mouse with a roller. Quite a
different animal to use.
The new optical mice are only vaguely related to the old ones.
They don't need the pad or anything. I haven't used one, so I
don't know if they are any more usable.
On December 7, UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
> As I recall, the q2020 has the same geometry as the Seagate st225
> (620/4/17).??
I think that's 614 cylinders for the ST225.
Oh GOD why do I remember that? Can't I recycle those brain cells?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
Does anyone on the list know where I might be able to find a few (10-20) used
but in good shape dumb terminals? I need some with a pc-style kb and wyse 60
emulation.
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
Sorry for the repost... but has anyone heard of
the (old) Dataproducts printer inteface?
It was also called the Line printer interface, and
was used on other Brands besides just Dataproducts.
Basically I know it uses differential signals - otherwise similar
to centronics - but I would like to find out some details.
I have the Pinout:
http://www.hardwarebook.net/connector/parallel/dataproductsdsub50.html
I would really like to find a description of the
"Demand" signal and the polarity of "Strobe" and "OnLine"
I would like to know the levels (I presume they are TTL)
If anyone can help me out, perhaps I can respond
in kind by giving them the final result - a circuit
for a Centronics-->Dataproducts interface.
steve(a)airborn.com.au
On December 4, Tony Eros wrote:
> Last month someone had an Industrial-8 two rack system with TU56, RK05,
> high-speed paper tape reader/punch listed on eBay. $1000 was evidently not
> enough, because now he appears to be selling off the bits. There's
> currently a listing for "PDP 8 Industrial DEC chassis and front panel" with
> about three days to go.
>
> Kind of a bummer.
Lynch mob time.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
On December 4, Tony Duell wrote:
> Presumably the number of people still using 8" drives who don't know how
> to clean the heads 'by hand' is even less than the number of people using
> 5.25" drives who don't know that. Which means that apart from collectors,
> there may be very few people who actaully need an 8" cleaning kit...
...which further suggests that, of the people who would want an 8"
cleaning kit, a higher percentage of them are collectors. Get those
8" kits on eBay, and make a fortune! ;)
[sorry, couldn't resist..]
Say, anybody got a spare top lid for a 10.5" 11/34 CPU chassis? I
could actually use two if anybody has a pile o' parts..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave McGuire [mailto:mcguire@neurotica.com]
> Value is in the eye of the beholder, man. Why is it automatically
> "insane" when someone else views omething as being more valuable than
> we do?
> The resale value of the stuff we hack on is going up, and we have to
> learn to deal with it. It has been for some time. People are buying
> it at these prices, and it's not just one or two people. Let them
> spend their money...if they're happy with their purchase, what's wrong
> with it?
> Further, one mustn't lose sight of the fact that different things
> are more readily available in different geographic areas than in
> others. Just because there are fifty AppleIIs at the corner yard sale
> in your neighborhood doesn't mean there are fifty of them at EVERY
> corner yard sale.
... ok, I understand this perfectly (believe me!) but this is a head
cleaning kit, and anyone who's still got a 5.25" disk likely could take it
apart and clean the head without the kit.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Dec 3, 15:38, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> Have 5.25 inch floppy drive cleaning kits
> become unobtainium, or only for the clueless:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1305651479
Wow, I wonder what my 8" ones are worth ;-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 4, 0:39, Carlini, Antonio wrote:
> > pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com wrote:
> >
> >> (Oh, what's the 50 pin HD-DB type connector? line-printer?)
> >
> >Good question :-)
>
> After my earlier miscounting I'd better check
> carefully :-0 but if this is labelled B1 (and
> there is another one labelled B2 on *some*
> MicroVAX 3100 Model 20s) and it is three
> rows of pins ... then it is a synchronous
> communications connector. The same
> connector was used on several other
> synch comms options (DEMSA, DECnis,
> DSV11, DSB32, DMB32 and DSF32).
> The interface presented (X.21, V.35,
> RS422, RS423) was determined by the
> stub cable you plugged in.
Thanks for that -- that's helpful. I might even have a use for it :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Williams [mailto:dlw@trailingedge.com]
> I too would be interested in getting together with other
> collectors in
> the Houston area. Always like to meet others in the area, visit or
> hit collecting spots. I know there are a few more on the list. Any
> others interested?
Houston's starting to sound like a cool place to live ;)
In all seriousness, though, maybe local user groups or something more
loosely knit are a good idea.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> On December 4, Tony Eros wrote:
> > Last month someone had an Industrial-8 two rack system with TU56, RK05,
> > high-speed paper tape reader/punch listed on eBay. $1000 was evidently
not
> > enough, because now he appears to be selling off the bits. There's
> > currently a listing for "PDP 8 Industrial DEC chassis and front panel"
with
> > about three days to go.
> >
> > Kind of a bummer.
>
> Lynch mob time.
OTOH, I know someone hoping to pick up the chassis/front panel
(not me)...
-dq
>Thanks to a VERY generous man, located about an hour's drive from me, I have
>a boatload of CompuPro S-100 stuff, 8" floppy drives, manuals, software,
>etc.
<snip>
YIKES Batman... Nice score!
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave McGuire [mailto:mcguire@neurotica.com]
> On December 4, Tony Eros wrote:
> > Last month someone had an Industrial-8 two rack system with
> TU56, RK05,
> > high-speed paper tape reader/punch listed on eBay. $1000
> was evidently not
> > enough, because now he appears to be selling off the bits. There's
> > currently a listing for "PDP 8 Industrial DEC chassis and
> front panel" with
> > about three days to go.
> > Kind of a bummer.
> Lynch mob time.
Exactly what I was thinking. That really offends me.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> And I've seen bubble sorts used when they were inappropriate, or worse
> yet, a bubble sort going from left to right, when right to
> left was called
> for - that creates the worst case scenario that gives a
> bubble sort its
> bad reputation.
Back to the description of the bubble sort that Wirth had in his book (the
book is "algorighms + data structures = programs," for the curious), he
suggests modifications to a bubble sort:
Always remember the position of the last switch that you've made. You can
start/end here next time. (A similar thing was mentioned in a previous mail
by somebody)
Alternate the order of the sort going right-to-left one pass and
left-to-right the next. That takes advantage of the fact that a number
that's incredibly far out of place will tend to move further if you're
sorting towards its proper place. (In other words, it's as you say, but
assuming that we don't know the order of the data, so the sort can be
generic and still be more efficient)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On December 2, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> I'm making progress on the PDP-8/E I got this last week. The powersupply
> checks out once the Front Panel is plugged in, and thanks to all the spare
> lightbulbs I've got all the burnt out bulbs replaced. Unfortunatly I'm now
> down to two spares which my -8/m could probably use, the -8/e had nearly
> half it's bulbs out. This brings up the question, how hard is it to get
> replacement bulbs?
I thought all 8/M systems had LED front panels. At least every one
I've seen has.
Not sure where to find replacements. Newark Electronics has a nice
(but expensive) selection of lamps. Also you might want to try Gilway
Technical Lamp...if you can't find them online, let me know and I'll
dig up a catalog.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com [mailto:pete@dunnington.u-net.com]
> You're supposed to stop one position shorter each time,
> because by the end
> of the sweep, the largest (or smallest, depending on which
> way you do the
> comparison-and-swap) number has fallen to the bottom (end) of
> the array.
> It makes a big difference to the time it takes.
You're right. It would. Wirth had a better example in one of his books,
but I didn't want to type it all in. ;)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iggy Drougge [mailto:optimus@canit.se]
> But who could by a VAX? And why one terminal only? The VAX
> wasn't a personal
> computer by any means.
> Not that just anyone could buy an IBM PC in '81, but chances
> were, your
> employer could.
Well, depending on your employer they might afford a VAX too. I used one
terminal as an example of a way to give your VAX a nice keyboard and
display. I didn't mean it to be an exhaustive configuration.
> OTOH, the TI99's processor had the same addressing problems
> as the 8-bitters,
> 15-bit addressing with a 16-bit word orientation led to the
> same addressable
> space as the 6502 and Z80 micros. Arithmetically, the TI99
> was a sixteen-
> bitter, but not in the common definition of sixteen bits used from the
> eighties and onwards.
AFAIR the 8088 was also very "8-bit" :) I suppose it's all in the
marketing, though.
> The PC was AFAIK released in '81.
> I wouldn't define the 68000 as a 32-bitter, only as a more
> elegant sixteen-
> bitter.
Well, we certainly agree on the "more elegant" part. ;)
> >several 32-bit systems on the market by 1984 or so (though,
> my personal
> >favorite was done in '87 with the Acorn Archimedes).
> None were IBM, though, and none could be easily cloned.
Well, no, none were IBM. (Honestly, IBM has only done a few things I like
-- all of them being more expensive than I could ever hope to afford new. :)
As for being easily cloned, I suppose you mean that Compaq must have already
done the reverse engineering work? ;)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'