>X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.ezwind.net: majordom set sender to
>owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org using -f
>X-Sender: cfandt(a)206.231.8.2
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
>Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:54:36 -0500
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
>Subject: Couple of items available . . .
>Sender: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
>I've got four Iomega Bournoulli Boxes, model A210H, if anybody wants them.
>I can maybe think of a few bits to swap for them but that doesn't matter. I
>just need the room (as several list members who've visited us can attest)
>and want them to go to a new home.
>
>I can ship but just reimburse me for the shipping cost and maybe purchase
>of a proper shipping carton or two as needed. Seem to weigh 15 to 20 lbs.
>each. Zip code 14701.
>
>Also, any interest in several IBM 3287 printers? Dot matrix 132 column page
>printers which use SNA network interface.
I have had a few questions asking (basically) what those Bournoulli Boxes
are. Please forgive me as I thought they were somewhat well known - but
that's probably because we used them all over the plant where I once worked
and I kinda got used to them. Plus, it's been a relatively long time since
they fell out use and younger folks of course wouldn't know much of them.
At any rate, they are a removeable media mass storage device which uses
what are essentially disk cartridges. Vintage '82-'85, I think. The media
inside its case, IIRC, is similar to an 8" floppy disk except encased in a
rigid plastic case. The cart is something like 8" wide, about 12" long and
about 5/8" or so thick.
These model A210H units have two 10 megabyte drives within a single
enclosure. It measures approximately 5 inches high, about 12 inches wide
and about 13-14 inches front-to-back.
The PC XT, AT and compatible host machines had installed within themselves
a proprietary ISA card with a cable from it to the Bournoulli Box. I know
I've got at least two of these cards tucked away somewhere but I need to
dig and hunt for them. They're packed away in one of the boxes from our
move to this house several years ago. I've got a software driver disk or
two around too. Same thing: where the h*** are they at the moment? But I
can find them with diligent hunting. We live on a 66' x 210' lot and they
can be eventually found :-)
Iomega's Bournoulli Boxes were great for use as backup of the contemporary
20-to-80 mb hard disks of that era. That is what these units had been used
for at my ex-employer along with their use as local data storage for daily
Customer Service and Field Service records. I rescued them when we cleaned
out an off site warehouse back in the mid 90's.
I've also got maybe a dozen or more of the cartridges, too, which I just found.
Yours for the taking too. Same conditions as previously stated (pay
shipping, help towards a shipping box if actually needed, etc.,
yadda-yadda-yadda).
Come and get 'em.
Thanks. -Chris
-- --
NNNN
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
On Dec 15, 15:47, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> So it's almost like cloth, but made of wire?
Yup, though the ferrite core rings mean the spacing between strands is
larger than in cloth woven from thread. And it's knitted. I was told the
other day that there are still two old ladies in the Midlands who can
repair some types of core by re-knitting it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On December 13, Doc wrote:
> > Remember Linux too needs lots of memory. With >16 meg on a video card
> > your OS needs about 16x that. It is the video display that is the
> > killer.
>
> BZZZT!! Wrong.
>
> Linux *likes* lots of memory. I can show you X running on a 386SX with
> 12M and a 1M video card. Not just a demo; that's my friend's firewall.
A firewall with a video card? Gotta love them PCs. ;)
But yes, I agree...Linux can be made to work well on machines with
small quantities of memory. It's actually pretty good at it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
In a message dated 12/15/2001 7:18:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jhellige(a)earthlink.net writes:
<< >That is just right. Airc, IBM would'nt buy Intel's processor for the IBM
>PC unless Intel had multiple sources. This was to ensure supply to IBM if
>Intel's plants were overridden by bugs, damages by an infusion of dust (or
>aluminum powder.....;-)). AMD at least (and I think Seimens and NEC as
>well) was contracted to produce the 8088 cpu. AMD was given all info
>needed to clone the chips.
>
>This relationship continued through the 80286 and 80386 processors, but
>became very strained as AMD was making 386's cheaper and imho better than
>the intel products by modifying the Intel designs. Intel and AMD ended up
>in court over the 80486 chip ; intel claiming that the contract between it
>and AMD did not include information or production of this CPU. AMD was
>eventually forced to produce a 'clean room' 80486 design but because of
>the delays caused by the litigation they had plenty of time to do it.
AMD's faster coprocessors also caused quite a problem if I
remember correctly. Harris also pushed the 286 faster than any of
the other sources. I remember PC Magazine running an article
comparing various 286 machines with a headline that mimicked the
Corvair's 'Unsafe at any speed' headline. >>
I've always liked AMD stuff. My first PC I got myself was an AMD 386 dx40. I
couldnt decide whether to get a 486-25 and didnt quite understand the sx/dx
issue. Ran OS/2 great on 8 meg. Later, I found that the AMD 486 dx2/80 was
cheaper than Intel's 66 so I got that and never any problems with it.
--
Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
Where were you a few years ago when I was looking
for a home for my Burroughs software & manuals (didn't
run across this list at the time though). After 10 years
or so programming these babies (L/TC/B80&90) I'd
accumulated pretty well every piece of firmware, utility
& app software there was, but then (as now) there wasn't
much interest in what most people (unfairly, in my biased
opinion) derided as "just" an accounting machine (you
haven't lived 'till you've played Lunar Lander with
a golfball printer...)
Unlike the mainframes, these machines were generally
sold outright & therefore scrapped outside of Burroughs,
so there were lots of them around.
Finally sold the hard disk carts to a rebuilder,
recycled the floppies & tossed the mylar tapes
& manuals.
HOWEVER, I do still have an electrical parts
catalogue from 1972, a little early for the B80,
but might have some of those chips from the
TC listed; if you're interested, send me a couple
of part numbers off list & I'll see if they're listed
and it's worth while scanning it for ya.
If size vs computing power were a criterion,
there wouldn't be very many old mainframes in
Sridhar's collection...
And yes, rugged indeed; extremely reliable, aside
>from the occasional head crash. Alas, many of
them were disembowelled & ended up as desks
or workbenches.
As mentioned elsewhere, I also still have a digital
cassette drive & tapes with who knows what on
them (for the L/TC's), as well as a TD700 flat-
screen display unit & controller for the B80, if
anybody's interested.
mike
----------------Original Message-----------------
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:44:21 +0100
From: "Sipke de Wal" <sipke(a)wxs.nl>
Subject: Re: Burroughs - any information?
I did obtain about 5 TC5500 consoles and a B80
back in the '80.
They were rather large for their computing power
and no software was obtainable so I scrapped them.
I still have a couple of kilo's TTL-chips from them, with
their own Burroughs legacy partnumbers.
Very rugged design though!
Maybe you could get some old "B" hardeware but
software was out of the question.
Sipke de Wal
Ugh... this takes the cake.
I was pulling apart a 486 logic board, and I pulled the heat sink off the
chip... to be greated with an AMD 486 chip with "Made for Microsoft
Windows" and the Windows logo stamped on it.
What... no other OS is supposed to use an intel compatible processor?!? I
am sure anyone that bought this chip to use with any other OS probably
paid an MS tax because of that stamp!
Just for that, I think I might see if I can get my Intel build of
Rhapsody to install on it.
Ok, so it isn't 10 years or older, but at least you people can understand
the pain.
-c
On December 16, Huw Davies wrote:
> The problem with the Alphabook was that it's not exactly fast and
> the battery life is short. They are also hard to find and expensive
> should you find one. I suspect that a 1GHz laptop will run a VAX
> emulation faster than the Alphabook with better battery life too.
Yes but then you'd have the embarrassment of being seen carrying a
PeeCee around. That's a hangin' offense around here! ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 15, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> No normal detergent will attack ordinary plastics or epoxies. Some
> industrial detergent powders include caustic ingedients, and (mainly for
> that reason, and because they can harm skin) are banned from domestic sale
> in the UK, and also, I beieve, in the USA. In general, any home-use
> detergent safe to use on your skin, clothes, etc, is safe on PCBs and
> electronics.
Alconox Inc. makes a few different cleaning compounds specifically
for PCBs and electronic components.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 15, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> Actually, I think that's a good suggestion, if you can find someone with
> the same ROMs. In my experience, most programmers actually do use the same
> algorithm -- one of the common CRCs. At least, all three programmers I
> regularly use do, and the checksums match the ones printed on SGI ROMs and
> a few other ROMs I have that have printed checksums.
Hmm..lucky. ;) My Data-I/O 2900, Heath 4801, and printed checksums
on my SGI I2's ROMs don't match.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On Dec 15, 14:29, Dave McGuire wrote:
> What kind of ROMs does it use? Another possibility might be to find
> someone with the same model of PR1ME (how rare are they?) and checksum
> the ROMs & compare them...most PROM burners will generate checksums,
> but now that I think of it, PROM burner manufacturers have yet to
> standardize on a checksumming algorithm so it'd probably be useless
> unless they're summed with the same make/model of burner. :-(
Actually, I think that's a good suggestion, if you can find someone with
the same ROMs. In my experience, most programmers actually do use the same
algorithm -- one of the common CRCs. At least, all three programmers I
regularly use do, and the checksums match the ones printed on SGI ROMs and
a few other ROMs I have that have printed checksums.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 15, 14:09, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 16:16, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> >
> > > In particular, do any of you have familiarity with
> > > systems that flash the on or power light as an
> > > indicattor, sopecifiecally, of a power supply
> > > problem?
> >
> > The only thing I can think of that's *designed* to do something like
that
> > is an SGI Indy; if you power one up and it can't even run the the code
in
> > the PROM, it flashes the power light (which is a two-colour LED). The
> > usual cause id that there's no (recognisable) RAM at all in it.
Probably
> > not relevant to a PR1ME.
>
> No, I'm afraid you may have hit it on the head, and it's been the
> direction I've been leaning, that the microcode ROMs may have
> fried, but that just blows my mind.
Possible, of course, but in the case of an Indy, the processor and PSU are
working, and it gets only as far as the "I think, therefore I am a
processor; I wonder if I have any memory" test in the PROM, and then
executes a loop which controls the LED in the PSU if there's no RAM. At
least, that's what I believe; I've not seen a detailed description of the
PROM startup. I suppose your problem may be something similar, in that the
CPU is running but can't do anyting useful because either it's crippled or
some other part of the system is disfuntional. Does the CPU control the
power supply LED(s), like it does in an Indy?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: Jeffrey S. Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
>I asked and was told not to clean the core, that whatever junk gets
stuck
>in there wou't hurt the core's operation. Maybe it's time for round 2
of
>the discussion.
>
>What if something in that dust is conductive?
I'd rise in clean water maybe Isopropanol(91% or better) by dipping in a
pan with a large quanitiy. Agitate minimally, no brushing or high
pressure air near the mat. dry with warm (NOT HOT) hairdryer.
>What if something in that dust has wierd magnetic properties?
>What if that dust interferes with the core's cooling?
See above.
>What if I slowly dipped the core board into a pan of IPA or distilled
>water, then slowly lifted it out, and repeated until the core board was
>clean?
IPA may not be the best bet for the muck. Use a lage quanity so that
you don't saturate the solution with the muck. Rinse again with fresh
solution to further remove the muck. You might try water with
a small (1%) amount of detergent too. Risnse water out with IPA and
blow dry with hair dryer on warm, not hot.
Remember IPA is flammable and to do a PDP-8 core I'd use about
2 quarts (2L for those on the otherside) for first rine and about the
same for the second. So use care and DO IT OUTSIDE.
Allison
On Dec 15, 10:34, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> I've never seen core in real life...... how small are the wires?
Depends on the core, but thinner than hair, usually. There's a picture of
an H214 core board on EBay at the moment; you'll see 12 large and 8 small
dark rectangles on it.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1309747460
The larger rectangles measure approximately 5/8" x 2 1/4". Those
rectangles are the core mat; it's an 8K x 16 bit core mat. Each of those
131072 ferrite cores has three wires going through it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>I use the dishwasher to clean computers too, but what about core
>memory? I've never handled it myself, but I understand it is quite
>delicate.... any special handling needed?
I did a pdp-8/f, washed everything save for the PS and the Core
plane. The acutal core plane was fairly clean but everything
else was a mess and needed a bath serious.
Allison
On Dec 15, 12:20, Matthew Sell wrote:
> I don't know enough about the effects of using certain chemicals on the
> various plastics and expoxies used in the manufacture of the boards, so I
> steer clear of using a detergent unless I know that it would be perfectly
fine.
No normal detergent will attack ordinary plastics or epoxies. Some
industrial detergent powders include caustic ingedients, and (mainly for
that reason, and because they can harm skin) are banned from domestic sale
in the UK, and also, I beieve, in the USA. In general, any home-use
detergent safe to use on your skin, clothes, etc, is safe on PCBs and
electronics.
I'd be wary of some organic solvents, including alcohols, however. Some
attack plastics such as Perspex (Lucite), polystyrene, ABS, etc; some will
attack some types of enamel insulation on wire; some affect PVC insulation,
making it swell or become brittle.
> My experience has been that with certain devices that spend entire lives
> inside, that usually a rinse with hot water makes them look new. I've
been
> satisfied with just using hot water, and everything looks nearly new when
> complete.
Unfortunately that doesn't apply to computers that have been in places
where they may accumulate sticky substances from the air (tobacco film,
brewing residue, oily film + dust, etc). In that case, warm water and a
moderate amount of detergent is the kindest thing you could use. Ever
tried to clean an old TV set with plain water?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: Mark Crispin <mrc(a)CAC.Washington.EDU>
>I am appalled that anyone would seriously consider putting any
electronic
>equipment, much less antiques, in a dishwasher.
You never seen how they were made then.
>It may be alright to (gently!) vaccuum away dust and deteriorated foam
>rubber, although a feather duster may be more appropriate. I would not
Believe it or not vacuuming can create damaging ESD for sensitive
boards like core drivers and even TTL!
>risk anything else, and certainly not insert anything (including water
or
>alcohol) under the plexiglass shield protecting the core.
Correct there. The core plane is fragile.
>A damp cloth with perhaps a bit of soap to the exterior surfaces of the
>case is probably all you really need, but be sure not to let any liquid
>seep into the inerior.
A lot of the PDP-8s have lived in industrial enviornments and offices
where clean air is unheard of. Many really are filthy.
Allison
From: Gunther Schadow <gunther(a)aurora.regenstrief.org>
>I have that itching to start up my new PDP8/A even without
>disks attached. Have a programmers console, so that's enough
>to enter a few programs. It's intriguing to see a machine
Congrats!
>But first I need to give this thing a good cleaning. A friend
>has assured me that there's nothing better than the dishwasher,
>with the exception of big capacitors and, what about magnetic
>core memory? So, how should I clean the RAM cards? How the
>DC power supply units?
The PS do by hand and CORE planes never goes in the dishwasher.
The core IO boards can be dishwashed.
>If I put the other stuff in the dishwasher, I know there should
>be no detergent and no heat dry. But what about the rinsing
>aid, do I have to pump this out of the reservoir?
No problem. I use minimal detergent as most of the dreg on the boards
is water soluable.
>I heard of another method using hand-washing first, then drying
>and finally a bath in Isopropanol. Is that what I should do
>with the core memory cards?
Core planes are very fragile and usually covered enough to prevent
much muck inside. the driver boards usually get nasty dirty.
>Finally, finally, I noticed that the cards are all slightly
>bent from being kept in a horizontal position. They are sagging
>a little, like a hammock. Would that be a cause of concern
>in the long run? Should I mount the chassis in an upright
>position in the future?
Not an issue, dont try to straighten.
>PS: I am probably going to make one "portable" PDP-8, where
>the console is mounted on the chassis and the rest of the
>opening covered plus a handle on the top. That would be neat
>for bringing into the classroom to teach fundamentals of
>computer programming, wouldn't it?
yes it would PDP-8 is still a good minimalist model to work from.
Allison
On Dec 15, 9:27, Ben Franchuk wrote:
> I also would consider the qaulity of the water. I would wash in
> distilled
> water. The last thing you want is clorine or other acids and junk from
> the
> water slower eating your PCB.
For the time it takes to wash a PCB, nothing dissolved in normal water is
going to matter. Make sure it's free of paticulate matter that might get
stuck somwhere, don't use the raw undiluted waste from someone else's
chemical process, but there's no need to go over the top. The chlorine
added to tap water, for example, will do no harm.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On December 15, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> No, I'm afraid you may have hit it on the head, and it's been the
> direction I've been leaning, that the microcode ROMs may have
> fried, but that just blows my mind. Tonight, I'll set up the
No, Doug...the microcode ROMs being fried should blow the PR1ME's
mind, not yours. ;)
(Sorry, I couldn't resist!)
> PC that's got my ROM burner/reader, and read each one (if the
> ROMs aren't too large a size for my Needham unit). I'm assuming
> I'll see all 00s or all FFs (or maybe something like FEs) if
> they're blown; been a long time since I've looked at popped
> ROMs...
What kind of ROMs does it use? Another possibility might be to find
someone with the same model of PR1ME (how rare are they?) and checksum
the ROMs & compare them...most PROM burners will generate checksums,
but now that I think of it, PROM burner manufacturers have yet to
standardize on a checksumming algorithm so it'd probably be useless
unless they're summed with the same make/model of burner. :-(
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> On Dec 14, 16:16, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > In particular, do any of you have familiarity with
> > systems that flash the on or power light as an
> > indicattor, sopecifiecally, of a power supply
> > problem?
>
> The only thing I can think of that's *designed* to do something like that
> is an SGI Indy; if you power one up and it can't even run the the code in
> the PROM, it flashes the power light (which is a two-colour LED). The
> usual cause id that there's no (recognisable) RAM at all in it. Probably
> not relevant to a PR1ME.
No, I'm afraid you may have hit it on the head, and it's been the
direction I've been leaning, that the microcode ROMs may have
fried, but that just blows my mind. Tonight, I'll set up the
PC that's got my ROM burner/reader, and read each one (if the
ROMs aren't too large a size for my Needham unit). I'm assuming
I'll see all 00s or all FFs (or maybe something like FEs) if
they're blown; been a long time since I've looked at popped
ROMs...
About the only other possibility is that the backplane got
cooked, but it looks fine...
-dq
Guys,
This argument always comes up every few months on the video game collecting
newsgroups that I'm a member of.
Here we go....
How do you think the boards were cleaned by the manufacturer?
Boardwashers!!!!! (big versions of dishwashers - usually with conveyors for
constant operation)
I've been employed by two different electronic test equipment
manufacturers, and have consulted a bunch more regarding quality control
and calibration of electronic test equipment.
EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM USES WATER TO CLEAN THE BOARDS.
No shit.
Depending on the type of equipment that is being produced, some may use
distilled water, others filtered water, some use "deionized" water.
But it's still water. Hot water.
I clean all of my computers, upright video games, and all of the boards
>from my two 11/780's and one PDP-11/34A in the dishwasher. No damage yet,
after several YEARS of doing this. I've put high-voltage power supplies,
low voltage power supplies, floppy disk drives, CPU boards and everything
else in the wash. What doesn't fit in the dishwasher gets blasted with 409
and hot water in the tub.
Here's the secrets to doing this right:
1) Do not use any detergents. NONE.
2) Turn off the plate warming and drying cycles. The heating elements in
the washer can distort or damage plastics.
3) Remove soon after cycle is complete. Do not let items sit overnight.
Shake off water.
4) Stand up or hang to dry.
5) Let items dry inside the house for several days. I usually don't touch
washed items for at least 3-4 days.
6) Don't plug the item in to power of any form until step #5 has completed.
For delicate items, I use water from the sink at a low flow rate, and spray
a mixture of 409 and water onto the item and allow it to soak for a few
minutes before rinsing. I may use a soft paintbrush to clean stubborn dirt
if necessary. Rinse and repeat.
I know that a good percentage of you are skeptical. Every one of my games
in my arcade collection had at least the CPU boardset in the dishwasher.
Several others had every single board through the wash. All of them work,
and did so before going into the dishwasher and immediately after drying.
Others had the monitors powerwashed. I took an entire 11/780 out into my
driveway and I powerwashed the chassis AND backplane!
Don't take my word for it; take a board that you know is operational, of
little value to you, test it out, and run it through the dishwasher using
the steps outlined above. After a few days of drying, test it out. It'll
work. And - I severely doubt that you get it any cleaner using any other
method.
Of course, don't wash the boards with your regular load of plates and
pots..... : )
- Matt
At 10:25 PM 12/14/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Gunther Schadow wrote:
> > But first I need to give this thing a good cleaning.
>
>Why?
>
> > A friend
> > has assured me that there's nothing better than the dishwasher,
> > with the exception of big capacitors and, what about magnetic
> > core memory?
>
>I am appalled that anyone would seriously consider putting any electronic
>equipment, much less antiques, in a dishwasher.
>
>It may be alright to (gently!) vaccuum away dust and deteriorated foam
>rubber, although a feather duster may be more appropriate. I would not
>risk anything else, and certainly not insert anything (including water or
>alcohol) under the plexiglass shield protecting the core.
>
>A damp cloth with perhaps a bit of soap to the exterior surfaces of the
>case is probably all you really need, but be sure not to let any liquid
>seep into the inerior.
>
>-- Mark --
>
>http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
>Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
> Two parallel blades is 120V 15A. One perpendicular to the other is
> (usually!) 120V 20A, but it could be a 250V plug, too. The 120V 20A plug
> can be adjusted to fit a 15A recep by the judicious(sp?) application of a
> pair of pliers... No, I've never done such a dangerous thing! -_^ Just
> remember, too close to the body of the plug and it'll shear off, too far out
> and it won't insert fully into the plug.
Sorry I wasn't clear- plug matches the outlet it goes
into, no need to "re-engineer"...
-dq
> The Lilith & the Tektronix Magnolia. These I regret not
> hanging on to. I have never seen another. I still have
> a Lilith mouse.
Did the Magnolia really Smalltalk-80 in reverse-video
mode? The only ones I've seen were in photos, and one
showed white text on black background in Smalltalk...
-dq
On Dec 14, 23:47, Gunther Schadow wrote:
> But first I need to give this thing a good cleaning. A friend
> has assured me that there's nothing better than the dishwasher,
> with the exception of big capacitors and, what about magnetic
> core memory? So, how should I clean the RAM cards? How the
> DC power supply units?
NOT the core! If you need to clean the core, my suggestion would be to
immerse it in a washing-up basin with tepid water and a little soap or
washing-up detergent, and *gently* swish it about a little. Then rinse
twice, let it drain, and dry off gently. Don't use compressed air or
solvents.
> If I put the other stuff in the dishwasher, I know there should
> be no detergent and no heat dry. But what about the rinsing
> aid, do I have to pump this out of the reservoir?
I don't think the detergent will do any harm, providing it's not too
caustic, but avoid excessively hot water and high-temperature drying.
Before you use the dishwasher, check for switches etc that might not take
kindly to being immersed in soapy water, and either carefully remove them
(taking careful note of where they go) and relays (don't wash relays).
Also check for any labels that will be damaged or which might come off and
end up where you don't want them. The rinse aid won't do any harm at all,
in fact it wil help the water drain off (it's just a wetting agent).
> I heard of another method using hand-washing first, then drying
> and finally a bath in Isopropanol. Is that what I should do
> with the core memory cards?
Yes, see above, but omit the IPA.
When I cleaned my PDP-8/E recently, I put all the boards except the core in
the dishwasher, along with the front panel circuit board (I removed the
LEDs first, since they were in bi-pin sockets), over-the-top connectors,
and the two backplanes. I ran it on the usual cycle, with detergent and
rinse aid.
When I took the boards out, I blew off the remaining water (some tends to
stay under ICs) with compressed air, and gave anything that might harbour
water (DIP switches, panel switches) a good dose of iso-propyl alcohol,
which I then drained/blew off. The IPA mixes with the remaining water and
helps to remove it; the air removes the last traces of IPA. Finally I
treated all the switches to a small dose of low-residue switch
cleaner/lubricant.
Similar treatment for the backplanes and connectors, except it's hard to
get the last of the water/IPA out so I let them stand upright in front of a
hair drier on a low heat setting for a couple of hours while I got on with
other things.
The PSU was too big for the dishwasher, and I wouldn't have wanted the
transformer in there anyway. The 8/E has a linear supply with a big
transformer; the 8/A has a switcher, I think. Anyway, I took off the side
panel, removed the fans, relay, and fuse carriers (carefully noting how
they were wired). I sprayed it with enzymatic cleaner (it was smelly) and
detergent mixed with water in a spray bottle to dissolve the muck, left it
to sit for a few minutes, and then rinsed it out with the garden hose (low
pressure!) trying to avoid getting too much water into the transformer.
Then I drained it out, and used most of a 500g aerosol of IPA to flush out
the water, and compressed air to remove the residue, especially in the
connectors. I let it stand in a warm dry room overnight before powering it
up; I figured there might still be dampness in nooks and crannies in the
transformer, and I didn't want to take chances.
If you have small parts that need washed, then they can go in the cutlery
basket in the dishwasher providing they're heavy enough not to jump out
(metal brackets for example) or in a strong mesh bag in the dishwasher.
For more delicate things you can tie them in a pillowcase and put them in
the washing machine. I use the pillowcase/washing machine for keytops,
cartridge cases, etc.
Most of the foam in my 8/E was past redemption, so I stripped it off with a
wallpaper stripping knife and replaced it with "high-density" upholstery
foam about 3/8" thick -- not the really high density stuff that seems to be
made of lumps of recylcled stuff, just the stuff used to pad seats. I
cleaned off the old glue and stuck the new foam on with spray glue, after
masking off the area to spray (like you would for spray paint). The foam
under the backplanes was OK, so it went in the (clothes) washing machine on
a hot wash.
> Finally, finally, I noticed that the cards are all slightly
> bent from being kept in a horizontal position. They are sagging
> a little, like a hammock. Would that be a cause of concern
> in the long run? Should I mount the chassis in an upright
> position in the future?
Not unless they're so badly warped that things might short between cards.
Some of mine were warped when I got them, and don't seem to have suffered.
> any other things I should know?
Use a pen torch to look in the backplane slots for any rubbish the
dishwasher might not remove (paperclips, cruddy foam, etc). Do make sure
everything is dry before you power them up (or even reassemble them). Do
make a note of where and how everything you remove goes back. I thought
all the LEDs in my panel were the same way up; they weren't and it took me
half an hour (without the circuit diagrams) to get them all the right way
round.
I find it helpful to put the screws from each section or panel or whatever
into a separate ziplock bag or a dish; there are always some missing and it
helps figure out what goes where, how many are needed, and what lengths
they should be when you come to reassemble it all. Check the fans rotate
freely; I always relubricate bronze bearing types with light machine oil.
I have a few toggle-in programs I've collected or modified for first-time
confidence testing, like the inchworm program and a couple of serial port
testers (continuously write character to console; echo console, etc).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
"Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner" <spc(a)conman.org> wrote:
> So what, exactly is a co-routine? I've heard the term before, but I'm not
> entirely sure what they are, or how they would work.
> -spc (I may have used them in assembly, but not knew the proper term ... )
The only time I remember using a coroutine was a time when
I had no interrupts to use.
The Sega Genesis has a 68000 with main program memory, plus
a sound system controlled by a Z80 with it's own sound memory.
Sound memory is loaded with a sound driver written in Z80
assembly. Now the sound system has a free running timer but
no interrupts, so most games had a sound driver that played
FM sounds or a sound driver that played digitized sound.
My job was to take an FM sound driver and make it play
digitized sound at the same time.
So I wrote a routine that quickly checked if a digitized
sound was playing and if it was, then check if it was time
to stuff the next value of the digitized sound. The hard part
was then to pepper the existing sound driver with calls to
this coroutine such that the existing sound driver would
not be slowed down and that the digitized sound would be
played at a constant rate. It worked great.
Oh! "what, exactly is a co-routine?"
A coroutine is a procedure that executes from the point it
last suspended execution up to the next instruction that suspends
its execution. That is, it preserves state between invocations.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================