I didn't read any of this thread until tonight, when I read the whole
thing ... and now I have a headache. :)
Some thoughts:
Tony wrote: >>> What benefit would there be to the rest of the classic
computer community if I visited such an event
Having attended five VCF events (four California, one Boston) and
personally organized four more (East 3, 4, 5, and 6), I can say this
with complete confidence: VCF attendees (and most exhibitors) don't
attend with the attitude, "Everyone is there to see ME" -- they go with
the attitude of, "I'm there to see everyone else." VCF is a * community
* event. Even some of the most name-brand keynote and panel speakers at
past VCFs were excited to see the rest of the show, despite them truly
being brought in for others to meet. Anyone non-celebrity who thinks
their personal attendance is for others' benefit -- well, such people
won't be missed.
Rod wrote: >>> it would appear that computer museums are groups of
donation funded, unpaid volunteers
That part is true. In the MARCH computer museum @ the InfoAge Science
Center, here in New Jersey, we're all volunteers and our group is solely
donation-funded.
>> who seek to aquire as many inanimate examples
as possible.
False. We're not out for quantity. We turn away quite a lot -- and so
do professional well-funded museums like the CHM. Here in NJ, sometimes
we do take in more examples of Computers Brand X than we really need,
but usually that's because the alternative is the owner throwing it away.
>> Systems are made to work only to attract
visitors and hence revenue.
We make systems work for the art, education, fun, and history of it. *
Of course * that also includes attracting visitors -- how is that a bad
thing!? I can't speak for other museums, but we're a not-for-profit, so
any "revenue" we make is solely for the purpose of operating the museum
and hosting events like VCF, certainly not to line anyone's pockets.
>> The members of the groups would much rather
the space was used to
store even more non working equipment and keep it out of
sight and
accessible only to the select few.
That's not only wrong, it is offensive. Small museums like ours, and
big museums like CHM, have "visible storage" and frequently arrange
behind-the-scenes tours -- expressly because we want to * show * people
what we have in our collections. In our case here at MARCH, it's also
because we hope the visitors will become members and help us restore
ever-more systems to working condition.
Pat wrote: >>> At all of the VCF/Midwest events I ran, I never had any
problem with any of the public doing anything to harm exhibits, and the
exhibitors have complete control (within reason anyhow) of their own
exhibit.
That is universally true at all U.S. VCFs, and it's true at Europe, from
what Hans has told me. Sellam, not Patrick, nor myself has ever had a
security problem at a VCF. Here in NJ, our security is extra-safe,
because we host VCF at our own venue -- so we're the ones who lock the
doors at the end of the day.
Will wrote: >>> I would encourage all our UK and European members to
give this show a chance. Go. You will have fun. Go to any VCF you can.
Yes !!!
>> Go to the MARCH VCFEast, so you can pick a
fight with me.
But take it outside, please. :) No fighting in our buildings!
>> There seem to be some assholes ... but they
can be ignored, and fun
will be had by all attending. I wish I could be there
+1
Tony wrote, in another reply: >>> from what I've heard from talking to
people who've attended the VCF in the States or in Germany, it appears
it will be a somewhat different sort of event.
I haven't heard that.
>> I do have sufficient reservations about ...
who it appears to be
aimed at that I will not be attending.
It's aimed at all the same kinds of people who attend every other VCF.
you're saying you won't attend because you don't like "those" kind
of nerds?
>> I do hope the event is a success, though.
Gee ... thanks.