untested as I never have had a MASSBUS unit.
Just email daniel(a)internet.look.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 1999 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: Floppy disks again
>On Oct 13, 8:34, allisonp(a)world.std.com wrote:
>
>> I know when NS* offered
>> the DD controller one option was 96tpi twosided drives and it was called
>> quad density as it was 800k and the same controller single density on
>> a 35track single sided (the introductory format) was a whopping 90k!
>
>I remember *them* well. And I remember the awe at getting Apple DOS 3.3
>140K on the same drive (well, same SS 35 tracks, anyway).
>
>--
>
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Dept. of Computer Science
> University of York
>
On Oct 13, 8:34, allisonp(a)world.std.com wrote:
> I know when NS* offered
> the DD controller one option was 96tpi twosided drives and it was called
> quad density as it was 800k and the same controller single density on
> a 35track single sided (the introductory format) was a whopping 90k!
I remember *them* well. And I remember the awe at getting Apple DOS 3.3
140K on the same drive (well, same SS 35 tracks, anyway).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: collectors vs. enthusiasts
>I wrote:
>> <rant>
>> That's because eBay is where "collectors" hang out. Not people like
>> us, for whom collector is an insufficient/inaccurate term.
>
>"George Currie" <g(a)kurico.com>
>> Whereas I agree that there is a differentiation between the
>> "collector" and the "enthusiast", I must take umbrage to the ,again,
>> generalization of the person who pays "too much" on ebay
>> automatically being "collector assholes, just because he had deep
>> pockets".
>
>I don't believe I said anything of the sort. I said that "collectors"
>hang out on eBay, but I never said that enthusiasts don't.
>
>> Are you implying that one must be of modest means to be an
>> "enthusiast".
>
>No, I didn't. I've seen enthusiasts pay enormous amounts of money
>for certain items. I've done it myself. What I object to is having
>to do it because some non-enthusiast asshole has more dollars than
>sense. More about this later.
My friend... That is what auctions are all about.. and it's not limited to
computers.
When I was 17 I was at the Interhauler Yauht backruptsy auction. They had an
IBM mainframe and a mini. As the mini was old I was hoping to pick it up for
$100 (I was a student). I placed a bid of $50. when all of a sudden the
owner from "Kitchens Construction" thinks the machine can be used and placed
a bid of $500! I did not have $500 on me.... he was arrogant about the win
of his auction... smiled at me and left the room. Little did he know the
next auction was for the DISKPACKS for *his* computer. I bought them for
$60. I went out to him RIGHT after he won the auction and asked him if he
won the bid on the computer. He smurked at me and said "Of Course". I told
him (and I can remember my exact words): "Good, I just bought all the
software for YOUR computer so I guess you WON'T be using it".
His face dropped! He looked down and walked over to the auctioneer to
complain. When he couldn't get his way he came over to me and asked me what
I was going to do with them. I told him I had a PDP 11 and was going to
FORMAT the platters and use them on my system. I knew who he was, I let him
stu all night and called him the next day. He bought the diskpacks without
the case for $750!
>
>> If you saw a rare whatnot that you had always loved
>> and wanted to tinker with, and had the financial means to acquire
>> it, would you let it go to the scrap because you thought the asking
>> price was too high?
>
>No. But I still might complain about the price.
>
>> Would you let it go to a "collector asshole"
>> because you thought the asking price was too high?
>
>Yes, if the "asking price" was "too high". "Too high" is a
>subjective measure. I never buy ANYTHING that I think is priced
>"too high". Of course, tommorow's value of "too high" may be
>different from today's.
>
>> Now of course, there are people who would purchase something
>> simply for the "coolness" of having it.
>
>Those are the people that buy perfectly good, working core memory
>planes, and destroy them to make wall hangings. Those are the
>people for whom I believe there should be a special place reserved
>in hell. I don't think I'm alone in that opinion.
>
>> I fully understand the frustration, but venting it by making
>> generalizations of those who happen to be better financially
>> equipped than you, or are just willing to pay more for something
>> than you, is just immature.
>
>If complaining about life's injustices is immature, then I'm
>immature. But then, so's most everyone else I know.
>
>In fact, aren't you complaining about me based on some generalization
>you've made regarding me? Sounds immature to me. :-)
>
>> Call the guy who purchased an Altair for $2K an
>> asshole/loser collector/not worthy,
>
>Depends on why he purchased it. Maybe he is, maybe not. But I've
>had personal experiences with people who I *KNOW* were just
>"collectors" and had no interest in machines other than because
>they are "collectable". I.e., they had no experience with the
>particular machine, and no real interest in learning about it.
>If you don't think those people are assholes, fine. I do.
>
>Others suggested distinguishing between people who view collecting
>as an "investment", vs. people who collect for completeness. I
>don't see that as being nearly as useful a distinction, because
>there are two kinds of people who collect for completeness. Using
>the Atari 8-bit example:
>
>1) People who want every last Atari model and peripheral because
> they actually like and care about Ataris. That still maps to
> my "enthusiast" category.
>
>2) People who want every last Atari model and peripheral because they
> happen to think they are collectable, even though they have no real
> personal interest in Atari stuff. And they don't really care
> whether the machine is in working order, or about keeping it that
> way if it is. They may or may not think it is an investment. Yes,
> I've met people like that. And that's who I was referring to as a
> "collector". Yes, I consider those people to be assholes. That's
> my opinion, and I'm not trying to force it on anyone else.
>
>Obviously I should be more precise in my terminology: I divide people
>buying old computers into "enthusiasts" (who might be collectors) and
>"non-enthusiast collectors" (who may or may not be "investors"). The
>fact that some collectors are also enthusiasts does not make me like the
>"non-enthusiast collectors".
>
>Eric
>
I hope this is the correct place to ask this question. If
not, please direct me elsewhere.
Is there anyone out there that is familiar with the little
Panasonic Hand Held Computer (RL-H1000 series) that
came out in the early eighties? More specifically, can it
be adapted to use some type of conventional printer to
bypass the little thermal printer (RL-P1004A) that was
designed for it?
There seems to be a surprising number of these computers
still in use out there in many two-way radio shops. The HHC
was the heart of GE's 'suitcase programmer' for setting the
frequencies in their early models of synthesized radios.
The print heads in these printers fail, so you can't get a
printout of the frequency information that has been read
>from the radio or going to be written into the radio. It does
not make the programmer useless, but it would be handy
to be able to get hard copies again.
Thanks for any help!
- David -
I have a pretty complete series of BYTEs from 1982 until 1998 that need to
find a new library to add their immense body of computer history knowledge
to.
Pricing does not include shipping unless specifically mentioned. Priority
will go to buyers wanting to take entire runs (ie. someone wanting to buy
an entire year will get priority over someone wanting to buy one or two
issues for that year).
Please reply directly to <sellam(a)vintage.org> or <dastar(a)wco.com>.
Replies to this message to ClassicCmp will not even be seen by me, and
will therefore be ignored. Repeat: REPLIES TO CLASSICCMP WILL BE IGNORED.
APR,MAY/1982 - $2.00 each
JAN-DEC/83 - $2.00 each or $18 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/84 - $2.00 each or $18 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/85 - $1.50 each or $15 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/86 - $1.00 each or $12 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/87 - $0.75 each or $5 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/88 - $0.50 each or $5 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/89 - $0.50 each or $5 for the whole set
JAN-DEC/90 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
JAN-DEC/91 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
JAN-DEC/92 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
JAN-DEC/93 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
JAN-DEC/94 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
JAN-DEC/95 - 1.2 * shipping (whole set only please)
Also available are these special editions:
1984 IBM PC Special Issue: Guide to the IBM PCs - $3.00
1985 IBM PC Special Issue: Guide to the IBM PCs - $2.00
1986 Extra Edition Guide to the IBM PCs - $1.00
1987 Extra Edition Guide to the IBM PCs - $1.00
1987 Bonus Edition: Applications Software Today - $1.00
1988 IBM Special Edition - $1.00
1989 IBM Special Edition: Redefining the Standards - $1.00
1990 IBM Special Edition: Guideposts for the 90s - $1.00
1991 Extra Edition: Outlook '92 - $1.00
1992 Special Issue: Essential Guide to Windows - $3.00
1992 Special Issue: Essential Guide to Portable Computing - $1.00
1993 Spring '93 Special Issue: Essential Guide to Windows - $1.00
Remember: Reply to <sellam(a)vintage.org> or <dastar(a)wco.com>.
To help you decide which issues you want, here's a handy guide that shows
the issue topic that is printed on the binding of each issue:
04/82: Human Factors Engineering
08/82: Logo
01/83: Looking Ahead
02/83: Standards
03/83: Mass Storage
04/83: New Chips
05/83: The Electronic Office
06/83: 16-bit Designs
07/83: Videotex
08/83: The C Language
09/83: Portable Computers
10/83: Unix
11/83: Inside the IBM PC
12/83: Easy Software
01/84: 1984 and Beyond
02/84: Benchmarks
03/84: Simulation
04/84: Real-World Interfacing
05/84: Computers and the Professions
06/84: Computers and Education
07/84: Computers and Video
08/84: Modula-2
09/84: Computer Graphics
10/84: Databases
11/84: New Chips
12/84: Communications/Byte Guide to Apple PCs
01/85: Through the Hourglass
02/85: Computing and the Sciences
03/85: Bargain Computing
04/85: Artificial Intelligence
05/85: Multiprocessing
06/85: Programming Techniques
07/85: Computers and Space
08/85: Declarative Languages
09/85: Homebrewing/10th Anniversary (* great historical issue!)
10/85: Simulating Society
11/85: Graphics Hardware
12/85: Computer Conferencing
01/86: Robotics
02/86: Text Processing
03/86: Homebound Computing
04/86: Number Crunching
05/86: Mass Sotrage
06/86: Computers and Music
07/86: Engineer's Toolbox
08/86: Object-Oriented Languages
09/86: The 68000 Family
10/86: Public Domain Powerhouses
11/86: Knowledge Representation
12/86: Graphics Algorithms
01/87: Programmable Hardware
02/87: Educational Computing
03/87: Image Processing
04/87: Instruction Set Strategies
05/87: Desktop Publishing * Internal Modems
06/87: CAD * Mice * 12-Mhz ATs * IBM PS/2 Family
07/87: LANs * IBM PS/2 Models 30,50,60 * CAD Software
08/87: Prolog * 386 Hardware and Software
09/87: Printer Technologies * 80386 System Software
10/87: Heuristic Algorithms * Tandy's New Lineup
11/87: Accelerator Boards * Workstations
12/87: AT Memory Boards * Natural Language Processing
01/88: Database Software * Managing Megabytes
02/88: 14 Multiscan Monitors * LISP
03/88: New Math Coprocessors * Enhanced EGA/VGA Boards
04/88: Memory Management * 24-pin Printers
05/88: CPU Architectures * Word Processors
06/88: New Benchmarks * Ultra-High-Speed Modems
07/88: Multitasking * Fast 40-megabyte Hard Disks
08/88: The C Language * Special Macintosh Supplement
09/88: Display Technology * Postscript Printers
10/88: Hypertext * Affordable 80386s
11/88: Parallel Processing * NeXT * Project Management
12/88: Mac Supplement * Groupware * Benchmark Update
01/89: PC Communications * Annual Awards * Digitizing Tablets
02/89: Personal Workstations * C Compilers * Mac SE/30
03/89: Mac Supplement * 286 vs. 386SX * Object-Oriented Programming
04/89: CASE * UPSes * Graphics Supplement
05/89: Unix * CAD * Technology Breakthroughs
06/89: Mac Supplement * Security * Modems
07/89: 12 GUIs * LAN OSes * Distributed Processing
08/89: 80386-based Portables * Neural Networks * Mac Supplement
09/89: Apricot 80486 * Multiuser Operating Systems * Database Trends
10/89: Mac Portable * Optical Technologies * Optical Storage
11/89: Inside EISA * Beyond VGA * 32 Bits and Above
12/89: 5 New Laptops * Sound and Image Processing * CASE Tools
01/90: Annual Awards * Harddisk Utilities * State of Chips
02/90: Annual Index * Multimedia * Great Spreadsheets
03/90: 26 VGA Monitors * Compaq Systempro * Life within 1 Megabyte
04/90: OS/2 2.0 * Applications Architecture * 386 Roundup
05/90: SQL Servers * Amiga 3000 * Global Text Displays
06/90: Windows 3.0 * Networking * Low-cost LANs
07/90: Computing Without Keyboards * Low-cost Lasers * Reader's Awards
08/90: 386SX Showdown * Inside Windows 3.0 * End-user Programming
09/90: 15th Anniversary Summit * WYSIWYG Word Processors
10/90: DTP * Object-Oriented Computing * Knowledge Engineering
11/90: Mass Storage * Large SCSI Drives * FPUs
12/90: Laser Printer Alternatives * Advanced Graphics
01/91: Annual Awards * Artificial Intelligence * Caching Controllers
02/91: Laptop Technologies * 15 Notebook Computers
03/91: E-mail Software * Network Management * DOS Secrets
04/91: OCR Tools * Soviet Computing * Paperless Offices
05/91: Managing Gigabytes * Nineteen 486/33s * HP 95LX
06/91: 486SX vs. Am386-40 * SX Notebooks * Desktop Multiprocessing
07/91: DOS 5.0 * Wide-Area Networks * Sparc Clones
08/91: Safe Data * 10 Years of Smalltalk * NCR's Pen-based Portable
09/91: 64-bit Computing * 3rd-Generation CD-ROMs * Group Schedulers
10/91: Printer Technologies * Modularity * 9600-BPS Modems
11/91: Interoperability * Momenta * New Macs
12/91: OS/2 2.0 * Multimedia * Presentation Graphics
01/92: 1991 Awards * Databases * Cross-platform Development
02/92: Tomorrow's Processors * PowerPC * Network Servers
03/92: Windows on the Road * Memory & Storage * Spreadsheets
04/92: Natural I/O * Business Graphics * Windows 3.1
05/92: 3-D Computing * Intel's 486DX2 * High-resolution Monitors
06/92: Text Management * Color Printers * Windows Special Report
07/92: Apple's PDA * Portable Libraries * Flatbed Scanners
08/92: Network Analysis Tools * Postscript Printers * Parallel Computing
09/92: Unix * Optical Computing * Notebooks
10/92: Windows NT * Local Bus * Removable Storage
11/92: DSPs * Low-cost PCs * Ultimate Workstations
12/92: 66-Mhz 486DX2s * CPU CHoices * Objects and Users
01/93: 1992 Awards * Machine Translations * Windows Accelerators
02/93: Recordable CD-ROM * Fax Servers * Mobile Communications
03/93: E-mail * Groupware * 600-DPI Printers
04/93: Fighting Fatware * Compression * Visualization
05/93: Pentium * Lab Report: 126 Printers * Security
06/93: Windows * Client/Server Technology * Fast 486s
07/93: Pentium PCs * Data Acquisition * Fast Modems
08/93: PowerPC * 100 Ethernet Cards * Tomorrow's Networks
09/93: Video Computing * Hard Drives * Digital Documents
10/93: First PDAs * Pen and Voice * Notebooks
11/93: Special Report: Windows & OS/2 * Graphics Technology * Printers
12/93: WANs * High-speed 486s * Printer Technology
01/94: Advanced Operating Systems * New Processors * Monitors
02/94: Compression * Graphics Accelerators * Compilers
03/94: The Data Highway * 486-based Portables * Mass Storage
04/94: PowerPCs * Pentium/486 Systems * Object Database Systems
05/94: Componentware * Printers * Wireless Communications
06/94: New 80x86s * Ethernet Adapters * Distributed Computing
07/94: PC-Telephony * 14.4-Kbps Modems * Groupware
08/94: Document Management * High-end Pentiums * Bus Technologies
09/94: Plug and Play * Fast CD-ROM Drives * Internetworking
10/94: Intelligent Networks * Portable Systems * Data Acquisition
11/94: Special Report: Beyond Windows * Printers * New CPUs
12/94: Apple's Gamble * 90-Mhz Pentiums * Networking
01/95: Small-office Computing * Monitors * Color Management
02/95: The New Novell * Graphics Accelerators * Pattern Recognition
03/95: Technology Reshapes Learning * Tape Drives * SOftware Agents
04/95: Intel's P6 * Internet Firewalls * Client/Server Computing
05/95: Mainframes of the Future * Printers * Digital Video
06/95: Mobile Computing * V.34 Modems * Memory Technologies
07/95: The Internet * Ethernet Switching Hubs * 3-D Graphics
08/95: Microsoft * Windows 95 * Internet Servers * Groupware
09/95: 20th Anniversary Special Issue
11/95: Chips * Operating Systems * Network Printers
12/95: Software Reliability * 133 Mhz Pentiums * Games
01/96: Supercomputers * Best of Comdex * Componentware
03/96: Web PC * Web Servers * Multimedia
04/96: Future Computers * Windows 95 * Middleware
05/96: Unix vs. NT * Mobile Computing * WANs
06/96: Electric Money * Ink-jets * Recordable CDs
07/96: Group War * NT * Reader's Choice Awards
08/96: Business on the Net * Tape Libraries * ATM
09/96: No-wait Web * Telephony Boards * Software Quality
10/96: 3-D For Everyone * Notebooks * Network Design
11/96: Java Chips * Dual Pentium Pros * Cairo, Copland, 64-bit Unix
12/96: How Chips Changed the World * Network Printers
01/97: Can Java Replace Windows? * 3-D Workstations * Netware 4.11
04/97: Network Computers * Web Componentware * Java 1.1
05/97: NT 5.0 * SMP Servers * Hostile Applets
06/97: Digital IDs * 56K Modems * Database Programming
07/97: New User Interface * MMX Systems * Memphis
08/97: Energize Your Intranet * New Chips * Extend Your Enterprise
09/97: ActiveX Demystified * 300-Mhz Pentium IIs * Universal Inbox
10/97: Your Next Net * 8 Java Solutions * Pentium II with AGP
11/97: The Orbiting Internet * MMX Notebooks * Secure Windows NT
12/97: Beyond Pentium II * Editor's Choice * Network Computers
01/98: 1998's Top Technologies * 300-Mhz Pentium IIs * Cable Modems
02/98: Disposable PCs * Internet2 * Storage Report
03/98: Reinventing the Web * Netware 5 * 3-D Boards
04/98: Crash-proof Computing * Benchmarks * Color Lasers
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin <marvin(a)rain.org>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: collectors vs. enthusiasts
>
>
>Tony Duell wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > > > It's crazy. I can't believe what they are paying on EBay for less
>> > > > than *incomplete* systems. I could see $1400 with drives, running,
>> > > > tested, manuals, etc... but a shell??????
>> > >
>> > > <rant>
>> > > That's because eBay is where "collectors" hang out. Not people like
>> > > us, for whom collector is an insufficient/inaccurate term.
>> >
>> > Whereas I agree that there is a differentiation between the
>> > "collector" and the "enthusiast", I must take umbrage to the ,again,
>> > generalization of the person who pays "too much" on ebay
>> > automatically being "collector assholes, just because he had deep
>> > pockets".
>>
>> My main objection to e-bay (and to most other forms of selling,
>> actually), is that I don't know who the item is going to be sold to.
>
>The same could be said about newcomers to this list, and just about anyone
I
>don't know. This is something only time will correct. The same goes on
ebay.
>After a while, you see a lot of the same people bidding on stuff. The other
>not so minor detail is that people that pay for this stuff will probably
not
>send it to that junkyard in the sky.
>
Collecting computers is in it's infancy (for the general population). I
don't think owning an old mini with front panel switches will ever go out of
style. Stamps first, then cars, now computers....
I don't see these EBayers leaving anytime soon. Just look at the other
items... IE: Monopoly games. A 1933 board game fetched $30-40 last year,
this year it's over a $100. As more people get online there will be more of
that *one* person that just HAS to have the item on the auction block.
and for computers... how many Silicon Valley Execs are retiring this year???
George, I agree 100%. If you want something that bad you have to pay for it.
Pure and simple.
-----Original Message-----
From: George Currie <g(a)kurico.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: collectors vs. enthusiasts
> > It's crazy. I can't believe what they are paying on EBay for less
> > than *incomplete* systems. I could see $1400 with drives, running,
> > tested, manuals, etc... but a shell??????
>
> <rant>
> That's because eBay is where "collectors" hang out. Not people like
> us, for whom collector is an insufficient/inaccurate term.
Whereas I agree that there is a differentiation between the
"collector" and the "enthusiast", I must take umbrage to the ,again,
generalization of the person who pays "too much" on ebay
automatically being "collector assholes, just because he had deep
pockets".
Are you implying that one must be of modest means to be an
"enthusiast". If you saw a rare whatnot that you had always loved
and wanted to tinker with, and had the financial means to acquire
it, would you let it go to the scrap because you thought the asking
price was too high? Would you let it go to a "collector asshole"
because you thought the asking price was too high? If this is the
case then you obviously didn't "want" the item that much or didn't
have that much passion for it. Perhaps this activity can be further
classified as "bargain vintage computer enthusiast".
I am both an enthusiast and a collector. I try to get working what I
can, but I don't stop acquiring if I know that I won't have time to get
around to something. Maybe a computer has special meaning to
me, and I just want to have one, and I have the financial resources
to do it, does that make me an asshole?
Now of course, there are people who would purchase something
simply for the "coolness" of having it. With the advent of ebay,
those who have deeper pockets are now playing the game. It's a
real bummer having to pay lots for stuff that used to be given to
you. But hey, that's life. Is the guy who drives a Ferrari an
asshole because you drive a Ford (of course he could be, but not
just because he drives the Ferrari of course).
I fully understand the frustration, but venting it by making
generalizations of those who happen to be better financially
equipped than you, or are just willing to pay more for something
than you, is just immature. I get just as bummed as anyone else
when something that I've been wanting goes for more than what I'm
willing to pay ($100 for an HP Integral, nope, don't think so, but
dang, I've been wanting one for a very long time now), but at least
it's not going to a scrapper (in my opinion, our true enemies). And
yes, I know that those who don't have a passion for the item is
more likely to scrap it if it's investment value/cool factor diminishes,
so no come-backs about this are necessary.
Another thing is this whole "if someone paid more than what I think
something's worth, then they must be one of these slimeball
collector folk" attitude. Before I discovered things like live auctions,
ebay was the best/only (or so I thought at the time) to acquire
things. If it is your only reasonable source, then of course you
would be willing to pay more for something than someone who lives
next door to Weird Stuff.
Anyway, sorry for the long rant, but this whole "attitude" thing just
irks me and I've been averaging like 4 hrs of sleep for the last
couple of weeks (new baby + company being bought out) so I
guess I'm a bit touchy (and not too coherent). So, whine about
how hard it is to get stuff on cheap, fine, I do that all the time (just
ask my wife). Call the guy who purchased an Altair for $2K an
asshole/loser collector/not worthy, well, anyway, you now know
how I feel.
George
I just came across this site.
Here in Austin the Goodwill has vintage stuff for sale and
stuff on ebay.
http://www.eden.com/~arena/compworks/vintage.htm
Not all are good deals but some are right like the Woz GS for $19.95.
Ruben
Glad to hear that others find value in these historical manuals..
> I have collected a few also. The XT and AT manuals have
>etched writing on the outside. PC-DOS 3.10 (don't have
>3.00) and later in the 3.xx series have a paper cover.
>And I have PC-DOS 4.00 in the hard cover manual and the
>el-cheapo paper box. So I am assuming that this is where
>the hard cover manuals stopped.
I think you are right, I have IBM DOS 5.0 but its manual is a
Paperback type..
>I have a real nice glass faced wooden book shelf for their display.
>Partly for outward viewing and partly to keep the dust out.
My collection is centered in the family room and is always the
subject of conversation when I have guests over..
All my other reference books and manuals are filed in the garage so I
can get to them if I need one in a hurry.. And I have many Boxes full of
them..
Phil..