I believe I have that issue, at least it is on my list of issues in the
collection. Traveling at the moment but if you don't get it elsewhere
I'll check when I am home tomorrow.
David
On 3/10/2023 11:48 PM, Steve Lewis via cctalk wrote:
Was looking for a higher resolution scan of page 10 of
August 1980 issue of
80 Microcomputing magazine.
The one online has some "square markings" -- and maybe that's just the way
it is, from the original photographs and how they got published in that
issue. But finding a physical copy might clarify.
But really after any image of a 1977-1978 inside-the-factory shot of Tandy,
Commodore, or Apple (mostly on the "motherboard" assembly itself). I did
find one from 1982 for Commodore (German factory), and an Apple one from
1984 (Macintosh assembly), but was hoping for a pre-1980 shot.
-Steve
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:01 PM Bill Degnan via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're asking for, can you clarify?
> Bill
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 11:52 PM Mark Huffstutter via cctalk <
> cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Ah, I missed the physical copy part, You might have already found this
> one
>> online.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Huffstutter
>> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 8:45 PM
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
>> cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>> Subject: RE: [cctalk] 80 Micro Aug 1980 page scan
>>
>> Steve,
>> There is a pretty good copy on
archive.org
>>
>>
https://archive.org/details/80-microcomputing-magazine-1980-08
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Lewis via cctalk <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 8:40 PM
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
>> cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>> Cc: Steve Lewis <lewissa78(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: [cctalk] 80 Micro Aug 1980 page scan
>>
>> Anyone here have a physical copy of 80 Microcomputing (TRS-80 themed)
>> issue from August 1980? There is a better quality scan of a page I'm
>> trying to get.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
>>
>