The eBay folks are making money, and that's what they set out to do. It's
to their advantage to get the highest bids because they get a cut. Sealed
bids don't necessarily get that, because, though they tap into the
insecurity a bidder may have about what an item will bring, they don't tap
into the last-minute feeding frenzy which often drives prices up.
If you set up your bid so you enter your highest bid right away, but let the
system make minimum incremental bids automatically each time someone
overbids you, that's essentially the best of both worlds for the buyer. He
can pay less than, but not more than, what is essentially a sealed bid. He
is allowed to continue bidding after his maximum is reached, but the system
won't do it automatically.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, October 18, 1999 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: My Biggest eBay gripe..
>> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Marvin wrote:
>> > John Lawson wrote:
>> > > My main concern with the eBay auction algorithm is that it is
>> > > time-limited, rather than bid-limited.... the aution closes after a
>> > > fixed span **no matter what the bidding activity is**.
>> > > 'Normal' auctions close when **no further bids are recieved** in an
>> > > agreed-upon span.
>
>> > You are forgetting the sealed bid auctions. IMNSHO, it would be far
better
>> > for ebay to add the capability to make sealed bids (and yes, I have
>> > suggested that to them.) That would eliminate this inching up just to
see
>> > where the high bid is prior to closing.
>
>> > Ebays suggestion that you just bid your maximum and wait to see what
happens
>> > is a good thought. But making that bid early just invites "well, I'll
just
>> > bid one more dollar to see what happens" and thus driving the price up.
Most
>> > ebay buyers have educated themselves to know that early bids do not
bring
>> > the best prices. Hence the popularity of sniping. A combination of
sealed
>> > and open bidding would most likely work out better than the current
mess.
>
>> Yes, which is really what "sniping" is; a user-created form of sealed
>> bidding.
>
>Come on - that would be if you where just allowed to enter one bid.
>
>> People like me are the reason that bidding the max early is no good. I am
>> a fool with my money, and I don't know when to say "when." I view a
dollar
>> as something that won't even buy me a cup of coffee most places, so it's
>> never a big deal to say, "Hmmm...just one more dollar..." to try to top a
>> bid. That's the biggest reason I bid in the final few seconds, to protect
>> me from myself. By the time I can reload the page after I bid, the
auction
>> is over and I either won for that amount or lost...
>
>In fact, the eBay scheme comes from an overidealistic view of
>their users - if all are well defined ethical beeings beting
>... ah bidding acording to the idealistic rules, everything
>would work fine - just, people are not like that. And by
>insisting that their rules are the one and only way, the eBay
>guys are just as stubborn as all idiologic kind.
>
>So my solution would be in offering different auction styles,
>giving the seller the freedom of choice what kind of auction
>he likes:
>
>- classic eBay with fixed end date
>- seald bid, you are allowed _one_ bid, the amount is secret
> until the final time _and_ the named amount is the amount
> to go for (!)
>- time driven - every last bid extends the closing time by
> 60 Minutes (to allow slow line / bussy people to place a
> new bid)
>
>Well, the sealed bid could be modified to a seled bid light,
>where the mechanics of the classic eBay scheme is used, which
>results into paying only the next step after the second highest
>bid (unlikely that a seller will select that if he has a choice
>between both).
>
>Also the time driven may be enhanced with a final date (unknown
>to public) to ensure that there is no endless auction.
>
>Anyway, I don't think we will see such a variety on eBay - Giving
>fredom of coice isn't everybodys thing...
>
>Gruss
>H.
>
>
>BTW: this issue even arosed in the new 'eBay' Magazine... No joke,
> there is a news stand magazine about eBay (and similar stuff),
> licencing their name!
>
>
>--
>Stimm gegen SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
>Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
>Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
>Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
>HRK
If you are interested please contact Noma.
Thanks,
Bob
----------------------------------------
From: Rednlh(a)aol.com
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:27:38 EDT
Subject: TRS80 2000
To: bwit(a)pobox.com
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 41
I have a monitor, keyboard and cpu for a TRS80 2000. Used to have some
floppies but
cannot locate them. Know anyone in the DFW area that might be interested?
Noma L Kelton Henderson
1949 Spring Dr
Roanoke, Tx 76262
rednlh(a)aol.com
817-431-2172
The various CP/M resources out there not only have Z-80 code and development
resources, but 8080 and 8085 code as well. Be careful you don't try to run
some 8085 code. Most of the code is 8080, since that's the common
denominator, but many of these sites even have 8085-family support and the
housekeeping isn't always perfect.
The Rodnay Zaks book is one of a few Z-80 books written just for Z-80
coding. It was a disappointment to me, but it is not half bad.
Check your local library. They often have these things sitting on the
shelves in considerable (unused) quantity.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, October 18, 1999 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: Programming the Z-80
>>Anyone have pointers to good Z-80 Assembly language programming
>>resources on the net?
>
>Any of the CP/M archives will be filled with more Z-80 and 8080
>assembly source than you'll know what to do with. For starters,
>try
>
> http://oak.oakland.edu/pub/cpm/
>
>>What books would you recommend for advanced programming topics?
>
>If I remember correctly, Rodney Zaks had a book titled "Programming
>the Z-80" in his lineup.
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>Anyone have pointers to good Z-80 Assembly language programming
>resources on the net?
Any of the CP/M archives will be filled with more Z-80 and 8080
assembly source than you'll know what to do with. For starters,
try
http://oak.oakland.edu/pub/cpm/
>What books would you recommend for advanced programming topics?
If I remember correctly, Rodney Zaks had a book titled "Programming
the Z-80" in his lineup.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- daniel <daniel(a)internet.look.ca> wrote:
> I got two quad (looks to be originals for the 11) PDP extender cards for
> $21.50! I had to get up at 1 in the morning to nail it. If the spacing is
> the same on either side of the middle "slot" then I guess I just have to cut
> them down the middle for the PDP 8? Sorry "flipchip".
You don't need to cut them... just pull four cards and extend all of them
together. At these speeds, the extra length isn't going to kill you.
Quad is quad. They can also be used for OMNIBUS cards as well as Qbus/UNIBUS
cards.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
While trying to figure out how to reach more PDP-11 users with my
freeware archives
(immodest plug: See
http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/freeware.html
for information about the PDP-11 freeware CD's and FTP sites with
PDP-11 freeware)
it occured to me that I've only been using two methods of announcing
availability: this (Classiccmp) mailing list and Usenet newsgroups
specific to PDP-11's.
It's obvious that these methods of reaching classic computer
users hit only a small fraction of active PDP-11 users.
There's what, maybe a couple of dozen frequent participants in this
mailing list, and the number of regular posters on vmsnet.pdp-11 can
be counted on two hands.
Is there a better way of reaching a wider audience of classic computer
users? In particular, folks who don't read technical Usenet discussion
groups and who haven't happened upon this specific mailing list.
Or, even in this "connected" world that we live in, is there no better
way of reaching what I know is a very broad base of classic computer
users out there?
One idea that has crossed my mind, but I don't know if there's any way
to pull it off: There are obviously lots of "collectors" on E-bay who have
little connection with our reality of using classic computers. Is there
no way at all of reaching these folks? I don't mean preaching to them,
but at least tying them together into a broader knowledge base than the
wheeling and dealing on E-bay.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Hi,
I still believe in miracles...
I am looking for a IBM MST-1 card with P/N 5558222. This card was used
by IBM Customer Engineer in an IBM System/3 model 15 (IBM 5415).
This card was only available at IBM CE Branch Offices and was needed
to diagnose any problems in the so-called 'DA 3277/3284 Attachment'
and 'LDA (Local Display Attachment)' in the S/3 model 15.
Together with the card came a CE Switchbox P/N 5558132 and overlay
P/N 5558224.
Anyone who might be able to perform a small miracle... ?
Thanks.
Henk Stegeman
IBM Collector.
Anyone have pointers to good Z-80 Assembly language programming resources on the net?
What books would you recommend for advanced programming topics?
TIA,
Steve Robertson - <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
I'm not surprised. The Sinclairs were very plentiful back in the days when
they were of interest.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenatacme(a)aol.com <Glenatacme(a)aol.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, October 17, 1999 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: TImex SInclair 1000 Manual
>In a message dated 10/17/1999 12:06:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>edick(a)idcomm.com writes:
>
>> While digging through a box of "stuff" I have, I found a Timex Sinclair
>1000
>> manual in used but decent condition and apparently quite complete. Is
this
>> something best placed on eBay, or do you some of you guys have use for
it?
>
>Actually this is a very common and abundant item. A "perfect" one will
>typically fetch less than US$10 on Ebay.
>
>Glen Goodwin
>0/0
>I've seen this, too. On one particular item that I wanted,
>in viewing the "View Sellers Other Auctions", I noticed that
>he had a number of them to sell. Spread out over a few days.
>I would bid on one and someone would outbid me. I'd bid on
>another and someone would outbid me. I finally just said forget
>it, this is getting ridiculous. :-)
Certainly, E-bay does provides tools for many "commodity" type items
to compare one sale with past ones, so you know what a reasonable bid
is. There are evidently folks who don't know how to use this, and
it doesn't really bother me, I just feel kind-of-sorry for them.
Other E-bay phenomena:
1. Items (like HP C3010 2 Gbyte SCSI drives) that have been
flooding the surplus market. These are available from liquidators
like www.hitechcafe.com and www.compgeeks.com for $30-$35-$40, but
I've seen them bid up into the $50-$60 range on E-bay very regularly.
Same thing often happens for surplus PC-clone mainboards.
2. What really amazes me is when a seller makes a reserve price auction,
very plainly states the reserve price in the item description, and
there are literally dozens of bids made *below* the stated reserve
price. What the ???. Either the bidders think this is entirely a
"bidding game", where the objective is to outbid the other guy with
no real intention to buy, or they don't read the description at all, or they
haven't a clue period.
Tim.