Future of cctalk/cctech

[ED SHARPE]

These 2 have my vote as well....
I do not know, anyone using a text only mail reader anymore!

> The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on attachments.
>
> Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Rob Jarratt via cctalk <rob at jarratt.me.uk; robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Al Kossow via
> cctalk
> Sent: 17 June 2020 13:55
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
> 
> 
> 
> > I wonder what you don't like about "groups.io" Its pretty much a pure mailing
> list?
> 
> Like all of the webby time-wasters, they don't have easy to mirror zipped
> archives, because they want to to spend time hovering around clicking on their
> sites.
> 
> 
> http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/
> 
> 
> The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on attachments.
> 
> Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.

I would agree with both of those too.

Rob