whatever happened to going private with stuff like this?! this is more off
topic than anything else.
In a message dated 98-03-02 02:46:52 EST, somebody started flaming:
<< Enrico:
I have many Model 1 computers... as a matter of fact, I sent one to you!
So don't think you just made a great 'caught-me' remark. I do have many.
I don't, however, have a damn 4k Model 1 without the keypad on the
right. That is what you're looking for, isn't it? Oh, I suppose you
changed your mind -- again!?!
Gees, Enrico, you never stop do you? I am being completely honest with
you, what is it that you think I am hiding anyway? Black and white: I
have model 1 computers, many of them. I have 0 Model 1 computers that
you are looking for!! Figure it out!! Not Black and white: Why you are a
complete idiot!?!
Leave me alone until I e-mail you and tell you I have a Model 1
computer, circa 1978, with 4k of memory, and no keypad, ok? Damn,
Enrico, I was even doing you a favor and looking for one for you....
You really know how to spoil someone's day,
CORD >>
I did actually check this. It says 208. This is not awfully
informative, AFAIK, because the voltage fluctuates +/- 5 or so anyway
>Open the side opposite the CE panel, and look down by the 4 twinax
connectors.
>There shoud be a label saying what yours is wired for - Mine wants 204V
AC.
>-------
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Today was my first major interaction with the system/34, unfortunately
on 1/2 hour long. Next monday, I can stay there 2-8 PM if I want to...
I made the following discoveries:
a)It's on casters
b)It has a 65MB hard drive
c)It's not all that dusty.
By virtue of a, I moved it to reveal the CE panel, which had all of
the floppies and a little error code booklet tucked inside. This
booklet is fairly useless now that IBM doesn't support the 34, but
it does list all of the parts and their names. There is a thing that
I saw called the DC distribution panel. I was thinking that I might
switch the power supply's outputs with the outputs for a normal PC AT
PSU, of course not powering the drives. The booklet does imply that
the PSU outputs -4, -5, 5,6,8.5,-12,12,-24, and 24 volts. Knowing this
I ought to be able to get a couple of PC psus and run it. Next step:
finding a room that has power to it - this one doesn't...
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Yes, it is. That's the reason for all this trouble, that I don't know
how to get it to run without a 220 volt outlet (it's in a storage room)
Now, my question is a bit dumb, I suppose, but why is it that when
Intel made the 8086 (which I heard was about as powerful as the 34),
IBM made this huge half-ton box only to leave it mostly empty anyway?
>Just curious, isn't the S/34 a 220v box?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<> The first trap is that this monitor has a live (hot) chassis, or at lea
<> the 115V models do. The video input is opto-isolated so that the TRS-80
<> itself can be grounded/floating. This means that you need to be more
BIG TIME!!!! Take all the care in the world with this one.
FYI the monitor is isolated from the trs80 via opto isolators so there is
no DC or AC connection between the two. The optos are pressed real hard
to run at video (luminance) rates so they can sometime be a cause of porr
video.
<> careful than usual when working inside this unit - mains on all the
<> exposed metalwork is a good way to get killed! In fact, I'd say that yo
<> shouldn't attempt to repair this unit unless (a) you have an isolation
<> transformer and (b) you know why you should use one.
Having worked on these at Tandy I can say first hand that is no lie!
I've been wacked a few time over the years, it hurts...if your lucky!
<I've done some simple work (replacing flybacks, logic boards, etc) on
<VT100's previously - if I do decide to open this thing up, rather than
Vt100s are line isolated and a bit safer save for the hi-volts on the CRT.
Allison
[tony duell]
:> yes. shame about VALDOCS really. it seems to have killed forth's
:> reputation for all time. it was reputedly an integrated package
:>written in forth - unfortunately, it seems, the people who wrote
:I thought it was written in Stoic, which although a threaded
:stack-based language like Forth, was somewhat different in the
:details.
not that different. we have a source listing for stoic on our hard drive
at the moment (you want it? we'll mail it) and the major differences
>from forth were (a) it used a file system with 6 letter names, (b) it
compiled everything, even immediate stuff, into a temporary buffer then
executed the buffer, (c) you pushed textual words using 'xxxx rather
than forth's method of having "WORD" pick up the next word in the input
stream.
:Not forgetting HP's RPL language which is Forth done even better.
:You can push _anything_ onto the stack - integers, reals, strings,
:even programs :-) I think the HP28 is now 10 years old, so we can
:mention it here.
ah, yes... we finally got hold of the dos development suite for this.
it's a lovely language, but it departs somewhat from the simplicity and
directness we like in forth. on the other hand, it's great for its
chosen application, and if you're a lisp fan too... (yes, we are.
symbolics 3600 on offer, anyone...? ;> )
what we'd like to see, though, is a forth effectively incorporating the
concepts in smalltalk (ie everything on the stack is an object, possibly
with a tag bit to differentiate between integers and anything else).
have to start hacking one...
-- Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
Net-Tamer V 1.08X - Test Drive
To everyone: Some judicious snipping of quoted email replies would make it
MUCH easier to read, and really is common net-etiquette these days.
As far as want-list;
Me, I'm open to trades - I have a spare Exidy Sorcerer and assorted
oddities.
I'd like some of the early single boards - such as sym, etc.
Andrew
<From: John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com>
<fantasy of running Music IV (or Csound) under Unix on the PDP 15 with
<period DACs providing signals to the Moog.... a living early 70's
<music research lab. Maybe the Minc-11.... naw, never mind.
Forget unix or music from a -15 it was more suited to industrial control.
I did do some serious hacking with music back some using the altair to
drive a string of smal 8085 based boards(one per voice).
<about two weeks away from getting a pilot's license, *if* the
<examiner and the weather are co-incident and *if* I pass the damn
<checkride... oops, off topic. sorry.
Well if you don't pass the check ride the instructor should be shot for
sending you unprepared. I have a license for 20 years and a Cessna150
to enjoy it in.
Docs for systems, board and the like are a resource that is
underestimated. There are so many s100 systems and boards that are
mostly useless without docs as it's impossible to set them up or use
them.
Allison
>
>>
>>
>>
>> ah, if we're going to get on to the "what do i wish for?" list...
>
>Well, I don't recomend killing me to get your hands on my little
>collection... And I rarely sell machines.
>
>> a perq. any perq. please, PLEASE!!!...
>
>Keep looking... There are still some out there. No, my 4 (!) are not
for
>sale...
What is a perq and why is it good?
>>
>> any system based on the 32xxx (a ceres would be nice, but we doubt
>> they're available...)
>
>More practically, there are still a number of Whitechapel MG1's about.
>Repairing one is not hard - the main problem is the NiCd battery used
for
>starting it. A Technical manual does exist...
>
>>
>> an original archimedes, with the original arthur os and the gui in
basic
>
>Hmm... I still have my Arthur programmer's reference manuals, but I
doubt
>I could find a set of the ROMs, alas...
>
>>
>> a dg nova
>
>Again, keep looking. They were popular in embedded control systems at
one
>time. Mine came off an electron microscope....
Speaking of novas, I finished Soul of a New Machine. Great book!
>> a linn rekursiv (wouldn't you? ;> )
>
>Ooooh... Now that's a machine I don't have, and would like!
Is the machine as weird as the name?
>>
>> one of the two machines we know about that ever used a z8000
(olivetti
>> m20 or onyx..?)
>
>What about a Zilog 8000 ? It was/is (there's at least one still
>operational) a Z8000-based unix box. Mine has an SMD disk controller
and
>a QIC tape drive. It's built in slices about 2' square - the bottom
slice
>is empty, the next contains just the RS223 port distribution panel, the
>next contains the drives, and the top slice contains the cardcage.
>There's the CPU card, a memory card (some machines had ECC memory, I
>think), and assorted device controllers.
>
>
>>
>> a perq
>
>Does the fact that you've listed 'perq' about 4 times mean that you
want
>one from each series?
>
>>
>> an original cp/m system or three (hm systems; the minstrel always
>> appealed)
>
>What do you mean by 'original'? If you mean a machine designed to run
>CP/M, then there must still be some RML 380Z's (very solid UK CP/M
>machines used in schools) about. Ditto for DEC rainbows, Amstrads
>(although I don't like those myself), BBC Z80 second processors, Epson
>QX10's (IMHO one of the nicest CP/M machines ever built), etc.
Was CP/M made for any specific machine originally, kind of like
DOS was made for a PC (leaving Seattle Computers aside for a moment)
>MDS800, then good luck in finding one.
>
>>
>> any really weird 70s mini (small honeywell machine, perhaps? tony
duell
>> speaks highly of the philips p850...? maybe an icl thingy...?) - must
be
I believe the system/34 was a Mini. I think that's what those UPS
tractor-trailers are for :)
>of it, although as it was the machine that got me into computer
>collecting, I do have a somewhat biased love of it. Mind you, with 2K
>(max) of memory, 16 CPU registers, a strange instruction set, and a CPU
>based on a hard-wired state machine rather than microcode, it must be
>worth saving.
Isn't microcode hard-wired anyway?
>Philips P800 series machines are not at all common, alas...
>
>> nice to put forth on, though
>>
>> oh, did we mention that if someone would provide us with a perq at
>> reasonable cost and proximity to bradford, we would be quite
delighted
>> and mount a one-person campaign to get him or her canonised?
>
>Which reminds me... I must Canon-ise my PERQ again - that is, repair
the
>Canon laser printer port. The crystal oscillator lost its legs, and
while
>I was trying to repair it, the local cat stepped on the device and the
>quartz crystal plate is now in about 100 pieces... I must try to obtain
a
>29.8MHz xtal.
>
>Just out of curiousity, why aren't you looking for the following
>machines?
>
>DEC PDP8, PDP11, Vax, any other PDP's?
What does PDP mean, exactly? Is it something like the PC standard?
>AMT DAP (Distributed Array Processor)
Which is?
>Anything transputer-based
Which is?
>The Xerox D-machines (somewhat PERQ-like in many ways) - Brian Rosen
was
>involved in the design of both AFAIK. The only problem with these is
that
>low level hardware/software docs seem to be next-to-impossible to
obtain.
>The PERQ has the advantage that there are some _very_ clueful
enthusiasts
>(not me, alas) who will help you with just about any problem.
>
>Torch XXX, quadX, etc
I can just imagine "Sabrina's jungle dungeon - hosted on a Torch XXX"
>Tiger. Now there's a strange machine.. A Z80 + 64K RAM, a 6809 + 8K
RAM,
>RS232, parallel, cassette ports, 1200/75 baud modem, 7220 graphics chip
+
>96K RAM, etc, etc, etc. It was going to be sold as a home computer...
So, how much RAM total?
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I have a canon SX320!!
>I think the first 'computer' I programmed seriously was a Canon SX320
>calculator, which was a desktop machine with a full keyboard and 40? col
>printer. I also did Fortran and Algol-W programming at highschool.