This 'scope clock also uses circle generators rather than vectors to
produce well-formed characters. It mentions a Teensy controller so I don't
think it's the original made in this way - the first I heard of was too
long ago for that. But I don't know if it's an update or a separate design.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:59 PM Paul Koning via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On Apr 3, 2024, at 6:32 PM, Rick Bensene
<rickb(a)bensene.com> wrote:
I wrote:
>> The digits are among the nicest looking digits that I've ever seen
>> on a CRT display, including those on the CDC scopes as well as IBM >>
console displays.
To which Paul responded:
> I have, somewhere, a copy of a paper that describes analog circuits >
for generating waveforms for digits along the lines you describe.
Might
have been from MIT, in the 1950s, but right now I can't find > it.
Found it (on paper): "Generating
characters" by Kenneth Perry and
Everett Aho, > Electronics, Jan 3, 1958, pp. 72-75.
> Bitsavers has it in the MIT/LincolnLaboratory section:
https://bitsavers.org/pdf/mit/lincolnLaboratory/Perry_and_Aho__Generating_C…
Very interesting. Here's a link to the patent for the display system
on the Wyle Labs calculator:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/17/51/58/89c19cee6c60e2/US33058…
The concepts are very similar to the paper written up in ELECTRONICS
magazine in early 1958 that you found. Your memory is incredible to have
been able to have this pop into your mind when you read my description of
the way the calculator generates its display.
Thank you for looking up this article! It'll provide some nice
background for the concepts of generating characters this way when I
finally get to documenting the Wyle WS-01/WS-02 calculators in an Old
Calculator Museum exhibit.
I wonder if the inventor of the display system for the calculator (in
fact, the inventor of the entire Wyle Labs calculator architecture) had
read this article at some point prior?
I scanned through the patent for the calculator display system looking
for any reference to the article or any document from MIT relating, and I
couldn't find anything.
I didn't see any either, and the patent examiners didn't cite any. Then
again, it's amazing how often patent examiners miss relevant prior art.
One example I like to mention is Edwin Armstrong's patent for FM radio,
which doesn't cite an actual earlier US patent, 1,648,402 from 1927,
actually filed 12 years before Armstrong's. Or the prior art centuries
preceding US 6469...
On the other hand, while the concept is similar the details are rather
different, and the Wyle design is clearly a whole lot simpler.
The inventor is still alive, and I have talked to
him on the telephone a
couple of times. For his advanced age, he is still quite sharp, and
remembers a lot of the challenges involved with trying to make a
solid-state electronic calculator that would fit on a (large) desktop using
early 1960's technology.
It would be neat to ask him about that MIT article.
paul