8 Apr
2021
8 Apr
'21
9:27 p.m.
I believe the original Amiga file system also used a linked-list approach. That way you
could, theoretically, reconstruct a file from any one of it?s data blocks.
Richard
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
9 Apr
9 Apr
6:05 a.m.
Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a sense. DECtape file systems for DOS
(also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes for the CDC 6000 file system (more
precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a track, and links from the last block in the
track to the next track number).
paul
On Apr 9, 2021, at 12:27 AM, Richard Sheppard via
cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I believe the original Amiga file system also used a linked-list approach. That way you
could, theoretically, reconstruct a file from any one of it?s data blocks.
Richard
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
7:47 a.m.
On 4/9/21 6:05 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a
sense. DECtape file systems for DOS (also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes
for the CDC 6000 file system (more precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a track, and
links from the last block in the track to the next track number).
paul
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 12:27 AM, Richard Sheppard via cctalk <cctalk at
classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> I believe the original Amiga file system also used a linked-list approach. That way
you could, theoretically, reconstruct a file from any one of it?s data blocks.
> Richard
The point with the WORM drive setup I described, is that one may recover
*every* file ever written, however the name and attributes of the file
may not be recoverable, being stored in the tree, which may not be
readable. That is, the linked list may be intact, but the tree not so
or vice-versa. The advantage is that searching for a given file is
faster using a tree than it would be traversing a list.
Reading old papers on the subject, it seems that old optical
phase-change storage, while permanent may not have been absolutely reliable.
I should also mention that although the WORM discs do store quite a bit
of data (in my case 470MB per side), they're not very fast. More
floppy-disk speed than hard disk.
--Chuck
1136
days inactive
1136
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
cclist＠sydex.com -
paulkoning＠comcast.net -
rshepprd＠gmail.com