OK, I looked at the data sheet:
"The 6500/1 is a complete, high-performance 8-bit NMOS microcomputer on
a single chip, ans it totally upward/downward software compatible with all
members of the 6500 family."
"The 6500/1 consists of a 6502 CPU, an internal clock oscillator, 2048
bytes of Read Only Memory (ROM), 64 bytes of Random Access Memory (RAM) and
flexible interface circuitry. The interface circuitry includes a 16-bit
programmable counter/latch with four operating modes, 32 bidirectional
input/output lines (including two edge-sensitive lines), five interrupts and
a counter I/O line."
"Mask Programmable Options: Internal pull-up resistors on ports A, B, C,
D. Selectable for 8-bit port groups only, not for individual port lines.
Internal pull-up resistor on the CNTR line."
Kind of sounds like a 6502 and a 6522 rolled together with a small ROM
and some RAM. Other interesting tidbits: no mention of 6800 compatibility;
separate power pin for the internal RAM; five interrupts include reset, NMI,
two edge-sensitive, counter overflow.
None of the data sheets that I have (not even the "family" ones) mention
a 6501.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin!/CW7
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of "classic" computers
<========= reply separator ==========>
< Just curious if anyone remembers a magazine called "Kilobaud" - Seems
< like it had a short life.
Yes I remember it, mostly hardware bent and good too. Lasted at least
four years.
Allison
As promised:
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/pdf/wsj1030.pdf
Don't try the link immediately...I'm uploading stuff later tonight.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin!/CW7
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of "classic" computers
<========= reply separator ==========>
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:28:21 +1, "Hans Franke" <franke(a)sbs.de> wrote:
>>The 6500/x wasn't a clone at all - maybe a simplified design
>>using the same philosophy about a CPU, but the 6500/1
>>(or 6501) did use the 6800 Bus _and_ was pin compatible,
This is true. I looked in some other data that I have (I think in the
Rockwell R6500 Hardware Book, I think), where it explicitly says that.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin!/CW7
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of "classic" computers
<========= reply separator ==========>
>> There was one version of one of the CBM disk drives (I think it was the
>> 8252LP) where a 6530 was replaced by a daughtboard containing (I think)
>> an 6532 + a ROM + TTL glue. I don't know how universal that solution is,
>> but I guess something could be worked out.
>
>Jep, thats exactly the soulution I was suggesting.
>
Just grab one of these people that want to build a 64 bit
Z80 computer or a IMSAI clone. Builting a 6530 daugther board
should be a piece of cake for them.
And as a hint, have them compare the schematics of the KIM with
the schematics of the VIM or the SYM. They use 6532s.
=========================================
Doug Coward
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
=========================================
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 07:40:18 EST, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
>>everyone start scouring the thrift stores and radio rallies and buy up
>>everything now! prices for old worthless computers shirley will go up
now!
...and stop calling me Shirley!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin!/CW7
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of "classic" computers
<========= reply separator ==========>
For those of you that are tired of hearing about the online auctions I
exxpress my apologies. For those of you that use eBay to sell I need to
express a little concern about their fee system so that you can watch
your accounts. Seems I've had three items in the $25 to $1000 range sell
and should have seen a 2.5% fee added as a "final value fee". Well an
example is an item that sold for $242.50 at close. The fee listed is
$6.69 rather than the 6.06 that 4 of my calculators ran up. I'm not an
accountant but I know how to do percentages. The fee of 5% for items
under $25 come up fine. I had two printers sell today and they are also
wrong. One sold for $41.00 and has a fee of $1.65 rather than the 2.5%
fee of $1.03 and the other sold at $31.27 with fee listed as $1.41
instead of the 2,5% fee of 78 cents. I've written eBay support but don't
expect an answer until Monday.
My whole point of this is to go back and check the fees on your items!
You might very well be getting ripped without knowing it. Sure I'm only
screwed on a buck or two but eBay is making out when you consider the
volume sold every day. If 1000 items closed daily and each seller was
overcharged 25 cents they'd have $250 more than they were supposed to.
You get my point I hope and will now have the foreskin, er, foresight to
check the account detail and their math.
Thanks for the time in listening to my babble.