On Feb 3, 2023, at 1:12 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 2/2/23 21:23, Tom Hunter via cctalk wrote:
The actual ferrite core doughnuts do not break
down with continued use, BUT
moisture or mechanical impact or vibration will damage or degrade the
ferrite cores. Otherwise the ferrite doughnut will live and maintain its
properties "forever".
Well, I don't know about that. The CDC 7600 had issues with core
overheating and included a "Duty Cycle Integrator" on core. See PDF
page 51, page 2-24:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cdc/cyber/cyber_70/60367200D_Cyber70-76_Jul75.…
--Chuvk
That reminds me of a PDP-11 diagnostic -- not usually run -- called the "core heating
test". The way I remember the description is that it would do rapid memory accesses
in a set of addresses that are physically close in the core memory (obviously this is
model-dependent). The idea was to find marginal memories. One reason for not running that
test is that it was very slow.
From the same era I recall that our IBM 1620 mod 2 had a heating system for the memory
cabinet, and that after power up you had to wait 10 minutes or so for the memory to be
warmed up to its normal operating temperature. I don't think I ever saw an
explanation why this was done.
It's puzzling that temperature would matter. Obviously, when you hit the Curie
temperature the data goes away, but for typical magnetic materials that is in the hundreds
of degrees. Does the hysteresis curve shift enough at moderate temperatures (a bit over
room temperature) to matter?
paul