Anyone know ancient versions of XLC?

[Liam Proven]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 18:44, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling at kev009.com> wrote:
>
> Linux tends to churn that amount of code in a release.  I find it interesting how large systemd has become as well:  https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/06/linux_2020_kernel_systemd_code/

I didn't know but I can well believe it. Virtually _any_ 30-40+ year
old code is, by modern standards, lightweight and fast.

Compared to, say, C++, Ada is a lightweight, clean language. Compared
to modern *nix, Multics itself is a sylph-like slip of a thing.

One of my personal favourites... there is a lot of word-processor
advocacy online now and the one most people praise as The Best Thing
EVAH is WordPerfect.

I used and supported WordPerfect in the late '80s & early '90s. I
never liked it that much. Fast, feature-rich, yes, but a UI one could
only love because of Stockholm Syndrome.

But I remember 5.x introducing pull-down CUA-type menus and being for
me significantly easier to use as a result. And I remember v 6,
lambasted as sluggish bloatware at the time, having a graphics-mode
GUI on DOS if you wanted.

So I found a copy and installed it on PC DOS 7.1 on a Core 2 Duo
Thinkpad. On a modern multi-gigahertz x86, it _flies_ along. It's
snappy and responsive even in graphics mode, and by modern standards
it's tiny. A dozen meg or so.

I don't use it much but it's fun to do so occasionally.

My main go-to WP on my primary laptop is MS Word 97 for Windows, under
WINE on 64-bit Ubuntu. Again, sluggish bloatware when new, but ¼
century later, lightweight and positively snappy. Does everything I
need and more, including the all-important Outline mode. Has proper
menus, not a Ribbon. Runs perfectly under WINE including being able to
install service releases to get it as current as possible. Same file
format as used up to 2003.

There are 2 features I know are missing compared to later versions.
Seriously, just 2. It has no highlighter (fake yellow marker pen you
can drag over text). Who cares? And you can't embed a table inside a
cell of another table.

That is the complete list of missing features that I know about for
the next 3 releases, then the Ribbon came in and I lost all interest.

On my Mac I use Word 2011, which is also now obsolete and out of
support. Works fine, though, and on macOS, you still have a menu bar
and can turn off the Ribbon completely.

> The rate of change to Linux literally keeps me up at night during incidents.. but attempting to tame this for an enterprise also pays the bills.. I find it peculiar so many people are ok with this model of computing but the jobs are good for the time being.

Agreed. I'm in the same boat: documenting an enterprise Linux distro.

-- 
Liam Proven – Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk – gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven – Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 – ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053