Motor generator

[David Barto]

I don’t refer to them as Audio-phools.

They are GESR’s. (pronounced guesser)

Golden
Eared
Sonic
Reviewers

They guess this sounds better than that, so it must be worth it.

	David

> On May 5, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> 
> I think a lot of the time audio-phools, if they will be honest with themselves, are really trying to recreate the stereo (or even HiFi) sounds of the 1960s because they have fond memories and like it better.  THAT I have no problem with whatsoever.
> 
> What gets annoying is when the phools try and convince others that this old gear somehow more accurately reproduces recordings or that the "fleecy" stuff referred to actually makes things better.  Oh well.
> 
> JRJ
> 
> On 5/5/2021 8:14 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
>> On 05/05/2021 07:44 PM, Donald via cctalk wrote:
>>> Many thanks for all the info. I just wanted to make sure my recesses were
>>> right.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I asked about MG because, in an audio forum, I see folks paying crazy money
>>> for AC cords and power line conditioners.  I thought a good MG would solve
>>> many of the 'problems' they are trying to fix.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Oh, that's audio-phoolery, the discussion topic of lots of people with a real understanding of electronics and physics.  The audiophools have NO understanding, just "belief".  And, they get fleeced regularly by this kind of stuff.
>> Jon