WTB/WTT: Intel MDS-800

[dwight]

If you only need a single drive and it is single density floppies, you don't need a MSD-800 and a MSD-720 to run the ICE-85. You can use what we call a Series II. It came with a small number of multibus slot. As I recall, we used to run ICE-80s and ICE-85 on a Series II. We may have had the drive boxes as well but I don't recall that much.
Dwight


________________________________
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> on behalf of Mich.com via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 2:06 PM
To: Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com>; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: WTB/WTT: Intel MDS-800

I have a few Intellec MDS Series II development systems.  They can host an ICE-85.  I’d sell you one. They are VERY heavy. I’m in Michigan.

Dave

Sent from my iPhone.

> On Oct 12, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> and here are detailed pics of the Shugart jumpers
> https://www.vintagecomputer.net/intel/MDS-720/
>
> Maybe you could try a set of drives set to be 720's and see if that gets
> you going.
>
> BIll
>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:50 PM Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is an MDS-720.  Note the drives inside are Shugart 800 seriers.  I
>> would think the 800's would be Shugart-compatible if not actually Shugart
>> drives inside.
>> https://www.vintagecomputer.net/intel/MDS-720/Intel_MDS-720_D1-SN.jpg
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:11 PM Jonathan Chapman via cctalk <
>> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I recently picked up an ICE-85 in-circuit emulator from Jack Rubin
>>> (thanks Ian and Connor for ferrying it back!). I thought that the stuff it
>>> came with included a Prompt-80 as a controller, but it does not: there's an
>>> unrelated Prompt-48 board in the boxes. The ICE-85 came with ISIS control
>>> software on 8" diskette. So I guess I'm in the market for an Intel MDS-800.
>>> Good luck, right? :P
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>