Is there much demand for tape support? It probably wouldn't be that
difficult to add it, but seems a small number of use cases for it...
Using it of course requires a Massbus controller configured for tape and a
separate emulator if you want to run both disk and tape.
Jim
On 10/5/26 21:25, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
Hi Jim!
Just watched the video. Impressive no doubt.
Fitting it on the 3 5904 board would be perfect, Then it just sits there in
the RH11/RH70/Whatever and you don't need to deal with the ribbon cables or a
nice big MASSBUS bulkhead and cable.
I would love to keep an eye on this, thank you for doing it. Tape emulation,
specifically a TU45 with a TM03 with the 18 bit fiddler would be optimal, but
just getting the drive going would be a major step. We can load the microcode
off an RM03.
Chris
On 10/5/26 21:14, Jim Bender wrote:
>
>
> Hi Chris:
>
> Don't see why it wouldn't work on a 2020, but someone with a 36-bit machine
> will need to test it.
>
> I think your expectations of the possible drive shrinkage factor are a bit
> off... :-)
>
> While a solution that fits inside a terminator would be convenient, it just
> is not possible. You could, however, run ribbon cables directly from the
> Massbus transceivers (usually M5904s) to the emulator and hide the emulator
> inside the rack somewhere.
>
> My eventual goal is to reduce the emulator to a three-board "sandwich" that
> takes the place of the M5904 trio on systems that use it. That eliminates
> the differential drivers and receivers and simplifies the electronics quite
> a bit. Also solves the problem of "where do I put the emulator at?" :-)
>
>
> Something like this:
>
>
https://www.dmv.net/mbe/RS06_Setasi.pdf
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On 10/5/26 19:57, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
>> Jim:
>>
>> Nicely done. If it runs on a 2020 this will finally be a game-changer. :-)
>>
>> Can it be built into a Massbus terminator plug? That would be a proper
>> mounting....
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 10/5/26 18:00, Jim Bender via cctalk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's been a while since my initial posting about this project but it is
time
>>> for an update.
>>>
>>> This has been mostly a spare time project, and you know how life tends
>>> gets in
>>> the way sometimes...
>>>
>>> The work itself has been a bit of a "maze of twisty little passages, all
>>> alike" with many potholes and obstacles, but progress has been made.
>>>
>>> The video below tells the tale:
>>>
>>>
https://youtu.be/KwaNschJg6w
>>>
>>>
>>> Synopsis:
>>>
>>> A real PDP-11/70 boots RSTS/E V10.1 through it's unmodified RH70
controller
>>> with the data coming from the Massbus emulator.
>>>
>>> Operation is rock solid and so far have not been able to break it. It also
>>> passes the ERHAE1 XXDP diagnostic without errors.
>>>
>>> We now have a viable option for modern storage for Massbus systems.
>>>
>>> Still to do is performance optimizations, hardening against some edge cases,
>>> and a large amount of code cleanup.
>>>
>>> I only have a PDP-11/70 to test with, but it *should* work with any Massbus
>>> system. Adherence to the DEC Massbus Specification was strict and every
>>> attempt made to make it behave as a proper Massbus device rather than just
>>> coding things to make the RH70 happy.
>>>
>>> I am kicking around the idea of putting together a blog chronicling the
>>> various trials, tribulations and milestones encountered along the way if
>>> anyone is interested in reading the gory details....
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Jim
>