>Post a digital pic on your webpage so we can look 'n' see?
K.. but it will have to wait until tomorrow (I have to bring my camera in
to work).
Any particular shots you want? Front, Sides, Insides... posing in a
nightie?
I was able to find a "part number" on the main board. Claims to be a
980100-01 Rev D. I am about to hit WYSE's site to see if that gets me
anywhere.
While I am posting pics, I will post ones of my other terminal for
another phone system, since ultimatly I want to get it replaced as well.
The other one I am guessing to be a Qume of some kind (I have better docs
for the 2nd phone system, and it hints at it being a Qume, but doesn't
say a Qume what, or even if it IS one). The two terminals look TOTALLY
different. (but the 2nd one isn't as big of a deal, since I am able to
connect a laptop to it running a TVI-50(?) emulator).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
on 19-Sep-01 10:41:29, Willi Kusche wrote:
>Hi!
>On 19-Sep-01, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>>I _think_ the Amiga 3000/16 had a 16Mhz 68881 and the A3000/25
>>had a 25Mhz 68882, but I could easily be mistaken.
> I'm composing this message on an Amiga 3000 that had its motherboard
>upgraded from 16 Mhz to 25 Mhz. Ever since the upgrade I occasionally get a
>video crash that makes the screen unreadable. But, the system keeps running
>OK. For example, if that video crash were to occur while I'm typing this
>message, I've learned that hitting right-Amiga and 'S' will save the message
>so I can finish the message after re-booting the A3000.
Sounds like the two PAL ic on the left side, under any zorro cards you may have
installed, they have a nasty habit of running hot, and makingen the screen
unreadable.
I changes mine and at the sametime removede the batteri for the RTC as it
was leaking.
Regards Jacob Dahl Pind
--
CBM, Amiga,Vintage hardware collector
Email: Rachael_(a)gmx.net
url: http://rachael.dyndns.org
On Oct 10, 14:18, Roger Merchberger wrote:
> Rumor has it that Pete Turnbull may have mentioned these words:
>
> >Teac made SCSI floppies which were used by SGI and others; one of my
> >Indigos has one, and a couple of friends have them too. The floppy is a
> >more-or-less standard FD-235, except that most have a motorised eject.
The
> >SCSI card is an add-on, albeit a very compact one.
> >
> >If you don't want the SCSI cards, I can use them :-)
>
> VAXStations use them, too -- it's basically a SCSI to MFM bridgeboard
that
> is really quite compatible -- when my floppy drive died on my
SCSI-enabled
> PeeCee, I snagged my spare VAX bridgeboard w/1.44 floppy, set the SCSI ID
&
> slid it onto the chain... worked flawlessly.
>
> I doubt the bridgeboard would work for a 2.88Meg floppy, tho -- dunno if
> the "BIOS" (for lack of a better term) supports that density as it didn't
> exist until well after the board was built.
Possibly not. I have a DEC one that certainly does, but it's much larger
than the TEAC ones, which fit under the drive in a small frame the same
form factor as the drive. They're so small and thin that at first glance
you might not notice there's an "extra bit".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Is there a way to tell what type of WYSE terminal one is? I have a broken
terminal that I need to figure out what kind it is, so I can connect a PC
running emulation (or another terminal) to the system.
The terminal itself carries only the name of my phone system (it is the
operators terminal for it), but opening it shows a main board marked
WYSE. But I can't find anything that says what KIND of wyse. Is there
someplace is should be marked? It is possible to tell based on some of
the chips?
I also see some kind of a daughter card attached to the main board. Are
these terminals custom programmable? Is it possible the phone system uses
a stock terminal with some kind of custom additions (I sure hope not, but
I have that fear, as the keyboard has some phone specific keys like Voice
Mail on it... but I was really really hoping they were just regular keys
and the system knows that things like "end" really mean enter the Voice
Mail system).
Anyone have any pointers for me about how to figure out what terminal
type this is.
Thanks (oh, and it should fit as on topic, since the only date I can find
on the unit is a refurb'd sticker marked 1991, so it just had its 10 year
B-day... at least since being refurbished, that and the phone system it
belongs to was discontinued about 15 years ago)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Can anyone help Jeremy? Please respond to him directly.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:04:14 -0500
From: "Nolle, Jeremy" <JNolle(a)rgare.com>
To: "'archive(a)vintage.org'" <archive(a)vintage.org>
Subject: vintage schematic for academic use
Hi!
I am a student at Washington University in St Louis, and as a project in my
EE class I would like to turn an old laptop into a standard VGA display.
I have currently access to several Toshiba displays (4400c, 4700ct, etc) and
can get Zenith displays also (433 vlps) from the mid 1990s.
Do you have (know where to find) schematics for these displays?
I also have the mainboards from these laptops, as well, although I dont
think that will help. I will be building an A/D controller, and need to get
the schematic before I start. Thanks!
Jeremy Nolle
jmn3(a)cec.wustl.edu
jnolle(a)rgare.com
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
On Oct 10, 15:45, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Was DIX really the original Ethernet? Wasn't that 10 Mbps and all?
Depends on your definition, I suppose. I was being a bit lazy (ie
inaccurate :-)) when I wrote "original DIX Ethernet". The first system
called Ethernet was developed at Xerox PARC, and that was 3Mb/s. It was
originally called "Alto Aloha Network" but the name was changed becasue it
would work for any suitably-equipped machine, not just an Alto. The first
proposed cross-platform *standard* was the DIX standard, which was 10Mb/s.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Oct 10, 10:27, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On October 9, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > much larger house :-) The same fibre that carries FOIRL can (if it's
the
> > right size, 50/125) carry 10baseF, 100baseFX, 1000baseSX, ATM, FDDI,
...
>
> FDDI generally uses 62.5/125 fiber.
All of ours used 50/125. It has better performance, and it was the
standard when ours was installed. A lot of other UK installations were
done later, and used 62.5/125 because that was more common in Europe at
that time -- but they're now regretting it as 50/125 has become the
standard for Gigabit.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Oct 10, 7:44, Carlos Murillo wrote:
> The vinegar seems to do a good job of eating the NiCd spill
> and corrosion. What do other people on the list use?
I usually use warm soapy water and a toothbrush, but I've used vinegar once
or twice.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> > At 10:26 AM 10/10/01 -0400, you wrote:
> > >On October 10, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> > >> >How about the original DIX Ethernet? Try a web search for Aloha.
> > >>
> > >> Was DIX really the original Ethernet? Wasn't that 10 Mbps and all?
> > >
> > > I believe the original Ethernet was 3Mbps.
> > >
> > > -Dave
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Tom Uban wrote:
>
> > Hmm, looking at my copy of: "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network,
> > Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specifications", from Digital,
> > Intel, and Xerox, September 30, 1980 -- the specification says:
> > "Data rate: 10 Million bits/sec"
>
> I don't know if it went to standard, but there definitely was 3Mbps
> ether. I have a CHANNEL-3Mbps card for an S/370 here.
You're right, Dave & Sridhar... from:
http://www.baylor.edu/~Sharon_P_Johnson/etg/ethernethistory.htm
1972-The first experimental Ethernet system, Alto Aloha Network,
was developed by Metcalfe and his Xerox PARC colleagues. It was
designed to interconnect the Xerox Alto, a personal workstation
with a graphical user interface, and linked Altos to one another,
and to servers and laser printers. The data transmission rate was
2.94 Mbps [Spurgeon].
Regards,
-doug q
On October 10, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> >How about the original DIX Ethernet? Try a web search for Aloha.
>
> Was DIX really the original Ethernet? Wasn't that 10 Mbps and all?
I believe the original Ethernet was 3Mbps.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> Anyway, I've heard that 64Meg RAM was awfully tight to run VMS on an Alpha,
> but is it still faster than Tru64 Unix? (The machine was no screamer, but
> it was still faster than my wife... ;-) Or should I just sell it to someone
> willing to give it a good home? (I have too many computers now - and I'm
> trying to purchase a [smaller] house so may be moving soon... I *need* to
> consolidate my collection & am downsizing machines which I will never have
> time to tinker with...)
If the DEC 3000/300 is anything like a DEC 3000/300LX then you should be
able to get some 72-pin true parity SIMMs and upgrade your RAM. If you can
get it up to a minimum of 112MB it should work great. If you can get it up
to 96MB it will work OK. Less than 96MB, and it will work, but will
probably do a fair amount of swaping. OpenVMS V7.2 won't even load if
you've got less than 64MB RAM.
It's definitly a good VMS box, so I say keep it, get some more RAM for it, and
play with VMS on it. I used my DEC 3000/300LX as my OpenVMS server for a
while with a BA350 chassis attached to it for disks.
Zane
On Oct 9, 17:33, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > > > IP over carrier pigeon!!
> > >
> > > UUCP over floppies ferried by cars! BLEEEAAAAAARGH!!
> > >
> > > Peace... Sridhar
> >
> > Unless I'm mistaken Dave is talking about a transmittion method that's
> > actually been used. There is actually an RFC for it.
>
> Haven't carrier pigeons been extinct long before IP and UUCP were
> developed?
Nope. The RFC exists (RFC 1149) and there has been a practical
implementation. See http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
vegard@gyversalen:~$ ping -i 900 10.0.3.1
PING 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms
--- 10.0.3.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms
vegard@gyversalen:~$
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I just discovered Window Maker. Installed it on my SGI Indigo2 Maximum
IMPACT. Oh my god. It's like a dream. Running IRIX with the interface
of NeXTstep. I love it. Time to install it on all my headed
workstations.
Peace... Sridhar
On October 9, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> much larger house :-) The same fibre that carries FOIRL can (if it's the
> right size, 50/125) carry 10baseF, 100baseFX, 1000baseSX, ATM, FDDI, ...
FDDI generally uses 62.5/125 fiber.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Another good one is Enlightenment.. It has some crazy deps, but it supposedly
compiles
and looks mad snazzy.. I've used it on Sun and Alpha (as well as a myriad of
wintel) but
never on SGI.
Jim
On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:27 AM, One Without Reason
[SMTP:vance@ikickass.org] wrote:
>
> I just discovered Window Maker. Installed it on my SGI Indigo2 Maximum
> IMPACT. Oh my god. It's like a dream. Running IRIX with the interface
> of NeXTstep. I love it. Time to install it on all my headed
> workstations.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
Non-IBM, PS/2 floppy drives?? Isn't that an oxymoron?
What about the Mitsubishi drives made for IBM?
Jim
(Isn't misuse of grammar fun?)
On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:46 AM, Mike Ford [SMTP:mikeford@socal.rr.com]
wrote:
> I've been looking for some 2.88 non-IBM PS/2 floppy drives, and I found
> some, but the guy says they are SCSI. Is that nuts or what?
>
> TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card
> TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card
> TEAC FD-235 J 610 W/SCSI Card
>
> Some of the HP/Apollo 725/50 computers I found recently had SCSI floppies,
> but it looked like the SCSI part might be detachable. I wonder if I should
> bother getting the above drives to work in a PC, which I would have to fuss
> around adding SCSI to?
>
> Now for real HV - I was told by an ex-electrical
> engineer - that he watched while someone
> was measuring up for a new HV cabinet with
> a tape measure. The usual metal sort you or I
> might use for DIY. He dropped it and shorted
> out the busbars, instantly melted the tape
> and ended up in hospital with major burns
> across his arms and chest.
At a place I used to work we were setting up a new raised floor.
The (licensed!) electrician that was setting up the new UPS was
leaning with his hand against one end of the bank of batteries.
He leaned down to tighten the nut on the other end of the bank
of batteries with a metal socket wrench. The UPS was about the
size of four large refrigerators side-by-side, 90% of which was
filled with batteries.
He nearly died and spent quite a long time in the hospital. The
investigation kept the area closed for almost a week.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On October 9, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Since I'll be running another headless computer (HP 9000/380), I brought home
> my VT420. Nice terminal, but unfortunately this specimen will only talk, not
> listen.
> At first, I suspected my HP had lost its settings (the stupid boot PROM must
> be set via the keyboard to use a serial console). I proceeded to bring my HIL
> keyboard home and set it (without any screen) to use a "remote" console again,
> and the machine seemed to acknowledge that, beeping happily. But no response
> from the terminal. So I tested it with my DECstation. No response there
> either. So I hooked it up to my Amiga. Typing at the keyboard, there was
> output in NComm, but doing the opposite didn't work at all.
> So we have only one-way communication. What could be the problem?
Is flow control enabled on the terminal? I assume you're using a
DB25 adapter at the other end of an MMJ cable. Try turning off flow
control in the communications setup menu and shorting pins 2-3 on the
connector. At that point the terminal should echo what you type back
to the display. If it doesn't, you might have a toasty RS232 line
receiver in your terminal.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Naw.. Passenger pigeons were good eatin'.. They were hunted to death.
Jim
On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:41 PM, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)
[SMTP:cisin@xenosoft.com] wrote:
> > One is extinct, the other isn't.
>
> Due to trying to carry passengers?
One is extinct, the other isn't.
Jim
On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:37 PM, Dan Linder [SMTP:dlinder@uiuc.edu] wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> > > Haven't carrier pigeons been extinct long before IP and UUCP were
> > > developed?
> >
> > Nah, Its passenger pigeons taht are extinct...
>
> okay, I'll bite... what's the difference between a "carrier pigeon" and a
> "passenger pigeon"?
>
> - Dan
>
> Dan Linder / dlinder @ uiuc.edu
> Graduate Student, College of Engineering, Dept. of Computer Science
> - Dept. of Computer Science Teaching Assistant
> - DRES Computer Accessibility Researcher
For a birthday present, my girlfriend tracked down and bought me a Radio Shack
PC-1 with cassette adapter (Both in orig boxes!). It compliments nicely the
PC-2
and plotter I already have. After addition of four 1.35V zinc-air hearing aid
batteries,
it's humming along on my desk counting up by eights..
Does anyone still have software for this beastie?
My other Q is converter programs. wav2bin (Sharp calc converter) supports it
fine
(its just a rebadged PC-1211) but the companion program bin2wav does not. Do
other conversion programs exist? Are there any that run under *nixen? Any with
source? I have tried contacting the fine folks at www.pocketmuseum.com, as they
seem to be the author of the software mentioned already, to no avail (broken
email
addy).
Jim
It's NIBBLE Tinybasic, there was an old BYTE or KB Article
on the earlier 8a500 version of same. _If_ I ever get to the bottom
of my pile I have the manual for the National version of the SBC
with the 8073 on it.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A. Cini, Jr. <rcini(a)optonline.net>
To: ClassCompList <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:26 PM
Subject: 8073-based SBC info
Hello, all:
I just received a National Semiconductor SBC kit that's based on its
8070-series 8-bit processor. It's got a version of TinyBASIC written by
National as an instrumentation and control language.
I have a family data sheet and a short industry article but no
programming
or user's manual. The board is manufactured by Sterling. There is almost
no
information on this board available through the usual search engines.
Any info appreciated. Thanks.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
